Search results for 'Philosophy, Indic History' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  4
    K. Satchidananda Murty (1967). Readings in Indian History, Politics and Philosophy. London, Allen & Unwin.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Surendranath Dasgupta (1969). History of Indian Philosophy. Allahabad, Kitab Mahal.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  3. Umesha Mishra (1957). History of Indian Philosophy. Allahabad, Tirabhukti Publications.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  4. Debiprasad Chattopadhyaya (ed.) (1978). Studies in the History of Indian Philosophy: An Anthology of Articles by Scholars, Eastern and Western. K. P. Bagchi.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Kireet Joshi, Sen Gupta & K. A. (eds.) (2004). Project of History of Indian Science, Philosophy, and Culture: An Introductory Presentation. Indian Council of Philosophical Research.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Robert C. Solomon (1996). A Short History of Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
    In this accessible and comprehensive work, Robert Solomon and Kathleen Higgins cover the entire history of philosophy--ancient, medieval, and modern, from cultures both East and West--in its broader historical and cultural contexts. Major philosophers and movements are discussed along with less well-known but interesting figures. The authors examine the early Greek, Indic, and Chinese philosophers and the mythological traditions that preceded them, as well as the great religious philosophies, including Christianity, Hinduism, Judaism, and Taoism. Easily understandable to students (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. S. P. Dubey (ed.) (1996). Indian Philosophy and History. Distributed by Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Erich Frauwallner (1974). History of Indian Philosophy. New York,Humanities Press.
    v. 1. The philosophy of the Veda and of the epic.--The Buddha and the Jina.--The Sāmkhya and the classical Yoga-system.--v. 2. The Nature-philosophical schools and the Vaiśeṣika system.--The system of the Jaina.--The materialism.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  9. Sibesh Chandra Bhattacharya (ed.) (2010). History, Philosophy, Culture: Revisiting Professor G.C. Pande's Thoughts and Works. Aryan Books International.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Sibesh Chandra Bhattacharya (ed.) (2010). History, Philosophy, Culture: Revisiting Professor G. Aryan Books International.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Rattan Mann (1988). Critique of Indian Philosophy, History, and Culture. Mann Pub. House.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Mariettta T. Stepanyants (ed.) (1993). History of Indian Philosophy: A Russian Viewpoint. Distributed by Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Robert C. Solomon & Kathleen M. Higgins (1996). A Short History of Philosophy. Oxford University Press Usa.
    In this accessible and comprehensive work, Robert Solomon and Kathleen Higgins cover the entire history of philosophy--ancient, medieval, and modern, from cultures both East and West--in its broader historical and cultural contexts. Major philosophers and movements are discussed along with less well-known but interesting figures. The authors examine the early Greek, Indic, and Chinese philosophers and the mythological traditions that preceded them, as well as the great religious philosophies, including Christianity, Hinduism, Judaism, and Taoism. Easily understandable to students (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  30
    Michael Beaney (2016). Historiography, Philosophy of History and the Historical Turn in Analytic Philosophy. Journal of the Philosophy of History 10 (2):211-234.
    _ Source: _Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 211 - 234 This article has three main interconnected aims. First, I illustrate the historiographical conceptions of three early analytic philosophers: Frege, Russell and Wittgenstein. Second, I consider some of the historiographical debates that have been generated by the recent historical turn in analytic philosophy, looking at the work of Scott Soames and Hans-Johann Glock, in particular. Third, I discuss Arthur Danto’s _Analytic Philosophy of History_, published 50 years ago, and argue for a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  12
    Michael Beaney (forthcoming). Historiography, Philosophy of History and the Historical Turn in Analytic Philosophy. New Content is Available for Journal of the Philosophy of History.
    _ Source: _Page Count 24 This article has three main interconnected aims. First, I illustrate the historiographical conceptions of three early analytic philosophers: Frege, Russell and Wittgenstein. Second, I consider some of the historiographical debates that have been generated by the recent historical turn in analytic philosophy, looking at the work of Scott Soames and Hans-Johann Glock, in particular. Third, I discuss Arthur Danto’s _Analytic Philosophy of History_, published 50 years ago, and argue for a reinvigorated analytic philosophy of (...). (shrink)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  33
    Frank Ankersmit (2009). Danto's Philosophy of History in Retrospective. Journal of the Philosophy of History 3 (2):109-145.
    Danto's Analytical Philosopy of History is one of the undisputed classics of post-war reflection on the nature of historical writing. Upon its publication in 1965 it was immediately recognized to be a major contribution to contemporary historical thought. Strangely enough, however, little effort was made by philosophers of history to penetrate into the depth of Danto's argument. The explanation is, perhaps, that there was more than a hint of historicism in Danto's conception of historical writing and for which (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  14
    Carolina Armenteros (2012). 'True Love' and Rousseau's Philosophy of History. Journal of the Philosophy of History 6 (2):258-282.
    Rousseau, a philosopher of history? The suggestion may startle those who know him as an enemy of history, the founder of Counter-Enlightenment who rejected his century’s hope in progress and conjured quasi-utopias devoid of time. Alone, the political texts seem to justify this interpretation. Side by side with the Emile and Julie sagas, however, they disclose a new Rousseau, the weaver of a master plot that governs private and public history. This essay describes Jean-Jacques’ overarching narrative and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  5
    R. Puligandla (1975). Fundamentals of Indian Philosophy. Abingdon Press.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  36
    Stephen Leach (2011). History, Ethics and Philosophy: Bernard Williams Appraisal of R. G. Collingwood. Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (1):36-53.
    The author examines Williams' appraisal of Collingwood both in his eponymous essay on Collingwood, in the posthumously published Sense of the Past , and elsewhere in his work. The similarities and differences between their philosophies are explored: in particular, with regard to the relationship between philosophy and history and the relationship between the study of history and our present-day moral attitudes. It is argued that, despite Williams usually being classified as an analytic philosopher and Collingwood being classified as (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  39
    Dun Zhang (2010). The End of History ” and the Fate of the Philosophy of History”. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (4):631-651.
    The end of history by Fukuyama is mainly based on Hegel’s treatise of the end of history and Kojeve’s corresponding interpretation. But Hegel’s end of history is a purely philosophical question, i.e., an ontological premise that must be fulfilled to complete absolute knowledge. When Kojeve further demonstrates its universal and homogeneous state, Fukuyama extends it into a political view: The victory of the Western system of freedom and democracy marks the end of the development of human (...) and Marxist theory and practice. This is a misunderstanding of Hegel. Marx analyzes, scientifically, the historical limitation of Western capitalism and maintains, by way of a kind of revolutionary teleology, the expectation of and belief in human liberation, which is the highest historical goal. His philosophy of history is hence characterized by theoretical elements from both historical scientificalness and historical teleology. (shrink)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  44
    Jonardon Ganeri (2011). The Lost Age of Reason: Philosophy in Early Modern India, 1450-1700. Oxford University Press.
    The ancient texts are now not thought of as authorities to which one must defer, but regarded as the source of insight in the company of which one pursues the ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  22.  35
    Jouni-Matti Kuukkanen (2009). Towards a Philosophy of the History of Thought? Journal of the Philosophy of History 3 (1):25-54.
    There are a large number of disciplines that are interested in the theoretical aspects of the history of thought. Their perspectives and subjects may vary, but fundamentally they have a common research interest: the history of human thinking and its products. Despite this, they are studied in relative isolation. I argue that having different subjects as specific objects of research, such as political or scientific thinking, is not a valid justification for the separation. I propose the formation of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  18
    Admir Skodo (2013). Analytical Philosophy and the Philosophy of Intellectual History: A Critical Comparison and Interpretation. Journal of the Philosophy of History 7 (2):137-161.
    This article argues that the relationship between analytical philosophy and the philosophy of intellectual history is conceptually uneasy and even antagonistic once the general philosophical viewpoints, and some particular topics, of the two perspectives are drawn out and compared. The article critically compares the philosophies of Quentin Skinner and Mark Bevir with the philosophies of Ludwig Wittgenstein, J.L. Austin, W.V.O. Quine and Donald Davidson. Section I compares the way in which these two perspectives view the task of philosophy. Section (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  32
    Géza Kállay (2011). At T-Time, the Inchoative Nick of Time, and “Statements About the Past”: Time and History in the Analytic Philosophy of Language. Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (3):322-351.
    The paper, drawing on articles by J. M. E. McTaggart, G. E. Moore, D. Davidson, J. L. Austin, B. Russell, A. J. Ayer and G. E. M. Anscombe, argues that the philosophy of language in the analytic tradition has developed an “inchoative“ view of time, and history is a problem as regards the existence of events in the past and how these events can be known. An alternative view is hinted at through the work of L. Wittgenstein and S. (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  32
    Rajendra Prasad (2008). A Conceptual-Analytic Study of Classical Indian Philosophy of Morals. Jointly Published by Centre for Studies in Civilization and Concept Pub. Co. For the Project of History of Indian Science, Philosophy, and Culture.
    Using recontructive ideas available in classical Indian original works, this book makes a departure in the style of modern writings on Indian moral philosophy.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Maria Rosa Antognazza (2015). The Benefit to Philosophy of the Study of its History. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (1):161-184.
    This paper advances the view that the history of philosophy is both a kind of history and a kind of philosophy. Through a discussion of some examples from epistemology, metaphysics, and the historiography of philosophy, it explores the benefit to philosophy of a deep and broad engagement with its history. It comes to the conclusion that doing history of philosophy is a way to think outside the box of the current philosophical orthodoxies. Somewhat paradoxically, far from (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Pauline Kleingeld (2001). Nature or Providence? On the Theoretical and Moral Importance of Kant’s Philosophy of History. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 75 (2):201-219.
    Kant’s use of the terms ‘Nature’ and ‘Providence’ in his essays on history has long puzzled commentators. Kant personifies Nature and Providence in a curious way, by speaking of them as “deciding” to give humankind certain predispositions, “wanting” these to be developed, and “knowing” what is best for humans Moreover, he leaves the relationship between the two terms unclear. In this essay, I argue that Kant’s use of ‘Nature’ and ‘Providence’ can be clarified and explained. Moreover, I show that (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  28.  5
    Jeffrey Andrew Barash (2011). Myth in History, Philosophy of History as Myth: On the Ambivalence of Hans Blumenberg's Interpretation of Ernst Cassirer's Theory of Myth. History and Theory 50 (3):328-340.
    ABSTRACTThis essay explores the different interpretations proposed by Ernst Cassirer and Hans Blumenberg of the relation between Platonic philosophy and myth as a means of bringing to light a fundamental divergence in their respective conceptions of what precisely myth is. It attempts to show that their conceptions of myth are closely related to their respective assumptions concerning the historical significance of myth and regarding the sense of history more generally. Their divergent conceptions of myth and of history, I (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Bina Gupta (2009). Reason and Experience in Indian Philosophy. Distributed by Motilal Banarsidass.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  30.  46
    Gary Hatfield (2005). The History of Philosophy as Philosophy. In Tom Sorell & G. A. J. Rogers (eds.), Analytic Philosophy and History of Philosophy. Oxford University Press 82-128.
    The chapter begins with an initial survey of ups and downs of contextualist history of philosophy during the twentieth century in Britain and America, which finds that historically serious history of philosophy has been on the rise. It then considers ways in which the study of past philosophy has been used and is used in philosophy, and makes a case for the philosophical value and necessity of a contextually oriented approach. It examines some uses of past texts and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  31. Mrinalkanti Gangopadhyaya (1980). Indian Atomism: History and Sources. K.P. Bagchi.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  32. B. R. Kamble (1979). Caste and Philosophy in Pre Buddhist India. Parimal.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. K. Satchidananda Murty (2007). Evolution of Indian Philosophy. D.K. Printworld.
  34. Krishna Roy (ed.) (2003). Political Philosophy: East & West. Centre of Advanced Study in Philosophy, Jadavpur University in Collaboration with Allied Publishers.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Surendra Nath Sen (ed.) (1995). Science, Philosophy, and Culture in Historical Perspective. Project of History of Indian Science, Philosophy, and Culture.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. S. M. Shaha (1987). The Dialectic of Knowledge and Reality in Indain [I.E. Indian] Philosophy: Kundakunda, Nāgārjuna, Gauḍapāda, and Śaṅkara. Eastern Book Linkers.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Gummaraju Srinivasan (1980). The Phenomenological Approach to Philosophy, Indian and Western. Caravan Pub. Co..
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  46
    Giuseppina D’Oro (2008). The Ontological Backlash: Why Did Mainstream Analytic Philosophy Lose Interest in the Philosophy of History? Philosophia 36 (4):403-415.
    This paper seeks to explain why mainstream analytic philosophy lost interest in the philosophy of history. It suggests that the reasons why the philosophy of history no longer commands the attention of mainstream analytical philosophy may be explained by the success of an ontological backlash against the linguistic turn and a view of philosophy as a form of conceptual analysis. In brief I argue that in the 1950s and 1960s the philosophy of history attracted the interest of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  39.  5
    Michael Beaney (forthcoming). Historiography, Philosophy of History and the Historical Turn in Analytic Philosophy. Brill.
    _ Source: _Page Count 24 This article has three main interconnected aims. First, I illustrate the historiographical conceptions of three early analytic philosophers: Frege, Russell and Wittgenstein. Second, I consider some of the historiographical debates that have been generated by the recent historical turn in analytic philosophy, looking at the work of Scott Soames and Hans-Johann Glock, in particular. Third, I discuss Arthur Danto’s _Analytic Philosophy of History_, published 50 years ago, and argue for a reinvigorated analytic philosophy of (...). (shrink)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  22
    Krzysztof Brzechczyn (2008). In Defence of Metanarrative in the Philosophy of History. Interstitio. East European Review of Historical Anthropology 2 (1):7-22.
    The aim of this paper is to consider the standard objections put against the construction of metanarratives in the philosophy of history. The author distinguishes following intelectual sources questioning the grasp of Entirety in the philosophy of history: anti-naturalistic German philosophy of science, dogmatic Marxism, liberalism and postmodernism. Analysis of the content of these stances allows for disclose of hidden methodological and theoretical premises which are responsible for misunderstanding and critique of the historiosophical discourse.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Philip J. Kain (1988). Hegel's Political Theory and Philosophy of History. Clio 17 (4):345-368.
    HEGEL'S POLITICAL THOUGHT COMBINES ROUSSEAU'S POLITICAL THEORY AND KANT'S PHILOSOPHY OF HISTORY. IT COMBINES (1) RATIONAL FREEDOM REALIZED THROUGH A GENERAL WILL OR CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE, (2) A THEORY OF HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT LIKE KANT'S WHERE CONFLICTING PARTICULAR INTERESTS LEAD TO A MORAL SOCIETY, (3) AND CUSTOM, TRADITION, OR COMMUNITY LIKE THAT FOUND IN ROUSSEAU. TO DO THIS HEGEL MUST REJECT CERTAIN ASPECTS OF ROUSSEAU AND KANT AND EXPLAIN HOW COMMUNITY INSTEAD OF BEING CORRUPTED BY PARTICULAR INTERESTS, AS ROUSSEAU THOUGHT IT (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Philip J. Kain (1989). Kant's Political Theory and Philosophy of History. Clio 18 (4):325-45.
    The importance of Kant's political thought can best be understood if we do two things: if we compare it to political theory as it existed before Kant and if we see how it fundamentally depends upon his philosophy of history. It is Kant's philosophy of history that allows him to take a major step beyond previous political thinkers. Kant brings together for the first time two projects which had traditionally remained separate. He develops a theory of the ideal (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  47
    M. C. Lemon (2003). Philosophy of History: A Guide for Students. Routledge.
    This work is an essential introduction to the vast body of writing about history, from classical Greece and Rome to the contemporary world. M.C. Lemon maps out key debates and central concepts of philosophy of history placing principal thinkers in the context of their times and schools of thought. Lemon explains the crucial differences between speculative philosophy as an n enquiry into the course and meaning of history and analytic philosophy of history as relating to the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Roman Murawski (ed.) (2010). Essays in the Philosophy and History of Logic and Mathematics. Rodopi.
    The book is a collection of the author’s selected works in the philosophy and history of logic and mathematics. Papers in Part I include both general surveys of contemporary philosophy of mathematics as well as studies devoted to specialized topics, like Cantor's philosophy of set theory, the Church thesis and its epistemological status, the history of the philosophical background of the concept of number, the structuralist epistemology of mathematics and the phenomenological philosophy of mathematics. Part II contains essays (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  8
    Marc Depaepe (2007). Philosophy and History of Education: Time to Bridge the Gap? Educational Philosophy and Theory 39 (1):28–43.
    In this article, the relationship between philosophy and history of education is delved into. First, it is noted that both disciplines have diverged from each other over the last few decades to become relatively autonomous subsectors within the pedagogical sciences, each with its own discourses, its own expositional characteristics, its own channels of communication, and its own networks. From the perspective of the history of education, it seems as though more affiliation has been sought with the science of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  46.  8
    James Alexander (2016). The Philosophy of Political History in Oakeshott and Collingwood. Journal of the Philosophy of History 10 (2):279-303.
    _ Source: _Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 279 - 303 Every political philosopher has a philosophy of political history, if sometimes not a very good one. Oakeshott and Collingwood are two twentieth century political philosophers who were particularly concerned with the significance of history for political philosophy; and who both, in the 1940s, sketched what I call philosophies of political history: that is, systematic schemes which could make sense of the entire history of political philosophy. In (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  51
    Tom Sorell & G. A. J. Rogers (eds.) (2005). Analytic Philosophy and History of Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
    Philosophy written in English is overwhelmingly analytic philosophy, and the techniques and predilections of analytic philosophy are not only unhistorical but anti-historical, and hostile to textual commentary. Analytic usually aspires to a very high degree of clarity and precision of formulation and argument, and it often seeks to be informed by, and consistent with, current natural science. In an earlier era, analytic philosophy aimed at agreement with ordinary linguistic intuitions or common sense beliefs, or both. All of these aspects of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  48.  7
    James Alexander (forthcoming). The Philosophy of Political History in Oakeshott and Collingwood. New Content is Available for Journal of the Philosophy of History.
    _ Source: _Page Count 25 Every political philosopher has a philosophy of political history, if sometimes not a very good one. Oakeshott and Collingwood are two twentieth century political philosophers who were particularly concerned with the significance of history for political philosophy; and who both, in the 1940s, sketched what I call philosophies of political history: that is, systematic schemes which could make sense of the entire history of political philosophy. In this article I observe that (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  78
    Noël Carroll (2011). History and the Philosophy of Art. Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (3):370-382.
    In this essay I trace the role of history in the philosophy of art from the early twentieth century to the present, beginning with the rejection of history by formalists like Clive Bell. I then attempt to show how the arguments of people like Morris Weitz and Arthur Danto led to a re-appreciation of history by philosophers of art such as Richard Wollheim, Jerrold Levinson, Robert Stecker and others.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  69
    Stephen Gaukroger (2011). What Does History Matter to the History of Philosophy? Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (3):406-424.
1 — 50 / 1000