Search results for 'Politzer Guy' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Guy Politzer (2009). Could It Be the Case That If I Am Right My Opponents Will Be Pleased? A Rejoinder to Johnson-Laird, Byrne and Girotto. Topoi 28 (1):81-85.score: 360.0
    I take up the four issues considered by Johnson-Laird, Byrne and Girotto in their reply to Politzer ( 2007 ). Based on the conceptual clarification which they adduce, it seems that the disagreement can be settled about the first one (truth functionality) and can be attenuated about the second one (the paradoxes of material implication). However, I maintain and refine my criticisms on the last two (negation and the probability of conditionals), backed up by considerations borrowed from the (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Jean-François Bonnefon & Guy Politzer (2011). Pragmatics, Mental Models and One Paradox of the Material Conditional. Mind and Language 26 (2):141-155.score: 300.0
    Most instantiations of the inference ‘y; so if x, y’ seem intuitively odd, a phenomenon known as one of the paradoxes of the material conditional. A common explanation of the oddity, endorsed by Mental Model theory, is based on the intuition that the conclusion of the inference throws away semantic information. We build on this explanation to identify two joint conditions under which the inference becomes acceptable: (a) the truth of x has bearings on the relevance of asserting y; and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Guy Politzer (2003). No Problem for Aristotle's Subject and Predicate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):298-299.score: 300.0
    It is argued that, in the traditional subject-predicate sentence, two interpretations of the subject term coexist, one intensional and the other extensional, which explains the superficial difference between the traditional S-P relation and the predication of predicate logic. Data from psychological studies of syllogistic reasoning support the view that the contrast between predicate and argument is carried over to the traditional S-P sentence.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Jean Baratgin, David E. Over & Guy Politzer (2011). Betting on Conditionals. Thinking and Reasoning 16 (3):172-197.score: 300.0
    A study is reported testing two hypotheses about a close parallel relation between indicative conditionals, if A then B , and conditional bets, I bet you that if A then B . The first is that both the indicative conditional and the conditional bet are related to the conditional probability, P(B|A). The second is that de Finetti's three-valued truth table has psychological reality for both types of conditional— true , false , or void for indicative conditionals and win , lose (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Jean Baratgin & Guy Politzer (2006). Is the Mind Bayesian? The Case for Agnosticism. Mind and Society 5 (1):1-38.score: 300.0
    This paper aims to make explicit the methodological conditions that should be satisfied for the Bayesian model to be used as a normative model of human probability judgment. After noticing the lack of a clear definition of Bayesianism in the psychological literature and the lack of justification for using it, a classic definition of subjective Bayesianism is recalled, based on the following three criteria: an epistemic criterion, a static coherence criterion and a dynamic coherence criterion. Then it is shown that (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Jean Baratgin & Guy Politzer (2011). Updating: A Psychologically Basic Situation of Probability Revision. Thinking and Reasoning 16 (4):253-287.score: 300.0
    The Bayesian model has been used in psychology as the standard reference for the study of probability revision. In the first part of this paper we show that this traditional choice restricts the scope of the experimental investigation of revision to a stable universe. This is the case of a situation that, technically, is known as focusing. We argue that it is essential for a better understanding of human probability revision to consider another situation called updating (Katsuno & Mendelzon, 1992), (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Guy Politzer & Jean-François Bonnefon (2009). Let Us Not Put the Probabilistic Cart Before the Uncertainty Bull. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):100-101.score: 300.0
    Although we endorse the primacy of uncertainty in reasoning, we argue that a probabilistic framework cannot model the fundamental skill of proof administration. Furthermore, we are skeptical about the assumption that standard probability calculus is the appropriate formalism to represent human uncertainty. There are other models up to this task, so let us not repeat the excesses of the past.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Guy Politzer & Hugo Mercier (2008). Solving Categorical Syllogisms with Singular Premises. Thinking and Reasoning 14 (4):434 – 454.score: 300.0
