Search results for 'Please Delete' (try it on Scholar)

751 found
Order:
  1. Please Delete, Please Delete. This is a Duplicate.
  2.  2
    Delete Delete (2015). Delete This Item. Epistemologia 1:18-30.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Delete Delete (2015). Delete This Item. Epistemologia 1:18-30.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Robin James (2013). From "No Future" to "Delete Yourself ". Journal of Popular Music Studies 25 (4).
    Beginning with the role of the Sex Pistols’s “God Save the Queen” in Lee Edelman and J. Jack Halberstam’s debates about queer death and failure, I follow a musical motive from the Pistols track to its reappearance in Atari Teenage Riot’s 1995 “Delete Yourself .” In this song, as in much of ATR’s work from the 1990s, overlapping queer and Afro-diasporic aesthetics condense around the idea of death or “bare life.” ATR’s musical strategies treat this death as a form (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  21
    Matthew Smith (2009). Viktor Mayer-Schönberger, Delete: The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age. [REVIEW] Identity in the Information Society 2 (3):369-373.
    Viktor Mayer-Schönberger, Delete: the virtue of forgetting in the digital age Content Type Journal Article DOI 10.1007/s12394-010-0039-x Authors Matthew L. Smith /, International Development Research Centre Ottawa Canada Journal Identity in the Information Society Online ISSN 1876-0678 Journal Volume Volume 2 Journal Issue Volume 2, Number 3.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  6
    Karen Spaceinvaders (2011). Please Mind the Gap: How To Podcast Your Brain. Continent 1 (2):76-77.
    continent. 1.2 (2011): 76-77. Please click to listen to the mp3 files of deep brain recordings of individual brain cells, the smallest unit of the brain, in a whole, intact living brain. Each brain region’s cells possess an electrical signature. During recordings electrical signals are transformed into sound to facilitate auditory identification of cells during a process called “mapping.” Subthalamic nucleus by continent Cortex by continent Mapping is an important step in successfully identifying and localizing the appropriate target site (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Patricia Gherovici (2010). Please Select Your Gender: From the Invention of Hysteria to the Democratizing of Transgenderism. Routledge.
    "I have the worst birth defect a woman can have: I was born with a penis and a pair of testicles." Thus we meet Hera, who shares her reason for starting psychoanalysis and whose statement embodies the debate over transgenderism, rigorously dissected in _Please Select Your Gender_. Is it a mental disorder, as some would claim, or a matter of sexual identity? An orientation or a life choice? Despite differing opinions, transgenderism has lost much of its stigma over the past (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  47
    David Wiens (forthcoming). Will the Real Principles of Justice Please Stand Up? In Kevin Vallier & Michael Weber (eds.), Political Utopias: Contemporary Debates. Oxford University Press
    This chapter develops a ``nesting'' model of deontic normative principles (i.e., principles that specify moral constraints upon action) as a means to understanding the notion of a ``fundamental normative principle''. I show that an apparently promising attempt to make sense of this notion such that the ``real'' or ``fundamental'' demands of justice upon action are not constrained by social facts is either self-defeating or relatively unappealing. We should treat fundamental normative principles not as specifying fundamental constraints upon action, but as (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Jeanette Kennett & Cordelia Fine (2009). Will the Real Moral Judgment Please Stand Up? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (1):77–96.
    The recent, influential Social Intuitionist Model of moral judgment (Haidt, Psychological Review 108, 814–834, 2001) proposes a primary role for fast, automatic and affectively charged moral intuitions in the formation of moral judgments. Haidt’s research challenges our normative conception of ourselves as agents capable of grasping and responding to reasons. We argue that there can be no ‘real’ moral judgments in the absence of a capacity for reflective shaping and endorsement of moral judgments. However, we suggest that the empirical literature (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   14 citations  
  10.  18
    Andrew Crane (1999). Are You Ethical? Please Tick Yes □ or No □ on Researching Ethics in Business Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics 20 (3):237 - 248.
    This paper seeks to explore the empirical agenda of business ethics research from a methodological perspective. It is argued that the quality of empirical research in the field remains relatively poor and unconvincing. Drawing on the distinctions between the two main philosophical positions from which methodologies in the social sciences are derived – positivism and interpretism – it is argued that it is business ethics' tradition of positivist, and highly quantitative approaches which may be at the root of these epistemological (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   33 citations  
  11.  30
    Ilina Singh (2005). Will the "Real Boy" Please Behave: Dosing Dilemmas for Parents of Boys with ADHD. American Journal of Bioethics 5 (3):34 – 47.
    The use of Ritalin and other stimulant drug treatments for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) raises distinctive moral dilemmas for parents; these moral dilemmas have not been adequately addressed in the bioethics literature. This paper draws upon data from a qualitative empirical study to investigate parents' use of the moral ideal of authenticity as part of their narrative justifications for dosing decisions and actions. I show that therapeutic decisions and actions are embedded in valued cultural ideals about masculinity, self-actualization and success, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   20 citations  
  12.  29
    Jaakko Kuorikoski, Aki Lehtinen & Caterina Marchionni (2012). Robustness Analysis Disclaimer: Please Read the Manual Before Use! Biology and Philosophy 27 (6):891-902.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  13.  11
    Tessa E. Basford, Lynn R. Offermann & Tara S. Behrend (2014). Please Accept My Sincerest Apologies: Examining Follower Reactions to Leader Apology. Journal of Business Ethics 119 (1):99-117.
    Recognizing gaps in our present understanding of leader apologies, this investigation examines how followers appraise leader apologies and how these perceptions impact work-related outcomes. Results indicate that followers who viewed their leader as trustworthy or caring before a leader wrongdoing were more likely to perceive their leader’s apology to be sincere, as compared to followers who previously doubted their leader’s trustworthiness and caring. Attributions of apology sincerity affected follower reactions, with followers perceiving sincere apologies reporting greater trust in leadership, satisfaction (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  14.  69
    Lincoln Dahlberg (2007). Review: Mark Poster, Information Please: Culture and Politics in the Age of Digital Machines (Duke University Press: Durham and London, 2006). [REVIEW] Thesis Eleven 90 (1):126-128.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  70
    Amy Coplan (2011). Will the Real Empathy Please Stand Up? A Case for a Narrow Conceptualization. Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (s1):40-65.
    A longstanding problem with the study of empathy is the lack of a clear and agreed upon definition. A trend in the recent literature is to respond to this problem by advancing a broad and all-encompassing view of empathy that applies to myriad processes ranging from mimicry and imitation to high-level perspective taking. I argue that this response takes us in the wrong direction and that what we need in order to better understand empathy is a narrower conceptualization, not a (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  16.  43
    Daniel D. Hutto & Erik Myin (2014). Neural Representations Not Needed - No More Pleas, Please. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 13 (2):241-256.
    Colombo (Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 2012) argues that we have compelling reasons to posit neural representations because doing so yields unique explanatory purchase in central cases of social norm compliance. We aim to show that there is no positive substance to Colombo’s plea—nothing that ought to move us to endorse representationalism in this domain, on any level. We point out that exposing the vices of the phenomenological arguments against representationalism does not, on its own, advance the case for representationalism (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  17.  7
    Adriaan Spruyt (2014). Attention Please: Evaluative Priming Effects in a Valent/Non-Valent Categorisation Task. Cognition and Emotion 28 (3):560-569.
  18.  83
    M. Brimacombe (2004). Gunman Aimed to Please. Medical Humanities 30 (2):93-94.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  52
    J. Harris (2005). No Sex Selection Please, We're British. Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (5):286-288.
    There is a popular and widely accepted version of the precautionary principle which may be expressed thus: “If you are in a hole—stop digging!”. Tom Baldwin, as Deputy Chair of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority , may be excused for rushing to the defence of the indefensible,1 the HFEA’s sex selection report,2 but not surely for recklessly abandoning so prudent a principle. Baldwin has many complaints about my misrepresenting the HFEA and about my supposed elitist contempt for public opinion; (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  20.  4
    Benedikt Werner & Klaus Rothermund (2013). Attention Please: No Affective Priming Effects in a Valent/Neutral-Categorisation Task. Cognition and Emotion 27 (1):119-132.
  21. Maria Kronfeldner (2010). Won't You Please Unite? Darwinism, Cultural Evolution and Kinds of Synthesis. In A. Barahona, H.-J. Rheinberger & E. Suarez-Diaz (eds.), The Hereditary Hourglass: Genetics and Epigenetics, 1868-2000. Max Planck Insititute for the History of Science 111-125.
    The synthetic theory of evolution has gone stale and an expanding or (re-)widening of it towards a new synthesis has been announced. This time, development and culture are supposed to join the synthesis bandwagon. In this article, I distinguish between four kinds of synthesis that are involved when we extend the evolutionary synthesis towards culture: the integration of fields, the heuristic generation of interfields, the expansion of validity, and the creation of a common frame of discourse or ‘big-picture’. These kinds (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  22.  3
    Lester E. Krueger (1992). Will the Real Stimulus Please Step Forward? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15 (3):570-572.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   14 citations  
  23.  28
    Sam Baron (2016). Mathematical Explanation and Epistemology: Please Mind the Gap. Ratio 29 (2):149-167.
    This paper draws together two strands in the debate over the existence of mathematical objects. The first strand concerns the notion of extra-mathematical explanation: the explanation of physical facts, in part, by facts about mathematical objects. The second strand concerns the access problem for platonism: the problem of how to account for knowledge of mathematical objects. I argue for the following conditional: if there are extra-mathematical explanations, then the core thesis of the access problem is false. This has implications for (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  16
    George Annas, Armand H. Matheny Antommaria, John D. Arras, Mary Ann Baily, Françoise Baylis, Leah Belsky, Henry S. Richardson, Michael Bérubé, Alistair Campbell & Arthur Caplan (2004). Following is the Comprehensive Index for Volume 34 of the Hastings Center Report Covering All Feature Material From 2004. Letters Have Not Been Included. Ffl Complete Issues Are Available for Volume 34 (2004) and May Be Purchased for $16.00 Each, Plus Shipping. Please Contact the Membership Department, The Hastings Center, 21 Malcolm Gordon Road, Garrison, NY 10524-5555; Tel.:(845) 424-4040; Fax:(845) 424-4545; E-Mail: Publications@ Thehastingscenter. Org. [REVIEW] Hastings Center Report 34.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  25.  44
    John Richard Harris & Richard Galvin (2012). 'Pass the Cocoamone, Please': Causal Impotence, Opportunistic Vegetarianism and Act-Utilitarianism. Ethics, Policy and Environment 15 (3):368 - 383.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  26.  89
    Louise Antony (1995). Sisters, Please, I'd Rather Do It Myself. Philosophical Topics 23 (2):59-94.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  27.  13
    Thomas Cochrane & Matt T. Bianchi (2011). “Take My Organs, Please”: A Section of My Living Will. American Journal of Bioethics 11 (8):56-58.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 11, Issue 8, Page 56-58, August 2011.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  28.  20
    Paul B. Miller & Charles Weijer (2003). Will the Real Charles Fried Please Stand Up? Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (4):353-357.
    : In response to the preceding commentary by Jerry Menikoff in this issue of the Journal , the authors argue that Fried's central concern is not that randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are conducted without consent, but rather that various aspects of the design and conduct of RCTs are in tension with physicians' duties of personal care to their patients. Although Fried does argue that the existence of equipoise cannot justify failure to obtain consent from research subjects, informed consent by itself (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  29.  53
    Daniel C. Dennett (2013). Please Don't Feed the Bugbears. In Paul Russell & Oisin Deery (eds.), The Philosophy of Free Will: Essential Readings From the Contemporary Debates. OUP Usa 43.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Bryan Frances, Please Explain What a Rigid Designator Is”.
    This is an essay written for undergraduates who are confused about what a rigid designator is.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  3
    Fabio Paglieri (2007). No More Charity, Please! Enthymematic Parsimony and the Pitfall of Benevolence. In Christopher W. Tindale Hans V. Hansen (ed.), Dissensus and the Search for Common Ground. Ossa 1--26.
    Why are enthymemes so frequent? Are we dumb arguers, smart rhetoricians, or parsimonious reasoners? This paper investigates systematic use of enthymemes, criticizing the application of the principle of charity to their interpretation. In contrast, I propose to analyze enthymematic argumentation in terms of parsimony, i.e. as a manifestation of the rational tendency to economize over scant resources. Consequences of this view on the current debate on enthymemes and on their rational reconstruction are discussed.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  32.  4
    Cornelius Weiller, Mariachristina Musso, Michel Rijntjes & Dorothee Saur (2009). Please Don’T Underestimate the Ventral Pathway in Language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13 (9):369-370.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  33.  6
    Rutger Rienks, Anton Nijholt & Paulo Barthelmess (2007). Pro-Active Meeting Assistants: Attention Please! [REVIEW] AI and Society 23 (2):213-231.
    This paper gives an overview of pro-active meeting assistants, what they are and when they can be useful. We explain how to develop such assistants with respect to requirement definitions and elaborate on a set of Wizard of Oz experiments, aiming to find out in which form a meeting assistant should operate to be accepted by participants, and whether the meeting effectiveness and efficiency can be improved by an assistant at all. This paper gives an overview of pro-active meeting assistants, (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  34.  68
    Jan Willem Wieland (2012). Carving the World As We Please. Philosophica 84 (1):7-24.
    Nelson Goodman defends the seemingly radical view that, in a certain sense, all facts depend on our perspective on the matter. We make the world, rather than merely find it. The aim of this contribution is three-fold: to make sense of Goodman's metaphysical perspectivalism, clearly explain how it differs from other branches of perspectivalism (epistemic and semantic), and put two issues on the agenda that deserve renewed attention.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  40
    Physician-Assisted Suicide (2000). Please Note That Not All Books Mentioned on This List Will Be Reviewed. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3:221-222.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  3
    Maha Adamo, Carson Pun, Jay Pratt & Susanne Ferber (2008). Your Divided Attention, Please! The Maintenance of Multiple Attentional Control Sets Over Distinct Regions in Space. Cognition 107 (1):295-303.
  37.  69
    Robert P. Farrell (2000). Will the Popperian Feyerabend Please Step Forward: Pluralistic, Popperian Themes in the Philosophy of Paul Feyerabend. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14 (3):257 – 266.
    John Preston has claimed that we must understand Paul Feyerabend's later, post-1970, philosophy in terms of a disappointed Popperianism: that Feyerabend became a sceptical, relativistic, literal anarchist because of his perception of the failure of Popper's philosophy. I argue that this claim cannot be supported and trace the development of Feyerabend's philosophy in terms of a commitment to the central Popperian themes of criticism and critical explanatory progress. This commitment led Feyerabend to reject Popper's specific methodology in favour of a (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  38.  29
    Yves Gingras (2007). "Please, Don't Let Me Be Misunderstood": The Role of Argumentation in a Sociology of Academic Misunderstandings. Social Epistemology 21 (4):369 – 389.
    Academic debates are so frequent and omnipresent in most disciplines, particularly the social sciences and humanities, it seems obvious that disagreements are bound to occur. The aim of this paper is to show that whereas the agent who perceives his/her contribution as being misunderstood locates the origin of the communication problem on the side of the receiver who "misinterprets" the text, the emitter is in fact also contributing to the possibility of this misunderstanding through the very manner in which his/her (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  39.  6
    Gerd H. Hövelmann (1987). Please Wait to Be Tolerated”: Distinguishing Fact From Fiction on Both Sides of a Scientific Controversy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 (4):592.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  40.  6
    Willibald Ruch (1995). Will the Real Relationship Between Facial Expression and Affective Experience Please Stand Up: The Case of Exhilaration. Cognition and Emotion 9 (1):33-58.
  41.  9
    Jonathan Herring & Charles Foster (2012). Please Don't Tell Me”. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21 (01):20-29.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  42.  4
    William Lawrence Allen & Ray Edward Moseley (2012). Will the Last Health Care Professional to Forgo Patient Advocacy Please Call an Ethics Consult? American Journal of Bioethics 12 (8):19 - 20.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 12, Issue 8, Page 19-20, August 2012.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  43.  51
    Michael Tomasello (2001). Could We Please Lose the Mapping Metaphor, Please? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1119-1120.
    Although Bloom gives more credit to social cognition (mind reading) than do most other theorists of word learning, he does not go far enough. He still relies fundamentally on a learning process of association (or mapping), neglecting the joint attentional and cultural learning skills from which linguistic communication emerges at one year of age.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  44.  26
    Michael T. Ghiselin (1992). Will a Real Evolutionary Ecologist Please Stand Up? Biology and Philosophy 7 (3):355-359.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  15
    Daniel J. Honan (1946). Rime, Gentlemen, Please. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 21 (1):158-159.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  9
    Jacob M. Appel, Mark D. Fox, Adrienne Asch, Robert Baker, Rachelle Bernacki, Katrina A. Bramstedt, Robert Macauley, Kathrin Braun, Robert A. Burt & Daniel Callahan (2005). Following is the Comprehensive Index for Volume 35 of the Hastings Center Report Covering All Feature Material From 2005. Let-Ters Have Not Been Included. Ffl Complete Issues Are Available for Volume 35 (2005) and May Be Purchased for $16.00 Each, Plus Shipping. Please Contact the Membership Department, The Hastings Center, 21 Malcolm Gordon Road, Garrison, NY 10524; Tel.:(845) 424-4040; Fax:(845) 424-4545; E-Mail: Publications@ Thehastingscenter. Org. [REVIEW] Hastings Center Report 35.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  47.  5
    Rüdiger Schätz (1990). Formalizing Falsification: Three Delete Operations. Zeitschrift fur mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 36 (5):455-470.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  48.  13
    George Cairns & Tamar Jeffers (2003). Looking Into/Out of* Organizations Through the Rear Window: Voyeurism and Exhibitionism in Organization Studies (* Delete as Appropriate). In Adrian Carr & Philip Hancock (eds.), Art and Aesthetics at Work. Palgrave Macmillan 38.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  50
    Philippe H. Martin (1997). "If You Don't Know How to Fix It, Please Stop Breaking It!" The Precautionary Principle and Climate Change. Foundations of Science 2 (2):263-292.
    Taking precautions to prevent harm. Whether principe de précaution, Vorsorgeprinzip, føre-var prinsippet, or försiktighetsprincip, etc., the precautionary principle embodies the idea that public and private interests should act to prevent harm. Furthermore, the precautionary principle suggests that action should be taken to limit, regulate, or prevent potentially dangerous undertakings even in the absence of absolute scientific proof. Such measures also naturally entail taking economic costs into account. With the environmental disasters of the 1980s, the precautionary principle established itself as an (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  50.  10
    Michael Dunn & Mark Sheehan (2010). No Sex Please, We're Social Scientists? American Journal of Bioethics 10 (7):39-41.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
1 — 50 / 751