Search results for 'Pier Davide Guenzi' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Pier Davide Guenzi (2004). Book Review: Between Technology and Humanity: The Impact of Technology on Health Care Ethics. [REVIEW] Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (3).score: 870.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Pier Davide Guenzi (2004). Book Review: Between Technology and Humanity: The Impact of Technology on Health Care Ethics. [REVIEW] Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (3):219-224.score: 87.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. J. R. Elkjaer (2000). David Ricardo: Notes on Malthus's" Measure of Value". By Pier Luigi Porta. The European Legacy 5 (4):589-589.score: 30.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Sabina Lovibond (2004). Reply to McNaughton and Rawling (Paper From the 2003 Session, Naturalism and Normativity by David McNaughton and Piers Rawling, and Sabina Lovibond). Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104 (2):185–201.score: 24.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Hoyt N. Duggan (2002). C. David Benson and Lynne S. Blanchfield, The Manuscripts of “Piers Plowman”: The B-Version. Woodbridge, Eng., and Rochester, NY: Boydell and Brewer, 1997. Pp. Ix, 339; 18 Black-and-White Facsimiles, Tables, and Charts. $108. [REVIEW] Speculum 77 (3):870-872.score: 24.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Russell A. Peck (2005). C. David Benson, Public Piers Plowman: Modern Scholarship and Late Medieval English Culture. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2004. Paper. Pp. Xix, 283; 18 Black-and-White Figures. [REVIEW] Speculum 80 (3):831-832.score: 24.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Davide Ruggero, Zhu‐Gang Wang & Pier Paolo Pandolfi (2000). The Puzzling Multiple Lives of PML and its Role in the Genesis of Cancer. Bioessays 22 (9):827-835.score: 24.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Gail Day (2010). The Project of Autonomy: Politics and Architecture Within and Against Capitalism, Pier Vittorio Aureli, New York: The Temple Hoyne Buell Center for the Study of American Architecture at Columbia University and Princeton Architectural Press, 2008. Historical Materialism 18 (4):219-236.score: 15.0
  9. Carlo Salzani Salzani (2010). Davide Panagia, The Poetics of Political Thinking ISBN 0-8223-3718-5, (Hbk), 166pp. & Davide Panagia, The Political Life of Sensation ISBN 978-0-8223-4479-7, (Hbk), 213 Pp. [REVIEW] Critical Horizons 11 (3):491-496.score: 12.0
    Davide Panagia, The Poetics of Political Thinking (Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2006). ISBN 0-8223-3718-5, (hbk) US$ 74.95, (pbk) US$ 21.95,166pp. and Davide Panagia, The Political Life of Sensation (Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press, 2009). ISBN 978-0-8223-4479-7, (hbk) US$ 79.95, (pbk) US$ 22.95, 213pp.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Rachel Loewen Walker (2011). Toward a FIERCE Nomadology: Contesting Queer Geographies on the Christopher Street Pier. Phaenex 6 (1):90-120.score: 12.0
    New York City has a long history of gentrification, well demonstrated by the strategies of “revitalization” and “re-development” that have occurred in Harlem throughout the last century. Less well known is the historical, political, and social context surrounding New York’s Pier 45, also known as the Christopher Street Pier. As a historically-known gathering spot for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender individuals, the Christopher Street Pier gained recognition for harbouring what could be described as a queer public . (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Juan Manuel Burgos & Pier Paolo Ottonello (eds.) (2005). Strade Maestre: Omaggio a Pier Paolo Ottonello Nel Trentesimo di Cattedra Universitaria. Marsilio.score: 12.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. David McNaughton, Piers Rawling & Sabina Lovibond (2003). Naturalism and Normativity. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):23 - 45.score: 10.0
    Simon Blackburn can be seen as challenging those committed to sui generis moral facts to explain the supervenience of the moral on the descriptive. We (like perhaps Derek Parfit) hold that normative facts in general are sui generis. We also hold that the normative supervenes on the descriptive, and we here endeavour to answer the generalization of Blackburn's challenge. In the course of pursuing this answer, we suggest that Frank Jackson's descriptivism rests on a conception of properties inappropriate to discussions (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. David McNaughton & Piers Rawling (2003). Naturalism and Normativity. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):23–45.score: 10.0
    Simon Blackburn can be seen as challenging those committed to sui generis moral facts to explain the supervenience of the moral on the descriptive. We (like perhaps Derek Parfit) hold that normative facts in general are sui generis. We also hold that the normative supervenes on the descriptive, and we here endeavour to answer the generalization of Blackburn’s challenge. In the course of pursuing this answer, we suggest that Frank Jackson’s descriptivism rests on a conception of properties inappropriate to discussions (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Pier Franco Beatrice, Christopher A. Beeley, David C. Bellusci & Jeffrey Bloechl (2013). James A. Andrews, Hermeneutics and the Church. In Dialogue with Augustine. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2012. Ankur Barua, The Divine Body in History: A Comparative Study of the Symbolism of Time and Embodiment in St. Augustine and Rāmānuja. Religions and Discourse 45. Oxford Et Al.: Peter Lang, 2009. [REVIEW] Augustinian Studies 44 (1):203-205.score: 10.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Daniel M. Haybron (2009). Economics and Happiness: Framing the Analysis , Edited by Luigino Bruni and Pier Luigi Porta. Cambridge University Press, 2005, XII + 366 Pages. [REVIEW] Economics and Philosophy 25 (2):217-223.score: 9.0
  16. David McNaughton & Piers Rawling (1998). On Defending Deontology. Ratio 11 (1):37–54.score: 8.0
    This paper comprises three sections. First, we offer a traditional defence of deontology, in the manner of, for example, W.D. Ross (1965). The leading idea of such a defence is that the right is independent of the good. Second, we modify the now standard account of the distinction, in terms of the agent-relative/agentneutral divide, between deontology and consequentialism. (This modification is necessary if indirect consequentialism is to count as a form of consequentialism.) Third, we challenge a value-based defence of deontology (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. David McNaughton, Florida State University & Piers Rawling (2007). Deontology. In David Copp (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory. Oup Usa.score: 8.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. David McNaughton & Piers Rawling (2000). Unprincipled Ethics. In Brad Hooker & Margaret Olivia Little (eds.), Moral Particularism. Clarendon Press.score: 8.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. David Mcnaughton & Piers Rawling (2001). Achievement, Welfare and Consequentialism. Analysis 61 (2):156–162.score: 8.0
    significant role for accomplishment thereby admits a ‘Trojan Horse’ (267).1 To abandon hedonism in favour of a conception of well-being that incorporates achievement is to take the first step down a slippery slope toward the collapse of the other two pillars of utilitarian morality: welfarism and consequentialism. We shall argue that Crisp’s arguments do not support these conclusions. We begin with welfarism. Crisp defines it thus: ‘Well-being is the only value. Everything good must be good for some being or beings’ (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Douglas W. Portmore (2001). McNaughton and Rawling on the Agent-Relative/Agent-Neutral Distinction. Utilitas 13 (03):350-356.score: 8.0
    In this paper, I criticize David McNaughton and Piers Rawling's formalization of the agent-relative/agent-neutral distinction. I argue that their formalization is unable to accommodate an important ethical distinction between two types of conditional obligations. I then suggest a way of revising their formalization so as to fix the problem.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. David McNaughton & Piers Rawling (2003). Can Scanlon Avoid Redundancy by Passing the Buck? Analysis 63 (4):328–331.score: 8.0
    Scanlon suggests a buck-passing account of goodness. To say that something is good is not to give a reason to, say, favour it; rather it is to say that there are such reasons. When it comes to wrongness, however, Scanlon rejects a buck-passing account: to say that j ing is wrong is, on his view, to give a sufficient moral reason not to j. Philip Stratton-Lake 2003 argues that Scanlon can evade a redundancy objection against his (Scanlon’s) view of wrongness (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Toni Rønnow-Rasmussen (2009). Normative Reasons and the Agent-Neutral/Relative Dichotomy. Philosophia 37 (2):227-243.score: 8.0
    The distinction between the agent-relative and the agent-neutral plays a prominent role in recent attempts to taxonomize normative theories. Its importance extends to most areas in practical philosophy, though. Despite its popularity, the distinction remains difficult to get a good grip on. In part this has to do with the fact that there is no consensus concerning the sort of objects to which we should apply the distinction. Thomas Nagel distinguishes between agent-neutral and agent-relative values, reasons, and principles; Derek Parfit (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. David McNaughton & Piers Rawling (1995). Value and Agent-Relative Reasons. Utilitas 7 (01):31-.score: 8.0
  24. David McNaughton & Piers Rawling (1991). Agent-Relativity and the Doing-Happening Distinction. Philosophical Studies 63 (2):167 - 185.score: 8.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. David McNaughton & Piers Rawling (2009). Benefits, Holism, and the Aggregation of Value. Social Philosophy and Policy 26 (1):354-374.score: 8.0
    We reject Moorean holism about value—the view that the value of the whole does not equal the sum of the values of its parts. We propose an alternative aggregative holism according to which the value of a state of affairs is the sum of the values of its constituent states. But these constituents must be evaluated in situ.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. David McNaughton & Piers Rawling (1992). Honoring and Promoting Values. Ethics 102 (4):835-843.score: 8.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Piers Rawling (2003). J. David Velleman, The Possibility of Practical Reason:The Possibility of Practical Reason. Ethics 113 (2):450-455.score: 8.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. David McNaughton & Piers Rawling (1995). Agent-Relativity and Terminological Inexactitudes. Utilitas 7 (02):319-.score: 8.0
  29. David McNaughton & Piers Rawling (2002). Conditional and Conditioned Reasons. Utilitas 14 (02):240-.score: 8.0
    This paper is a brief reponse to some of Douglas Portmore's criticisms of our version of the agent-relative/agent-neutral distinction.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. David McNaughton & Piers Rawling (2000). Deontology and Value. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 47:197-208.score: 8.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. David McNaughton & Piers Rawling (1993). Deontology and Agency. The Monist 76 (1):81-100.score: 8.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. David Mcnaughton & Piers Rawling (2013). Contours of the Practical. In David Bakhurst, Margaret Olivia Little & Brad Hooker (eds.), Thinking About Reasons: Themes From the Philosophy of Jonathan Dancy. Oxford University Press. 240.score: 8.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. David McNaughton, Piers Rawling & Sabina Lovibond (2004). Naturalism And Normativity: Reply to McNaughton and Rawling. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104 (1):187-203.score: 8.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. David McNaughton & Piers Rawling (2013). Particularism. In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Wiley-Blackwell.score: 8.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. David Aers (2000). Visionary Eschatology: Piers Plowman. Modern Theology 16 (1):3-17.score: 8.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. C. David Benson (1994). Britton J. Harwood,“Piers Plowman” and the Problem of Belief. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1992. Pp. Xii, 237. $60. [REVIEW] Speculum 69 (3):794-796.score: 8.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. David McNaughton & Piers Rawling (2004). Duty, Rationality, and Practical Reasons. In Piers Rawling & Alfred R. Mele (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 110--131.score: 8.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Phillip Bricker (2006). David Lewis: On the Plurality of Worlds. In John Shand (ed.), Central Works of Philosophy, Vol. 5: The Twentieth Century: Quine and After. Acumen Publishing.score: 6.0
    David Lewis's book 'On the Plurality of Worlds' mounts an extended defense of the thesis of modal realism, that the world we inhabit the entire cosmos of which we are a part is but one of a vast plurality of worlds, or cosmoi, all causally and spatiotemporally isolated from one another. The purpose of this article is to provide an accessible summary of the main positions and arguments in Lewis's book.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Anthony Skelton (2013). Sidgwick’s Argument for Utilitarianism and His Moral Epistemology: A Reply to David Phillips. Revue d'Etudes Benthamiennes 12.score: 6.0
    David Phillips’s Sidgwickian Ethics is a penetrating contribution to the scholarly and philosophical understanding of Henry Sidgwick’s The Methods of Ethics. This note focuses on Phillips’s understanding of (aspects of) Sidgwick’s argument for utilitarianism and the moral epistemology to which he subscribes. In § I, I briefly outline the basic features of the argument that Sidgwick provides for utilitarianism, noting some disagreements with Phillips along the way. In § II, I raise some objections to Phillips’s account of the epistemology underlying (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Barry Maguire (2013). Defending David Lewis's Modal Reduction. Philosophical Studies 166 (1):129-147.score: 6.0
    David Lewis claims that his theory of modality successfully reduces modal items to nonmodal items. This essay will clarify this claim and argue that it is true. This is largely an exercise within ‘Ludovician Polycosmology’: I hope to show that a certain intuitive resistance to the reduction and a set of related objections misunderstand the nature of the Ludovician project. But these results are of broad interest since they show that would-be reductionists have more formidable argumentative resources than is often (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Daniel Howard-Snyder (2001). Review of David O'Connor, God and Inscrutable Evil. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review.score: 6.0
    This is a critical review of David O'Connor's book, God and Inscrutable Evil.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Daniel von Wachter (2004). The Ontological Turn Misunderstood: How to Misunderstand David Armstrong’s Theory of Possibility. Metaphysica 5:105-114.score: 6.0
    This article argues that there is a great divide between semantics and metaphysics. Much of what is called metaphysics today is still stuck in the linguistic turn. This is illustrated by showing how Fraser MacBride misunderstands David Armstrong's theory of modality.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Mark Hanin (2012). Naturalistic Moral Realism and Moral Disagreement: David Copp's Account. Res Publica 18 (4):283-301.score: 6.0
    To enhance the plausibility of naturalistic moral realism, David Copp develops an argument from epistemic defeaters aiming to show that strongly a priori synthetic moral truths do not exist. In making a case for the non-naturalistic position, I locate Copp’s account within the wider literature on peer disagreement; I identify key points of divergence between Copp’s doctrine and conciliatorist doctrines; I introduce the notion of ‘minimal moral competence’; I contend that some plausible benchmarks for minimal moral competence are grounded in (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Lucas Siorvanes (1994). Davide Susanetti: Sinesio di Cirene: I Sogni. Introduzione, traduzione e commento. (Studi e Commenti, 10.) Pp. 184. Bari: Adriatica, 1992. Paper, L. 39,000. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 44 (02):402-.score: 6.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Michael Winterbottom (1988). Pier Vincenzo Cova, Roberto Gazich, Gian Enrico Manzoni, Graziano Melzani: Studi sulla lingua di Plinio il Vecchio. (Vita e Pensiero: Scienze Filologiche e Storia – Brescia, I.) Pp. 233. Milan: Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 1986. Paper, L. 39,000. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 38 (01):155-.score: 6.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. John Anzalone (1992). Pier Paolo Pasolini: Cinema as Heresy (Review). Philosophy and Literature 16 (1):194-195.score: 6.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Glenn Branch (2009). Review of William Paley, Natural Theology , Edited with an Introduction and Notes by Matthew D. Eddy and David Knight. [REVIEW] Sophia 48 (1):99-101.score: 6.0
    Matthew D. Eddy and David Knight’s new edition of William Paley’s Natural Theology deserves to become the standard scholarly edition of what is a historically, theologically, and philosophically important work, despite a certain neglect of philosophical issues on the part of the editors.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Pamela M. Huby (1991). Aristotle and Determinism Pier Luigi Donini: Ethos: Aristotele e il determinismo. (Culture Antiche, Studi e Testi, 2.) Pp. vi+154. Alessandria: Edizioni dell'Orso, 1989. Paper, L. 30,000. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 41 (02):370-371.score: 6.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Ruggero Benericetti (2000). La vergine Maria nei sermoni di S. Pier Crisologo. Augustinianum 40 (1):318-320.score: 6.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. A. Berardini (1963). Le Dottrine Filosoliche Di Pier Di Giovanni Olivi. Augustinianum 3 (1):220-221.score: 6.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000