    We elaborate on the approach to syllogistic reasoning based on “case identification” (Stenning & Oberlander, 1995; Stenning & Yule, 1997). It is shown that this can be viewed as the formalisation of a method of proof that dates back to Aristotle, namely proof by exposition ( ecthesis ), and that there are traces of this method in the strategies described by a number of psychologists, from St rring (1908) to the present day. We hypothesised that by rendering individual cases explicit (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Guy Politzer (2007). Reasoning with Conditionals. Topoi 26 (1):79-95.score: 300.0
    This paper reviews the psychological investigation of reasoning with conditionals, putting an emphasis on recent work. In the first part, a few methodological remarks are presented. In the second part, the main theories of deductive reasoning (mental rules, mental models, and the probabilistic approach) are considered in turn; their content is summarised and the semantics they assume for if and the way they explain formal conditional reasoning are discussed, in particular in the light of experimental work on the probability of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Guy Politzer & Jean-françois Bonnefon (2006). Two Varieties of Conditionals and Two Kinds of Defeaters Help Reveal Two Fundamental Types of Reasoning. Mind and Language 21 (4):484–503.score: 300.0
    Two notions from philosophical logic and linguistics are brought together and applied to the psychological study of defeasible conditional reasoning. The distinction between disabling conditions and alternative causes is shown to be a special case of Pollock's (1987) distinction between 'rebutting' and 'undercutting' defeaters. 'Inferential' conditionals are shown to come in two varieties, one that is sensitive to rebutters, the other to undercutters. It is thus predicted and demonstrated in two experiments that the type of inferential conditional used as the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Hugo Mercier & Guy Politzer (2011). Solving Categorical Syllogisms with Singular Premises. Thinking and Reasoning 14 (4):434-454.score: 300.0
    We elaborate on the approach to syllogistic reasoning based on “case identification” (Stenning & Oberlander, 1995; Stenning & Yule, 1997). It is shown that this can be viewed as the formalisation of a method of proof that dates back to Aristotle, namely proof by exposition ( ecthesis ), and that there are traces of this method in the strategies described by a number of psychologists, from St rring (1908) to the present day. We hypothesised that by rendering individual cases explicit (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Guy Politzer & Laure Carles (2001). Belief Revision and Uncertain Reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning 7 (3):217 – 234.score: 300.0
    When a new piece of information contradicts a currently held belief, one has to modify the set of beliefs in order to restore its consistency. In the case where it is necessary to give up a belief, some of them are less likely to be abandoned than others. The concept of epistemic entrenchment is used by some AI approaches to explain this fact based on formal properties of the belief set (e.g., transitivity). Two experiments were designed to test the hypothesis (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Guy Politzer (2005). Uncertainty and the Suppression of Inferences. Thinking and Reasoning 11 (1):5 – 33.score: 300.0
    The explanation of the suppression of Modus Ponens inferences within the framework of linguistic pragmatics and of plausible reasoning (i.e., deduction from uncertain premises) is defended. First, this approach is expounded, and then it is shown that the results of the first experiment of Byrne, Espino, and Santamar a (1999) support the uncertainty explanation but fail to support their counterexample explanation. Second, two experiments are presented. In the first one, aimed to refute one objection regarding the conclusions observed, the additional (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Guy Politzer & Laura Macchi (2000). Reasoning and Pragmatics. Mind and Society 1 (1):73-93.score: 300.0
    Language pragmatics is applied to analyse problem statements and instructions used in a few influential experimental tasks in the psychology of reasoning. This analysis aims to determine the interpretation of the task which the participant is likely to construct. It is applied to studies of deduction (where the interpretation of quantifiers and connectives is crucial) and to studies of inclusion judgment and probabilistic judgment. It is shown that the interpretation of the problem statements or even the representation of the task (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Jean Baratgin & Guy Politzer (2007). The Psychology of Dynamic Probability Judgment: Order Effect, Normative Theories, and Experimental Methodology. Mind and Society 6 (1):53-66.score: 300.0
    The Bayesian model is used in psychology as the reference for the study of dynamic probability judgment. The main limit induced by this model is that it confines the study of revision of degrees of belief to the sole situations of revision in which the universe is static (revising situations). However, it may happen that individuals have to revise their degrees of belief when the message they learn specifies a change of direction in the universe, which is considered as changing (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Jean-Baptiste Van Der Henst, Dan Sperber & Guy Politzer (2002). When is a Conclusion Worth Deriving? A Relevance-Based Analysis of Indeterminate Relational Problems. Thinking and Reasoning 8 (1):1 – 20.score: 300.0
    When is a conclusion worth deriving? We claim that a conclusion is worth deriving to the extent that it is relevant in the sense of relevance theory (Sperber & Wilson, 1995). To support this hypothesis, we experiment with ''indeterminate relational problems'' where we ask participants what, if anything, follows from premises such as A is taller than B, A is taller than C . With such problems, the indeterminate response that nothing follows is common, and we explain why. We distinguish (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Guy Politzer & J.-F. Bonnefon (2006). Two Varieties of Conditionals and Two Kinds of Defeaters Help Reveal Two Fundamental Types of Reasoning. Mind and Language 21 (4):484-503.score: 300.0
    Two notions from philosophical logic and linguistics are brought together and applied to the psychological study of defeasible conditional reasoning. The distinction between disabling conditions and alternative causes is shown to be a special case of Pollock's (1987) distinction between ‘rebutting' and ‘undercutting' defeaters. ‘Inferential' conditionals are shown to come in two types, one that is sensitive to rebutters, the other to undercutters. It is thus predicted and demonstrated in two experiments that the type of inferential conditional used as the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Jean Baratgin, David E. Over & Guy Politzer (2013). Uncertainty and the de Finetti Tables. Thinking and Reasoning 19 (3-4):308-328.score: 300.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Guy Politzer (2007). A Test of Directional Entailment Properties of Classical Quantifiers Defined by the Theory of Generalised Quantifiers (Barwise and Cooper, 1981) is Described. Participants Had to Solve a Task Which Consisted of Four Kinds of Inference. In the First One, the Premise Was of the Type Q Hyponym Verb Blank Predicate, Where Q is a Classical Quantifier,(Eg, Some Cats Are []), and the Question Was to Indicate What, If Anything, Can Be Concluded by Filling Up the Slots In........ Hyperonym Verb Blank Predicate (Eg. [REVIEW] Journal of Semantics 24 (4):331-343.score: 300.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Jean Baratgin Guy Politzer & Guy Politzer (2006). CNRS Institut Jean Nicod, Paris, France. Mind and Society 5:1-38.score: 300.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Guy Politzer & Martin D. S. Braine (1991). Responses to Inconsistent Premisses Cannot Count as Suppression of Valid Inferences. Cognition 38 (1):103-108.score: 300.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Guy Politzer, Jean‐Baptiste Henst, Claire Delle Luche & Ira A. Noveck (2006). The Interpretation of Classically Quantified Sentences: A Set‐Theoretic Approach. Cognitive Science 30 (4):691-723.score: 300.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Jean-Baptiste Van Der Henst, Dan Sperber & Guy Politzer (2002). When is a Conclusion Worth Deriving? A Relevance-Based Analysis of Indeterminate Relational Problems. Thinking and Reasoning 8 (1):1-20.score: 300.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Guy Politzer, David P. Over & Jean Baratgin (2010). Betting on Conditionals. Thinking and Reasoning 16 (3):172-197.score: 300.0
    A study is reported testing two hypotheses about a close parallel relation between indicative conditionals, if A then B, and conditional bets, I bet you that if A then B. The first is that both the indicative conditional and the conditional bet are related to the conditional probability, P(B|A). The second is that de Finetti's three-valued truth table has psychological reality for both types of conditional – true, false, or void for indicative conditionals and win, lose or void for conditional (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Guy Politzer (1990). Characterizing Spontaneous Inferences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (1):177-178.score: 300.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Guy Politzer, Jean-Baptiste Van Der Henst, Claire Delle Luche & Ira Noveck (2006). The Interpretation of Classically Quantified Sentences: A Set-Theoretic Approach. Cognitive Science 30 (4):691-723.score: 300.0
    We present a set-theoretic model of the mental representation of classically quantified sentences (All P are Q, Some P are Q, Some P are not Q, and No P are Q). We take inclusion, exclusion, and their negations to be primitive concepts. It is shown that, although these sentences are known to have a diagrammatic expression (in the form of the Gergonne circles) which constitute a semantic representation, these concepts can also be expressed syntactically in the form of algebraic formulas. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Politzer Guy & Bonnefon Jean-Francois (2006). Two Varieties of Conditionals and Two Kinds of Defeaters Help Reveal Two Fundamental Types of Reasoning. Mind and Language 21 (4):484-503.score: 240.0
    Two notions from philosophical logic and linguistics are brought together and applied to the psychological study of defeasible conditional reasoning. The distinction between disabling conditions and alternative causes is shown to be a special case of Pollock’s (1987) distinction between ‘rebutting’ and ‘undercutting’ defeaters. ‘Inferential’ conditionals are shown to come in two varieties, one that is sensitive to rebutters, the other to undercutters. It is thus predicted and demonstrated in two experiments that the type of inferential conditional used as the (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Jean-Francois Bonnefon & Politzer & Guy (2010). Pragmatic Conditionals, Conditional Pragmatics, and the Pragmatic Component of Conditional Reasoning. In Mike Oaksford & Nick Chater (eds.), Cognition and Conditionals: Probability and Logic in Human Thinking. Oup Oxford.score: 240.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Romero Baró, José Ma & Alain Guy (eds.) (2005). Homenaje a Alain Guy. Publicacions I Edicions de la Universitat de Barcelona.score: 210.0
    El filósofo francés Alain Guy (La Rochelle, 1918 - Narbonne, 1998) dedicó por entero su vida al estudio de la filosofía española e hispanoamericana, dándola a conocer no sólo en el extranjero sino también en nuestro país.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Philip N. Johnson-Laird, Ruth M. J. Byrne & Vittorio Girotto (2009). The Mental Model Theory of Conditionals: A Reply to Guy Politzer. Topoi 28 (1):75-80.score: 126.0
    This paper replies to Politzer’s ( 2007 ) criticisms of the mental model theory of conditionals. It argues that the theory provides a correct account of negation of conditionals, that it does not provide a truth-functional account of their meaning, though it predicts that certain interpretations of conditionals yield acceptable versions of the ‘paradoxes’ of material implication, and that it postulates three main strategies for estimating the probabilities of conditionals.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Laure Carles (2001). Belief Revision 1 Thinking and Reasoning, 2001, 7, 217 234 Belief Revision and Uncertain Reasoning Guy Politzer CNRS, SaintDenis. [REVIEW] Thinking and Reasoning 7:217-234.score: 120.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Robert J. Deltete & Reed A. Guy (1996). Emerging From Imaginary Time. Synthese 108 (2):185 - 203.score: 30.0
    Recent models in quantum cosmology make use of the concept of imaginary time. These models all conjecture a join between regions of imaginary time and regions of real time. We examine the model of James Hartle and Stephen Hawking to argue that the various no-boundary attempts to interpret the transition from imaginary to real time in a logically consistent and physically significant way all fail. We believe this conclusion also applies to quantum tunneling models, such as that proposed by Alexander (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Robert Deltete & Reed Guy (1991). Einstein and EPR. Philosophy of Science 58 (3):377-397.score: 30.0
    Recent studies have shown that Einstein did not write the EPR paper and that he was disappointed with the outcome. He thought, rightly, that his own argument for the incompleteness of quantum theory was badly presented in the paper. We reconstruct the argument of EPR, indicate the reasons Einstein was dissatisfied with it, and discuss Einstein's own argument. We show that many commentators have been misled by the obscurity of EPR into proposing interpretations of its argument that do not accurately (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Mary E. Guy (1990). Ethical Decision Making in Everyday Work Situations. Quorum Books.score: 30.0
    This book takes a new approach to ethics by focusing on the kinds of dilemmas that confront people almost daily on the job.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Alfred Guy (1991). The Role of Aristotle's Praxis Today. Journal of Value Inquiry 25 (3):287-289.score: 30.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. R. Kent Guy (2000). Of Body and Brush: Grand Sacrifice as Text/Performance in Eighteenth-Century China (Review). Philosophy East and West 50 (4):623-625.score: 30.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Robert J. Deltete & Reed A. Guy (1997). Hartle-Hawking Cosmology and Unconditional Probabilities. Analysis 57 (4):304–315.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Reed Guy & Robert Deltete (1990). Fine, Einstein, and Ensembles. Foundations of Physics 20 (8):943-965.score: 30.0
    Einstein insisted that the only acceptable interpretation of the quantum theory was an ensemble interpretation, that this way of understanding the quantum formalism eliminated all the problems associated with interpreting the theory as a complete description of individual systems. But he never developed his ensemble interpretation in any detail or explained how it was supposed to resolve the difficulties with the individual interpretation. We offer a reconstruction of Einstein's position that is consonant with his other beliefs and examine the “prism” (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. H. L. I. Bornett, J. H. Guy & P. J. Cain (2003). Impact of Animal Welfare on Costs and Viability of Pig Production in the UK. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 (2):163-186.score: 30.0
    The European Union welfare standardsfor intensively kept pigs have steadilyincreased over the past few years and areproposed to continue in the future. It isimportant that the cost implications of thesechanges in welfare standards are assessed. Theaim of this study was to determine theprofitability of rearing pigs in a range ofhousing systems with different standards forpig welfare. Models were constructed tocalculate the cost of pig rearing (6–95 kg) in afully-slatted system (fulfilling minimum EUspace requirements, Directive 91630/EEC); apartly-slatted system; a high-welfare,straw-based system (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Jean Baratgin, G. Politzer & D. P. Over, The Psychology of Indicative Conditionals and Conditional Bets.score: 30.0
    There is a new Bayesian, or probabilistic, paradigm in the psychology of reasoning, with new psychological accounts of the indicative conditional of natural language. In psychological experiments in this new paradigm, people judge that the probability of the indicative conditional, P(if A then C), is the conditional probability of C given A, P(C | A). In other experiments, participants respond with what has been called the 'de- fective' truth table: they judge that if A then C is true when A (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. S. C. Guy & L. Cahill (1999). The Role of Overt Rehearsal in Enhanced Conscious Memory for Emotional Events. Consciousness and Cognition 8 (1):114-122.score: 30.0
    This study tested the hypothesis that overt rehearsal is sufficient to explain enhanced memory associated with emotion by experimentally manipulating rehearsal of emotional material. Participants viewed two sets of film clips, one set of emotional films and one set of relatively neutral films. One set of films was viewed in each of two sessions, with approximately 1 week between the sessions. Participants were given a free recall test of all of films viewed approximately 1 week after the second session. Rehearsal (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. William Guy (1977). Philosophy of Education as Meta-Theory. Educational Philosophy and Theory 9 (2):43-55.score: 30.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. John A. Guy (1977). Thomas More as Successor to Wolsey. Thought 52 (3):275-292.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. G. Politzer (2007). The Psychological Reality of Classical Quantifier Entailment Properties. Journal of Semantics 24 (4):331-343.score: 30.0
    A test of directional entailment properties of classical quantifiers defined by the theory of generalized quantifiers (Barwise & Cooper 1981) is described. Participants had to solve a task which consisted of four kinds of inference. In the first one, the premise was of the form ‘Q–hyponym–verb–blank predicate’, where Q is a classical quantifier (e.g. ‘Some cats are [ ]’), and the question was to indicate what, if anything, can be concluded by filling the slots in ‘...–hyperonym–verb–blank predicate’ (e.g. ‘... animals (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Francisco Romero & Alain Guy (1958). Philosophie et histoire Des idées en ibéro-amérique. Les Etudes Philosophiques 13 (3):275 - 279.score: 30.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Ernest Guy (1945). The French Colonies, Past and Future. Thought 20 (1):137-138.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Lyle E. Bourne Jr, Donald E. Guy & Nancy Wadsworth (1967). Verbal-Reinforcement Combinations and the Relative Frequency of Informative Feedback in a Card-Sorting Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology 73 (2):220.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Donald E. Guy, Frederick M. Van Fleet & Lyle E. Bourne Jr (1966). Effects of Adding a Stimulus Dimension Prior to a Nonreversal Shift. Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (2):161.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Bernard Guy (2012). Penser ensemble le temps et l'espace. Philosophia Scientiae 15 (3):91-113.score: 30.0
    Nous proposons de penser ensemble les concepts d'espace et de temps : ils concernent les mêmes degrés de liberté des éléments du monde et fonctionnent toujours en tandem. Leurs fondements doivent être discutés, non dans une pensée de la substance (chacun est défini par une série de caractères qui lui sont propres), mais dans une pensée de la relation (chacun se définit en opposition à l'autre). Nous opposons des relations spatiales à des relations temporelles, ou encore des relations d'immobilité à (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Barbara Ann Hocking & Scott Guy (2010). Constitutional and Human Rights Disturbances: Australia's Privative Clauses Created Both in an Immigration Context. [REVIEW] Human Rights Review 11 (3):401-431.score: 30.0
    With the arrival of another wave of “boat people” to Australian waters in late 2009, issues of human rights of asylum seekers and refugees once again became a major feature of the political landscape. Claims of “queue jumping” were made, particularly by some sections of the media, and they may seem populist, but they are also ironic, given the protracted efforts on the part of the federal government to stymie any orderly appeals process, largely through resort to “privative clauses”. Such (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000