Search results for 'Protrepticus' (try it on Scholar)

36 found
Order:
  1.  71
    Monte Ransome Johnson & D. S. Hutchinson (2005). Authenticating Aristotle's Protrepticus. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 29:193-294.
    Authenticates approximately 500 lines of Aristotle's lost work the Protrepticus (Exhortation to Philosophy) contained in the circa third century AD work by Iamblichus of Chalcis entitled Protrepticus epi philosophian. Includes a complete English translation of the authenticated material.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Christopher Bobonich (2007). Why Should Philosophers Rule? Plato's Republic and Aristotle's Protrepticus. Social Philosophy and Policy 24 (2):153-175.
    I examine Plato's claim in the Republic that philosophers must rule in a good city and Aristotle's attitude towards this claim in his early, and little discussed, work, the Protrepticus. I argue that in the Republic, Plato's main reason for having philosophers rule is that they alone understand the role of philosophical knowledge in a good life and how to produce characters that love such knowledge. He does not think that philosophic knowledge is necessary for getting right the vast (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  70
    D. S. Hutchinson & Monte Ransome Johnson, The Antidosis of Isocrates and Aristotle's Protrepticus.
    Isocrates' Antidosis ("Defense against the Exchange") and Aristotle's Protrepticus ("Exhortation to Philosophy") were recovered from oblivion in the late nineteenth century. In this article we demonstrate that the two texts happen to be directly related. Aristotle's Protrepticus was a response, on behalf of the Academy, to Isocrates' criticism of the Academy and its theoretical preoccupations. -/- Contents: I. Introduction: Protrepticus, text and context II. Authentication of the Protrepticus of Aristotle III. Isocrates and philosophy in Athens in (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  20
    Matthew Walker (2010). The Utility of Contemplation in Aristotle's Protrepticus. Ancient Philosophy 30 (1):135-153.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  5.  6
    D. J. Allan & Ingemar During (1964). Aristotle's PROTREPTICUS: An Attempt at Reconstruction. Philosophical Quarterly 14 (54):83.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  6.  11
    D. J. Allan (1976). Critical and Explanatory Notes on Some Passages Assigned to Aristotle's "Protrepticus". Phronesis 21 (3):219 - 240.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7.  6
    George P. Klubertanz (1966). "Aristotle: Protrepticus, A Reconstruction," by Anton-Hermann Chroust. Modern Schoolman 43 (3):297-298.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  2
    D. J. Furley, Aristotle & I. During (1964). Protrepticus: An Attempt at Reconstruction. Journal of Hellenic Studies 84:192.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  15
    D. J. Allan (1959). Aristotle's Protrepticus. The Classical Review 9 (02):124-.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  5
    D. J. Allan (1976). Critical and Explanatory Notes on Some Passages Assigned to Aristotle's Protrepticus. Phronesis 21 (3):219-240.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11.  10
    Renaud Gagné & Miguel Herrero (2009). Themis at Eleusis: Clement of Alexandria, Protrepticus 2.22.5. Classical Quarterly 59 (01):289-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  10
    Sander M. Goldberg (2010). (A.) Russo (ed.) Quinto Ennio: Le opere minori. Introduzione, edizione critica dei frammenti e commento. Volume 1. Praecepta, Protrepticus, Saturae, Scipio, Sota. (Testi e Studi di Cultura Classica 40.) Pp. 299. Pisa: Edizioni ETS, 2007. Paper, €23. ISBN: 978-88-467-1819-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 60 (1):309.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  1
    D. J. Allan & Ingemar During (1961). Aristotle's Protrepticus an Attempt at Reconstruction. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14.  9
    C. F. Salazar (2002). Galen's protrepticus and ars medica V. Boudon (ed.): Galien II: Exhortation à l'étude de la médecine; art médical (collection Des universités de France publiée sous le patronage de l'association Guillaume budé). Pp. 454. Paris: Les belLes lettres, 2000. Cased, frs. 400. isbn: 2-251-00483-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 52 (02):273-.
  15.  7
    Anton-Hermann Chroust (1966). The Term "Philosopher" and the Panegyric Analogy in Aristotle's Protrepticus. Apeiron 1 (1):14 - 17.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  6
    D. J. Allan (1959). Aristotle's Protrepticus W. Gerson Rabinowitz: Aristotle's Protrepticus and the Sources of its Reconstruction. (Publ. In Classical Archaeology, Vol. 16, No. 1.) Pp. 95. Berkeley: University of California Press (London: Cambridge University Press), 1957. Paper, $2. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 9 (2):124-127.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  8
    Michael Haslam (1989). Comparative Worth in Aristotle's Protrepticus. Phronesis 34 (1):109-110.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  6
    Felix M. Cleve (1966). Aristotle: Protrepticus. New Scholasticism 40 (1):123-125.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  5
    Scott Mcgill (2007). Ausonius' Letter to Hesperius Attached to the Protrepticus Ad Nepotem and Quintilian's Institutio Oratoria 10.1.17–19. Classical Quarterly 57 (01):332-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. A. Bos (1984). Aristotle’s Eudemus and Protrepticus: Are They Really Two Different Works? Dionysius 8:19-51.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Anton-Hermann Chroust & Aristotle (1964). Aristotle, Protrepticus a Reconstruction. University of Notre Dame Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Anton-Hermann Chroust (1967). The Term "Philosopher" and the Panegyric Analogy in Aristotle's Protrepticus. Apeiron 1 (1).
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Anton-Hermann Chroust (1966). What Prompted Aristotle to Address the Protrepticus to Themison? Hermes 94 (2):202-207.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Felix M. Cleve (1966). Aristotle: Protrepticus: A Reconstruction. [REVIEW] New Scholasticism 40 (1):123-125.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. D. J. Furley & W. Gerson Rabinowitz (1959). Aristotle's 'Protrepticus' and the Sources of Its Reconstruction. I. Journal of Hellenic Studies 79:178.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Cornelia De Vogel (1965). Did Aristotle ever accept Plato's Theory of Transcendent Ideas? Problems around a New Edition of the "Protrepticus". Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 47 (3):261.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  9
    Claudia Seggiaro (2011). Resonancias platónicas en la serie de fragmentos 33-36 del Protréptico de Aristóteles. Areté. Revista de Filosofía 23 (2):399-420.
    “Platonic Echoes in the 33-36 fragments of Aristotle’s Protrepticus”. Theaim of this paper is to examine the series of fragments 33-36 of the Protrepticusunder the light of a possible Platonic influence. Our thesis is that, despite the factthat the definition of science as the knowledge of causes and the identificationof these with the principles of reality is an essential conception of Platonism, thefact that we find in the Protrepticus the influence of this conception does not allowus to infer (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  5
    Claudia Seggiaro (2014). La noción aristotélica de noûs: conocimiento de los primeros principios y vida contemplativa en el Protréptico de Aristóteles. Signos Filosóficos 16 (32):38-70.
    El objetivo del presente artículo es analizar la noción de noûs en el Protréptico de Aristóteles. Para ello, me centraré en los fragmentos 24, 28, 65 y 110. Mediante el examen del primero de ellos argumentaré que el noûs es una facultad cuya meta es el conocimiento de los objetos inteligibles. A través del análisis de los fragmentos 28 y 65 intentaré demostrar que el ejercicio de esta facultad no es una actividad más entre otras, sino la distintiva del hombre, (...)
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. P. N. Singe (1997). Levels of Explanation in Galen. Classical Quarterly 47 (02):525-.
