Search results for 'Philosophy and social sciences' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Mark J. Smith (ed.) (2005). Philosophy & Methodology of the Social Sciences. Sage.score: 702.0
    This is a comprehensive and authoritative reference collection in the philosophy and methodology of the social sciences. The source materials selected are drawn from debates within the natural sciences as well as social scientific practice. This four volume set covers the traditional literature on the philosophy of the social sciences, and the contemporary philosophical and methodological debates developing at the heart of the disciplinary and interdisciplinary groups in the social sciences. (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Matti Sintonen, Petri Ylikoski & Kaarlo Miller (eds.) (2003). Realism in Action: Essays in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Kluwer Academic Publishers.score: 696.0
    Realism in Action is a selection of essays written by leading representatives in the fields of action theory and philosophy of mind, philosophy of the social sciences and especially the nature of social action, and of epistemology and philosophy of science. Practical reason, reasons and causes in action theory, intending and trying, and folk-psychological explanation are some of the topics discussed by these leading participants. A particular emphasis is laid on trust, commitments and (...) institutions, on the possibility of grounding social notions in individual social attitudes, on the nature of social groups, institutions and collective intentionality, and on common belief and common knowledge. Applications to the social sciences include, e.g., a look at the Erklären-Verstehen controversy in economics, and at constructivist and realist views on archeological reconstructions of the past. (shrink)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Chrysostomos Mantzavinos (ed.) (2009). Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Philosophical Theory and Scientific Practice. Cambridge University Press.score: 696.0
    This volume is a unique contribution to the philosophy of the social sciences, presenting the results of cutting-edge philosophers' research alongside critical discussions by practicing social scientists. The book is motivated by the view that the philosophy of the social sciences cannot ignore the specific scientific practices according to which social scientific work is being conducted, and that it will be valuable only if it evolves in constant interaction with theoretical developments in (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Stephen P. Turner & Paul Andrew Roth (eds.) (2003). The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Blackwell Pub..score: 651.0
    Presents a collection of essays that cover a variety of issues in the social sciences.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Ian C. Jarvie & Jesus Zamoro Bonilla (eds.) (2011). The SAGE Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences. SAGE.score: 629.0
    In this excting Handbook, Jarvie and Bonilla provide a broad and democratic coverage of the many currents in social science.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Christopher Hookway & Philip Pettit (eds.) (1977). Action and Interpretation: Studies in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press.score: 618.0
    Whether the interpretations made by social scientists of the thoughts, utterances and actions of other people, including those from an alien culture or a ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Adam M. Hedgecoe (2001). Ethical Boundary Work: Geneticization, Philosophy and the Social Sciences. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (3):305-309.score: 615.0
    This paper is a response to Henk ten Have's Genetics and Culture: The Geneticization thesis . In it, I refute Ten Have's suggestion that geneticization is not the sort of process that can be measured and commented on in terms of empirical evidence,even if he is correct in suggesting that it should be seen as part of ‘philosophical discourse’. At the end, I relate this discussion to broader debates within bioethics between the social science and philosophy, and suggest (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Stefan Schubert (2012). Ernest Gellner's Use of the Social Sciences in Philosophy. Philosophy of the Social Sciences (1):0048393112444319.score: 609.0
    It is well known that Ernest Gellner made substantial use of his knowledge of the social sciences in philosophy. Here I discuss how he used it on the basis of a few examples taken from Gellner’s philosophical output. It is argued that he made a number of highly original “translations”, orre-interpretations, of philosophical theories and problems using his knowledge of the social sciences. While this method is endorsed, it is also argued that some of Gellner’s (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Vernon Pratt (1978). The Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Methuen.score: 609.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Alan Ryan (1970). The Philosophy of the Social Sciences. London,Macmillan.score: 609.0
  11. S. I. Benn & G. W. Mortimore (eds.) (1976). Rationality and the Social Sciences: Contributions to the Philosophy and Methodology of the Social Sciences. Routledge and Kegan Paul.score: 609.0
  12. Robert Bishop (2007). The Philosophy of the Social Sciences: An Introduction. Continuum.score: 609.0
  13. Len Doyal (1986). Empiricism, Explanation, and Rationality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Routledge & K. Paul.score: 609.0
  14. Antony Flew (1985). Thinking About Social Thinking: The Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Blackwell.score: 609.0
  15. I. C. Jarvie, Zamora Bonilla & P. Jesús (eds.) (2011). The Sage Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences. Sage.score: 609.0
  16. Peter T. Manicas (1987). A History and Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Basil Blackwell.score: 609.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Maurice Alexander Natanson (1963). Philosophy of the Social Sciences. New York, Random House.score: 609.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Murray Newton Rothbard (1979). Individualism and the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Cato Institute.score: 609.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Keith Webb (1995). An Introduction to Problems in the Philosophy of Social Sciences. Pinter.score: 609.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. John W. Sutherland (1973). A General Systems Philosophy for the Social and Behavioral Sciences. New York,Braziller.score: 579.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Philip Mirowski (2004). The Scientific Dimensions of Social Knowledge and Their Distant Echoes in 20th-Century American Philosophy of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (2):283-326.score: 546.0
