Search results for 'Proteomics' (try it on Scholar)

26 found
Sort by:
  1. Hendrik G. Stunnenberg & Michiel Vermeulen (2011). Towards Cracking the Epigenetic Code Using a Combination of High‐Throughput Epigenomics and Quantitative Mass Spectrometry‐Based Proteomics. Bioessays 33 (7):547-551.score: 21.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Sandra Orchard, Rolf Apweiler, Robert Barkovich, Dawn Field, John S. Garavelli, David Horn, Andy Jones, Philip Jones, Randall Julian, Ruth McNally, Jason Nerothin, Norman Paton, Angel Pizarro, Sean Seymour, Chris Taylor, Stefan Wiemann & Henning Hermjakob, Proteomics and Beyond : A Report on the 3rd Annual Spring Workshop of the HUPO-PSI 21-23 April 2006, San Francisco, CA, USA. [REVIEW]score: 18.0
    The theme of the third annual Spring workshop of the HUPO-PSI was proteomics and beyond and its underlying goal was to reach beyond the boundaries of the proteomics community to interact with groups working on the similar issues of developing interchange standards and minimal reporting requirements. Significant developments in many of the HUPO-PSI XML interchange formats, minimal reporting requirements and accompanying controlled vocabularies were reported, with many of these now feeding into the broader efforts of the Functional Genomics (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Miguel A. Andrade‐Navarro (2009). The Dictionary of Genomics, Transcriptomics, and Proteomics. Bioessays 31 (12):1367-1369.score: 15.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. K. K. Jain (2004). Book Review: Proteins and Proteomics: A Laboratory Manual and Purifying Proteins for Proteomics: A Laboratory Manual. [REVIEW] Bioessays 26 (12):1366-1367.score: 15.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Subhash C. Basak, Brian D. Gute & Frank Witzmann (2005). Information-Theoretic Biodescriptors for Proteomics Maps: Development and Applications in Predictive Toxicology. Complexity 1:2.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. David Emerson, Liane Agulto, Henry Liu & Liping Liu (2008). Identifying and Characterizing Bacteria in an Era of Genomics and Proteomics. BioScience 58 (10):925-936.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Geoffrey D. Findlay & Willie J. Swanson (2010). Proteomics Enhances Evolutionary and Functional Analysis of Reproductive Proteins. Bioessays 32 (1):26-36.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Bent Honor�, Morten �Stergaard & Henrik Vorum (2004). Functional Genomics Studied by Proteomics. Bioessays 26 (8):901-915.score: 15.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. David L. Remington (2008). Evolutionary Genomics and Proteomics. BioScience 58 (8):761-762.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Sertac Eroglu (forthcoming). Language-Like Behavior of Protein Length Distribution in Proteomes. Complexity:n/a-n/a.score: 7.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Ulrich Krohs & Werner Callebaut (2007). Data Without Models Merging with Models Without Data. In Fred C. Boogerd, Frank J. Bruggeman, Jan-Hendrik S. Hofmeyr & Hans V. Westerhoff (eds.), Systems Biology: Philosophical Foundations. Elsevier. 181--213.score: 6.0
    Systems biology is largely tributary to genomics and other “omic” disciplines that generate vast amounts of structural data. “Omics”, however, lack a theoretical framework that would allow using these data sets as such (rather than just tiny bits that are extracted by advanced data-mining techniques) to build explanatory models that help understand physiological processes. Systems biology provides such a framework by adding a dynamic dimension to merely structural “omics”. It makes use of bottom-up and top-down models. The former are based (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Madhvi Patel, Mohamed If Shariff, Nimzing G. Ladep, Andrew V. Thillainayagam, Howard C. Thomas, Shahid A. Khan & Simon D. Taylor‐Robinson (2012). Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Diagnostics and Screening. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (2):335-342.score: 6.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Ron Milo (2013). What is the Total Number of Protein Molecules Per Cell Volume? A Call to Rethink Some Published Values. Bioessays 35 (12):1050-1055.score: 6.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. [deleted]Stein D. (2008). Neuroplastic Proteins Identified in a Proteomic Profile of SERT Knockout Rats. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2.score: 5.0
  15. Björn Schwanhäusser, Jana Wolf, Matthias Selbach & Dorothea Busse (2013). Synthesis and Degradation Jointly Determine the Responsiveness of the Cellular Proteome. Bioessays 35 (7):597-601.score: 5.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Nicolas Lecrenier, Françoise Foury & Andre Goffeau (1998). Two‐Hybrid Systematic Screening of the Yeast Proteome. Bioessays 20 (1):1-5.score: 5.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. David Moreira, Louis Ranjard & Purificaci�N. L.�pez-Garcia (2004). The Nucleolar Proteome and the (Endosymbiotic) Origin of the Nucleus. Bioessays 26 (10):1144-1145.score: 5.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. David Moreira, Louis Ranjard & Purificación López‐Garcia (2004). The Nucleolar Proteome and the (Endosymbiotic) Origin of the Nucleus. Bioessays 26 (10):1144-1145.score: 5.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Massimo Pigliucci (2007). Post-Genomic Musings. [REVIEW] Science 317:1172-1173.score: 3.0
    Everyone in biology keeps predicting that the next few years will bring answers to some of the major open questions in evolutionary biology, but there seems to be disagreement on what, exactly, those questions are. Enthusiasts of the various “-omics” (genomics, proteomics, transcriptomics, metabolomics, and even phenomics) believe, as Michael Lynch puts it in the final chapter of The Origins of Genome Architecture, that “we can be confident of two things: the basic theoretical machinery for understanding the evolutionary process (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Koffi N. Maglo (2012). Group-Based and Personalized Care in an Age of Genomic and Evidence-Based Medicine: A Reappraisal. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 55 (1):137-154.score: 3.0
