26 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Phillip D. Cummins [26]Phillip Daniel Cummins [1]
  1. M. R. Ayers, Phillip D. Cummins, Robert Fogelin, Don Garrett, Edwin McCann, Charles J. McCracken, George Pappas, G. A. J. Rogers, Barry Stroud, Ian Tipton, Margaret D. Wilson & Kenneth Winkler (1998). The Empiricists: Critical Essays on Locke, Berkeley, and Hume. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    This collection of essays on themes in the work of John Locke , George Berkeley , and David Hume , provides a deepened understanding of major issues raised in the Empiricist tradition. In exploring their shared belief in the experiential nature of mental constructs, The Empiricists illuminates the different methodologies of these great Enlightenment philosophers and introduces students to important metaphysical and epistemological issues including the theory of ideas, personal identity, and skepticism. It will be especially useful in courses devoted (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  2.  17
    Phillip D. Cummins (1996). Hume on Qualities. Hume Studies 22 (1):49-88.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3.  21
    Larry Arnhart, Carla Bagnoli, Christopher Berry, Deborah Boyle, Janet Broughton, Stephen Buckle, Dario Castiglione, Kenneth Clatterbaugh, Phillip D. Cummins & Daniel Flage (2004). Hume Studies Referees, 2003-2004. Hume Studies 30 (2):443-445.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  55
    Phillip D. Cummins (1965). Time for Change. Analysis 26 (2):41 - 43.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  8
    Phillip D. Cummins (2005). Berkeley on Minds and Agency. In Kenneth Winkler (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley. Cambridge University Press 190.
  6.  25
    Phillip D. Cummins (1974). Reid's Realism. Journal of the History of Philosophy 12 (3):317-340.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  7. Phillip D. Cummins (ed.) (1992). Minds, Ideas, and Objects: Essays on the Theory of Representation in Modern Philosophy. Ridgeview Publishing Company.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  8.  28
    Phillip D. Cummins (1990). Pappas on the Role of Sensations in Reid's Theory of Perception. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50 (4):755-762.
  9.  30
    Phillip D. Cummins (2000). A Puzzling Passage in “Why Utility Pleases”. Hume Studies 26 (1):179-181.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  16
    Phillip D. Cummins (1995). Hume as Dualist and Anti-Dualist. Hume Studies 21 (1):47-55.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  40
    Phillip D. Cummins (1963). Perceptual Relativity and Ideas in the Mind. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 24 (December):202-214.
  12.  10
    Phillip D. Cummins (1973). Locke's Anticipation of Hume's Use of "Impression". Modern Schoolman 50 (3):297-301.
  13.  6
    Phillip D. Cummins (1973). Locke's Anticipation of Hume's Use of "Impression". Modern Schoolman 50 (3):297-301.
  14.  10
    Phillip D. Cummins (1999). Hume's Diffident Skepticism. Hume Studies 25 (1/2):43-65.
  15.  31
    Phillip D. Cummins (1990). Berkeley's Manifest Qualities Thesis. Journal of the History of Philosophy 28 (3):385-401.
  16.  8
    Phillip D. Cummins (1967). Vernon on Descartes' Three Substances. Southern Journal of Philosophy 5 (2):126-128.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  17. Phillip D. Cummins (1987). On the Status of Visuals in Berkeley's 'New Theory of Vision'. In Ernest Sosa (ed.), Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley. D. Reidel
  18.  11
    Phillip D. Cummins (1991). Hume on the Idea of Existence. Hume Studies 17 (1):61-82.
    In the Treatise Hume claims one's idea of existence is not distinct from the idea of what one conceives to be existent. From clues in his extremely terse defence of his claim I construct an argument that is logically valid and founded on premises he is likely to have considered both cogent and consistent with his main philosophical principles. I also examine briefly and incompletely what his position on existence and the idea of existence does and does not include.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  8
    Phillip D. Cummins (1989). Berkeley's Unstable Ontology. Modern Schoolman 67 (1):15-32.
  20.  15
    Phillip D. Cummins (1975). Berkeley's Ideas of Sense. Noûs 9 (1):55-72.
  21.  9
    Phillip D. Cummins (1975). The Philosophy of Leibniz and the Modern World. Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):153-154.
  22.  13
    Phillip D. Cummins (1966). Philosophy, Science and Sense Perception. Journal of the History of Philosophy 4 (4):354-356.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  12
    Phillip D. Cummins (1985). Problems of Cartesianism. Journal of the History of Philosophy 23 (1):103-109.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  10
    Phillip D. Cummins (1973). Hume's Disavowal of the Treatise. Philosophical Review 82 (3):371-379.
  25. Phillip D. Cummins (2007). Perceiving and Berkeley's Theory of Substance. In Stephen H. Daniel (ed.), Reexamining Berkeley's Philosophy.
  26. Phillip D. Cummins (1976). Reid on Abstract General Ideas. In Stephen Francis Barker & Tom L. Beauchamp (eds.), Thomas Reid: Critical Interpretations. University City Science Center 3-62.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography