10 found
Order:
  1.  2
    Pieter D'Hoine (2006). The Status of the Arts. Proclus' Theory of Artefacts. Elenchos: Rivista di Studi Sul Pensiero Antico 2 (2):305-344.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2.  4
    Pieter D'Hoine (2004). Review: F. Fronterotta. Methexis. La teoria platonica delle idee e la partecipazione delle cose empiriche. Dai dialoghi giovanili al Parmenide. [REVIEW] Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 66 (1):143-146.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  2
    Pieter D'Hoine (2010). Review: RM van den Berg. Proclus' Commentary on the Cratylus in Context. Ancient Theories of Language and Naming. [REVIEW] Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 72 (1):151-153.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  4
    Pieter D'Hoine (2011). (P.) Remes Neoplatonism. Pp. Xii + 244. Stocksfield: Acumen Publishing Ltd, 2008. Paper, £16.99 (Cased, £50). ISBN: 978-1-84465-125-2 (978-1-84465-124-5 Hbk). [REVIEW] The Classical Review 61 (02):440-442.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  1
    Pieter D'Hoine (2004). Four Problems Concerning the Theory of Ideas : Proclus, Syrianus and the Ancient Commentaries on the Parmenides. In Carlos G. Steel, Gerd van Riel, Caroline Macé & Leen van Campe (eds.), Platonic Ideas and Concept Formation in Ancient and Medieval Thought. Leuven University Press 32--9.
  6. Sylvain Delcomminette, Pieter D'Hoine & Marc-Antoine Gavray (eds.) (2015). Ancient Readings of Plato’s Phaedo. Brill.
    Unlike the _Phaedo_ itself, its reception in Antiquity remains little studied. By examining the extant commentaries, their sources, and the dialogue’s presence in the reflections of ancient thinkers both inside and outside the Platonic tradition, this volume aims to reconstruct its ancient history.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Pieter D'Hoine (2005). Review: J. Dillon. The Heirs of Plato. A Study of the Old Academy (347-274 BC). [REVIEW] Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 67 (3):568-570.
  8. Caroline Macé, Carlos Steel & Pieter D'Hoine (2009). Bessarion lecteur du commentaire de Proclus sur le Parménide, avec une édition de ses scholies aux livres II et III. Byzantion 79:241-279.
    Ambrosianus B 165 sup., a 14th-cent. Constantinopolitan manuscript containing Proclus' In Parmenidem, was once owned by the Cardinal Bessarion, who has read, corrected and annotated the text with remarkable care. In this contribution, we provide an analysis of Bessarion's work on this manuscript, thus offering a case-study of his philological method. We also discuss some quotations from this text in Bessarion's works, which testify to the importance of his knowledge of Proclus for his own writings. In addition, Bessarion's Greek scholia (...)
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Recognoverunt Brevique Adnotatione Critica Instruxerunt Carlos Steel, Caroline Mace & Pieter D'Hoine (2007). T. I. Libros I-III Continens. In Proclus (ed.), Procli in Platonis Parmenidem Commentaria. Oxford University Press
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Recognoverunt Brevique Adnotatione Critica Instruxerunt Carlos Steel, Caroline Mace & Pieter D'Hoine (2007). T. 2. Libros IV-V Continens. In Proclus (ed.), Procli in Platonis Parmenidem Commentaria. Oxford University Press
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography