Search results for 'Presentation' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Krista Lawlor (2005). Confused Thought and Modes of Presentation. Philosophical Quarterly 55 (218):21-36.score: 24.0
    Ruth Millikan has long argued that the phenomenon of confused thought requires us to abandon certain traditional programmes for mental semantics. On the one hand she argues that confused thought involves confused concepts, and on the other that Fregean senses, or modes of presentation, cannot be useful in theorizing about minds capable of confused thinking. I argue that while we might accept that concepts can be confused, we have no reason to abandon modes of presentation. Making sense of (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Jens E. Kjeldsen (2013). Strategies of Visual Argumentation in Slideshow Presentations: The Role of the Visuals in an Al Gore Presentation on Climate Change. [REVIEW] Argumentation 27 (4):425-443.score: 24.0
    The use of digital presentation tools such as PowerPoint is ubiquitous; however we still do not know much about the persuasiveness of these programs. Examining the use of visual analogy and visual chronology, in particular, this article explores the use of visual argumentation in a Keynote presentation by Al Gore. It illustrates how images function as an integrated part of Gores reasoning.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Johann C. Marek (2012). Exemplarization and Self-Presentation: Lehrer and Meinong on Consciousness. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 161 (1):119-129.score: 24.0
    Alexius Meinong's specific use of the term "self-presentation" had a significant influence on modern epistemology and philosophical psychology. To show that there are remarkable parallels between Meinong's account of the self-presentation of experiences and Lehrer's account of the exemplarization of experiences is one of this paper's main objectives. Another objective is to put forward some comments and critical remarks to Lehrer's approach. One of the main problems can be expressed by the following: The process of using a particular (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Stephen M. Kosslyn, Rogier A. Kievit, Alexandra G. Russell & Jennifer M. Shephard (2012). PowerPoint® Presentation Flaws and Failures: A Psychological Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology 3.score: 24.0
    Electronic slideshow presentations are often faulted anecdotally, but little empirical work has documented their faults. Three studies reported here document psychological causes of their flaws. In Study 1 we found that eight psychological principles are often violated in PowerPoint® presentations, across different fields—for example, academic research presentations generally were no better or worse than business presentations. In Study 2 we found that respondents reported having noticed, and having been annoyed by, specific problems in presentations arising from violations of particular psychological (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Bernard Sève (2011). Utilisation et « présentation esthétique » des instruments de musique. Methodos 11.score: 24.0
    J’appelle « présentation esthétique » le fait, pour un artiste, de présenter certaines conditions ou certains moyens de son art dans les formes même de son art, de manière sensible (« esthétique ») et non pas discursive. Dans certaines œuvres, le musicien présente esthétiquement certains instruments de musique : l’instrument n’est plus seulement au service de la musique, il est mis en avant pour lui-même. La musique devient alors l’instrument de son instrument. J’analyse de ce point de vue les Six (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Jennifer M. Shephard Stephen M. Kosslyn, Rogier A. Kievit, Alexandra G. Russell (2012). PowerPoint® Presentation Flaws and Failures: A Psychological Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology 3.score: 24.0
    Electronic slideshow presentations are often faulted anecdotally, but little empirical work has documented their faults. Three studies reported here document psychological causes of their flaws. In Study 1 we found that eight psychological principles are often violated in PowerPoint® presentations, across different fields—for example, academic research presentations generally were no better or worse than business presentations. In Study 2 we found that respondents reported having noticed, and having been annoyed by, specific problems in presentations arising from violations of particular psychological (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Marisa Wolf-Ridgway (2012). Application of Work Psychodynamics to the Analysis of CEOs''Presentation of Self': Resorting to an'Astute'Clinical Methodology. Journal of Research Practice 8 (2):Article - M10.score: 24.0
    Does work psychodynamics--a sub-discipline of clinical psychology in the field of work sciences--offer a relevant methodological reference to analyze the psychological processes that come into play when a CEO is working? The objective of this article is to propose an answer to this question by going back to a doctoral research, which focused on the clinical analysis of the CEOs' "presentation of self," noted as one aspect of their work. The author's arguments for a clinical approach are presented as (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Edward N. Zalta (2001). Fregean Senses, Modes of Presentation, and Concepts. Philosophical Perspectives 15 (s15):335-359.score: 21.0
    of my axiomatic theory of abstract objects.<sup>1</sup> The theory asserts the ex- istence not only of ordinary properties, relations, and propositions, but also of abstract individuals and abstract properties and relations. The.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. William A. Roberts (1972). Free Recall of Word Lists Varying in Length and Rate of Presentation: A Test of Total-Time Hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology 92 (3):365.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Rob Brady (1981). Verdictives, Self-Presentation, and Self-Knowledge. Southern Journal of Philosophy 19 (1):11-20.score: 21.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Irwin P. Levin, Jeral R. Williams, Corinne S. Dulberg & Kent L. Norman (1970). Performance in a Verbal Transfer Task as a Function of Preshift and Postshift Response Dominance Levels and Method of Presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 86 (3):469.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Ronald Ley (1968). Associative Reaction Time, Meaningfulness, and Presentation Rate in Paired-Associate Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (2p1):285.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Allen L. Pinkus & Kenneth R. Laughery (1970). Recoding and Grouping Processes in Short-Term Memory: Effects of Subject-Paced Presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 85 (3):335.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Benton J. Underwood, John J. Shaughnessy & Joel Zimmerman (1972). List Length and Method of Presentation in Verbal Discrimination Learning with Further Evidence on Retroaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology 93 (1):181.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Tannis Y. Arbuckle & Lola L. Cuddy (1969). Discrimination of Item Strength at Time of Presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (1):126.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Tannis Y. Arbuckle & Louise Aznavour (1973). Effectiveness of Supplied Mediators in Relation to Presentation Modality and Retrieval Cue. Journal of Experimental Psychology 98 (2):286.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. David Birch, James R. Ison & Sally E. Sperling (1960). Reversal Learning Under Single Stimulus Presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 60 (1):36.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Gail A. Bruder (1969). Effects of Method of Presentation on Paired-Associate Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (2p1):383.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. M. C. Corballis (1966). Memory Span as a Function of Variable Presentation Speeds and Stimulus Durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (3):461.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Elizabeth Fehrer & Donald Ganchrow (1963). Effects of Exposure Variables on Figural Aftereffects Under Tachistoscopic Presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 66 (5):506-513.score: 21.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Ronald H. Hopkins, Richard E. Edwards & Cheri L. Cook (1973). Presentation Modality, Distractor Modality, and Proactive Interference in Short-Term Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology 98 (2):362.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Thomas K. Landauer & Lynn Eldridge (1967). Effect of Tests Without Feedback and Presentation-Test Interval in Paired-Associate Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (3):290.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Barry Stein (1969). Random Versus Constant Presentation of S-R Pairs: Effects of Associative Value and Test Rate. Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (2p1):401.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. David M. Stoff & Morris N. Eagle (1971). The Relationship Among Reported Strategies, Presentation Rate, and Verbal Ability and Their Effects on Free Recall Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 87 (3):423-428.score: 21.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Edward J. Stubin, Walter I. Heimer & Sherman J. Tatz (1970). Total Time and Presentation Time in Paired-Associate Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (2):308.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Nancy C. Waugh (1967). Presentation Time and Free Recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology 73 (1):39.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Tannis Y. Arbuckle (1971). Mediational Instruction, Stage of Practice, Presentation Rate, and Retrieval Cue in Paired-Associate Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 88 (3):396.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Wayne H. Bartz (1972). Repetition Effects in Dichotic Presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 92 (2):220.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. B. R. Bugelski (1962). Presentation Time, Total Time, and Mediation in Pairedassociate Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 63 (4):409.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. V. David Burns (1974). Presentation Rate and Intralist Repetition Effects in Immediate Probe Recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (5):813.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Robert C. Calfee & Rita Anderson (1971). Presentation Rate Effects in Paired-Associate Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 88 (2):239.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. John B. Carroll & Mary Long Burke (1965). Parameters of Paired-Associate Verbal Learning: Length of List, Meaningfulness, Rate of Presentation, and Ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (6):543.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. C. Richard Chapman & Joseph Halpern (1969). Positive Contrast Effects as a Function of Method of Incentive Presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (3p1):548.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Charles N. Cofer (1968). Free Recall of Nouns After Presentation in Sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (1):145.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Phebe Cramer (1971). Can Semantic Generalization Occur Without CS Presentation? Journal of Experimental Psychology 88 (3):380.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. D. M. Forsyth & A. Chapanis (1958). Counting Repeated Light Flashes as a Function of Their Number, Their Rate of Presentation, and Retinal Location Stimulated. Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 (5):385.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. William R. Gamboni, Gregory R. Gaustad & Buford E. Wilson (1972). Verbal Discrimination Learning as a Function of Percentage Occurrence of Reinforcing Information (% ORI) and Varying Presentation Rates. Journal of Experimental Psychology 93 (2):256.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Harry F. Gollob & Andrew M. Lugg (1973). Effects of Instruction and Stimulus Presentation on the Occurrence of Averaging Responses in Impression Formation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 98 (1):217.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. G. Robert Grice, John J. Hunter & David L. Kohfeld (1967). Order of Presentation, Cs Intensity, and Response Latency. Journal of Experimental Psychology 74 (4, Pt.1):581-585.score: 21.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. E. Rae Harcum & Stephen M. Friedman (1963). Reproduction of Binary Visual Patterns Having Different Element-Presentation Sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology 66 (3):300.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Ronald H. Hopkins, Richard E. Edwards & James R. Gavelek (1971). Presentation Modality as an Encoding Variable in Short-Term Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology 90 (2):319.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. C. I. Hovland (1938). Experimental Studies in Rote Learning Theory. II. Reminiscence with Varying Speeds of Syllable Presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 22 (4):338.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Geoffrey Keppel & William A. Mallory (1969). Presentation Rate and Instructions to Guess in Free Recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (2p1):269.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Geoffrey Keppel & Robert J. Rehula (1965). Rate of Presentation in Serial Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (2):121.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. David J. King (1968). Retention of Connected Meaningful Material as a Function of Modes of Presentation and Recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (4):676.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. David Laberge & James R. Tweedy (1964). Presentation Probability and Choice Time. Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (5):477.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Clessen J. Martin & Eli Saltz (1963). Serial Versus Random Presentation of Paired Associates. Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (6):609.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. A. W. Melton & G. R. Stone (1942). The Retention of Serial Lists of Adjectives Over Short Time-Intervals with Varying Rates of Presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 30 (4):295.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Margaret J. Peterson (1964). Cue Trials, Frequency of Presentation, and Mediating Responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (5):432.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Ernst Z. Rothkopf (1958). Stimulus Similarity and Sequence of Stimulus Presentation in Paired-Associate Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 (2):114.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000