Search results for 'Principle of Sufficient Reason' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Shieva Kleinschmidt (forthcoming). Reasoning Without the Principle of Sufficient Reason. In Tyron Goldschmidt (ed.), The Philosophy of Existence: Why Is There Something Rather Than Nothing? Routledgescore: 1642.0
    According to Principles of Sufficient Reason, every truth (in some relevant group) has an explanation. One of the most popular defenses of Principles of Sufficient Reason has been the presupposition of reason defense, which takes endorsement of the defended PSR to play a crucial role in our theory selection. According to recent presentations of this defense, our method of theory selection often depends on the assumption that, if a given proposition is true, then it has (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Martin Lin (forthcoming). The Principle of Sufficient Reason in Spinoza. In Michael Della Rocca (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Spinoza.score: 1440.0
  3. Alexander R. Pruss (2006). The Principle of Sufficient Reason: A Reassessment. Cambridge University Press.score: 1332.0
    The Principle of Sufficient Reason (PSR) says that all contingent facts must have explanation. In this volume, the first on the topic in the English language in nearly half a century, Alexander Pruss examines the substantive philosophical issues raised by the Principle Reason. Discussing various forms of the PSR and selected historical episodes, from Parmenides, Leibnez, and Hume, Pruss defends the claim that every true contingent proposition must have an explanation against major objections, including Hume's (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. F. C. White (1992). On Schopenhauer's Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason. E.J. Brill.score: 1332.0
    This book is a philosophical commentary on Schopenhauer's "Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason," dealing with each of Schopenhauer's principal ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Arthur Schopenhauer (1974). On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason. La Salle, Ill.,Open Court.score: 1332.0
    Machine generated contents note: General editor's preface; Editorial notes and references; Introduction; Notes on text and translation; Chronology; Bibliography; Part I. On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason: 1. Introduction; 2. Survey of what is most important in previous teachings about the principle of sufficient reason; 3. Inadequacy of previous accounts and sketch of a new one; 4. On the first class of objects for the subject and the form of the (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (forthcoming). The Principles of Contradiction, Sufficient Reason, and Identity of Indiscernibles. In Maria Rosa Antognazza (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Leibniz. Oxford University Pressscore: 1331.0
    Leibniz was a philosopher of principles: the principles of Contradiction, of Sufficient Reason, of Identity of Indiscernibles, of Plenitude, of the Best, and of Continuity are among the most famous Leibnizian principles. In this article I shall focus on the first three principles; I shall discuss various formulations of the principles (sect. 1), what it means for these theses to have the status of principles or axioms in Leibniz’s philosophy (sect. 2), the fundamental character of the Principles of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Yitzhak Melamed & Martin Lin, Principle of Sufficient Reason.score: 1236.0
    The Principle of Sufficient Reason is a powerful and controversial philosophical principle stipulating that everything must have a reason or cause. This simple demand for thoroughgoing intelligibility yields some of the boldest and most challenging theses in the history of metaphysics and epistemology. In this entry we begin with explaining the Principle, and then turn to the history of the debates around it. A section on recent discussions of the Principle will be added (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Jacek Wojtysiak (2007). On the Principle of Sufficient Reason. Polish Journal of Philosophy 1 (1):111-135.score: 1236.0
    The aim of this paper is to defend the ontological Principle of Sufficient Reason (PSR-O). I analyse various versions of this principle and various ways of justifying it. Then I attempt to challenge some counterexamples allegedly refuting a universal application of the PSR-O. There are standard and non-standard versions of the PSR-O. The PSR-Ostand can only be valid if there are no chains of contingent reasons and outcomes with first modules, i.e. all chains are actually infinite. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Mark T. Nelson (1996). The Principle of Sufficient Reason: A Moral Argument. Religious Studies 32 (1):15-26.score: 1224.0
    The Clarke/Rowe version of the Cosmological Argument is sound only if the Principle of Sufficient Reason (PSR) is true, but many philosophers, including Rowe, think that there is not adequate evidence for the principle of sufficient reason. I argue that there may be indirect evidence for PSR on the grounds that if we do not accept it, we lose our best justification for an important principle of metaethics, namely, the Principle of Universalizability. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Brandon C. Look (2011). Grounding the Principle of Sufficient Reason: Leibnizian Rationalism Versus the Humean Challenge. In Carlos Fraenkel, Dario Perinetti & Justin Smith (eds.), The Rationalists: Between Tradition and Revolution. Springer 201--219.score: 1224.0
    This essay examines arguments offered in support of the Principle of Sufficient Reason (PSR) by Leibniz and his followers as well as Hume's critique of the PSR. It is shown that Leibniz has a defensible argument for the PSR, whereas the arguments of his self-proclaimed followers are weak. Thus, Hume's challenge is met by Leibniz, by Wolff and Baumgarten not so much.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Alexander R. Pruss (2004). A Restricted Principle of Sufficient Reason and the Cosmological Argument. Religious Studies 40 (2):165-179.score: 1224.0
    The Principle of Sufficient Reason (PSR) says that, necessarily, every contingently true proposition has an explanation. The PSR is the most controversial premise in the cosmological argument for the existence of God. It is likely that one reason why a number of philosophers reject the PSR is that they think there are conceptual counter-examples to it. For instance, they may think, with Peter van Inwagen, that the conjunction of all contingent propositions cannot have an explanation, or (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Henry P. Stapp (2011). Retrocausal Effects as a Consequence of Orthodox Quantum Mechanics Refined to Accommodate The Principle of Sufficient Reason. AIP Conference Proceedings 1408.score: 1224.0
    The principle of sufficient reason asserts that anything that happens does so for a reason: no definite state of affairs can come into being unless there is a sufficient reason why that particular thing should happen. This principle is usually attributed to Leibniz, although the first recorded Western philosopher to use it was Anaximander of Miletus. The demand that nature be rational, in the sense that it be compatible with the principle of (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Alexander Pruss, Ex Nihilo Nihil Fit: Arguments New and Old for the Principle of Sufficient Reason Alexander R. Pruss November 1, 2002 1. Introduction. [REVIEW]score: 1224.0
    “Ex nihilo nihil fit,” goes the classic adage: nothing comes from nothing. Parmenides used the Principle of Sufficient Reason to argue that there was no such thing as change: If there was change, why did it happen when it happened rather than earlier or later? “Nothing happens in vain, but everything for a reason and under necessitation,” claimed Leucippus. Saint Thomas insisted in the.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Brian Leftow (2003). On a Principle of Sufficient Reason. Religious Studies 39 (3):269-286.score: 1224.0
    In The Metaphysics of Creation and The Metaphysics of Theism, Norman Kretzmann defends an argument for God's existence which he claims to find in Aquinas. I assess this argument's key premise, a principle of sufficient reason, that: ‘PSR2: Every existing thing has a reason for its existence either in the necessity of its own nature or in the causal efficacy of some other beings’. PSR2 requires God's nature to explain His existence. Kretzmann does not tell us (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Elmar J. Kremer (1997). The Cosmological Argument Without the Principle of Sufficient Reason. Faith and Philosophy 14 (1):62-70.score: 1224.0
    We formulate a version of the Cosmological Argument that deploys an epistemic principle of explanation in place of the traditional Principle of Sufficient Reason. The epistemic principle asserts that if there is a possible explanation of a fact, and some proposition is entailed by that explanation and by every other possible explanation of that fact, it is reasonable to accept that proposition. We try to show that there is a possible explanation of the fact that (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. John Edwin Gurr (1959). The Principle of Sufficient Reason in Some Scholastic Systems, 1750-1900. Marquette University Press.score: 1128.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Arthur Schopenhauer (1891/2006). On the Principle of Sufficient Reason. Prometheus Books.score: 1128.0
  18. Lois Frankel (1986). From a Metaphysical Point of View: Leibniz and the Principle of Sufficient Reason. Southern Journal of Philosophy 24 (3):321-334.score: 1080.0
    The relation between leibniz's logical and his metaphysical views is the subject of much modern scholarship. Some commentators have argued that his metaphysics is based on his logic; others have taken the opposite position. However, Both sides pose the question in terms of 'priority'. On the contrary, I argue that it is likely that leibniz means the psr to play "both" a logical and a metaphysical role. The ambiguity of leibniz's psr indicates that he equates the metaphysical notion of causation (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Gordon Belot (2001). The Principle of Sufficient Reason. Journal of Philosophy 98 (2):55-74.score: 1044.0
    The paper is about the physical theories which result when one identifies points in phase space related by symmetries; with applications to problems concerning gauge freedom and the structure of spacetime in classical mechanics.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Daniel Whiting (2011). Spinoza, the No Shared Attribute Thesis, and the Principle of Sufficient Reason. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (3):543 - 548.score: 1044.0
    British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Volume 19, Issue 3, Page 543-548, May 2011.
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Lloyd P. Gerson (1987). Two Criticisms of the Principle of Sufficient Reason. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 21 (3):129 - 142.score: 1032.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Béatrice Longuenesse (2001). Kant's Deconstruction of the Principle of Sufficient Reason. The Harvard Review of Philosophy 9 (1):67-87.score: 1032.0
  23. Christopher Adair-Toteff (1994). On Schopenhauer's Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason. Review of Metaphysics 47 (4):848-849.score: 1032.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Francesco Piro (2008). For a History of Leibniz's Principle of Sufficient Reason. First Formulations and Their Historical Background. In Marcelo Dascal (ed.), Leibniz: What Kind of Rationalist? Springer 463--478.score: 1032.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Ismay Barwell & Kathleen Lennon (1982). The Principle of Sufficient Reason. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 83:19 - 33.score: 1032.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Robert Wicks (1994). On Schopenhauer's "Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason" (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 32 (1):149-151.score: 1032.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. L. S. F. (1960). The Principle of Sufficient Reason in Some Scholastic Systems 1750-1900. Review of Metaphysics 13 (3):530-530.score: 1032.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Antonino Drago (2012). Pluralism in Logic: The Square of Opposition, Leibniz'Principle of Sufficient Reason and Markov's Principle. In J.-Y. Beziau & Dale Jacquette (eds.), Around and Beyond the Square of Opposition. Birkhäuser 175--189.score: 1032.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. John D. Caputo (1975). The Principle of Sufficient Reason: A Study of Heideggerian Self-Criticism. Southern Journal of Philosophy 13 (4):419-426.score: 1032.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. D. W. Hamlyn (1971). Schopenhauer on the Principle of Sufficient Reason. Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 5:145-162.score: 1032.0
    ‘The Principle of Sufficient Reason in all its forms is the sole principle and the sole support of all necessity. For necessity has no other true and distinct meaning than that of the infallibility of the consequence when the reason is posited. Accordingly every necessity is conditioned ; absolute, i.e. unconditioned, necessity therefore is a contradicto in adjecto . For to be necessary can never mean anything but to result from a given reason.’ These (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Christopher Hitchcock (2007). Prevention, Preemption, and the Principle of Sufficient Reason. Philosophical Review 116 (4):495-532.score: 1020.0
  32. Rudolf Allers (1960). Heidegger on the Principle of Sufficient Reason. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 20 (3):365-373.score: 1020.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Quentin Smith (1995). A Defense of a Principle of Sufficient Reason. Metaphilosophy 26 (1‐2):97-106.score: 1020.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. George N. Schlesinger (1995). A Pragmatic Version of the Principle of Sufficient Reason. Philosophical Quarterly 45 (181):439-459.score: 1020.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Kevin Davey (2007). Alexander Pruss the Principle of Sufficient Reason: A Reassessment. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006). Pp. XIII+335. £48.00 (Hbk). [REVIEW] Religious Studies 43 (4):500-503.score: 1020.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. John Atwell (1994). On Schopenhauer's Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason. International Studies in Philosophy 26 (1):142-143.score: 1020.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Dale Jacquette (1992). Schopenhauer's Circle and the Principle of Sufficient Reason. Metaphilosophy 23 (3):279-287.score: 1020.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. David Werther (2010). The Principle of Sufficient Reason. Faith and Philosophy 27 (1):94-98.score: 1020.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. William L. Rowe (1968). The Cosmological Argument and the Principle of Sufficient Reason. Man and World 1 (2):278-292.score: 1020.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Chad Allen (1997). The Principle of Sufficient Reason and the Uncaused Beginning of the Universe. Dialogue 36 (03):555-.score: 1020.0
    Des philosophes théistes comme Thomas D. Sullivan ont adapté les arguments cosmologiques bases sur le Principe de raison suffisante pour les ajuster à la cosmologie contemporaine du Big Bang Leur thèse centrale est que uisque le Big Bang n'a pas pu avoir une cause physique et puisque tout a une cause, le Big Bang a dû avoir une cause non physique ou surnaturelle. Des philosophes non théistes qui acceptent la cosmologie standard du Big Bang ont remis en question la vérité (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. A. Phillips Griffiths (1976). The Inaugural Address: Wittgenstein and the Four-Fold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 50:1 - 20.score: 1020.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Anthony Palmer (1996). Janus Beliefs and the Principle of Sufficient Reason. Philosophical Investigations 19 (1):87-93.score: 1020.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Dennis Vanden Auweele (2013). Arthur Schopenhauer: On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason and Other Writings. Edited, Introduced and Translated by David Cartwright, Edward Erdmann and Christopher Janaway. Philosophischer Literaturanzeiger 66 (2):206-208.score: 1020.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Adolf Grünbaum (2005). Does Leibniz's Principle of Sufficient Reason License His Primordial Existential Question» Why Is There Something Condngent, Rather Than Nothing?«? In Gereon Wolters & Martin Carrier (eds.), Homo Sapiens Und Homo Faber. De Gruyter 147.score: 1020.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Dale Jacquette (1992). FC White, On Schopenhauer's Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 12 (5):370-372.score: 1020.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Dennis Vanden Auweele (2013). Review of Arthur Schopenhauer: On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason and Other Writings Edited by Cartwright, Erdmann, Janaway. [REVIEW] Philosophischer Literaturanzeiger 66 (2):206-208.score: 1020.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Gunnar Andersson (2009). Critical Rationalism and the Principle of Sufficient Reason. In Zuzana Parusniková & R. S. Cohen (eds.), Rethinking Popper. Springer 21--30.score: 1020.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. D. Rickles (2007). Alexander R. Pruss, The Principle of Sufficient Reason: A Reassessment. Philosophy in Review 27 (5):370.score: 1020.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Michael Della Rocca (2003). A Rationalist Manifesto: Spinoza and the Principle of Sufficient Reason. Philosophical Topics 31 (1):75-93.score: 1020.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Ni Dingfu (1981). The Principle of Sufficient Reason and the Development of Formal Logic. Contemporary Chinese Thought 12 (3):16-28.score: 1020.0
    Whether or not the principle of sufficient reason is a fundamental rule of formal logic is a question that merits serious discussion. In debates from as early as the 1960s, when discussing the subject and functions of formal logic, some comrades pointed out that formal logic cannot study just the forms of thought alone. One of their basic arguments was that "the principle of sufficient reason demands that the content of a premise must be (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000