Search results for 'Publication ethics' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  91
    Mindaugas Broga, Goran Mijaljica, Marcin Waligora, Aime Keis & Ana Marusic (2013). Publication Ethics in Biomedical Journals From Countries in Central and Eastern Europe. Science and Engineering Ethics (1):1-11.
    Publication ethics is an important aspect of both the research and publication enterprises. It is particularly important in the field of biomedical science because published data may directly affect human health. In this article, we examine publication ethics policies in biomedical journals published in Central and Eastern Europe. We were interested in possible differences between East European countries that are members of the European Union (Eastern EU) and South-East European countries (South-East Europe) that are not (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2.  88
    Berna Arda (2012). Publication Ethics From the Perspective of PhD Students of Health Sciences: A Limited Experience. Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (2):213-222.
    Publication ethics, an important subtopic of science ethics, deals with determination of the misconducts of science in performing research or in the dissemination of ideas, data and products. Science, the main features of which are secure, reliable and ethically obtained data, plays a major role in shaping the society. As long as science maintains its quality by being based on reliable and ethically obtained data, it will be possible to maintain its role in shaping the society. This (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3.  95
    Addeane S. Caelleigh (2003). Roles for Scientific Societies in Promoting Integrity in Publication Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):221-241.
    Scientific societies can have a powerful influence on the professional lives of scientists. Using this influence, they have a responsibility to make long-term commitments and investments in promoting integrity in publication, just as in other areas of research ethics. Concepts that can inform the thinking and activities of scientific societies with regard to publication ethics are: the “hidden curriculum” (the message of actions rather than formal statements), a fresh look at the components of acting with integrity, (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  4.  71
    Jong Foo & Stephen Wilson (2012). An Analysis on the Research Ethics Cases Managed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Between 1997 and 2010. Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):621-631.
    The growing emphasis on the importance of publishing scientific findings in the academic world has led to increasing prevalence of potentially significant publications in which scientific and ethical rigour may be questioned. This has not only hindered research progress, but also eroded public trust in all scientific advances. In view of the increasing concern and the complexity of research misconduct, the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) was established in 1997 to manage cases with ethical implications. In order to (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  44
    Sergio Sismondo & Mathieu Doucet (2009). Publication Ethics and the Ghost Management of Medical Publication. Bioethics 24 (6):273-283.
    It is by now no secret that some scientific articles are ghost authored – that is, written by someone other than the person whose name appears at the top of the article. Ghost authorship, however, is only one sort of ghosting. In this article, we present evidence that pharmaceutical companies engage in the ghost management of the scientific literature, by controlling or shaping several crucial steps in the research, writing, and publication of scientific articles. Ghost management allows the pharmaceutical (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  6. Alastair Matheson (2016). The ICMJE Recommendations and Pharmaceutical Marketing – Strengths, Weaknesses and the Unsolved Problem of Attribution in Publication Ethics. BMC Medical Ethics 17 (1):1-10.
    BackgroundThe International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Recommendations set ethical and editorial standards for article publication in most leading medical journals. Here, I examine the strengths and weaknesses of the Recommendations in the prevention of commercial bias in industry-financed journal literature, on three levels – scholarly discourse, article content, and article attribution.DiscussionWith respect to overall discourse, the most important measures in the ICMJE Recommendations are for enforcing clinical trial registration and controlling duplicate publication. With respect to article content, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  4
    Rasheda Begum & Simon Kolstoe (2015). Can UK NHS Research Ethics Committees Effectively Monitor Publication and Outcome Reporting Bias? BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):1-5.
    BackgroundPublication and outcome reporting bias is often caused by researchers selectively choosing which scientific results and outcomes to publish. This behaviour is ethically significant as it distorts the literature used for future scientific or clinical decision-making. This study investigates the practicalities of using ethics applications submitted to a UK National Health Service research ethics committee to monitor both types of reporting bias.MethodsAs part of an internal audit we accessed research ethics database records for studies submitting an end (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  25
    E. Wager, S. Fiack, C. Graf, A. Robinson & I. Rowlands (2009). Science Journal Editors' Views on Publication Ethics: Results of an International Survey. Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (6):348-353.