    The widespread impression that recent philosophy of science has pioneered exploration of the “social dimensions of scientific knowledge‘ is shown to be in error, partly due to a lack of appreciation of historical precedent, and partly due to a misunderstanding of how the social sciences and philosophy have been intertwined over the last century. This paper argues that the referents of “democracy‘ are an important key in the American context, and that orthodoxies in the (...) of science tend to be molded by the actual regimes of science organization within which they are embedded. These theses are illustrated by consideration of three representative philosophers of science: John Dewey, Hans Reichenbach, and Philip Kitcher. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]. (shrink)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Jayant Vishnu Narlikar, Indu Banga & Chhanda Gupta (eds.) (1992). Philosophy of Science: Perspectives From Natural and Social Sciences. Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers.score: 537.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Beatrice Kobow (2014). How to Do Things with Fictions Reconsidering Vaihinger for a Philosophy of Social Sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 44 (2):201-222.score: 531.0
    The article reconstructs three key concepts of Hans Vaihinger: the idea of mental fictions as self-contradictory, provisory, conscious, and purposeful; the law of the devolution of ideas stating that an idea oscillates between dogma, hypothesis, or fiction; and the underlying assumption about human consciousness that the psyche constructs thoughts around perceptions like an oyster produces a pearl. In a second, constructive part, these concepts are applied in a discussion of John Searle’s social ontologically extended theory of speech acts. The (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Peter T. Manicas (2006). A Realist Philosophy of Social Science: Explanation and Understanding. Cambridge University Press.score: 526.0
    This introduction to the philosophy of social science provides an original conception of the task and nature of social inquiry. Peter Manicas discusses the role of causality seen in the physical sciences and offers a reassessment of the problem of explanation from a realist perspective. He argues that the fundamental goal of theory in both the natural and social sciences is not, contrary to widespread opinion, prediction and control, or the explanation of events (including (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Peter Winch (2008/2007). The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy. Routledge.score: 526.0
    The problems dealt with in The Idea of a Social Science are philosophical. It is an attempt to place the social science, considered as a single group, on the intellectual map, with special attention to the relations of the discipline to philosophy on the one hand and the natural sciences on the other. The author holds that the relation between the social sciences and philosophy is commonly misunderstood because of certain fashionable misconceptions about (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Alexander Rosenberg (1995). Philosophy of Social Science. Westview Press.score: 526.0
    This is an expanded and thoroughly revised edition of the widely adopted introduction to the philosophical foundations of the human sciences. Ranging from cultural anthropology to mathematical economics, Alexander Rosenberg leads the reader through behaviorism, naturalism, interpretativism about human action, and macrosocial scientific perspectives, illuminating the motivation and strategy of each.Rewritten throughout to increase accessibility, this new edition retains the remarkable achievement of revealing the social sciences’ enduring relation to the fundamental problems of philosophy. It includes (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Yvonne Sherratt (2006). Continental Philosophy of Social Science: Hermeneutics, Genealogy, Critical Theory. Cambridge University Press.score: 526.0
    Continental Philosophy of Social Science demonstrates the unique and autonomous nature of the continental approach to social science and contrasts it with the Anglo-American tradition. Yvonne Sherratt argues for the importance of an historical understanding of the Continental tradition in order to appreciate its individual, humanist character. Examining the key traditions of hermeneutic, genealogy, and critical theory, and the texts of major thinkers such as Gadamer, Ricoeur, Derrida, Nietzsche, Foucault, the Early Frankfurt School and Habermas, she also (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Kathryn Dean (ed.) (2006). Realism, Philosophy and Social Science. Palgrave Macmillan.score: 526.0
    The authors examine the nature of the relationship between social science and philosophy and address the sort of work social science should do, and the role and sorts of claims that an accompanying philosophy should engage in. In particular, the authors reintroduce the question of ontology, an area long overlooked by philosophers of social science, and present a cricital engagement with the work of Roy Bhaskar. The book argues against the excesses of philosophising and commits (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Antti Saaristo (2006). There is No Escape From Philosophy: Collective Intentionality and Empirical Social Science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (1):40-66.score: 523.0
    This article examines two empirical research traditions—experimental economics and the social identity approach in social psychology—that may be seen as attempts to falsify and verify the theory of collective intentionality, respectively. The article argues that both approaches fail to settle the issue. However, this is not necessarily due to the alleged immaturity of the social sciences but, possibly, to the philosophical nature of intentionality and intentional action. The article shows how broadly Davidsonian action theory, including Hacking’s (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Julian Reiss, David Teira & Jesús Zamora Bonilla (2008). What's New in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences?: Guest Editors' Introduction. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (3):311-313.score: 522.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Ernest Gellner (1975). A Wittgensteinian Philosophy of (or Against) the Social Sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 5 (2):173-199.score: 522.0
  32. Michael Schmid (1988). The Idea of Rationality and its Relationship to Social Science: Comments on Popper's Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Inquiry 31 (4):451 – 469.score: 522.0
    Popper has proposed a ?theory of situational rationality? as a basis for the social sciences. This theory of rational action is reconstructed and its methodological and substantial implications discussed. It is shown that methodologically Popper's idea of rational action leads to a version of theoretical instrumentalism which is incompatible with his general philosophy of science, and that substantially it implies an unacceptable theory of social institutions. Instrumentalism can be avoided by a more contentful theory of human (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Reinoud Bosch (2013). Book Review: The SAGE Handbook of the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (4):563-569.score: 522.0
  34. Piotr Sztompka (1986). Some Aspects of Florian Znaniecki's Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 16 (4):441-457.score: 522.0
  35. F. D'Agostino (2007). Book Review: Baert, P. (2005). Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Towards Pragmatism. Cambridge: Polity. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (4):541-543.score: 522.0
  36. Paul A. Roth (1996). Dubious Liaisons: A Review of Alvin Goldman's Liaisons: Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences. [REVIEW] Philosophical Psychology 9 (2):261 – 279.score: 522.0
    Alvin Goldman's recent collection (Goldman, 1992) includes many of the important and seminal contributions made by him over the last three decades to epistemology, philosophy of mind, and analytic metaphysics. Goldman is an acknowledged leader in efforts to put material from cognitive and social science to good philosophical use. This is the “liaison” which Goldman takes his own work to exemplify and advance. Yet the essays contained in Liaisons chart an important evolution in Goldman's own views about the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. P. Stone (2002). Book Review: Microfoundations, Method, and Causation: On the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (1):120-126.score: 522.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Daniel Diermeiq Chong, Jack Knight & Lany Rothenbe (forthcoming). 76 Philosophy of the Social Sciences/March 1996. Philosophy of the Social Sciences.score: 522.0
  39. M. Martin (1990). Book Reviews : J. O. Wisdom, Philosophy of the Social Sciences I: A Metascientific Introduction. Gower, Aldershot, England, 1987. Pp. Ix, 133, $33.00 (Cloth). J. O. Wisdom, Philosophy of the Social Sciences II: Schemata. Gower, Aldershot, England, 1987. Pp. Xi, 210, $43.00 (Cloth. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 20 (3):394-398.score: 522.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. S. W. Gaukroger (1979). Book Reviews : Philosophy and Methodology in the Social Sciences. By Barry Hndess. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press, 1977. Pp. 258. $17.75. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 9 (3):379-382.score: 522.0
  41. Michel Verdon (1985). Midwife or Toad? Philosophy and the Social Sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 15 (1):53-63.score: 522.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. W. W. Miller (1988). Book Reviews : Thinking About Social Thinking: The Philosophy of the Social Sciences. By Antony Flew. Oxford and New York: Basil Blackwell, 1985. Pp. 222. 5.50, $13.75 (Paper. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 18 (3):411-413.score: 522.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. George Psathas & Victor Kestenbaum (1980). Human Studies: A Journal for Philosophy and the Social Sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 10 (3):292-292.score: 522.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. F. D. Agostino (2007). Review of Philosophy of the Social Sciences, by Patrick Baert. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (4):541.score: 522.0
  45. Berel Dov Lerner (2001). Rules, Magic and Instrumental Reason: A Critical Interpretation of Peter Winch's Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Routledge.score: 522.0
    This book offers a systematic and critical discussion of Peter Winch's writings on the philosophy of the social sciences. The author points to Winch's tendency to over-emphasize the importance of language and communication, and his insufficient attention to the role of practical, technological activites in human life and society. It also offers an appendix devoted to the controversy between the anthropologists Marshall Sahlins and Gananath Obeyesekere regarding Captain James Cook's Hawaiian adventures. Essential reading for those studying the (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Len & Roger Doyal & Harris (2008). Empiricism, Explanation and Rationality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Routledge.score: 522.0
    Originally published in 1986. All students of social science must confront a number of important philosophical issues. This introduction to the philosophy of the social sciences provides coherent answers to questions about empiricism, explanation and rationality. It evaluates contemporary writings on the subject which can be as difficult as they are important to understand. Each chapter has an annotated bibliography to enable students to pursue the issues raised and to assess for themselves the arguments of the (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Steve Fuller (2003). Philosophy of Social Sciences. In Stephen P. Turner & Paul Andrew Roth (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Blackwell Pub.. 207.score: 522.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Steve Fuller (forthcoming). Studies and the Philosophy of Social Sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences.score: 522.0
  49. Reiss Julian, Teira David & Bonilla Jesus Zamora (2008). What's New in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences?. Guest Editors'introduction. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (3).score: 522.0
  50. David-Hillel Ruben (2008). Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Five Questions. In D. Rios & C. Schmidt-Petri (eds.), Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Five Questions. Automatic Press.score: 522.0
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000