Search results for 'Principle (Philosophy' (try it on Scholar)

  1. Daniel Steel (2014). Philosophy and the Precautionary Principle: Science, Evidence, and Environmental Policy. Cambridge University Press.
    Scholars in philosophy, law, economics and other fields have widely debated how science, environmental precaution, and economic interests should be balanced in urgent contemporary problems, such as climate change. One controversial focus of these discussions is the precautionary principle, according to which scientific uncertainty should not be a reason for delay in the face of serious threats to the environment or health. While the precautionary principle has been very influential, no generally accepted definition of it exists and critics (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  2.  84
    Loretta M. Kopelman, David Resnick & Douglas L. Weed (2004). What is the Role of the Precautionary Principle in the Philosophy of Medicine and Bioethics? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (3):255 – 258.
    (2004). What is the Role of the Precautionary Principle in the Philosophy of Medicine and Bioethics? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 255-258.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  3.  26
    Antonio Gutiérrez-Pozo (2012). La vida humana como principio interpretativo radical en la filosofía de Ortega y Gasset / Human Life as Radical Interpretative Principle in the Philosophy of Ortega y Gasset. Trans/Form/Ação 35 (3):81-96.
    En este artículo presentamos el concepto de vida humana como texto eterno en el pensamiento de Ortega y sus consecuencias para el problema de la interpretación. La filosofía de la razón vital de Ortega se fundamenta en el concepto de vida humana como realidad radical y principio interpretativo universal, y por esta razón se presenta desde el principio como una filosofía hermenéutica de la vida y no como una reducción hacia la conciencia trascendental. Esta hermenéutica se practica especialmente en el (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Mary Anne Perkins (1994). Coleridge's Philosophy: The Logos as Unifying Principle. Oxford University Press.
    Mary Anne Perkins re-examines Coleridge's claim to have developed a "logosophic" system which attempted "to reduce all knowledges into harmony." She pays particular attention to his later writings, some of which are still unpublished. She suggests that the accusations of plagiarism and of muddled, abstruse metaphysics which have been levelled at him may be challenged by a thorough reading of his work in which its unifying principle is revealed. She explores the various meanings of the term "logos," a recurrent (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5.  33
    F. Bertola & Umberto Curi (eds.) (1988). The Anthropic Principle: Proceedings of the Second Venice Conference on Cosmology and Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
    The questions that were purely in the realms of philosophy are now beginning to be answered by science. The second Venice Conference on Cosmology and Philosophy explores the anthropic principle which states that the Universe has the conditions we observe because we are here. Out of all possible universes we can only experience the restricted class that permits observers. This realization has profound implications for cosmology, philosophy and theology; all of which are explored in this book by thirteen contributors (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  10
    Wm Pepperell Montague (1925). A Theory of Monads: Outlines of the Philosophy of the Principle of Relativity. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 22 (21):577-583.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  53
    Antony Duff (ed.) (1998). Philosophy and the Criminal Law: Principle and Critique. Cambridge University Press.
    Five pre-eminent legal theorists tackle a range of fundamental questions on the nature of the philosophy of criminal law. Their essays explore the extent to which and the ways in which our systems of criminal law can be seen as rational and principled. The essays discuss some of the principles by which, it is often thought, a system of law should be structured, and they ask whether our own systems are genuinely principled or riven by basic contradictions, reflecting deeper political (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  8. E. T. Whittaker (1951). Eddington's Principle in the Philosophy of Science. Cambridge Eng.University Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  9.  9
    John H. Zammito (2003). 'This Inscrutable Principle of an Original Organization': Epigenesis and 'Looseness of Fit' in Kant's Philosophy of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (1):73-109.
    Kant’s philosophy of science takes on sharp contour in terms of his interaction with the practicing life scientists of his day, particularly Johann Blumenbach and the latter’s student, Christoph Girtanner, who in 1796 attempted to synthesize the ideas of Kant and Blumenbach. Indeed, Kant’s engagement with the life sciences played a far more substantial role in his transcendental philosophy than has been recognized hitherto. The theory of epigenesis, especially in light of Kant’s famous analogy in the first Critique , posed (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  10.  21
    John H. Zammito (2003). 'This Inscrutable Principle of an Original Organization': Epigenesis and 'Looseness of Fit' in Kant's Philosophy of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (1):73-109.
    Kant's philosophy of science takes on sharp contour in terms of his interaction with the practicing life scientists of his day, particularly Johann Blumenbach and the latter's student, Christoph Girtanner, who in 1796 attempted to synthesize the ideas of Kant and Blumenbach. Indeed, Kant's engagement with the life sciences played a far more substantial role in his transcendental philosophy than has been recognized hitherto. The theory of epigenesis, especially in light of Kant's famous analogy in the first Critique (B167), posed (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  11.  6
    R. F. Atkinson (1957). J. S. Mill's “Proof” Of The Principle Of Utility: PHILOSOPHY. Philosophy 32 (121):158-167.
    In Chapter 4 of his essay Utilitarianism , “Of what sort of Proof the Principle of Utility is susceptible,” J. S. Mill undertakes to prove , in some sense of that term, the principle of utility. It has very commonly been argued that in the course of this “proof” Mill commits two very obvious fallacies. The first is the naturalistic fallacy which he is held to commit when he argues that since “the only proof capable of being given (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  42
    Brook Ziporyn (2008). Form, Principle, Pattern, or Coherence? Li in Chinese Philosophy. Philosophy Compass 3 (3):401–422.
    This article provides an overview of controversies in the history of Chinese philosophy concerning the diversity of meanings of the term Li , as well as the comparative issues raised in various attempts by modern Chinese and Western interpreters to come to terms with this diversity of meanings. Revisiting the earliest pre-philosophical uses of the term, an attempt is then made to synthesize the insights of previous interpreters and open up a new path for investigating its distinctive implications in classical (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  40
    Theodore M. Benditt (1978). Law as Rule and Principle: Problems of Legal Philosophy. Stanford University Press.
    Legal Realism Judges ascertain and apply the law. This is what almost everyone would suppose, and legal writers as far apart in their views of law as Sir ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14.  1
    W. G. Maclagan (1960). Respect For Persons as a Moral Principle—II: PHILOSOPHY. Philosophy 35 (135):289-305.
    In Part I of this discussion I considered the nature and validity of the principle of respect for persons as distinguished from its practical import and application. Before I proceed to that second topic let me draw together in summary fashion the main points of the view I have put forward.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15. John Major Jenkins (1994). Jaloj Kexoj and Phi-64: The Dual Principle Core Paradigm of Mayan Time Philosophy and its Conceptual Parallel in Old World Thought. Four Ahau Press.
  16. Bimal Krishna Matilal (1985). The 'Context-Principle' in Indian Philosophy of Language ; and, Scepticism and Mysticism in Indian Philosophy. Mortimer and Raymond Sackler Institute of Advanced Studies, Tel Aviv University.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  4
    Camilla Colombo & Katie Steele (forthcoming). Daniel Steel Philosophy and the Precautionary Principle: Science, Evidence, and Environmental Policy. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science:axw001.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  7
    Tomomi Asakura (2013). On the Principle of Comparative East Asian Philosophy: Nishida Kitarō and Mou Zongsan. National Central University Journal of Humanities 54:1-25.
    Recent research both on the Kyoto School and on the contemporary New Confucians suggests significant similarities between these two modern East Asian philosophies. Still missing is, however, an explanation of the shared philosophical ideas that serve as the foundation for comparative studies. For this reason, I analyze the basic theories of the two distinctly East Asian philosophies of Nishida Kitarō (1870-1945) and Mou Zongsan (1909-95) so as to identify and extract the same type of argument. This is an alternative to (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  41
    JeeLoo Liu (2010). WANG Fuzhi's Philosophy of Principle (Li) Inherent in Qi. In John Makeham (ed.), Dao Companion to Neo-Confucian Philosophy. Springer 355--379.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  3
    Charlotte Werndl (2016). Philosophy of the Precautionary Principle, Daniel Steel. Cambridge University Press, 2015, Xv + 256 Pages. [REVIEW] Economics and Philosophy 32 (1):162-169.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Ingrid Marroquin, Paul Naylor, Tom Walters, Craig Tenney & Shannon Atkinson (forthcoming). Philosophy of Work Group Project Mill's Liberal Libertarianism Via the Principle of Utility. Philosophy.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  17
    Rolf Ahlers (2005). Reinhold and Hegel on the Principle and Systematicity of Philosophy. Idealistic Studies 35 (2-3):215-253.
    In the United States the relationship between Hegel and Schelling divides into two camps: The first sees Hegel’s critical remarks in the Phenomenology not directed against Schelling himself but against Schelling’s adherents. I provide here detailed arguments for the minority view: Although Hegel did collaborate with Schelling in the early Jena years even opposing Reinhold, he nonetheless worked with Reinhold’s arguments on the origins and systematicity of philosophy differently than did Schelling: The rift between the two giants really goes back (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  13
    Alison Hills (2007). The Principle of Right: Practical Reason and Justification in Kant's Ethical and Political Philosophy. Politics and Ethics Review 3 (1):24-36.
    The principle of right is Kant's main formulation of the rules of politics, and it has obvious affinities with the moral law. Do we have moral reasons to obey the principle? I argue that we may have moral reasons to obey the principle ourselves, but not coercively to enforce it. Do we have prudential reasons to obey the principle? I argue that we do not have reasons based on happiness, but that we may have prudential reasons (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  3
    Kevin Elliott (2015). Review: Daniel Steel. Philosophy and the Precautionary Principle: Science, Evidence, and Environmental Policy. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 82 (3):524-527.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  21
    Michael David Resnik (1967). The Context Principle in Frege's Philosophy. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 27 (3):356-365.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  26.  47
    Allen W. Wood, The 'I' as Principle of Practical Philosophy.
    Fichte founded a revolutionary philosophical movement and invented an entirely new kind of philosophy; and he did so knowingly and intentionally. Yet, paradoxically, he did all this merely in the course of attempting to complete the philosophical project of Kant and protect critical philosophy against the possibility of skeptical..
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  4
    Mikl Pos R. Pedei & L. Paszl Po E. Szab Po (1999). On Reichenbach's Common Cause Principle and Reichenbach's Notion of Common Cause* G Pabor Hofer-Szab Po Department of Philosophy Technical University of Budapest. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50:377-399.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  10
    Zhang Yibing (2002). 10 Against Humanitarianism: The Most Important and Basic Principle in Marxism——An Analysis of Althusser's Critique of Subjectivity Philosophy. Modern Philosophy 1:001.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  11
    Hans Köchler (1981). The Principle of Freedom. A Discussion of the Prospects and Limitations of Transcendental Philosophy. Philosophy and History 14 (1):4-6.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  2
    Margaret Wilson, Karl Schuhmann, Nicholas Fox, John Stephens & Ralph Walker (1997). ((Review of Celia Wolf-Devine, Descartes on Seeing: Epistemology and Visual Perception , ISBN 0-8093-1838-5); Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan, with Selected Variants Front the Latin Edition of 1668, Ed. With Introduction and Notes, by Edwin Curley , ISBN 0-87220-178-3 , 0-87220-177-5 ; Allison Coudert, Leibniz and the Kabbalah , ISBN 0-7923-3114-1; Richard Price, The Correspondence, Ed. D. O. Thomas and W. Bernard Peach, Vol. III. February 1786-February 1791, Ed. W. Bernard Peach. , ISBN 0-8223-1327-8; Henry Allison, Idealism and Freedom: Essays on Kant's Theoretical and Practical Philosophy , ISBN 0-521-48295-X , 0-521-48337-9 ; Terry Pinkard, Hegel's Phenomenology: The Sociality of Reason , ISBN 0-521-45300-3); Mary Anne Perkins, Coleridge's Philosophy, The Logos as Unifying Principle , ISBN 0-19-824075-9; Elzbieta Ettinger, Hannah Arendt - Martin Heidegger , ISBN 0-300-06407-1; Dana R. Villa, Arendt and Heidegger - The Fate of the Political ISBN 0-691-04400-7. [REVIEW] British Journal for the History of Philosophy 5 (2):415-445.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  19
    Douglas J. Den Uyl (1977). The Aristocratic Principle in the Political Philosophy of Leibniz. Journal of the History of Philosophy 15 (3):281-292.
  32.  1
    Kevin Elliott (2015). Daniel Steel,Philosophy and the Precautionary Principle: Science, Evidence, and Environmental Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 266 Pp., $95.00. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 82 (3):524-527.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  7
    Hans J. Verweyen (1981). Recognition as a Principle of Practical Philosophy. Studies in Hegel's Philosophy of the Spirit at Jena. Philosophy and History 14 (1):39-42.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  1
    Charles A. Campbell (1932). Scepticism and Construction: Bradley's Sceptical Principle as the Basis of Constructive Philosophy. Journal of Philosophy 29 (23):637-639.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  5
    Tom Sorell (2000). Insight and Inference: Descartes's Founding Principle and Modern Philosophy (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 38 (1):122-123.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  4
    Ch'eri Ho-Ch'ing (1973). Lenin on the Principle of Party Nature in Philosophy. Contemporary Chinese Thought 5 (2):4-20.
    Increasingly skillful forgery of Marxism and increasingly skillful disguise of various antimaterialist theories as Marxism are the characteristics of modern revisionism in political economy, tactics, and general philosophy ." In this remark, Lenin unmistakably pointed out the old tricks of the various revisionists who frenziedly attacked Marxism. In philosophy, veteran revisionists such as Bernstein and his ilk who followed on the tail of bourgeois professors of philosophy called for "return to Kant," integration of Marxism with Kantianism, and replenishment of Marxism (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Paul Carus & James Bradley (1913). The Principle of Relativity in the Light of the Philosophy of Science. Open Court Pub. Co.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. John J. Compton (1992). One of the Central Tasks for Any Philosophy of Science is to Assess the Conditions and Limits of Scientific Objectivity. What Should We Take This Sort of Objectivity to Mean? How is It to Be Legitimated? How Can It Be Achieved? Is It Even Possible in Principle, Given the Human Condition? These Questions Are of Perennial Concern, of Course, but in Recent Discussion They Have Become Acute. They. [REVIEW] In D. P. Chattopadhyaya, Lester E. Embree & Jitendranath Mohanty (eds.), Phenomenology and Indian Philosophy. Indian Council of Philosophical Research in Association with Motilal Banarsidass Publishers 185.
  39. J. Cottingham (2000). Murray Miles: Insight and Inference: Descartes' Founding Principle and Modern Philosophy. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (3):555-557.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. T. G. Cowling (1952). "Eddington's Principle in the Philosophy of Science." By Sir Edmund Whittaker. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 3 ([9/12]):281.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. R. A. Duff (1998). Philosophy and the Criminal Law: Principle and Critique. Cambridge University Press.
    Five pre-eminent legal theorists tackle a range of fundamental questions on the nature of the philosophy of criminal law. Their essays explore the extent to which and the ways in which our systems of criminal law can be seen as rational and principled. The essays discuss some of the principles by which, it is often thought, a system of law should be structured, and they ask whether our own systems are genuinely principled or riven by basic contradictions, reflecting deeper political (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. R. A. Duff (2009). Philosophy and the Criminal Law: Principle and Critique. Cambridge University Press.
    Five pre-eminent legal theorists tackle a range of fundamental questions on the nature of the philosophy of criminal law. Their essays explore the extent to which and the ways in which our systems of criminal law can be seen as rational and principled. The essays discuss some of the principles by which, it is often thought, a system of law should be structured, and they ask whether our own systems are genuinely principled or riven by basic contradictions, reflecting deeper political (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. R. A. Duff (2011). Philosophy and the Criminal Law: Principle and Critique. Cambridge University Press.
    Five pre-eminent legal theorists tackle a range of fundamental questions on the nature of the philosophy of criminal law. Their essays explore the extent to which and the ways in which our systems of criminal law can be seen as rational and principled. The essays discuss some of the principles by which, it is often thought, a system of law should be structured, and they ask whether our own systems are genuinely principled or riven by basic contradictions, reflecting deeper political (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. William A. Edmundson (1999). Antony Duff, Ed., Philosophy and the Criminal Law: Principle and Critique Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 19 (5):325-327.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Review by: Kevin Elliott (2015). Review: Daniel Steel. Philosophy and the Precautionary Principle: Science, Evidence, and Environmental Policy. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 82 (3):524-527,.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. G. J. Whitrow (1952). Eddingion's Principle in the Philosophy of Science. By Sir Edmund Whit-Taker, F.R.S. (Cambridge University Press. 1951. Pp. V + 35. Price 2s. 6d.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 27 (102):268-.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Christia Mercer (2012). The General Metaphysics of Nature: Plotinus on Logos / Lloyd P. Gerson. The Significance of 'Physics' in Porphyry : The Problem of Body and Matter / Andrew Smith. Self-Motion and Reflection : Hermias and Proclus on the Harmony of Plato and Aristotle on the Soul / Stephen Menn. Nature in Proclus : From Irrational Immanent Principle to Goddess / Alain Lernould. Platonism in Early Modern Natural Philosophy : The Case of Leibniz and Conway. [REVIEW] In James Wilberding & Christoph Horn (eds.), Neoplatonism and the Philosophy of Nature. Oxford Up
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. W. H. Sheldon (1907). Albot's Fundamental Principle of Fichte's Philosophy. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 4 (17):471.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Jürgen Stolzenberg (2009). The Highest Principle and the Principle of Origin in Hermann Cohen's Theoretical Philosophy. In Rudolf A. Makkreel & Sebastian Luft (eds.), Neo-Kantianism in Contemporary Philosophy. Indiana University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Reinhard A. Wetzel (1914). Arus's The Principle of Relativity in the Light of the Philosophy of Science. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 11 (13):359.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  51. Nothing found.