Search results for 'Physical Theory' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. James T. Culbertson (1942). A Physical Theory of Sensation. Philosophy of Science 9 (April):197-226.score: 210.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Taiki Takahashi (2014). Toward a Physical Theory of Quantum Cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science 6 (1):104-107.score: 192.0
    Recently, mathematical models based on quantum formalism have been developed in cognitive science. The target articles in this special issue of Topics in Cognitive Science clearly illustrate how quantum theoretical formalism can account for various aspects of human judgment and decision making in a quantitatively and mathematically rigorous manner. In this commentary, we show how future studies in quantum cognition and decision making should be developed to establish theoretical foundations based on physical theory, by introducing Taketani's three-stage (...) of the development of science. Also, implications for neuroeconomics (another rapidly evolving approach to human judgment and decision making) are discussed. (shrink)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Anastasios Brenner, Paul Needham, David Stump & Robert Deltete (2011). New Perspectives on Pierre Duhem's The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Metascience 20 (1):1-25.score: 180.0
    New perspectives on Pierre Duhem’s The aim and structure of physical theory Content Type Journal Article DOI 10.1007/s11016-010-9467-3 Authors Anastasios Brenner, Department of Philosophy, Paul Valéry University-Montpellier III, Route De Mende, 34199 Montpellier cedex 5, France Paul Needham, Department of Philosophy, University of Stockholm, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden David J. Stump, Department of Philosophy, University of San Francisco, 2130 Fulton Street, San Francisco, CA 94117, USA Robert Deltete, Department of Philosophy, Seattle University, 901 12th Avenue, Seattle, WA 98122-1090, USA (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Sam Baron, Peter Evans & Kristie Miller (2010). From Timeless Physical Theory to Timelessness. Humana.Mente 13:35-59.score: 180.0
    This paper addresses the extent to which both Julian Barbour‘s Machian formulation of general relativity and his interpretation of canonical quantum gravity can be called timeless. We differentiate two types of timelessness in Barbour‘s (1994a, 1994b and 1999c). We argue that Barbour‘s metaphysical contention that ours is a timeless world is crucially lacking an account of the essential features of time—an account of what features our world would need to have if it were to count as being one in which (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Alan C. Bowen (2007). The Demarcation of Physical Theory and Astronomy by Geminus and Ptolemy. Perspectives on Science 15 (3):327-358.score: 180.0
    : The Hellenistic reception of Babylonian horoscopic astrology gave rise to the question of what the planets really do and whether astrology is a science. This question in turn became one of defining the Greco-Latin science of astronomy, a project that took Aristotle's views as a starting-point. Thus, I concentrate on one aspect of the various definitions of astronomy proposed in Hellenistic times, their demarcation of astronomy and physical theory. I explicate the account offered by Geminus and its (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. David Leith (2012). Pores and Void in Asclepiades' Physical Theory. Phronesis 57 (2):164-191.score: 180.0
    Abstract This paper examines a fundamental, though relatively understudied, aspect of the physical theory of the physician Asclepiades of Bithynia, namely his doctrine of pores. My principal thesis is that this doctrine is dependent on a conception of void taken directly from Epicurean physics. The paper falls into two parts: the first half addresses the evidence for the presence of void in Asclepiades' theory, and concludes that his conception of void was basically that of Epicurus; the second (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Erik Curiel, Classical Mechanics is Lagrangian; It is Not Hamiltonian; the Semantics of Physical Theory is Not Semantical.score: 176.0
    One can (for the most part) formulate a model of a classical system in either the Lagrangian or the Hamiltonian framework. Though it is often thought that those two formulations are equivalent in all important ways, this is not true: the underlying geometrical structures one uses to formulate each theory are not isomorphic. This raises the question whether one of the two is a more natural framework for the representation of classical systems. In the event, the answer is yes: (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Marton Gomori & Laszlo E. Szabo, Is the Relativity Principle Consistent with Electrodynamics? Towards a Logico-Empiricist Reconstruction of a Physical Theory.score: 174.0
    It is common in the literature on electrodynamics and relativity theory that the transformation rules for the basic electrodynamical quantities are derived from the hypothesis that the relativity principle (RP) applies for Maxwell's electrodynamics. As it will turn out from our analysis, these derivations raise several problems, and certain steps are logically questionable. This is, however, not our main concern in this paper. Even if these derivations were completely correct, they leave open the following questions: (1) Is (RP) a (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Henry P. Stapp, Compatibility of Contemporary Physical Theory with Personality Survival.score: 174.0
    Orthodox quantum mechanics is technically built around an element that von Neumann called Process 1. In its basic form it consists of an action that reduces the prior state of a physical system to a sum of two parts, which can be regarded as the parts corresponding to the answers ‘Yes’ and ‘No’ to a specific question that this action poses, or ‘puts to nature’. Nature returns one answer or the other, in accordance with statistical weightings specified by the (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Victor Fritz Lenzen (1931). The Nature of Physical Theory. London, Chapman & Hall, Limited.score: 174.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Mark Zangari (1992). Adding Potential to a Physical Theory of Causation. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:261 - 273.score: 162.0
    Several authors have recently attempted to provide a physicalist analysis of causation by appealing to terms from physics that characterise causal processes. Accounts based on forces, energy/momentum transfer and fundamental interactions have been suggested in the literature. In this paper, I wish to show that the former two are untenable when the effect of enclosed electromagnetic fluxes in quantum theory is considered (i.e. the Aharonov-Bohm effect). Furthermore, I suggest that even in the classical and non-relativistic limits, a (...) of fundamental interactions should not be reduced to either a theory of forces or of energy/momentum transfer, but should be understood as a classical account of mutual interactions. Causal links are therefore correctly characterised by generalised potentials. This leads to some speculation regarding the fundamental ontology of interactions and, in particular, the role of the quantum mechanical phase. (shrink)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Roland Sypel & Harvey R. Brown (1992). When is a Physical Theory Relativistic? PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:507 - 514.score: 162.0
    Considerable work within the modern 'space-time theory' approach to relativity physics has been devoted to clarifying the role and meaning of the principle of relativity. Two recent discussions of the principle within this approach, due to Arntzenius (1990) and Friedman (1983), are found to contain difficulties.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Pierre Maurice Marie Duhem (1954). The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Princeton, Princeton University Press.score: 160.0
    This classic work in the philosophy of physical science is an incisive and readable account of the scientific method. Pierre Duhem was one of the great figures in French science, a devoted teacher, and a distinguished scholar of the history and philosophy of science. This book represents his most mature thought on a wide range of topics.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. W. De Baere (2005). On the Consequences of Retaining the General Validity of Locality in Physical Theory. Foundations of Physics 35 (1):33-56.score: 158.0
    The empirical validity of the locality (LOC) principle of relativity is used to argue in favour of a local hidden variable theory (HVT) for individual quantum processes. It is shown that such a HVT may reproduce the statistical predictions of quantum mechanics (QM), provided the reproducibility of initial hidden variable states is limited. This means that in a HVT limits should be set to the validity of the notion of counterfactual definiteness (CFD). This is supported by the empirical evidence (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Euan J. Squires (1993). Quantum Theory and the Relation Between the Conscious Mind and the Physical World. Synthese 97 (1):109-23.score: 156.0
    The measurement problem of quantum theory is discussed, and the difficulty of trying to solve it within the confines of a local, Lorentz-invariant physics is emphasised. This leads to the obvious suggestion to seek a solution beyond physics, in particular, by introducing the concept of consciousness. The resulting dualistic model, in the natural form suggested by quantum theory, is shown to differ in several respects from the classical model of Descartes, and to suggest solutions to some of the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Roberto Maiocchi (1990). Pierre Duhem's the Aim and Structure of Physical Theory: A Book Against Conventionalism. Synthese 83 (3):385 - 400.score: 156.0
    I reject the widely held view that Duhem's 1906 book La Théorie physique is a statement of instrumentalistic conventionalism, motivated by the scientific crisis at the end of the nineteenth century. By considering Duhem's historical context I show that his epistemological views were already formed before the crisis occured; that he consistently supported general thermodynamics against the new atomism; and that he rejected the epistemological views of the latter's philosophical supporters. In particular I show that Duhem rejected Poincaré's account of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Stojan Obradovć (2013). Empirical Evidence in the Structure of Physical Theories. Foundations of Science 18 (2):307-318.score: 156.0
    The author considers the empirical component of physical theories. He studies the origin and development of the theory of physical experiment, the structure and gnoseological hypotheses of the measuring process, as well as the relativity principle concerning the measuring equipment. Examples of modern physical theories are used in order to demonstrate the influence of experimental facts on the formation and development, verification and accepting of these theories in the structure of scientific systems. The role of accidental (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. A. R. Marlow (1978). Orthomodular Structures and Physical Theory. In , Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Theory. Academic Press. 59--70.score: 156.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Pierre Maurice Marie Duhem (1969). To Save the Phenomena, an Essay on the Idea of Physical Theory From Plato to Galileo. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.score: 154.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. P. W. Bridgman (1936). The Nature of Physical Theory. Princeton, Princeton University Press.score: 154.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Arthur Pap (1946/1968). The a Priori in Physical Theory. New York, Russell & Russell.score: 154.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Paul Busch, Book Review: Physical Theory and its Interpretation - Essays in Honor of Jeffrey Bub. [REVIEW]score: 152.0
    This is a book review. To be published in Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Leon N. Cooper (1983). Visible and Invisible in Physical Theory. Foundations of Physics 13 (2):247-251.score: 152.0
    The following question is considered: How is it that physicists can invent equations, so rich in structure, so detailed in consequences, and so closely in agreement with experience?
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. E. J. Post (1977). A Minor or a Major Predicament of Physical Theory? (Charge and Action Polarity and Their Order Properties). Foundations of Physics 7 (3-4):255-277.score: 152.0
    The questions of observational error and ambiguity of interpretation that have been raised in connection with the reported observation of a magnetic monopole have precipitated a situation calling for some further insight into the pairing principles of nature. A basic distinction relates to whether or not a pair is “ordered” (e.g., sexual pair) or without a priori order (e.g., mirror pair). It is shown that the polarity of electric charge is to be regarded as an example of pairing without an (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Andrew Elby, Harvey R. Brown & Sara Foster (1993). What Makes a Physical Theory “Complete”. Foundations of Physics 23 (7).score: 152.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Graziano Terenzi (2008). Anticipation in Biological and Cognitive Systems: The Need for a Physical Theory of Biological Organization. In World Scientific (ed.), Physics of Emergence and Organization. 371.score: 152.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. John F. Halpin (1994). Legitimizing Chance: The Best-System Approach to Probabilistic Laws in Physical Theory. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72 (3):317 – 338.score: 150.0
  28. Margaret Morrison (2005). Approximating the Real: The Role of Idealizations in Physical Theory. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 86 (1):145-172.score: 150.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Milton Fisk (1963). Cause and Time in Physical Theory. Review of Metaphysics 16 (3):522 - 549.score: 150.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Alyssa Ney & Kathryn Phillips (2013). Does an Adequate Physical Theory Demand a Primitive Ontology? Philosophy of Science 80 (3):454-474.score: 150.0
  31. William Marias Malisoff (1947). Book Review:The a Priori in Physical Theory Arthur Pap. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 14 (1):103-.score: 150.0
  32. Lars Bergström (2004). Underdetermination of Physical Theory. In Roger F. Gibson (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Quine. Cambridge University Press. 91--114.score: 150.0
  33. Gregory Vlastos (1950). The Physical Theory of Anaxagoras. Philosophical Review 59 (1):31-57.score: 150.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Pierre Duhem (1990). Logical Examination of Physical Theory. Synthese 83 (2):183 - 188.score: 150.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. R. Niall D. Martin (1970). To Save the Phenomena: An Essay on the Idea of Physical Theory From Plato to Galileo, By Pierre Duhem (Translated From the French by Edmund Doland and Chaninah Maschler) with an Introductory Essay by Stanley L. Jaki. (Chicago and London, University of Chicago Press. Price 68s.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 45 (174):344-.score: 150.0
  36. Eric Lewis (2000). Anaxagoras and the Seeds of a Physical Theory. Apeiron 33 (1):1 - 23.score: 150.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Ninian Marshall (1960). ESP and Memory: A Physical Theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (40):265-286.score: 150.0
  38. Fritz Rohrlich (1988). Pluralistic Ontology and Theory Reduction in the Physical Sciences. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (3):295-312.score: 150.0
    It is demonstrated that the reduction of a physical theory S to another one, T, in the sense that S can be derived from T holds in general only for the mathematical framework. The interpretation of S and the associated central terms cannot all be derived from those of T because of the qualitative differences between the cognitive levels of S and T. Their cognitively autonomous status leads to an epistemic as well as an ontological pluralism. This pluralism (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Victor F. Lenzen (1945). The Concept of Reality in Physical Theory. Philosophical Review 54 (4):321-344.score: 150.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Robert J. Deltete (1995). Hawking on God and Physical Theory. Zygon 30 (4):635-642.score: 150.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Richard Manning, Spinoza's Physical Theory. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.score: 150.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Wolfgang Yourgrau (1970). III. Hermann Bondi:Assumption and Myth in Physical Theory∗. Inquiry 13 (1-4):332-334.score: 150.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Peressini Anthony (1997). Troubles with Indispensability: Applying Pure Mathematics in Physical Theory. Philosophia Mathematica 5 (3).score: 150.0
  44. Colin Strang (1963). The Physical Theory of Anaxagoras. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 45 (2):101-118.score: 150.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. G. J. Whitrow (1949). The A Priori in Physical Theory. By Arthur Pap. (New York: King's Crown Press; London: Geoffrey Cumberlege. 1946. Pp. 112. Price 13s. 6d.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 24 (89):166-.score: 150.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Martin J. Klein (1954). Book Review:The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory Pierre Duhem, P. P. Wiener. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 21 (4):354-.score: 150.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Wolfgang Yourgrau (1969). Gȯdel and Physical Theory. Mind 78 (309):77-90.score: 150.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Henry Margenau (1937). Critical Points in Modern Physical Theory. Philosophy of Science 4 (3):337-370.score: 150.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. G. L. C. (1963). Fundamental Physical Theory and the Concept of Consciousness. Review of Metaphysics 17 (1):145-145.score: 150.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Peter Clark (1990). Explanation in Physics: Explanation in Physical Theory. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 27:155-175.score: 150.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000