See also:
  1. Phillip Honenberger (2011). History, Before and Beyond the Limit. Journal of the Philosophy of History 4 (3-4):274-295.
    What is the relation between past and present, and what role does historical research, writing and thinking play in regards to that relation? Does it, for instance, primarily record the features of objective breaks and continuities between past and future (as A. Danto has it) or does it rather institute those breaks and continuities (as C. Fasolt has recently argued)? Here I stress that historical understanding is a basic dimension of understanding in general, including understanding of the relation of past (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Phillip Honenberger (2010). Review of Skidelsky, "Ernst Cassirer: The Last Philosopher of Culture&Quot;. [REVIEW] Metaphilosophy 41 (1):239-243.
  3. Phillip Honenberger (2010). Ethics, Hermeneutics, and Eudaimonics. International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (2):243-256.
    Contemporary ethical theory ought to take both the biological and cultural constitution of human subjects into account. But the coupling of these constraints raises questions about the scope of each. In this paper I defend the view that, rather than predetermining human moral sensibility, or founding a universal ethic on that basis, the biological constitution of human beings actually prefigures their wide variability across cultures and argues for the open-endedness of questions of meaning and value. I defend this conception against (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation