Search results for 'Philosophy, Russian History' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Alyssa DeBlasio (2011). Writing the History of Russian Philosophy. Studies in East European Thought 63 (3):203-226.score: 648.0
    This article addresses the writing of the history of Russian philosophy from the first of such works—Archimandrite Gavriil’s Russian Philosophy [ Russkaja filosofija , 1840]—to philosophical histories/textbooks in the twenty-first century. In the majority of these histories, both past and present, we find a relentless insistence on the delineation of “characterizing traits” of Russian philosophy and appeals to “historiosophy,” where historiosophy is employed as being distinct from the historiographical method. In the 1990s and 2000s, the genre (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Louis J. Shein (ed.) (1977). Readings in Russian Philosophical Thought: Philosophy of History. Wilfrid Laurier University Press.score: 609.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Gary M. Hamburg & Randall Allen Poole (eds.) (2010). A History of Russian Philosophy 1830-1930: Faith, Reason, and the Defense of Human Dignity. Cambridge University Press.score: 570.0
    Machine generated contents note: List of contributors; Acknowledgments; Introduction: the humanist tradition in Russian philosophy G. M. Hamburg and Randall A. Poole; Part I. The Nineteenth Century: 1. Slavophiles, Westernizers, and the birth of Russian philosophical humanism Sergey Horujy; 2. Alexander Herzen Derek Offord; 3. Materialism and the radical intelligentsia: the 1860s Victoria S. Frede; 4. Russian ethical humanism: from populism to neo-idealism Thomas Nemeth; Part II. Russian Metaphysical Idealism in Defense of Human Dignity: 5. Boris (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Evert Van Der Zweerde (2001). The Normalization of the History of Philosophy in Post-Soviet Russian Philosophical Culture. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 12:95-104.score: 495.0
    The notion of ‘philosophical culture’ can be defined as the totality of conditions of philosophical thought and theory. Among these conditions is an awareness of the historical background of the philosophical culture in question. This awareness, which plays an important cognitive and normative role, often takes the form of a relatively independent discipline: history of philosophy. Over the last decade, Russian historians of philosophy have been attempting to make the repressed past accessible to contemporary philosophy, often modifying their (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Valeriĭ Aleksandrovich Kuvakin (ed.) (1994). A History of Russian Philosophy: From the Tenth Through the Twentieth Centuries. Prometheus Books.score: 489.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. V. V. Zenʹkovskiĭ (1953). A History of Russian Philosophy. New York, Columbia University Press.score: 489.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. E. van der Zweerde (2009). The Place of Russian Philosophy in World Philosophical History -- A Perspective. Diogenes 56 (2-3):170-186.score: 486.0
    This paper sketches the ambitious outlines of an assessment of the place of Russian philosophy in philosophical history ‘at large’, i.e. on a global and world-historical scale. At the same time, it indicates, rather modestly, a number of elements and aspects of such a project. A retrospective reflection and reconstruction is not only a recurrent phenomenon in philosophical culture (which, the author assumes, has become global), it also is, by virtue of its being a philosophical reflection, one among (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. S. R. Seliga, V. V. Zenkovsky & George L. Kline (1955). A History of Russian Philosophy. Philosophical Quarterly 5 (21):375.score: 486.0
    This set reprints volumes that were orginally published by Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd. in 1953. Landmark volumes at the time of their original publication, these titles do not merely expound the theoretical constructions of Russian philosophers, but also relate these constructions to the general conditions of Russian life. Volume One examines the historical conditions of the development of philosophy in Russia and explores the general features of Russian philosophy. It also surveys the principal works on the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Z. A. Kamenskii (2000). Was There a Break in the Development of Russian Philosophy in the Soviet Period of Its History? Russian Studies in Philosophy 39 (2):86-91.score: 441.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Marina F. Bykova (2012). A History of Russian Philosophy, 1830–1930: Faith, Reason, and the Defense of Human Dignity (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 50 (4):620-621.score: 441.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. A. I. Volodin (2000). The Three Ps, or, On Contemporary Versions of the History of Russian Philosophy in the Soviet Period. Russian Studies in Philosophy 39 (2):70-78.score: 441.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. M. T. Iovchuk (1964). The Philosophy of N. P. Ogarev and Its Place in the History of Russian Revolutionary Thought. Russian Studies in Philosophy 3 (3):27-37.score: 441.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. James Patrick Scanlan (1996). A History of Russian Philosophy: From the Tenth Through the Twentieth Centuries. Volumes I and II (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (4):627-629.score: 441.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. J. P. Scanlan (1996). Valery A. Kuvakin, Ed., A History of Russian Philosophy: From the Tenth Through the Twentieth Centuries. Journal of the History of Philosophy 34:627-628.score: 441.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Ernest Gellner (1980). A Russian Marxist Philosophy of History. Theory and Society 9 (5):757-777.score: 435.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Mariettta T. Stepanyants (ed.) (1993). History of Indian Philosophy: A Russian Viewpoint. Distributed by Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers.score: 423.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. W. Mays (1955). A History of Russian Philosophy. By V. V. Zenkovsky. Authorized Translation From the Russian by George L. Kline. (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd. 1953. Vol. I. Pp. Xiv + 465. Vol II. Pp. Viii + 482. Price £4 4s. The Set.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 30 (113):188-.score: 414.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. John Somerville (1953). Some Perspectives on Russia and the West From the History of Russian Philosophy. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 13 (3):324-336.score: 414.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. L. A. R. (1953). Book Review:History of Russian Philosophy N. O. Lossky. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 20 (1):80-.score: 414.0
  20. Evert van der Zweerde (2001). The Normalization of the History of Philosophy in Post-Soviet Russian Philosophical Culture. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2001.score: 414.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Brian Seitz (2012). A History of Russian Philosophy 1830-1930. Philosophical Inquiry 36 (1-2):77-81.score: 405.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. David Sider (2007). Philosophy (L.) Zhmud. The Origin of the History of Science in Classical Antiquity, Trans. From Russian by A. Chernoglazov. (Peripatoi 19). Berlin: De Gruyter, 2006. Pp. Xi + 331. 98. 9783110179668. [REVIEW] Journal of Hellenic Studies 127:241-.score: 405.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. John Hyde (1953). History of Russian Philosophy. Philosophical Studies 3:137-141.score: 405.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. M. Sapik (1995). Losev, Aleksei, Fedorovich (1893-1988), a Patriarch of Russian Philosophy, Aesthetics, Semiotics and History of Culture. Filozofia 50 (11):615-620.score: 405.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. B. Yakovenko (1995). Dostoevski Weltanschauung-a History of Russian Philosophy. Filozofia 50 (8):452-453.score: 405.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Stephanie Solywoda (2008). The Life and Work of Semen L. Frank: A Study of Russian Religious Philosophy. Ibidem-Verlag.score: 354.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Janusz Dobieszewski (2010). Neoplatonic Tendencies in Russian Philosophy. Studies in East European Thought 62 (1):3 - 10.score: 333.0
    The Absolute is a basic and fundamental issue for philosophy as such. I present different concepts of the Absolute (substantialism, energetism, escapism, methodologism). We can say that contemporary European philosophy “orphaned” the neo-Platonic tradition. Thereafter Russian philosophy developed in an intensive and turbulent as well as relatively uniform fashion, in view of the well-established Neo-Platonist context. This makes Russian philosophy not only part of a lasting universally acknowledged tradition; not only has Russian philosophy continued to develop currents (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Nikolaj Plotnikov (2012). «The Person is a Monad with Windows»: Sketch of a Conceptual History of 'Person' in Russia. [REVIEW] Studies in East European Thought 64 (3-4):269-299.score: 306.0
    The basic concepts 'person' (Person), I/self (Ich) and 'subject' (Subjekt) structuring the Russian discourse of personhood (Personalität) developed during the philosophical discussions of the 1820s-1840s. The development occurred in the course of an intense reception of German Idealism and Romanticism. Characteristic of this process is that the modern meaning of personhood going back to the theological and natural-law interpretations of the person in Western Europe does not exist in the Russian cultural consciousness. Therefore the Russian concepts of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Sergei Prozorov (2008). Russian Postcommunism and the End of History. Studies in East European Thought 60 (3):207 - 230.score: 279.0
    The article ventures a reading of Russian postcommunist politics from the perspective of the messianic turn in continental political philosophy, specifically Giorgio Agamben’s conception of the ‘end of history’. Taking its point of departure from a retrospective construction in the Russian political discourse of the 1990s as a period of ‘timelessness’, the paper argues that postcommunism may indeed be viewed as a paradoxical ‘time out of time’, a rupture in the ordinary temporality that entirely dispenses with the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. John Ryder (1999). Interpreting America: Russian and Soviet Studies of the History of American Thought. Vanderbilt University Press.score: 273.0
    In his pioneering new book Interpreting America, John Ryder makes available for the first time to English-speaking readers Russian views of the full range of American philosophical thought. Using his own accurate translations, he clearly reconstructs a chain of core ideas, emphasizes the most essential concepts of each writer's work, and gives a multidimensional reconstruction of the arguments of each author.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. George M. Young (2012). The Russian Cosmists: The Esoteric Futurism of Nikolai Fedorov and His Followers. Oxford University Press.score: 261.0
    The spiritual geography of Russian cosmism. General characteristics ; Recent definitions of cosmism -- Forerunners of Russian cosmism. Vasily Nazarovich Karazin (1773-1842) ; Alexander Nikolaevich Radishchev (1749-1802) ; Poets: Mikhail Vasilyevich Lomonosov, (1711-1765) and Gavriila Romanovich Derzhavin (1743-1816) ; Prince Vladimir Fedorovich Odoevsky (1803-1869) ; Aleksander Vasilyevich Sukhovo-Kobylin (1817-1903) -- The Russian philosophical context. Philosophy as a passion ; The destiny of Russia ; Thought as a call for action ; The totalitarian cast of mind -- The (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Thomas Seifrid (2005). The Word Made Self: Russian Writings on Language, 1860-1930. Cornell University Press.score: 261.0
    This book will have a lasting impact among readers who will be fascinated to discover the richness of this long-suppressed chapter in the history of Russian ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Leszek Augustyn (2010). Utopia and History. Some Remarks About Nikolai Berdjaev's Struggle with History. Studies in East European Thought 62 (1):71 - 79.score: 255.0
    The article deals with the philosophy of Nikolai Berdjaev (1874–1948), which he formulated between The Philosophy of Inequality (written in 1918, but published in 1923) and The New Middle - Ages (1924). Berdjaev’s philosophy is analyzed in the context of the Russian Revolution of 1917 and its aftermath. The other point of reference is the crisis of culture and civilisation, which affected the West in the inter-war period. Berdjaev’s position has been interpreted in view of the archetypal myth of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Alex Levant (2011). From the History of Soviet Philosophy: Lukács - Vygotsky - Ilyenkov. Historical Materialism 19 (3):176-189.score: 252.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Klaus-Detlev Grothusen (1985). Handbook of Russian History. Philosophy and History 18 (1):57-58.score: 252.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Klaus-Detlev Grothusen (1983). Handbook of Russian History. Vol. 1. Philosophy and History 16 (2):162-163.score: 252.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Klaus-Detlev Grothusen (1978). Manual of Russian History. Philosophy and History 11 (2):210-210.score: 252.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Bernhard Schalhorn (1976). An Outline of Russian History. Philosophy and History 9 (2):232-234.score: 252.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. V. I. Kerimov (1989). A. S. Khomiakov's Philosophy of History. Russian Studies in Philosophy 28 (1):33-60.score: 246.0
  40. Pavel Boyko (2005). The Dialectical Foundations of AF Losev's Philosophy of History. Russian Studies in Philosophy 44 (1):62-81.score: 246.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Akop P. Nazaretyan (2005). Western and Russian Traditions of Big History: A Philosophical Insight. [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science 36 (1):63 - 80.score: 243.0
    Big History - an integral conception of the past since the Big Bang until today - is a novel subject of cross-disciplinary interest. The concept was construed in the 1980-1990s simultaneously in different countries, after relevant premises had matured in the sciences and humanities. Various versions and traditions of Big History are considered in the article. Particularly, most of the Western authors emphasize the idea of equilibrium, and thus reduce cosmic, biological, and social evolution to the mass-energy processes; (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Dun Zhang (2010). “The End of History ” and the Fate of the Philosophy of History. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (4):631-651.score: 230.0
    The end of history by Fukuyama is mainly based on Hegel’s treatise of the end of history and Kojeve’s corresponding interpretation. But Hegel’s end of history is a purely philosophical question, i.e., an ontological premise that must be fulfilled to complete absolute knowledge. When Kojeve further demonstrates its universal and homogeneous state, Fukuyama extends it into a political view: The victory of the Western system of freedom and democracy marks the end of the development of human (...) and Marxist theory and practice. This is a misunderstanding of Hegel. Marx analyzes, scientifically, the historical limitation of Western capitalism and maintains, by way of a kind of revolutionary teleology, the expectation of and belief in human liberation, which is the highest historical goal. His philosophy of history is hence characterized by theoretical elements from both historical scientificalness and historical teleology. (shrink)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Annett Jubara (2010). Universalism in Cultural History and the Meaning of the Russian Revolution: On Some Aspects of Cultural Theory in the Work of Mikhail Lifšic. Studies in East European Thought 62 (3/4):299-314.score: 230.0
    Mikhail Lifsic (1905-1983) is one of the most contradictory and to this date poorly understood authors of the Soviet era. He represented an independent Marxist position, but one internally characterized by the tense relationship between Marxism and the philosophy of Hegel. This relationship, concerning historical philosophical questions, is the subject of this essay. In the 1930s, as "historical materialism" was canonized in the USSR, a development that Soviet civilization understood as the "beginning of the end of (universal) history", Lifsic (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Geza Kallay (2012). At T-Time, the Inchoative Nick of Time, and Statements About the Past: Time and History in the Analytic Philosophy of Language. Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (3):322-351.score: 228.0
    The paper, drawing on articles by J. M. E. McTaggart, G. E. Moore, D. Davidson, J. L. Austin, B. Russell, A. J. Ayer and G. E. M. Anscombe, argues that the philosophy of language in the analytic tradition has developed an “inchoative“ view of time , and history is a problem as regards the existence of events in the past and how these events can be known. An alternative view is hinted at through the work of L. Wittgenstein and (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. J. M. Kuukkanen (2009). Towards a Philosophy of the History of Thought? Journal of the Philosophy of History 3 (1):25-54.score: 228.0
    There are a large number of disciplines that are interested in the theoretical aspects of the history of thought. Their perspectives and subjects may vary, but fundamentally they have a common research interest: the history of human thinking and its products. Despite this, they are studied in relative isolation. I argue that having different subjects as specific objects of research, such as political or scientific thinking, is not a valid justification for the separation. I propose the formation of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Jouni-Matti Kuukkanen (2009). Towards a Philosophy of the History of Thought? Journal of the Philosophy of History 3 (1):25-54.score: 228.0
    There are a large number of disciplines that are interested in the theoretical aspects of the history of thought. Their perspectives and subjects may vary, but fundamentally they have a common research interest: the history of human thinking and its products. Despite this, they are studied in relative isolation. I argue that having different subjects as specific objects of research, such as political or scientific thinking, is not a valid justification for the separation. I propose the formation of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Lesley Chamberlain (2004). Motherland: A Philosophical History of Russia. Atlantic Books.score: 225.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Pauline Kleingeld (2001). Nature or Providence? On the Theoretical and Moral Importance of Kant’s Philosophy of History. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 75 (2):201-219.score: 224.0
    Kant’s use of the terms ‘Nature’ and ‘Providence’ in his essays on history has long puzzled commentators. Kant personifies Nature and Providence in a curious way, by speaking of them as “deciding” to give humankind certain predispositions, “wanting” these to be developed, and “knowing” what is best for humans Moreover, he leaves the relationship between the two terms unclear. In this essay, I argue that Kant’s use of ‘Nature’ and ‘Providence’ can be clarified and explained. Moreover, I show that (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Giuseppina D.’Oro (2008). The Ontological Backlash: Why Did Mainstream Analytic Philosophy Lose Interest in the Philosophy of History? Philosophia 36 (4):403-415.score: 224.0
    This paper seeks to explain why mainstream analytic philosophy lost interest in the philosophy of history. It suggests that the reasons why the philosophy of history no longer commands the attention of mainstream analytical philosophy may be explained by the success of an ontological backlash against the linguistic turn and a view of philosophy as a form of conceptual analysis. In brief I argue that in the 1950s and 1960s the philosophy of history attracted the interest (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. M. C. Lemon (2003). Philosophy of History: A Guide for Students. Routledge.score: 224.0
    This work is an essential introduction to the vast body of writing about history, from classical Greece and Rome to the contemporary world. M.C. Lemon maps out key debates and central concepts of philosophy of history placing principal thinkers in the context of their times and schools of thought. Lemon explains the crucial differences between speculative philosophy as an n enquiry into the course and meaning of history and analytic philosophy of history as relating to the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000