    Background: Breaches of publication ethics such as plagiarism, data fabrication and redundant publication are recognised as forms of research misconduct that can undermine the scientific literature. We surveyed journal editors to determine their views about a range of publication ethics issues. Methods: Questionnaire sent to 524 editors-in-chief of Wiley-Blackwell science journals asking about the severity and frequency of 16 ethical issues at their journals, their confidence in handling such issues, and their awareness and use of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  9.  6
    Francisco M. Salzano & A. Magdalena Hurtado (eds.) (2004). Lost Paradises and the Ethics of Research and Publication. Oxford University Press.
    In 2000, the world of anthropology was rocked by a high-profile debate over the fieldwork performed by two prominent anthropologists, Napoleon Chagnon and James V. Neel, among the Yanamamo tribe of South America. The controversy was fueled by the publication of Patrick Tierney's incendiary Darkness in El Dorado which accused Chagnon of not only misinterpreting but actually inciting some of the violence he perceived among these "fierce people". Tierney also pointed the finger at Neel as the unwitting agent of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Mathieu Doucet Sergio Sismondo (2010). Publication Ethics and the Ghost Management of Medical Publication. Bioethics 24 (6):273-283.
    ABSTRACTIt is by now no secret that some scientific articles are ghost authored – that is, written by someone other than the person whose name appears at the top of the article. Ghost authorship, however, is only one sort of ghosting. In this article, we present evidence that pharmaceutical companies engage in the ghost management of the scientific literature, by controlling or shaping several crucial steps in the research, writing, and publication of scientific articles. Ghost management allows the pharmaceutical (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  3
    A. Sheikh (2000). Publication Ethics and the Research Assessment Exercise: Reflections on the Troubled Question of Authorship. Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (6):422-426.
    The research assessment exercise forms the basis for determining the funding of higher education institutions in the UK. Monies are distributed according to a range of performance criteria, the most important of which is “research outputs”. Problems to do with publication misconduct, and in particular, issues of justice in attributing authorship, are endemic within the research community. It is here argued that the research assessment exercise currently makes no explicit attempt to address these concerns, and indeed, by focusing attention (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  12.  3
    J. Fraser (2006). Publish and Perish: A Case Study of Publication Ethics in a Rural Community. Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (9):526-529.
    Background: Health researchers must weigh the benefits and risks of publishing their findings.Objective: To explore differences in decision making between rural health researchers and managers on the publication of research from small identifiable populations.Method: A survey that investigated the attitudes of Australian rural general practitioners to nurse practitioners was explored. Decisions on the study’s publication were analysed with bioethical principles and health service management ethical decision-making models.Results: Response rate was 78.5% . 84–94% of GP responders considered it to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  1
    William V. Giannobile (2011). Publication Ethics of Authorship in the Oral Health Sciences. Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine 2 (2):157-159.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  1
    G. Van Norman & Stephen Jackson (2010). Publication Ethics: Obligations of Authors, Peer-Reviewers, and Editors. In G. A. van Norman, S. Jackson, S. H. Rosenbaum & S. K. Palmer (eds.), Clinical Ethics in Anesthesiology. Cambridge University Press
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  28
    Joseph Fulda (2007). The Ethics of Pseudonymous Publication. Journal of Information Ethics 16 (2):75-89.
    This article explores the ethics of pseudonymous publication of nonfiction by examining what and why an author might hide behind the veil of pseudonymity, when this is and is not appropriate, and when it is deemed appropriate what measures should be taken to ensure accountability despite the veil. The argument begins by assuming that the sole duty an author has qua author is to his audience and centers on issues in both ethics and philosophy of language.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  5
    Udo Schüklenk (2007). More on Publication Ethics. Bioethics 21 (3):ii–ii.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  17.  14
    Verena Tschudin (2006). How Nursing Ethics as a Subject Changes: An Analysis of the First 11 Years of Publication of the Journal Nursing Ethics. Nursing Ethics 13 (1):65-85.
    By analysing the first, second, 10th and 11th years of publication (i.e. volumes 1, 2, 10, 11) of Nursing Ethics, I will show the significant visible trends in the articles and draw some conclusions. The trends are visible at various levels: from simple analysis of an issue, or a comment on a situation in the early years, to in-depth philosophical and research studies; and from short statements to much longer articles. The ethical approaches used go from either none (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  3
    Mark J. Cherry (2013). What Are Our Moral Duties? Critical Reflections on Clinical Equipoise and Publication Ethics, Clinical Choices, and Moral Theory. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (6):581-589.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  77
    J. Savulescu (2003). Institute of Medical Ethics Prize for the Most Innovative Web Publication. Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (1):1-1.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. D. Isaacs (2015). Ethics of Paediatric End-of-Life Decision Making and Consent for Publication. Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (2):201-202.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  21.  8
    Robert Holley (2006). The Ethics of Scholarly Research and the Internet: Issues of Publication, Privacy, and the Right to Speak. Journal of Information Ethics 15 (1):27-34.
  22.  1
    M. A. Melrose (2008). The Ethics SIG Newsletter is Produced by Members of the Ethics SIG and ONS Staff and is Not a Peer-Reviewed Publication. Ethics 19 (3).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Joseph F. Gower (1990). Religion and Economic Ethics: The Annual Publication of the College Theology Society 1985. Upa.
    It remains the case that economic ethics is still an underdeveloped specialization within the discipline of religious ethics. Contemporary commentators have lamented the still emergent status of economic ethics and recently some have begun to point out new directions for this area of moral reflection. Part of the problem has been the historical fact that not many religious ethicists have taken the time to acquire the required specialization competence in economics, economic theory, and history. Religion and Economic (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  11
    Muriel Bebeau & Verna Monson (2011). Authorship and Publication Practices in the Social Sciences: Historical Reflections on Current Practices. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (2):365-388.
    An historical review of authorship definitions and publication practices that are embedded in directions to authors and in the codes of ethics in the fields of psychology, sociology, and education illuminates reasonable agreement and consistency across the fields with regard to (a) originality of the work submitted, (b) data sharing, (c) human participants’ protection, and (d) conflict of interest disclosure. However, the role of the professional association in addressing violations of research or publication practices varies among (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  25.  1
    Daniel O. Dahlstrom (2008). An Asterisk Denotes a Publication by a Member of the American Catholic Philosophical Association. The Editors Welcome Suggestions for Reviews. Bash, Anthony. Forgiveness and Christian Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007. Pp. Xi+ 208. Hard Cover $85.00, ISBN: 978-0-521-87880-7. Cary, Phillip. Inner Grace: Augustine in the Traditions of Plato and Paul. New York. [REVIEW] American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82 (3).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Joseph A. Bracken, Rémi Brague, J. Budziszewski & Stratford Caldecott (2009). An Asterisk Denotes a Publication by a Member of the American Catholic Philosophical Association. The Editors Welcome Suggestions for Reviews. Bedau, Mark A., and Emily C. Parke, Eds. The Ethics of Protocells: Moral and Social Implications of Creating Life in the Laboratory. Cambridge, Mass. And London: MIT Press, 2009. Pp. X+ 368. Paper $28.00, ISBN: 978-0-262-51269-5. [REVIEW] American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83 (3).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Ellen Silbergeld (2009). A Question of EthicsPublication Policy and Animals in Research. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (12):61-62.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  18
    Roberta Bampton & Christopher J. Cowton (2013). Taking Stock of Accounting Ethics Scholarship: A Review of the Journal Literature. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 114 (3):549-563.
    The proportion of business ethics literature devoted to accounting and the proportion of academic accounting literature devoted to ethical issues are both small, yet over the past two decades there has been a steady accumulation of research devoted to ethical issues in accounting. Based on a database of more than 500 articles gathered from a wide range of accounting and business ethics academic journals, this paper describes and analyses the characteristics of what has been published in the past (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  29.  4
    Sven Ove Hansson (forthcoming). The Ethics of Doing Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics:1-16.
    Ethicists have investigated ethical problems in other disciplines, but there has not been much discussion of the ethics of their own activities. Research in ethics has many ethical problems in common with other areas of research, and it also has problems of its own. The researcher’s integrity is more precarious than in most other disciplines, and therefore even stronger procedural checks are needed to protect it. The promotion of some standpoints in ethical issues may be socially harmful, and (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  19
    David Shaw (2011). The Ethics Committee as Ghost Author. Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (12):706-706.
    Ethics committees have a bad reputation for impeding, rather than facilitating research. Here, I argue that many committees actually improve the quality of the research proposal to such an extent that they deserve credit as authors in any resulting publications, or at least an acknowledgement of the contribution made.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  31.  7
    Carla Angelski, Conrad Fernandez, Charles Weijer & Jun Gao (2012). The Publication of Ethically Uncertain Research: Attitudes and Practices of Journal Editors. [REVIEW] BMC Medical Ethics 13 (1):4-.
    Background: Publication of ethically uncertain research occurs despite well-published guidelines set forth in documents such as the Declaration of Helsinki. Such guidelines exist to aide editorial staff in making decisions regarding ethical acceptability of manuscripts submitted for publication, yet examples of ethically suspect and uncertain publication exist. Our objective was to survey journal editors regarding practices and attitudes surrounding such dilemmas. Methods: The Editor-in-chief of each of the 103 English-language journals from the 2005 Abridged Index Medicus list (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  17
    E. Cave & C. Nichols (2007). Clinical Audit and Reform of the UK Research Ethics Review System. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (3):181-203.
    There is an international consensus that medical research involving humans should only be undertaken in accordance with ethical principles. Paradoxically though, there is no consensus over the kinds of activities that constitute research and should be subject to review. In the UK and elsewhere, research requiring review is distinguished from clinical audit. Unfortunately the two activities are not always easy to differentiate from one another. Moreover, as the volume of audit increases and becomes more formal in response to the demand (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  33.  5
    Michael JG Farthing (2006). Authors and Publication Practices. Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):41-52.
    This article looks at the ethical quandaries, and their social and political context, which emerge as a result of international nuclear waste substitution. In particular it addresses the dilemmas inherent within the proposed return of nuclear waste owned by Japanese nuclear companies and currently stored in the United Kingdom. The UK company responsible for this waste, British Nuclear Fuels Limited (BNFL), wish to substitute this high volume intermediate-level Japanese-owned radioactive waste for a much lower volume of much more highly radioactive (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  34. Flora Colledge, Bernice Elger & David Shaw (2013). “Conferring Authorship”: Biobank Stakeholders’ Experiences with Publication Credit in Collaborative Research. PLoS ONE 8:e76686.
    Background: Multi-collaborator research is increasingly becoming the norm in the field of biomedicine. With this trend comes the imperative to award recognition to all those who contribute to a study; however, there is a gap in the current “gold standard” in authorship guidelines with regards to the efforts of those who provide high quality biosamples and data, yet do not play a role in the intellectual development of the final publication. -/- Methods and findings: We carried out interviews with (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  21
    Elise Smith & Bryn Williams-Jones (2012). Authorship and Responsibility in Health Sciences Research: A Review of Procedures for Fairly Allocating Authorship in Multi-Author Studies. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (2):199-212.
    While there has been significant discussion in the health sciences and ethics literatures about problems associated with publication practices (e.g., ghost- and gift-authorship, conflicts of interest), there has been relatively little practical guidance developed to help researchers determine how they should fairly allocate credit for multi-authored publications. Fair allocation of credit requires that participating authors be acknowledged for their contribution and responsibilities, but it is not obvious what contributions should warrant authorship, nor who should be responsible for the (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  36. Peter Singer (1993). Practical Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
    Peter Singer's remarkably clear and comprehensive Practical Ethics has become a classic introduction to applied ethics since its publication in 1979 and has been translated into many languages. For this second edition the author has revised all the existing chapters, added two new ones, and updated the bibliography. He has also added an appendix describing some of the deep misunderstanding of and consequent violent reaction to the book in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland where the book has tested (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   281 citations  
  37.  6
    Harvey Marcovitch (2008). What Medical Journal Editing Means to Me. Mens Sana Monographs 6 (1):237.
    _Papers in medical journals are often difficult to understand and tedious to read. An editor's first loyalty should be to readers, by prioritising readability over merely producing a repository of data for the scientific community generally. The web now provides infinite repository space so there is even less excuse for journals to be unreadable. I give examples of how I attempted to improve one journal, despite external pressures and regardless of how it might affect the Impact Factor. As a postscript (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  14
    David A. Rier (2004). Publication Visibility of Sensitive Public Health Data: When Scientists Bury Their Results. Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (4):597-613.
    What happens when the scientific tradition of openness clashes with potential societal risks? The work of American toxic-exposure epidemiologists can attract media coverage and lead the public to change health practices, initiate lawsuits, or take other steps a study’s authors might consider unwarranted. This paper, reporting data from 61 semi-structured interviews with U.S. toxic-exposure epidemiologists, examines whether such possibilities shaped epidemiologists’ selection of journals for potentially sensitive papers. Respondents manifested strong support for the norm of scientific openness, but a significant (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  2
    Malhar N. Kumar (2014). Review of the Ethics and Etiquettes of Time Management of Manuscript Peer Review. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 12 (4):333-346.
    With the ever expanding array of professional journals, pressures on the peer review process have increased considerably. Unless editors and publishers recognize the need for improving the efficiency of the process, the future of traditional peer review may be at risk. This is a review of the studies that have followed up the suggestions made by Ingelfinger in 1974 for improvement of manuscript peer review. Implementation of changes has been slow, despite the abundance of literature that suggests the necessary improvements. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  7
    Edward J. Calabrese (2007). Elliott's Ethics of Expertise Proposal and Application: A Dangerous Precedent. Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (2):139-145.
    In a recent paper in Science and Engineering Ethics (SEE) Elliott proposed an ethics of expertise, providing its theoretical foundation along with its application in a case study devoted to the topic of hormesis. The application is based on a commentary in the journal Nature, and it includes assertions of ethical breaches. Elliott concludes that the authors of the commentary failed to promote the informed consent of decision makers by not providing representative information about alternative frequency estimates of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  1
    Peter Seele (2016). Business Ethics Without Philosophers? Evidence for and Implications of the Shift From Applied Philosophers to Business Scholars on the Editorial Boards of Business Ethics Journals. Metaphilosophy 47 (1):75-91.
    This article considers the relationship between business ethics and philosophy, specifically in relation to the field and persons working in it. The starting point is a grammatical one: business ethics by the rules of grammar belongs to ethics. In terms of academic disciplines, it belongs to applied ethics, which belongs to ethics, which belongs to practical philosophy, which belongs to philosophy. However, in the field of business ethics today one will seldom meet colleagues from (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  2
    Vince Ham (1999). Tracking the Truth or Selling One's Soul? Reflections on the Ethics of a Piece of Commissioned Research. British Journal of Educational Studies 47 (3):275 - 282.
    This paper takes as its starting point a decision to accept a particular commission for a piece of educational research which is subject to contractual restrictions. In the light of recent debate on the contentious politics and ethics of contractual research, it then addresses the problem of what might constitute an ethical defence, or critique, of such research and such contracts.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  43.  2
    S. Hahn, P. R. Williamson & J. L. Hutton (2002). Investigation of Within‐Study Selective Reporting in Clinical Research: Follow‐Up of Applications Submitted to a Local Research Ethics Committee. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 8 (3):353-359.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  27
    Kam C. Chan, Hung-Gay Fung & Jot Yau (2010). Business Ethics Research: A Global Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 95 (1):39 - 53.
    Using 10 years of publication data (1999-2008) from 10 leading business ethics journals, we examine global patterns of business ethics research and contributing institutions and scholars. Although U.S. academic institutions continue to lead in the contributions toward business ethics research, Asian and European institutions have made significant progress. Our study shows that business ethics research output is closely linked to the missions of the institutions driven by their values or religious belief. An additional analysis of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  45.  17
    Craig V. VanSandt & Christopher P. Neck (2003). Bridging Ethics and Self Leadership: Overcoming Ethical Discrepancies Between Employee and Organizational Standards. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 43 (4):363 - 387.
    In spite of extensive study and efforts to improve business ethics and increase corporate social responsibility, a quick review of almost any business publication will show that breaches of ethics are a common occurrence in the business community. In this paper we explore reasons for potential discrepancies or gaps between organizational and individual ethical standards, the consequences of such discrepancies, and possible methods of reducing the detrimental effects of these differences. The concept of self-leadership, as constructed through (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  46.  28
    Joseph A. Petrick, Wesley Cragg & Martha Sañudo (2011). Business Ethics in North America: Trends and Challenges. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 104 (S1):51-62.
    Using 15 years of data (1995–2009) from literature reviews, survey questionnaires, personal interviews, and desktop research, the authors examine North American (Canada, Mexico, and the United States of America) regional trends in business ethics research, teaching and training. The patterns indicate that business ethics continues to flourish in North America with high levels of productivity in both quantity and quality of teaching, training and research publication outputs. Topics/themes that have been covered during the time period are treated (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  47.  3
    Chad Albrecht, Jeffery A. Thompson, Jeffrey L. Hoopes & Pablo Rodrigo (2010). Business Ethics Journal Rankings as Perceived by Business Ethics Scholars. Journal of Business Ethics 95 (2):227 - 237.
    We present the findings of a worldwide survey that was administered to business ethic scholars to better understand journal quality within the business ethics academic community. Based upon the data from the survey, we provide a ranking of the top 10 business ethics journals. We then provide a comparison of business ethics journals to other mainstream management journals in terms of journal quality. The results of the study suggest that, within the business ethics academic community, many (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  48. Peter Singer (2015). Practical Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
    Peter Singer's remarkably clear and comprehensive Practical Ethics has become a classic introduction to applied ethics since its publication in 1979 and has been translated into many languages. For this second edition the author has revised all the existing chapters, added two new ones, and updated the bibliography. He has also added an appendix describing some of the deep misunderstanding of and consequent violent reaction to the book in Germany, Austria and Switzerland where the book has tested (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  49.  9
    Susan C. Borkowski & Mary Jeanne Welsh (1998). Ethics and the Accounting Publishing Process: Author, Reviewer, and Editor Issues. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (16):1785-1803.
    Are codes of ethics needed to guide author, reviewer and editor publishing practices in accounting journals? What practices are considered unethical, and to what extend do they occur? A survey of ninety-five journal editors who publish accounting articles rated author, reviewer and editor practices as ethical or unethical, and estimated the frequency with which these practices occur. Respondents also commented on current publishing practices regarding the double-blind review process, payments for reviews, confirmatory bias, and whether codes of ethics (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  50.  3
    Kathryn M. Weston, Judy R. Mullan, Wendy Hu, Colin Thomson, Warren C. Rich, Patricia Knight-Billington, Brahmaputra Marjadi & Peter L. McLennan (forthcoming). Academic Guidance in Medical Student Research: How Well Do Supervisors and Students Understand the Ethics of Human Research? Journal of Academic Ethics:1-16.
    Research is increasingly recognised as a key component of medical curricula, offering a range of benefits including development of skills in evidence-based medicine. The literature indicates that experienced academic supervision or mentoring is important in any research activity and positively influences research output. The aim of this project was to investigate the human research ethics experiences and knowledge of three groups: medical students, and university academic staff and clinicians eligible to supervise medical student research projects; at (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000