18 found
Sort by:
  1. Pierdaniele Giaretta, Individuation and Meteorological Universalism.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Pierdaniele Giaretta & Giuseppe Spolaore (2012). A Mereology for the Change of Parts. In Majda Trobok Nenad Miščević & Berislav Žarnić (eds.), Between Logic and Reality. Springer. 243--259.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Pierdaniele Giaretta & Giuseppe Spolaore (2012). Validity and Effectiveness of Ambiguity: A Famous Argument by Socrates. [REVIEW] Argumentation 26 (3):393-407.
    An argument can be superficially valid and rhetorically effective even if what is plausibly meant, what is derived from what, and how it is derived is not at all clear. An example of such an argument is provided by Socrates’s famous refutation of Euthyphro’s second definition of holy, which is generally regarded as clearly valid and successful. This paper provides a stricter logical analysis than the ones in the literature. In particular, it is shown that the argument contains a syntactically (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Pierdaniele Giaretta & Giuseppe Spolaore (2010). Knowability Principle and Disjunction Property. Logique Et Analyse 209:9-23.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Pierdaniele Giaretta (2009). Medicine & Philosophy. A Twenty-First Century Introduction – by Ingvar Johansson and Niels Lynøe. Dialectica 63 (1):89-94.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Pierdaniele Giaretta (2009). Paradoks znatljivosti iz raslovske perspektive. Prolegomena 8 (2):141-158.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Pierdaniele Giaretta (2009). The Paradox of Knowability From a Russellian Perspective. Prolegomena 8 (2):141-158.
    The paradox of knowability and the debate about it are shortly presented. Some assumptions which appear more or less tacitly involved in its discussion are made explicit. They are embedded and integrated in a Russellian framework, where a formal paradox, very similar to the Russell-Myhill paradox, is derived. Its solution is provided within a Russellian formal logic introduced by A. Church. It follows that knowledge should be typed. Some relevant aspects of the typing of knowledge are pointed out.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Andrea Manfrinati, Pierdaniele Giaretta & Paolo Cherubini (2008). Conditionals and Conditional Thinking. Mind and Society 7 (1):21-34.
    In this paper, we claim that the problem of conditionals should be dealt with by carefully distinguishing between thinking conditional propositions and conditional thinking, i.e. thinking on the basis of some supposition. This distinction deserves further investigation, if we are to make sense of some old and new experimental data concerning the understanding and the assertion of conditional sentences. Here we will argue that some of these data seem to refute the mental models theory of conditional reasoning, setting the ground (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Marzia Soavi, Massimiliano Carrara & Pierdaniele Giaretta (2008). È un uccello, è un aereo, è Superman! Visione E identificazione sortale. Rivista di Estetica 48 (39):265-280.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Massimiliano Carrara, Paolo Cherubini & Pierdaniele Giaretta (2007). Symposium on “Cognition and Rationality: Part II”. Mind and Society 6 (1):35-39.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Massimiliano Carrara, Paolo Cherubini & Pierdaniele Giaretta (2006). Symposium on “Cognition and Rationality: Part I”. [REVIEW] Mind and Society 5 (2):167-171.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Pierdaniele Giaretta (2006). Numbers, Reference and Russellian Propositions. Grazer Philosophische Studien 72 (1):95-110.
    Stewart Shapiro and John Myhill tried to reproduce some features of the intuitionistic mathematics within certain formal intensional theories of classical mathematics. Basically they introduced a knowledge operator and restricted the ways of referring to numbers and to finite hereditary sets. The restrictions are very interesting, both because they allow us to keep substitutivity of identicals notwithstanding the presence of an epistemic operator and, especially, because such restrictions allow us to see, by contrast, which ways of reference are not compatible (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Massimiliano Carrara & Pierdaniele Giaretta (eds.) (2004). Filosofia e logica. Rubbettino Editore.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Massimiliano Carrara & Pierdaniele Giaretta (2004). Ontologia, Ontologie Ed Analisi. Rivista di Estetica 44 (26):3-21.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Massimiliano Carrara & Pierdaniele Giaretta (2004). The Many Facets of Identity Criteria. Dialectica 58 (2):221–232.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Massimiliano Carrara & Pierdaniele Giaretta (2003). Quattro tesi sui criteri d'identità. Rivista di Estetica 43 (22):109-126.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Pierdaniele Giaretta (1998). Liar, Reducibility and Language. Synthese 117 (3):355-374.
    First, language and axioms of Church's paper 'Comparison of Russell's Resolution of the Semantical Antinomies with that of Tarski' are slightly modified and a version of the Liar paradox tentatively reconstructed. An obvious natural solution of the paradox leads to a hierarchy of truth predicates which is of a different kind from the one defined by Church: it depends on the enlargement of the semantical vocabulary and its levels do not differ in the ramified-type-theoretical sense. Second, two attempts are made (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Pierdaniele Giaretta (1997). Analysis and Logical Form in Russell: The 1913 Paradigm. Dialectica 51 (4):273–293.