    Galen's æuvre presents a remarkably varied body of texts–varied in subject matter, style, and didactic purpose. Logical tracts sit alongside tomes of drug–lore; handbooks of dietetics alongside anatomical investigations; treatises of physiology alongside ethical opuscula. These differences in type have received some, though as yet insufficient, scholarly attention. Mario Vegetti demonstrated the coexistence of two ‘profili’ or images of the art of medicine: Galen presents the art as an Aristotelian deductive science, on the one hand, and as a technician's craft, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  30.  3
    Clemens Alexandrinus & Protrepticus und Paedagogus (1986). Clement of Alexandria on Aristotle's (Cosmo-) Theology (Clem. Protrept. 5.66. 4). Elenchos 7:245-94.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  8
    G. W. Butterworth (1916). Clement of Alexandria's Protrepticvs and the Phaedrvs of Plato. Classical Quarterly 10 (04):198-.
    A very slight reading of Clement of Alexandria is enough to prove how deeply he is indebted to Plato both in respect of language and of thought. Quotations from Plato are to be found throughout Clement's works, and in many cases acknowledgment is made of their origin. In addition there are frequent allusions, which for the most part the student of Plato can easily recognize. Clement invariably shows a profound respect for the Greek philosopher, whom he looks upon as a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  4
    Evandro L. Gomes & Ítala M. L. D.?Ottaviano (2011). Aristotle's Theory of Deduction and Paraconsistency. Principia 14 (1):71-97.
    No Órganon Aristóteles descreve alguns esquemas dedutivos nos quais a presença de inconsistências não acarreta a trivialização da teoria lógica envolvida. Esta tese é corroborada por três diferentes situações teóricas estudadas por ele, as quais são apresentadas neste trabalho. Analizamos o esquema de inferência utilizado por Aristóteles no Protrepticus e o método de demonstração indireta para os silogismos categóricos. Ambos os métodos exemplificam como Aristóteles emprega estratégias de redução ao absurdo logicamente clássicas. Na sequência, discutimos os silogismos válidos a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  3
    R. P. H. Green (1985). Still Waters Run Deep: A New Study of the Professores of Bordeaux. Classical Quarterly 35 (02):491-.
    Perhaps the most remarkable feature of the works in which Ausonius of Bordeaux and Libanius of Antioch, writing within a few years of each other, recall their long and varied careers is that there is so little resemblance between them; the impressions given by these experienced and successful teachers could hardly be more disparate. The reader of Ausonius finds in his Protrepticus a familiar enough picture of the terrors of the schoolroom; his Professores offer at first sight a series (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  3
    A. P. Bos (1993). Clement of Alexandria on Aristotle's (Cosmo-)Theology (Clem. Protrept. 5.66.4). Classical Quarterly 43 (01):177-.
    In this paper I will reconsider the doxographical text about Aristotle in Clement of Alexandria's Protrepticus 5.66.4: οδν δ ομαι χαλεπν νταθα γενμενος κα τν κ το Περιπτου μνησθναι· κα γε τς αρσεως πατρ, τν λων ο νοσας τν πατρα, τν καλομενον ‘πατον’ ψυχν εναι το πντος οεται· τουτστι το κσμου τν ψυχν θεν πολαμβνων ατς ατ περιπερεται. γρ τοι μχρι τς σελνης ατς διορζων τν πρνοιαν, πειτα τν κσμον θεν γομενος περιτρπεται, τν μοιρον θεο θεν δογματζων.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Ronald Polansky (ed.) (2014). The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
    Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics is the first and arguably most important treatise on ethics in Western philosophy. It remains to this day a compelling reflection on the best sort of human life and continues to inspire contemporary thought and debate. This Cambridge Companion includes twenty essays by leading scholars of Aristotle and ancient philosophy that cover the major issues of this text. The essays in this volume shed light on Aristotle's rigorous and challenging thinking on questions such as: can there be (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Ronald Polansky (ed.) (2014). The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
    Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics is the first and arguably most important treatise on ethics in Western philosophy. It remains to this day a compelling reflection on the best sort of human life and continues to inspire contemporary thought and debate. This Cambridge Companion includes twenty essays by leading scholars of Aristotle and ancient philosophy that cover the major issues of this text. The essays in this volume shed light on Aristotle's rigorous and challenging thinking on questions such as: can there be (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography