Search results for 'Philosophy, Chinese History' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Youlan Feng (1983). A History of Chinese Philosophy. Princeton University Press.score: 672.0
    Since its original publication in Chinese in the 1930s, this work has been accepted by Chinese scholars as the most important contribution to the study of their country's philosophy. In 1952 the book was published by Princeton University Press in an English translation by the distinguished scholar of Chinese history, Derk Bodde, "the dedicated translator of Fung Yu-lan's huge history of Chinese philosophy" ( New York Times Book Review ). Available for the first time (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Bo Mou (ed.) (2008). Routledge History of Chinese Philosophy. Routledge.score: 585.0
    The History of Chinese Philosophy is a comprehensive and authoritative examination of the movements and thinkers that have shaped Chinese philosophy over the last three thousand years. An outstanding team of international contributors provide seventeen accessible entries organised into five clear parts: Identity of Chinese Philosophy Classical Chinese Philosophy : Pre-Han Period Classical Chinese Philosophy : From Han Through Tang Classical Chinese Philosophy : From Song Through Early Qing Modern Chinese Philosophy: From (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Shafu Xiao & Jinquan Li (eds.) (2008). An Outline History of Chinese Philosophy. Foreign Languages Press.score: 585.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Nicolas Standaert (1995). Review: The Discovery of the Center Through the Periphery: A Preliminary Study of Feng Youlan's "History of Chinese Philosophy" (New Version). [REVIEW] Philosophy East and West 45 (4):569 - 589.score: 495.0
    Feng Youlan's (1895-1990) "History of Chinese Philosophy" is at present still the most well-known introduction to Chinese philosophy in any Western language. During the 1980s Feng Youlan published a seven-volume new version of his "History" in which he further developed his view on history so that the work itself can be considered part of the history of Chinese philosophy in this century. This paper presents a preliminary analysis and comparison of the different versions (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. A. S. Cua (2005). Human Nature, Ritual, and History: Studies in Xunzi and Chinese Philosophy. The Catholic University of America Press.score: 489.0
    In this volume, distinguished philosopher Antonio S. Cua offers a collection of original studies on Xunzi, a leading classical Confucian thinker, and on other ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Youlan Feng (1948). A Short History of Chinese Philosophy. New York, Macmillan Co..score: 489.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Zhaowu He (2009). A Critical History of Classical Chinese Philosophy. New World Press.score: 489.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Wai-lu Hou (1959). A Short History of Chinese Philosophy. Peking, Foreign Languages Press.score: 489.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Kuang-ming Wu (1991). History, Thinking, and Literature in Chinese Philosophy. [Sun Yat-Sen Institute for Social Sciences and Philosophy].score: 489.0
  10. Antonio S. Cua (2008). Emergence of the History of Chinese Philosophy. In Bo Mou (ed.), International Philosophical Quarterly. Routledge 441-464.score: 486.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Bo Mou (ed.) (2008). History of Chinese Philosophy. Routledge.score: 486.0
    The History of Chinese Philosophy is a comprehensive and authoritative examination of the movements and thinkers that have shaped Chinese philosophy over the last three thousand years. An outstanding team of international contributors provide seventeen accessible entries organised into five clear parts: Identity of Chinese Philosophy Classical Chinese Philosophy : Pre-Han Period Classical Chinese Philosophy : From Han Through Tang Classical Chinese Philosophy : From Song Through Early Qing Modern Chinese Philosophy: From (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. C. Feng (1981). Discussion on the Question of Methodology in the History of Philosophy+ Chinese-Philosophy-the Need for Concrete Analysis of Philosophical Thought From the Historical Past. Chinese Studies in Philosophy 12 (2):76-81.score: 471.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Erin M. Cline (2006). Human Nature, Ritual, and History: Studies in Xunzi and Chinese Philosophy – Antonio S. Cua. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 33 (3):453–455.score: 441.0
  14. Hans Kuijper (2002). On the Idea of a New History of Chinese Philosophy. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 29 (2):285–289.score: 441.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Haiming Wen (2012). Chinese Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.score: 441.0
    Chinese Philosophy provides a clear, accessible conception of the Chinese philosophical sensibility and its evolution throughout history.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Paul R. Goldin (2008). Appeals to History in Early Chinese Philosophy and Rhetoric. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 35 (1):79–96.score: 441.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Shih Chün (1968). Discussions Concerning the Object and Scope of the "History of Chinese Philosophy" and Some Present Problems. Chinese Studies in History 2 (2):47-72.score: 441.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Chu Ch'ien-Chih (1969). Concerning the Object and the Sphere of the History of Chinese Philosophy. Chinese Studies in History 2 (4):41-48.score: 441.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Wh Liu (1981). Discussion on the Question of Methodology in the History of Philosophy-a Few Words on the Problem of Methodology in the History of Chinese-Philosophy. Chinese Studies in Philosophy 12 (2):81-86.score: 441.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Chu Po-K'un (1968). Problems of the History of Chinese Philosophy Are Discussed by Peking's Philosophy Circle. Chinese Studies in History 2 (2):98-104.score: 441.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Jy Ren (1981). The History of Chinese-Philosophy-30 Years of Study. Chinese Studies in Philosophy 12 (2):4-24.score: 441.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Hu Shih (1981). "A History of Chinese Philosophy" and its Subsequent Researches, Particularly on Ch'An Buddhism. Chinese Studies in History 14 (3):88-101.score: 441.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Sf Xiao (1991). Tang, Junyi Philosophical View of History and His Explanation of the Philosophy of Wang, Chuanshan-on Reading a Study of Origins in Chinese Philosophy (Zhongguo Zhexue Yuan Lun). Chinese Studies in Philosophy 22 (3):55-85.score: 441.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Xl Ye (1989). New Explorations in the History of the Philosophy of the Qin and Han Periods, Reflections on Reading the Qin-Han Section of The'History of the Development of Chinese Philosophy'. Chinese Studies in Philosophy 20 (3):55-70.score: 441.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Fung Yu-lan (1968). Two Problems in the Study of the History of Chinese Philosophy. Chinese Studies in History 2 (2):5-22.score: 441.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Fung Yu-lan (1969). The Struggle Between Materialism and Idealism in the History of Chinese Philosophy in Terms Of Several Major Problems in Chinese Philosophy. Chinese Studies in History 2 (4):3-27.score: 441.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Dn Zhang (1981). On the Critical Inheritance of Philosophical Thought+ Marxism and the History of Chinese-Philosophy. Chinese Studies in Philosophy 12 (2):52-67.score: 441.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Calvin G. Normore (2006). What is to Be Done in the History of Philosophy. Topoi 25 (1-2):75-82.score: 435.0
    Because the History of Philosophy is a branch of both History and Philosophy, it faces tasks which are Historical, tasks which are Philosophical, and tasks which overlap both. As Philosophy typically flourishes by incorporating and assimilating ideas and bodies of text which have either not previously been part of its stock in trade or have been forgotten, the main task facing the History of Philosophy today is that of developing serious scholarship in areas that have been largely (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Wenyu Xie (2008). An, Yanming, the Idea of Cheng (Sincerity/Reality) in the History of Chinese Philosophy. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 7 (2):211-213.score: 414.0
  30. Zhang Dainian (1998). The Place of Daoism in the History of Chinese Philosophy. Contemporary Chinese Thought 29 (3):81-94.score: 414.0
    In the Spring and Autumn and Warring States periods, scholarship flourished and the hundred schools contended. The term "the hundred schools" is of ancient origin.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. John Laird (1939). A History of Chinese Philosophy. The Period of the Philosophers. By Fung Yu-Lan, Ph.D. Translated by Derk Bodde . (Peiping: Henri Vetch; London: G. Allen & Unwin, Ltd. 1937. Pp. Xx + 454. Price in England 25s. Net.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 14 (53):112-.score: 414.0
  32. W. A. C. H. Dobson (1950). A Short History of Chinese Philosophy. By Fung Yu-Lan. Edited by Derk Bodde. New York: Macmillan. 1948. Philosophy 25 (92):75-.score: 414.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Zheng Jiadong (2006). The Writing of the History of Chinese Philosophy and the Present Difficulties Faced by Traditional Chinese Thought. Contemporary Chinese Thought 37 (2):71-93.score: 414.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Ren Jiyu (2010). Characteristics of the History of Chinese Philosophy. Contemporary Chinese Thought 41 (4):32-37.score: 414.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Ren Jiyu (1984). Subject and Method of the History of Chinese Philosophy. Contemporary Chinese Thought 15 (3):17-53.score: 414.0
    The history of philosophy is the history of entire knowledge, a definition made by Lenin.1 At the same time Lenin also pointed out that throughout the two thousand years of development of philosophy the struggle between idealism and materialism, between the lines or tendencies, has never come to a stalemate.2 Based on what Lenin had pointed out, Redanov [translation of the name in Chinese—Tr.] of the Soviet Union repudiated Alexandrov's definition of the history of philosophy. As (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Youngmin Kim (2013). Toward a Theoretical Foundation for the History of Chinese Political Philosophy. Philosophy Today 57 (2):204-212.score: 414.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Ge Zhaoguang (2005). Why Is It the" History of Thought"?: Reflections on the" Chinese Philosophy" Issue. Contemporary Chinese Thought 37 (1):43-49.score: 414.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Ren Jiyu (1985). The History of Chinese Philosophy—Object and Method of Study. Contemporary Chinese Thought 17 (2):3-34.score: 414.0
    The history of philosophy is the history of cognition in its entirety; this was Lenin's definition. At the same time, Lenin also pointed out that, throughout 2,000 years of philosophical development, the struggle between idealism and materialism, between the trends or lines of Plato and Democritus, has never become outdated.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Xiao Shafu (1991). Tang Junyi's Philosophical View of History and His Explanation of the Philosophy of Wang Chuanshan: On Reading A Study of Origins in Chinese Philosophy (Zhongguo Zhexue Yuan Lun). Contemporary Chinese Thought 22 (3):55-85.score: 414.0
    Mr. Tang Junyi is the son of the great scholar of Sichuan, Mr. Tang Difeng. As a child, he received much of the nurturing influence of the scholarship in his family; he was a wise young man from a very tender age, with many unusual thoughts. Since the publication of his essay "The theory of Nature in Xun Zi's Thought" when he was fifteen years old and still in middle school, Mr. Tang has pursued the road of a scholar and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Chen Weiping (2005). Metaphysical Wisdom and Lifeworld: Tendencies in Research on the History of Chinese Philosophy at the Juncture of the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries. Contemporary Chinese Thought 37 (1):24-33.score: 414.0
  41. Tang Yijie (1983). New Progress in the Study of the History of Chinese Philosophy Over Recent Years. Contemporary Chinese Thought 15 (2):25-38.score: 414.0
    Study of the history of Chinese philosophy has been in full swing in China over the recent years. The Society of the History of Chinese Philosophy has been set up, and in publication are two journals entitled Studies of the History of Chinese Philosophy and Chinese Philosophy, dedicated to publishing research results in this area. A number of books specializing in the subject have come off press and dozens of seminars have been held (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Ren Jiyu (2010). The Course of Development of the History of Chinese Philosophy. Contemporary Chinese Thought 41 (4):18-31.score: 414.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Zheng Xiaojiang (2002). The Archeology Method in History of Thoughts and the Study of Chinese Philosophy [J]. Modern Philosophy 1:010.score: 414.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Ren Jiyu (1980). The History of Chinese Philosophy - Thirty Years of Study. Contemporary Chinese Thought 12 (2):4-24.score: 414.0
    I have been engaged in teaching and research on the history of Chinese philosophy for a total of not less than thirty years. During the War of Resistance against Japan, it was at the Southwest Associated University in Kunming that I first began lecturing and became engaged in specialized studies on the history of Chinese philosophy. However, I should note that I only began using the truly scientific method to study the history of Chinese (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Yan Xiaofeng (2001). Disputes Over Words and Meanings in the History of Chinese Philosophy. Contemporary Chinese Thought 32 (3):18-31.score: 414.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Tang Yijie (1983). Prospects for the Study of the History of Chinese Philosophy: Also on the Issue of the True, the Good, and the Beautiful in China's Traditional Philosophy. Contemporary Chinese Thought 15 (2):9-24.score: 414.0
    Confronting us now is the problem of prospects for the study of Chinese philosophy, that is, the problem of how to evaluate the traditional philosophy of China.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Youngmin Kim (2013). Toward a Theoretical Foundation for the History of Chinese Political Philosophy Beyond Cultural Essentialism and Its Critique. Philosophy Today 57 (2):204.score: 414.0
  48. Sun Shuping (1981). Some Opinions on the Task of Studying the History of Chinese Philosophy. Contemporary Chinese Thought 12 (4):37-47.score: 414.0
    Upon delving into Chinese philosophy I have come to realize that Chinese philosophy is indeed rich and comprehensive, even though Chinese philosophy and the history of Chinese philosophy are different from the history of Western philosophy. Although Western society and Chinese society follow common laws, each has its own distinctive characteristics. Similarly, while Western philosophy and Chinese philosophy likewise follow common laws, each has its own distinctive characteristics. The scope of the (...) of Chinese philosophy cannot be determined by that of Western philosophy, nor can the scope of Western philosophy be determined by that of Chinese philosophy. The most outstanding periods of Western philosophy have been the ancient and modern periods. The most outstanding period of Chinese philosophy was that of the Spring and Autumn era through the early Qing period. This was due to the differences between the two societies. In the West, both the slave system and the bourgeois revolution were much more highly developed than they were in China. China had a brilliant feudal culture and subsequently China's brilliant feudal philosophy simply had a different style from that of Western philosophy. I remember that Comrade Hou Wailu came to the following conclusion: that the style of the Western philosopher was that of a wise man [zheren], while the style of the Chinese philosopher was that of a worthy man [xianren], My impressions are similar. Western philosophers usually discussed the problems of cognition and knowledge, while Chinese philosophers usually talked and wrote about questions of politics and ethics. What they have had in common is the fact that both have discussed only the general or universal laws of nature, society, and human thought. This Marxist definition of philosophy has held true both in the East and in the West. It is said that Ridannov defined the history of philosophy as being the history of the beginnings and development of materialism. Not having his works at hand, I cannot substantiate this. But I feel that such a definition is rather narrow. The history of philosophy should discuss the history of the development of man's knowledge of nature, society, and human thought, including both the history of the rise and development of materialism and the history of the rise and development of idealism. Only by interweaving the two can we arrive at a full history of philosophy. I do not know whether or not such an understanding on my part is correct. In any case, I have to write in accordance with my own understanding; otherwise I could not write at all. (shrink)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Liu Weihua (1980). A Few Words on the Problem of Methodology in the History of Chinese Philosophy. Contemporary Chinese Thought 12 (2):81-86.score: 414.0
    During the thirty years of Construction, studies in the history of Chinese philosophy have achieved great results, but not a few problems still remain. Those problems such as the problem of the subject matter, characteristics, and scope of the history of Chinese philosophy, the problem of the relationship between the study of the history of philosophy and real politics, the problem of evaluating the history of the ancient philosophers and their thought systems, the problem (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. T'ang Yüeh (1971). Three Questions with Regard to the Study of the History of Chinese Philosophy. Contemporary Chinese Thought 2 (4):271-281.score: 414.0
    Zhdanov writes in "A Speech Given in the Meeting Discussing Alexandrov's A History of Western European Philosophy," "The history of philosophy is the history of the struggle between materialism and idealism." First of all, I think this definition is not at all incorrect, and its incomplete aspects do not need much revision. Over the long period of history, materialism and idealism have been struggling continually with each other. It is impossible to imagine a period in (...) when they were not locked in conflict. Although materialism is stimulated to develop by idealism, or materialism absorbs conspicuous factual data from idealism — in other words, they penetrate and influence each other — it does not mean that materialism and idealism do not struggle against each other at times. This situation is just like the case in which we fight with an enemy: our military strategy is improved and stimulated by our enemy, and we absorb the positive aspects out of his strategy. But none of these phenomena implies that we stop fighting our enemy. Of course materialism and idealism must be possessed in some respects of a common language, a certain quantity of given basic facts, and they must be present in one society. Their common aspects provide them with the conditions for mutual struggle, rather than imply that they coexist peacefully. In Chapter VI of Materialism and Empiriocriticism, Lenin wrote, with great incisiveness: "All of Marx's philosophical literature focuses on explaining the fundamental antagonism between these two roads . From the point of view of the college-professor-style philosopher, this sort of ‘narrow attitude’ and ‘one-sided attitude’ is the weakest aspect in all of Marx's philosophical literature. In fact, holding firmly to this kind of narrow attitude in the face of those who try to compromise materialism and idealism is a great contribution by Marx, the one who established his philosophy by abiding by a clear and right philosophical road." Therefore it is correct to say that the history of philosophy is a history of struggle between materialism and idealism. (shrink)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000