8 found
Sort by:
  1. Christian Nl Olivers, Judith Peters, Roos Houtkamp & Pieter R. Roelfsema (2011). Different States in Visual Working Memory: When It Guides Attention and When It Does Not. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15 (7):327-334.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Ariel Zylberberg, Stanislas Dehaene, Pieter R. Roelfsema & Mariano Sigman (2011). The Human Turing Machine: A Neural Framework for Mental Programs. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15 (7):293-300.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Pieter R. Roelfsema, Arjen van Ooyen & Takeo Watanabe (2010). Perceptual Learning Rules Based on Reinforcers and Attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14 (2):64-71.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Matthew W. Self & Pieter R. Roelfsema (2007). A Field of Dreams. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11 (1):6-7.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Pieter R. Roelfsema (2005). System Levels. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 (5):226-233.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Pieter R. Roelfsema & Hans Supèr (2003). Why Do Schizophrenic Patients Hallucinate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (1):101-103.
    Phillips & Silverstein argue that schizophrenia is a result of a deficit of the contextual coordination of neuronal responses. The authors propose that NMDA-receptors control these modulatory effects. However, hallucinations, which are among the principle symptoms of schizophrenia, imply a flaw in the interactions between neurons that is more fundamental than just a general weakness of contextual modulation.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Pieter R. Roelfsema & Victor A. F. Lamme (2001). Which Brain Mechanism Cannot Count Beyond Four? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):142-143.
    Cowan makes an intriguing case for a fundamental limit in the number of chunks that can be stored in short term memory (STM). Chunks are collections of concepts that have strong associations to one another and much weaker associations to other chunks. A translation of this definition for the visual domain would be that a visual chunk is a collection of features that belong to the same perceptual group (see also Mahoney & Ullman 1988). Here, we will first address (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Pascal Fries, Pieter R. Roelfsema, Andreas K. Engel & Wolf Singer (1997). Synchronization of Oscillatory Responses in Visual Cortex Correlates with Perception in Interocular Rivalry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Usa 94:12699-12704.