Search results for 'Platonists' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. George E. Karamanolis (2006). Plato and Aristotle in Agreement?: Platonists on Aristotle From Antiochus to Porphyry. Oxford University Press.score: 24.0
    George Karamanolis breaks new ground in the study of later ancient philosophy by examining the interplay of the two main schools of thought, Platonism and Aristotelianism, from the first century BC to the third century AD. Arguing against prevailing scholarly assumption, he argues that the Platonists turned to Aristotle only in order to elucidate Plato's doctrines and to reconstruct Plato's philosophy, and that they did not hesitate to criticize Aristotle when judging him to be at odds with Plato. Karamanolis (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Lloyd P. Gerson (2005). Aristotle and Other Platonists. Cornell University Press.score: 24.0
    Aristotle and Other Platonists concludes with an assessment of some of the philosophical results of acknowledging harmony."--BOOK JACKET.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. C. A. Patrides (1980). The Cambridge Platonists. Cambridge University Press.score: 24.0
    This volume contains the selected discourses of four seventeenth-century philosophers, carefully chosen to illustrate the tenets characteristic of the influential movement known as Cambridge Platonism. Fundamental to their beliefs is the statement most clearly voiced by Benjamin Whichcote, their leader by common consent, that the spiritual is not opposed to the rational, nor Grace to nature. Religion is based on reason, even in the presence of 'mystery'. Free will and Grace are not mutually exclusive. The editor's comprehensive introduction delineates the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Frederick J. Powicke (1926/2006). The Cambridge Platonists: A Study. Martino Pub..score: 24.0
    Some characteristics of the Cambridge Platonists -- Benjamin Whichcote (1609-1683) -- John Smith (1616-1652) -- Ralph Cudworth (1617-1685) -- Nathaniel Culverwel (1618?-1651) -- Henry More (1614-1687) -- Peter Sterry (d. 1672).
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Frederick J. Powicke (1971/1970). The Cambridge Platonists. [Hamden, Conn.]Archon Books.score: 24.0
    Prologue.--Some characteristics of the Cambridge Platonists.--Benjamin Whichcote (1609-1683)--John Smith (1616-1652)--Ralph Cudworth (1617-1685)--Nathaniel Culverwel (1618?-1651)--Henry More (1614-1687)--Peter Sterry (d. 1672)--Epilogue.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. John M. Dillon (1977). The Middle Platonists, 80 B.C. To A.D. 220. Cornell University Press.score: 22.0
    CHAPTER ONE The Old Academy and the Themes of Middle Platonism Plato, on his death in 347 BC, left behind him a philosophical heritage that has not yet lost ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Ben Lazare Mijuskovic (1974). The Achilles of Rationalist Arguments: The Simplicity, Unity, and Identity of Thought and Soul From the Cambridge Platonists to Kant: A Study in the History of an Argument. Martinus Nijhoff.score: 21.0
    INTRODUCTION TO THE ARGUMENT AND ITS HISTORY PRIOR TO THE AND CENTURIES In the history of ideas, there is an argument that has been used repeatedly, ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. John M. Dillon (1977). The Middle Platonists: A Study of Platonism, 80 B.C. To A.D. 220. Duckworth.score: 21.0
  9. Eugene Munger Austin (1935). The Ethics of the Cambridge Platonists. Philadelphia.score: 21.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. John John De Boer (1931). The Theory of Knowledge of the Cambridge Platonists. Madras, Methodist Publishing House.score: 21.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Geoffrey Philip Henry Pawson (1930). The Cambridge Platonists and Their Place in Religious Thought. London, Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge.score: 21.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. John Russell Roberts (2012). Whichcote and the Cambridge Platonists on Human Nature: An Interpretation and Defense. Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy VI.score: 18.0
    Draft version of essay. ABSTRACT: Benjamin Whichcote developed a distinctive account of human nature centered on our moral psychology. He believed that this view of human nature, which forms the foundation of “Cambridge Platonism,” showed that the demands of reason and faith are not merely compatible but dynamically supportive of one another. I develop an interpretation of this oft-neglected and widely misunderstood account of human nature and defend its viability against a key objection.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Thomas Williams, Augustine and the Platonists.score: 18.0
    ’m not really sure what they were after when they asked me to talk to you about Augustine and the Platonists. Maybe they wanted me to talk about some specific Platonists, and the elements of Augustine’s views that he adopts or adapts. And no doubt I should at least mention a couple of names. There’s Plato himself, of course (428-348 BC). The thing is, it’s pretty clear that Augustine had never read Plato directly, whether in Greek (which Augustine (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Sam Baron (2013). Can Indispensability‐Driven Platonists Be (Serious) Presentists? Theoria 79 (3):153-173.score: 18.0
    In this article I consider what it would take to combine a certain kind of mathematical Platonism with serious presentism. I argue that a Platonist moved to accept the existence of mathematical objects on the basis of an indispensability argument faces a significant challenge if she wishes to accept presentism. This is because, on the one hand, the indispensability argument can be reformulated as a new argument for the existence of past entities and, on the other hand, if one accepts (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Matthew Tugby (2013). Nomic Necessity for Platonists. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 2 (4):324-331.score: 18.0
    After identifying some existing explanations offered by nomic necessitarians for the alleged necessary connections between natural properties and their dispositional or nomic features, I discuss a less explored necessitarian strategy. This strategy is available to Platonists who hold that properties exist necessarily, as most do.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Ruth Ap Roberts (forthcoming). Arnold and Cambridge Platonists. Clio.score: 18.0
    Matthew arnold maintains in the nineteenth century the renaissance school of the cambridge platonists. for them, reason and religion are by no means at odds: reason is in fact "the candle of the lord." for matthew arnold in "literature and dogma", christianity will prevail only by being shorn of its supernaturalist elements and set on its true rational ground. ernst cassirer has shown how the cambridge platonists bridge the gap between the italian renaissance and the german humanists of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Robert L. Armstrong (1969). Cambridge Platonists and Locke on Innate Ideas. Journal of the History of Ideas 30:191-205.score: 18.0
    The cambridge platonists exemplify the fear that newtonian natural philosophy subverts the status of traditional moral and religious beliefs, Which are strongly supported by the innate idea doctrine since it justifies them independently of the senses and the material universe. Isaac barrow, Friend and teacher of newton, Also employs the doctrine approbatively to support his metaphysics as a science of basic principles that constitute the foundation of natural science. Locke's rejection of the doctrine is analyzed and it is suggested (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Jon Cogburn & Jason Megill (2010). Are Turing Machines Platonists? Inferentialism and the Computational Theory of Mind. Minds and Machines 20 (3):423-439.score: 17.0
    We first discuss Michael Dummett’s philosophy of mathematics and Robert Brandom’s philosophy of language to demonstrate that inferentialism entails the falsity of Church’s Thesis and, as a consequence, the Computational Theory of Mind. This amounts to an entirely novel critique of mechanism in the philosophy of mind, one we show to have tremendous advantages over the traditional Lucas-Penrose argument.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Teun Tieleman (2007). Onomastic Reference in Seneca. The Case of Plato and the Platonists. In Mauro Bonazzi & Christoph Helmig (eds.), Platonic Stoicism, Stoic Platonism: The Dialogue Between Platonism and Stoicism in Antiquity. Leuven University Press. 133--48.score: 16.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Riin Sirkel (2008). Aristotle and Other Platonists – by Lloyd P. Gerson. Theoria 74 (1):91-95.score: 15.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. R. M. Dancy (2008). Plato and Aristotle in Agreement? Platonists on Aristotle From Antiochus to Porphyry (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (4):pp. 634-636.score: 15.0
  22. D. P. Walker (1953). Orpheus the Theologian and Renaissance Platonists. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 16 (1/2):100-120.score: 15.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Lloyd P. Gerson (2006). Review of George E. Karamanolis, Plato and Aristotle in Agreement? Platonists on Aristotle From Antiochus to Porphyry. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (10).score: 15.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. William Lane Craig (2011). Why Are (Some) Platonists so Insouciant? Philosophy 86 (2):213-229.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Deborah K. W. Modrak (2006). Aristotle and Other Platonists (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (2):315-317.score: 15.0
  26. J. Athanasius Weisheipl (1958). Albertus Magnus and the Oxford Platonists. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 32:124-139.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Charles Bigg (1886/1981). The Christian Platonists of Alexandria. G. Olms.score: 15.0
    Subtitle: Eight Lectures Preached Before the University of Oxford in the Year 1886 on the Foundation of the Late Rev.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. John Glucker (1980). The Middle Platonists John Dillon: The Middle Platonists. A Study of Platonism 80 B.C. To A.D. 200. Pp. Xxvii + 429. London: Duckworth, 1977. £12. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 30 (01):56-58.score: 15.0
  29. J. H. Muirhead (1927). The Cambridge Platonists (I). Mind 36 (142):158-178.score: 15.0
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. J. H. Muirhead (1927). The Cambridge Platonists (II). Mind 36 (143):326-341.score: 15.0
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Alan C. Bowen (1983). Menaechmus Versus the Platonists. Ancient Philosophy 3 (1):12-29.score: 15.0
  32. Sarah Hutton (2001). Cambridge Platonists. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.score: 15.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Sterling P. Lamprecht (1926). Innate Ideas in the Cambridge Platonists. Philosophical Review 35 (6):553-573.score: 15.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. James Wilberding (2007). Karamanolis (G.E.) Plato and Aristotle in Agreement? Platonists on Aristotle From Antiochus to Porphyry. Pp. X + 419. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006. Cased, £50. ISBN: 978-0-19-926456-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 57 (02).score: 15.0
  35. George Boys-Stones (2006). Gerson (L.P.) Aristotle and Other Platonists . Pp. Xii + 335. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2005. Cased, US$49.95, £27.50. ISBN: 0-8014-4164-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 56 (01):61-.score: 15.0
  36. John Bussanich (2006). Review of Lloyd P. Gerson, Aristotle and Other Platonists. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (3).score: 15.0
  37. Douglas Mcdermid (2008). Platonists, Poets, and the God's-Eye View: Reading Santayana's "On the Death of a Metaphysician". The Pluralist 3 (3):132 - 153.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Jeffrey Edwards (2000). The Cambridge Platonists in Philosophical Context. Review of Metaphysics 53 (3):727-728.score: 15.0
  39. Michael Ewbank (2007). Plato and Aristotle in Agreement?: Platonists on Aristotle From Antiochus to Porphyry. Review of Metaphysics 60 (4):870-872.score: 15.0
  40. G. R. Boys-Stones (2007). Review: Plato and Aristotle in Agreement? Platonists on Aristotle From Antiochus to Porphyry. [REVIEW] Mind 116 (464):1129-1132.score: 15.0
  41. W. F. S. M. (1999). G. A. J. Rogers, J. M. Vienne and Y. C. Zarka (Eds.) The Cambridge Platonists in Philosophical Context: Politics, Metaphysics and Religion. (International Archives of the History of Ideas). (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997). Pp. Xiv+249. NLG 250.00, £89.00 Hbk. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 35 (1):113-116.score: 15.0
  42. S. F. (1999). G. A. J. Rogers, J. M. Vienne and Y. C. Zarka (Eds.) The Cambridge Platonists in Philosophical Context: Politics, Metaphysics and Religion. (International Archives of the History of Ideas). (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997). Pp. XIV+249. NLG 250.00, £89.00 Hbk. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 35 (1):113-116.score: 15.0
  43. Marjorie Nicolson (1930). George Keith and the Cambridge Platonists. Philosophical Review 39 (1):36-55.score: 15.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Rosamond Kent Sprague (2007). Aristotle and Other Platonists, by Lloyd P. Gerson. Ancient Philosophy 27 (2):429-432.score: 15.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Michael Ewbank (2005). Aristotle and Other Platonists. Review of Metaphysics 59 (1):175-178.score: 15.0
  46. Michael J. Langford (1972). Gerald R. Cragg (Editor). The Cambridge Platonists. Pp. Xiii + 451. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1968.) £3·60. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 8 (2):181.score: 15.0
  47. G. J. P. O'daly (1979). The Middle Platonists. Philosophical Books 20 (1):12-14.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Anthony Preus (1980). The Middle Platonists, 80 B.C. To A.D. 220. International Studies in Philosophy 12 (2):92-94.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Cartesian Selves & E. D. McCANN (1986). Body and Soul in Philoponus, HJ BLUMENTHAL Philoponus Like Other Platonists Had to Reconcile His Dualism with the Need to Give an Account of Human Activity. The Article Explores How He Formulated and Attempted to Resolve Some of the Consequential Problems. It is Based on the Assumption That Philoponus' Neoplatonism Was Crucial. [REVIEW] New Scholasticism 60 (3).score: 15.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Kyle Smith (2013). E.D. Digeser A Threat to Public Piety. Christians, Platonists, and the Great Persecution. Pp. Xviii + 218. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2012. Cased, US$45. ISBN: 978-0-8014-4181-3. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 63 (1):169-171.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000