13 found
Sort by:
  1. Prasanta K. Pattanaik (2013). The Concepts of Choice and Preference in Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 20 (2):215-218.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Prasanta K. Pattanaik & Yongsheng Xu (2012). On Dominance and Context-Dependence in Decisions Involving Multiple Attributes. Economics and Philosophy 28 (2):117-132.
    In decision-making involving multiple criteria or attributes, a decision maker first identifies all relevant evaluative attributes in making decisions. Then, a dominance principle is often invoked whenever applicable: whenever an option x is better than an option y in terms of some attribute and no worse than y in terms of any other attributes, x is judged to be better than y. If, however, this dominance principle is not applicable, then the decision maker determines the relative importance between the identified (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Aditi Bhattacharyya, Prasanta K. Pattanaik & Yongsheng Xu (2011). Choice, Internal Consistency and Rationality. Economics and Philosophy 27 (2):123-149.
  4. Shatakshee Dhongde & Prasanta K. Pattanaik (2009). Preference, Choice, and Rationality : Amartya Sen's Critique of the Theory of Rational Choice in Economics. In Christopher W. Morris (ed.), Amartya Sen. Cambridge University Press.
  5. Prasanta K. Pattanaik & Yongsheng Xu (2009). Conceptions of Individual Rights and Freedom in Welfare Economics : A Re-Examination. In Reiko Gotoh & Paul Dumouchel (eds.), Against Injustice: The New Economics of Amartya Sen. Cambridge University Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Prasanta K. Pattanaik & Yongsheng Xu (2009). Re-Examination. In Reiko Gotoh & Paul Dumouchel (eds.), Against Injustice: The New Economics of Amartya Sen. Cambridge University Press. 187.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Prasanta K. Pattanaik (2008). Rights, Individual Preferences, and Collective Rationality. In Kaushik Basu & Ravi Kanbur (eds.), Arguments for a Better World: Essays in Honor of Amartya Sen: Volume I: Ethics, Welfare, and Measurement and Volume Ii: Society, Institutions, and Development. Oup Oxford.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Prasanta K. Pattanaik & Yongsheng Xu (2007). On Measuring Personal Connections and the Extent of Social Networks. Analyse and Kritik 29 (2).
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Prasanta K. Pattanaik & Y. Xu (1998). On Freedom and Preferences. Theory and Decision 44:173-198.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Prasanta K. Pattanaik & Yongsheng Xu (1998). On Preference and Freedom. Theory and Decision 44 (2):173-198.
    We consider the role of preferences in the assessment of an agent's freedom, visualized as the opportunity for choice. After discussing several possible intuitive approaches to the problem, we explore an approach based on the notion of preference orderings that a reasonable person may possibly have. Using different sets of axioms, we characterize the rules for ranking opportunity sets in terms of freedom. We also show that certain axioms for ranking opportunity sets are incompatible.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Prasanta K. Pattanaik (1996). The Liberal Paradox: Some Interpretations When Rights Are Represented as Game Forms. Analyse and Kritik 18 (1):38-53.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Prasanta K. Pattanaik (1976). Collective Rationality and Strategy-Proofness of Group Decision Rules. Theory and Decision 7 (3):191-203.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Raveendran N. Batra & Prasanta K. Pattanaik (1972). On Some Suggestions for Having Non-Binary Social Choice Functions. Theory and Decision 3 (1):1-11.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation