Search results for 'Political science Congresses' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Hayward R. Alker (ed.) (1982). Dialectical Logics for the Political Sciences. Rodopi.score: 280.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. André Laks & Malcolm Schofield (eds.) (1995). Justice and Generosity: Studies in Hellenistic Social and Political Philosophy: Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium Hellenisticum. Cambridge University Press.score: 234.0
    Hegel's often-echoed verdict on the apolitical character of philosophy in the Hellenistic age is challenged in this collection of new essays, originally presented at the sixth meeting of the Symposium Hellenisticum. An international team of leading scholars reveals a vigorous intellectual scene of great diversity: analyses of political leadership and the Roman constitution in Aristotelian terms; Cynic repudiation of the polis - but accommodation with its rulers; Stoic and Epicurean theories of justice as the foundation of society; Cicero's moral (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Lincoln Allison (ed.) (1990). The Utilitarian Response: The Contemporary Viability of Utilitarian Political Philosophy. Sage Publications.score: 234.0
    "Nearly all the essays are theoretically informed, argumentative, and exceptionally interesting; nearly all try to paint the merits (and demerits) of utilitarianism as a political philosophy in the light of attempted solutions to theoretical problems that are explored in some detail. The result is a searching, thoughtful volume." --Ethics "The Utilitarian Response is unique in the breadth of problems and questions in utilitarian theory covered. It is more suggestive of strategies by which contemporary utilitarianism could be improved than a (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Sara R. Jordan & Kim Q. Hill (2012). Ethical Assurance Statements in Political Science Journals. Journal of Academic Ethics 10 (3):243-250.score: 224.0
    Many journals in the physical sciences require authors to submit assurances of compliance with human subjects and other research ethics standards. These requirements do not cover all disciplines equally, however. In this paper we report on the findings of a survey of perceptions of ethical and managerial problems from journal editors in political science and related disciplines. Our results show that few journals in political science require assurance statements common to journals for other scientific disciplines. We (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. John William Burgess (1933). The Foundations of Political Science. New York, Columbia University Press.score: 224.0
    It has become, however, one of the commonest catchwords of modern political science. Especially is it so used and abused by French, English and American ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. David Williams (1996). Japan and the Enemies of Open Political Science. Routledge.score: 224.0
    Japan and the Enemies of Open Political Science argues that Eurocentric blindness is a scientific failing, not a moral one. In a way true of no other political system, Japan's greatness has the potential to enliven and reform almost all the main branches of Western Political Science. David Williams criticizes Western social science, Anglo-American Philosophy and French Theory and explains why mainstream economists, historians of political thought and postculturalists have ignored Japan's modern achievements. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Steven D. Roper & Lilian A. Barria (2009). Political Science Perspectives on Human Rights. Human Rights Review 10 (3):305-308.score: 224.0
    This special issue of Human Rights Review is devoted to an exploration of the current human rights research agendas within the political science discipline. Research on human rights is truly an interdisciplinary quest in which various epistemologies can contribute to each other and form a larger dialogue concerning rights and wrongs. This special issue is devoted to an expansive understanding of the state of research on human rights in the political science discipline. One common theme throughout (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Christian List & Kai Spiekermann (2013). Methodological Individualism and Holism in Political Science: A Reconciliation. American Political Science Review 107 (4):629-643.score: 208.0
    Political science is divided between methodological individualists, who seek to explain political phenomena by reference to individuals and their interactions, and holists (or nonreductionists), who consider some higher-level social entities or properties such as states, institutions, or cultures ontologically or causally significant. We propose a reconciliation between these two perspectives, building on related work in philosophy. After laying out a taxonomy of different variants of each view, we observe that (i) although political phenomena result from underlying (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Diana M. Judd (2008). Questioning Authority: Political Resistance and the Ethic of Natural Science. Transaction Publishers.score: 200.0
    Francis Bacon : a new interpretation of nature -- Thomas Hobbes' scientific approach to politics -- John Locke and the origins of political resistance -- The ethic and practice of modern natural science -- Critical theory and the critique of modernity -- Michel Foucault and the postmodern reaction.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Thalia Fung (2006). Philosophy: A New Knowledge and an Alternative Political Science. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:23-27.score: 199.0
    Philosophy can enhance communication among new forms of knowledge, existing ones, and those that will arise in light of the heuristic possibilities of the revolutions in science, technology, and thought; it can turn to a reevaluation of all of the culture that humanity has produced for its own welfare and can prevent the loss of the differentiating essences of diverse social groups. In the conjugation of the forms of knowledge, I am interested in the relationship that has emerged between (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Mark Bevir (ed.) (2010). Interpretive Political Science. Sage.score: 198.0
    v. 1. Interpretive theories -- v. 2. Interpretive methods -- v. 3. Interpreting politics -- v. 4. Interpreting policies.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. William E. Connolly (2006). Political Science and Ideology. Transaction Publishers.score: 196.0
    Professor David Kettler commented at the time of the initial release, that this book is "writing with great poise and clarity, the author says important things ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Takashi Inoguchi (2010). Political Science in Japan: Looking Back and Forward. Japanese Journal of Political Science 11 (3):291-305.score: 196.0
    The aim of the article is to review Japanese Political Studies in Japan (JPSJ) circa 2000 for the purpose of identifying the trends of JPSJ and gauging its scope, subject areas, and methods. I then identify the key questions asked in JPSJ, i.e. for the third quarter of the last century: (1) What went wrong for Japan in the 1930s and 1940s, which had been seemingly making progress in the scheme of and was with a ? (2) What is (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. William E. Connolly (1967). Political Science & Ideology. New York, Atherton Press.score: 196.0
    Professor David Kettler commented at the time of the initial release, that this book is "writing with great poise and clarity, the author says important things ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. José Maminta Aruego (1947). Principles of Political Science. Manila, University Pub. Co..score: 196.0
  16. Armand Jean Baldwin (1957). Christian Principles of Political Science. Latrobe, Pa.,Archabbey Press.score: 196.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Norman Wood Beck (1941). The Political Science of Niccolo Machiavelli. Chicago.score: 196.0
  18. John William Burgess (1978). Selections From Political Science and Comparative Constitutional Law. Distributed by Dabor Social Science Publications.score: 196.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Adam Ferguson (1792/1978). Principles of Moral and Political Science, 1792. Garland Pub..score: 196.0
  20. Adam Ferguson (1792/1975). Principles of Moral and Political Science. G. Olms.score: 196.0
  21. Raymond Garfield Gettell (1949). Political Science. Boston, Ginn.score: 196.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. A. H. Hanson (1965). Political Philosophy or Political Science? [Leeds, Eng.]Leeds University Press.score: 196.0
  23. Kathleen A. Staudt (1997). Political Science & Feminisms: Integration or Transformation? Prentice Hall International.score: 196.0
  24. Vernon Van Dyke (1960). Political Science: A Philosophical Analysis. London, Stevens.score: 196.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Ota Weinberger, Peter Koller & Alfred Schramm (eds.) (1988). Law, Politics, Society: Reports of the 12th International Wittgenstein-Symposium, 7th to 14th August 1987, Kirchberg Am Wechsel, Austria. [REVIEW] Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.score: 195.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Donata Romizi (2012). The Vienna Circle’s “Scientific World-Conception”: Philosophy of Science in the Political Arena. Hopos 2 (2):205-242.score: 192.0
    This article is intended as a contribution to the current debates about the relationship between politics and the philosophy of science in the Vienna Circle. I reconsider this issue by shifting the focus from philosophy of science as theory to philosophy of science as practice. From this perspective I take as a starting point the Vienna Circle’s scientific world-conception and emphasize its practical nature: I reinterpret its tenets as a set of recommendations that express the particular epistemological (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Jean-Joseph Goux & Philip R. Wood (eds.) (1998). Terror and Consensus: Vicissitudes of French Thought. Stanford University Press.score: 189.0
    This volume of twelve essays focuses on two interrelated issues. First it addresses the historical and cultural determinants that have given rise to what frequently has been described as 'the French exception': the unusually conflictual French political process inherited from the revolutionary past in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries and its accompanying avant-gardism in artistic, literary and philosophical practice, both of which distinguish France from other European countries. Second, the contributors assess the exhaustion of this tradition in recent years (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Sharon Crasnow (2012). The Role of Case Study Research in Political Science: Evidence for Causal Claims. Philosophy of Science 79 (5):655-666.score: 186.0
    Political science research, particularly in international relations and comparative politics, has increasingly become dominated by statistical and formal approaches. The promise of these approaches shifted the methodological emphasis away from case study research. In response, supporters of case study research argue that case studies provide evidence for causal claims that is not available through statistical and formal research methods, and many have advocated multimethod research. I propose a way of understanding the integration of multiple methodologies in which the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Tatiana Batoulev, Vasil Prodanov & Angel Stefanov (eds.) (1992). Philosophy and Power: Proceedings of the International Summer Philosophical School, Varna, 29.06-02.07.1992. Institute of Philosophical Sciences, Ministry of Education and Science.score: 180.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. J. L. Talmon & Zeev Sternhell (eds.) (1996). The Intellectual Revolt Against Liberal Democracy, 1870-1945: International Conference in Memory of Jacob L. Talmon. Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities.score: 180.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. John W. Danford (1978). Wittgenstein and Political Philosophy: A Reexamination of the Foundations of Social Science. University of Chicago Press.score: 176.0
  32. Andrew Hacker (1961). Political Theory: Philosophy, Ideology, Science. New York, Macmillan.score: 176.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. David Morrice (1996). Philosophy, Science, and Ideology in Political Thought. St. Martin's Press.score: 176.0
  34. Peter Breiner (2004). Translating Max Weber Exile Attempts to Forge a New Political Science. European Journal of Political Theory 3 (2):133-149.score: 174.0
    Although it is well-recognized that Max Weber was of central importance to many of the emigre social scientists who fled Hitler, commentators have overlooked both Weber’s attempt to found a new dynamic political science that would test partisan commitments and the endeavors of emigre political scientists to develop this project. This article lays out this new Weberian political science and assesses the fate of the various attempts on the part of the emigres to translate it (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. A. Chatterjee (2013). Ontology, Epistemology, and Multimethod Research in Political Science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (1):73-99.score: 170.0
    Epistemologies and research methods are not free of metaphysics. This is to say that they are both, supported by (or presumed by), and support (or presume) fundamental ontologies. A discussion of the epistemological foundations of "multimethod" research in the social sciences—in as much as such research claims to unearth "causal" relations—therefore cannot avoid the ontological presuppositions or implications of such a discussion. But though there isn’t necessarily a perfect correspondence between ontology, epistemology, and methodology, they do constrain each other. As (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. S. Crasnow (2011). Evidence for Use: Causal Pluralism and the Role of Case Studies in Political Science Research. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 41 (1):26-49.score: 170.0
    Most contemporary political science researchers are advocates of multimethod research, however, the value and proper role of qualitative methodologies, like case study analysis, is disputed. A pluralistic philosophy of science can shed light on this debate. Methodological pluralism is indeed valuable, but does not entail causal pluralism. Pluralism about the goals of science is relevant to the debate and suggests a focus on the difference between evidence for warrant and evidence for use. I propose that case (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Ignacio Sánchez-Cuenca (2008). A Preference for Selfish Preferences: The Problem of Motivations in Rational Choice Political Science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (3):361-378.score: 170.0
    This article analyzes the problem of preference imputation in rational choice political science. I argue against the well-established practice in political science of assuming selfish preferences for purely methodological reasons, regardless of its empirical plausibility (this I call a preference for selfish preferences). Real motivations are overlooked due to difficulties of imputing preferences to agents in a non-arbitrary way in the political realm. I compare the problem of preference imputation in economic and political markets, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. J. Kuorikoski & A. Lehtinen (2010). Economics Imperialism and Solution Concepts in Political Science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (3):347-374.score: 170.0
    Political science and economic science . . . make use of the same language, the same mode of abstraction, the same instruments of thought and the same method of reasoning. (Black 1998, 354) Proponents as well as opponents of economics imperialism agree that imperialism is a matter of unification; providing a unified framework for social scientific analysis. Uskali Mäki distinguishes between derivational and ontological unification and argues that the latter should serve as a constraint for the former. (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Mark Bevir (2011). Political Science After Foucault. History of the Human Sciences 24 (4):81-96.score: 170.0
    This article concerns the relevance of postfoundationalism, including the ideas of Michel Foucault, for political science. The first half of the article distinguishes three forms of postfoundationalism, all of which draw some of their inspiration from Foucault. First, the governmentality literature draws on Marxist theories of social control, and then absorbs Foucault’s focus on power/knowledge. Second, the post-Marxists combine the formal linguistics of Saussure with a focus on hegemonic discourses. Third, some social humanists infuse Foucauldian themes into the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Edgar Kiser (1999). Comparing Varieties of Agency Theory in Economics, Political Science, and Sociology: An Illustration From State Policy Implementation. Sociological Theory 17 (2):146-170.score: 168.0
    As rational choice theory has moved from economics into political science and sociology, it has been dramatically transformed. The intellectual diffusion of agency theory illustrates this process. Agency theory is a general model of social relations involving the delegation of authority, and generally resulting in problems of control, which has been applied to a broad range of substantive contexts. This paper analyzes applications of agency theory to state policy implementation in economics, political science, and sociology. After (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Matthew Stanley (2008). Mysticism and Marxism: A.S. Eddington, Chapman Cohen, and Political Engagement Through Science Popularization. [REVIEW] Minerva 46 (2):181-194.score: 168.0
    This paper argues that that political context of British science popularization in the inter-war period was intimately tied to contemporary debates about religion and science. A leading science popularizer, the Quaker astronomer A.S. Eddington, and one of his opponents, the materialist Chapman Cohen, are examined in detail to show the intertwined nature of science, philosophy, religion, and politics.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Mara Goldman, Paul Nadasdy & Matt Turner (eds.) (2011). Knowing Nature: Conversations at the Intersection of Political Ecology and Science Studies. University of Chicago Press.score: 168.0
    Knowing Nature brings together political ecologists and science studies scholars to showcase the key points of encounter between the two fields and how this ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Sharon Crasnow, Evidence for Use: The Role of Case Studies in Political Science Research.score: 168.0
    In its most recent form, the debate about the relationship between quantitative and qualitative methodology in political science has been shaped by the publication of Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research by Gary King, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba in 1994 (hereafter DSI). The focus of this debate has been case study research. DSI advocates that qualitative research, particularly case study research, be modeled on the template of quantitative research. The authors claim that all research (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Lee Sigelman & Robert Goldfarb (2012). The Influence of Economics on Political Science: By What Pathway? Journal of Economic Methodology 19 (1):1-19.score: 168.0
    The influence of economics, the most imperialistic of the social science disciplines, is widely thought to have been felt more decisively in political science than in any other discipline. After briefly reviewing some evidence that this alleged influence is not transmitted through the use of specific economics concepts, this paper explores the possibility that the influence instead stems from the importation of formal rational choice modeling techniques from economics into political science. This is carried out (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Barry Cooper (1999). Eric Voegelin and the Foundations of Modern Political Science. University of Missouri Press.score: 168.0
    This important new work is a major analysis of the foundation of Eric Voegelin's political science.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Yutaka Harada (2013). Pieter Vanhuysse and Achim Goerres (Eds.), Aging Populations in Post-Industrial Democracies: Comparative Studies of Policies and Politics, ECPR Studies in European Political Science, Routledge, 2011, 274 Pp. [REVIEW] Japanese Journal of Political Science 14 (3):447-449.score: 168.0
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Jon Fennell (2010). Polanyi's Arguments Against a Non-Judgmental Political Science. Tradition and Discovery 37 (1):6-18.score: 168.0
    Michael Polanyi articulates two arguments against the view that moral judgment has no proper place in the conduct of political science: Non-judgmental political science cannot understand what it studies; and non-judgmental political science cannot understand the political scientist himself. Evaluation of these arguments not only clarifies important dimensions of Polanyi’s conceptions of understanding and tacit inference, it prompts a reconsideration of the nature of both moral deliberation and moral truth. The encounter with Polanyi (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Kelly Moore, Daniel Lee Kleinman, David Hess & Scott Frickel (2011). Science and Neoliberal Globalization: A Political Sociological Approach. [REVIEW] Theory and Society 40 (5):505-532.score: 168.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Michael Blake (2012). Global Distributive Justice: Why Political Philosophy Need Political Science. Annual Review of Political Science 15:121-136.score: 168.0
  50. Stuart S. Blume (1974). Toward a Political Sociology of Science. New York,Free Press.score: 168.0
1 — 50 / 1000