    Individualized care and equality of care remain two imperatives for formulating any scientifically and morally informed public health policy. Yet both continue to be elusive goals, even in the age of genomics, proteomics, and evidence-based medicine. Nonetheless, with the rapid growth and improvement of human biotechnologies, the need to individualize therapies while allocating medical care equally may result partly from our biological constitution. Human beings are all unique, and their biological differences significantly influence variability in disease causation and therapeutic (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Branko Kozulić, Proteins and Genes, Singletons and Species.score: 3.0
    Recent experimental data from proteomics and genomics are interpreted here in ways that challenge the predominant viewpoint in biology according to which the four evolutionary processes, including mutation, recombination, natural selection and genetic drift, are sufficient to explain the origination of species. The predominant viewpoint appears incompatible with the finding that the sequenced genome of each species contains hundreds, or even thousands, of unique genes - the genes that are not shared with any other species. These unique genes and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Sanjay Goel & Stephen F. S. F. Bush (2004). Biological Models of Security for Virus Propagation in Computer Networks. Login, December 29 (6):49--56.score: 3.0
    This aricle discusses the similarity between the propagation of pathogens (viruses and worms) on computer networks and the proliferation of pathogens in cellular organisms (organisms with genetic material contained within a membrane-encased nucleus). It introduces several biological mechanisms which are used in these organisms to protect against such pathogens and presents security models for networked computers inspired by several biological paradigms, including genomics (RNA interference), proteomics (pathway mapping), and physiology (immune system). In addition, the study of epidemiological models for (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. John A. Copland, Melinda Sheffield‐Moore, Nina Koldzic‐Zivanovic, Sean Gentry, George Lamprou, Fotini Tzortzatou‐Stathopoulou, Vassilis Zoumpourlis, Randall J. Urban & Spiros A. Vlahopoulos (2009). Sex Steroid Receptors in Skeletal Differentiation and Epithelial Neoplasia: Is Tissue‐Specific Intervention Possible? Bioessays 31 (6):629-641.score: 2.0
    Sex steroids, through their receptors, have potent effects on the signal pathways involved in osteogenic or myogenic differentiation. However, a considerable segment of those signal pathways has a prominent role in epithelial neoplastic transformation. The capability to intervene locally has focused on specific ligands for the receptors. Nevertheless, many signals are mapped to interactions of steroid receptor motifs with heterologous regulatory proteins. Some of those proteins interact with the glucocorticoid receptor and other factors essential to cell fate. Interactions of steroid (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Darren A. Natale, Cecilia N. Arighi, Winona Barker, Judith Blake, Ti-Cheng Chang, Zhangzhi Hu, Hongfang Liu, Barry Smith & Cathy H. Wu (2007). Framework for a Protein Ontology. BMC Bioinformatics, Nov. 2007, 8(Suppl. 9) 8 (9):S1.score: 1.0
    Biomedical ontologies are emerging as critical tools in genomic and proteomic research where complex data in disparate resources need to be integrated. A number of ontologies exist that describe the properties that can be attributed to proteins; for example, protein functions are described by Gene Ontology, while human diseases are described by Disease Ontology. There is, however, a gap in the current set of ontologies—one that describes the protein entities themselves and their relationships. We have designed a PRotein Ontology (PRO) (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Susie Fisher (2010). Are Rna Viruses Vestiges of an Rna World? Journal for General Philosophy of Science 41 (1):121-141.score: 1.0
    This paper follows the circuitous path of theories concerning the origins of viruses from the early years of the twentieth century until the present, considering RNA viruses in particular. I focus on three periods during which new understandings of the nature of viruses guided the construction and reconstruction of origin hypotheses. During the first part of the twentieth century, viruses were mostly viewed from within the framework of bacteriology and the discussion of origin centered on the “degenerative” or the “retrograde (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Patrick Amar, Pascal Ballet, Georgia Barlovatz-Meimon, Arndt Benecke, Gilles Bernot, Yves Bouligand, Paul Bourguine, Franck Delaplace, Jean-Marc Delosme, Maurice Demarty, Itzhak Fishov, Jean Fourmentin-Guilbert, Joe Fralick, Jean-Louis Giavitto, Bernard Gleyse, Christophe Godin, Roberto Incitti, François Képès, Catherine Lange, Lois Le Sceller, Corinne Loutellier, Olivier Michel, Franck Molina, Chantal Monnier, René Natowicz, Vic Norris, Nicole Orange, Helene Pollard, Derek Raine, Camille Ripoll, Josette Rouviere-Yaniv, Milton Saier, Paul Soler, Pierre Tambourin, Michel Thellier, Philippe Tracqui, Dave Ussery, Jean-Claude Vincent, Jean-Pierre Vannier, Philippa Wiggins & Abdallah Zemirline (2002). Hyperstructures, Genome Analysis and I-Cells. Acta Biotheoretica 50 (4).score: 1.0
    New concepts may prove necessary to profit from the avalanche of sequence data on the genome, transcriptome, proteome and interactome and to relate this information to cell physiology. Here, we focus on the concept of large activity-based structures, or hyperstructures, in which a variety of types of molecules are brought together to perform a function. We review the evidence for the existence of hyperstructures responsible for the initiation of DNA replication, the sequestration of newly replicated origins of replication, cell division (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation