102 found
Order:
  1. R. G. Frey (1986). Rights, Killing, and Suffering: Moral Vegetarianism and Applied Ethics. Philosophical Review 95 (2):277-279.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  2.  97
    R. G. Frey (1980). Interests and Rights: The Case Against Animals. Oxford University Press.
  3. R. G. Frey (1977). Interests and Animal Rights. Philosophical Quarterly 27 (108):254-259.
    In his paper "rights" ("the philosophical quarterly", Volume 15, 1965, Pages 115-127), H j mccloskey maintains that only beings who can possess interests can possess rights; and he goes on to argue that animals cannot satisfy this requirement. In his paper "mccloskey on why animals cannot have rights" ("the philosophical quarterly", Volume 26, 1976, Pages 251-257), Tom regan disputes mccloskey's requirement. First, He queries whether mccloskey's "is" a requirement for the possession of rights; second, He tries to show that animals (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  4. R. G. Frey (1977). Animal Rights. Analysis 37 (4):186 - 189.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  96
    R. G. Frey (1983). Vivisection, Morals and Medicine. Journal of Medical Ethics 9 (2):94-97.
    If one wishes to accept that some painful animal experimentation can be justified on grounds that benefit is conferred, one is faced with a difficult moral dilemma argues the first author, a philosopher. Either one needs to be able to say why human lives of any quality however low should be inviolable from painful experimentation when animal lives are not; or one should accept that sufficient benefit can justify certain painful experiments on human beings of sufficiently low quality of life. (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  6.  76
    R. G. Frey (2008). Rights, Interests, Desires and Beliefs. In Susan J. Armstrong & Richard George Botzler (eds.), American Philosophical Quarterly. Routledge 233 - 239.
  7. R. G. Frey, Brad Hooker, F. M. Kamm, Thomas E. Hill Jr, Geoffrey Sayre-McCord, David McNaughton, Jan Narveson, Michael Slote, Alison M. Jaggar & William R. Schroeder (2000). Normative Ethics. In Hugh LaFollette - (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory. Blackwell Publishers
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  8. R. G. Frey (1999). Hume on Suicide. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (4):336 – 351.
    Anyone interested in the morality of suicide reads David Hume's essay on the subject even today. There are numerous reasons for this, but the central one is that it sets up the starting point for contemporary debate about the morality of suicide, namely, the debate about whether some condition of life could present one with a morally acceptable reason for autonomously deciding to end one's life. We shall only be able to have this debate if we think that at least (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  9. Gerald Dworkin, R. G. Frey & Sissela Bok (1998). Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide. Cambridge University Press.
    The moral issues involved in doctors assisting patients to die with dignity are of absolutely central concern to the medical profession, ethicists, and the public at large. The debate is fuelled by cases that extend far beyond passive euthanasia to the active consideration of killing by physicians. The need for a sophisticated but lucid exposition of the two sides of the argument is now urgent. This book supplies that need. Two prominent philosophers, Gerald Dworkin and R. G. Frey present the (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  10.  37
    R. G. Frey (1987). Autonomy and the Value of Animal Life. The Monist 70 (1):50-63.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  11.  44
    R. G. Frey (1996). Medicine, Animal Experimentation, and the Moral Problem of Unfortunate Humans. Social Philosophy and Policy 13 (2):181.
    We live in an age of great scientific and technological innovation, and what seemed out of the question or at least very doubtful only a few years ago, today lies almost within our grasp. In no area is this more true than that of human health care, where lifesaving and life-enhancing technologies have given, or have the enormous potential in the not so distant future to give, relief from some of the most terrible human illnesses. On two fronts in particular, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  12.  55
    R. G. Frey (2004). Tom Regan, Defending Animal Rights:Defending Animal Rights. Ethics 114 (2):372-373.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  46
    R. G. Frey (1978). Did Socrates Commit Suicide? Philosophy 53 (203):106 - 108.
    It is rarely, if at all, thought that Socrates committed suicide; but such was the case, or so I want to suggest. My suggestion turns not upon any new interpretation of ancient sources but rather upon seeking a determination of the concept of suicide itself.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14.  23
    Tom L. Beauchamp & R. G. Frey (eds.) (2011). The Oxford Handbook of Animal Ethics. Oxford University Press.
    Edited by Tom L. Beauchamp and R.G. Frey.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15.  9
    R. G. Frey (1984). Social Conflict and Resolution. Bowling Green Studies in Applied Philosophy 6:1-16.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. R. G. Frey, Mary Midgley & Tom Regan (1985). Rights, Killing, and Suffering. Ethics 96 (1):192-195.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  17.  43
    R. G. Frey (2005). Pain, Vivisection, and the Value of Life. Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (4):202-204.
    Pain alone does not settle the issue of vivisectionIn his paper, Lab animals and the art of empathy, David Thomas presents his case against animal experimentation. That case is a rather unusual one in certain respects. It turns upon the fact that, for Thomas, nothing can be proved or established in ethics, with the result that what we are left to operate with, apart from assumptions about cases that we might choose to make, are people’s feelings. We cannot show or (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  31
    R. G. Frey & Christopher Heath Wellman (eds.) (2003). A Companion to Applied Ethics. Blackwell Pub..
    Applied or practical ethics is perhaps the largest growth area in philosophy today, and many issues in moral, social, and political life have come under philosophical scrutiny in recent years. Taken together, the essays in this volume – including two overview essays on theories of ethics and the nature of applied ethics – provide a state-of-the-art account of the most pressing moral questions facing us today. Provides a comprehensive guide to many of the most significant problems of practical ethics Offers (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  19.  13
    Vere Chappell, Dorothy Coleman, Timothy Costelloe, Lisa Downing, James Dye, Daniel Flage, R. G. Frey, James King & Beryl Logan (2001). Hume Studies Referees, 2000-2001. Hume Studies 27 (2):371-372.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  37
    R. G. Frey (1977). Act-Utilitarianism: Sidgwick or Bentham and Smart? Mind 86 (341):95-100.
  21.  38
    R. G. Frey (1977). Can Act-Utilitarianism Be Put Into Practice? Journal of Value Inquiry 11 (1):49-58.
    A frequent objection to act-Utilitarianism is that, Because the consequences of acts extend indefinitely into the future, I cannot put the theory into practice, By trying to decide on its basis what it would be right to do in this case. I reinforce this unworkability argument with an argument designed to show that our ignorance of acts' total actual consequences, At least in the case of a great many acts, Stems not merely from remoteness in the causal and/or temporal orders (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  22.  33
    R. G. Frey (1996). The Ethics of Animal and Human Experimentation. Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (4):252-253.
  23.  14
    R. G. Frey (2000). Privacy, Control, and Talk of Rights. Social Philosophy and Policy 17 (2):45.
    An alleged moral right to informational privacy assumes that we should have control over information about ourselves. What is the philosophical justification for this control? I think that one prevalent answer to this question—an answer that has to do with the justification of negative rights generally—will not do.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  24.  23
    R. G. Frey (1975). Some Aspects to the Doctrine of Double Effect. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 5 (2):259 - 283.
    My interest is in two of the four conditions which must be satisfied if the doctrine of double effect is to be successfully employed. One of these involves the distinction between direct and oblique intention, And I deny that this distinction is the index of character or goodness adherents to the doctrine take it to be. Rather, I emphasize the notion of "control responsibility", In considering several cases around which discussion of the doctrine has focused. I develop this notion, In (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  20
    R. G. Frey (1995). Virtue, Commerce, and Self-Love. Hume Studies 21 (2):275-287.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  31
    R. G. Frey (2005). Intending and Causing. Journal of Ethics 9 (3-4):465-474.
    In much of the contemporary discussion of end of life cases, active killing is forbidden doctors, whereas the passive bringing about of death is, e.g., a rather common occurrence in our hospitals. In the former sorts of cases, doctors are held to be causes of death; in the latter sorts of cases, they are held not to be. If they did not cause a death, even though they did passively bring it about, we cannot use casual responsibility for a death (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  28
    R. G. Frey (2010). Goals, Luck, and Moral Obligation. Social Philosophy and Policy 27 (2):297-316.
    In Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy, Bernard Williams is rather severe on what he thinks of as an ethics of obligation. He has in mind by this Kant and W. D. Ross. For many, obligation seems the very core of ethics and the moral realm, and lives more generally are seen through the prism of this notion. This, according to Williams, flattens out our lives and moral experience and fails to take into account things which are obviously important to (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  17
    R. G. Frey (1986). Autonomy and Conceptions of the Good Life. Bowling Green Studies in Applied Philosophy 8:124-136.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  8
    R. G. Frey (1986). Critical Notice of Rights, Killing and Suffering: Moral Vegetarianism and Applied Ethics. Between the Species 2 (2):7.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  26
    R. G. Frey (1981). Consequences in an Act-Utilitarianism. Journal of Value Inquiry 15 (1):79-83.
    With what view of consequences shall we equip an act-Utilitarianism? I distinguish a broad view of consequences, According to which a consequence is any subsequent future state of the world caused or brought about by an act, Whether by the act alone or by it together with other concurrent happenings, Including the acts of other agents, From a narrow view, According to which a future state of the world is a consequence of an act only if that state would occur (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  3
    R. G. Frey (1977). Kant and Survival. Sophia 16 (2):18-23.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  14
    R. G. Frey (1983). Returning to Eden: Animal Rights and Human Responsibility. Environmental Ethics 5 (1):83-89.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  18
    R. G. Frey (2001). David DeGrazia, Taking Animals Seriously: Mental Life and Moral Status:Taking Animals Seriously: Mental Life and Moral Status. Ethics 111 (3):625-627.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  16
    R. G. Frey (1993). Book Review:Against Liberation: Putting Animals in Perspective Michael P. T. Leahy. [REVIEW] Ethics 103 (4):834-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  6
    R. G. Frey & Robert Paul Wolff (1979). Understanding Rawls: A Reconciliation and Critique of "A Theory of Justice". Philosophical Quarterly 29 (114):92.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  5
    R. G. Frey (ed.) (1984). Utility and Rights. Univ of Minnesota Press.
    Eight of the eleven essays were written expressly for this book; all of the authors are deeply engaged in the debate over utility and rights, and their essays build upon and extend current thinking on the subject.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  37.  7
    R. G. Frey (1977). TOLERATION by Preston King. Philosophical Books 18 (2):87-87.
  38.  17
    R. G. Frey (1978). Causal Responsibility and Contributory Causation. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 39 (1):106-119.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. R. G. Frey (2005). Animals. In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Practical Ethics. OUP Oxford
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  40.  2
    R. G. Frey (1987). Theories of Rights. Philosophical Books 28 (2):102-105.
  41.  3
    R. G. Frey (1974). On Causal Consequences. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 4 (2):365 - 379.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  42.  12
    R. G. Frey (1981). Suicide and Self-Inflicted Death. Philosophy 56 (216):193 - 202.
    The most common view of suicide today is that it is intentional self-killing. 1 Because of the self-killing component, suicide is often described as self-inflicted death or as dying by one's own hand, and the victim is in turn often described as having done himself to death or as having taken his own life. But must one's death be self-inflicted in order to be suicide? The answer, I want to suggest, is arguably no.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  2
    R. G. Frey (1990). Animals, Science, and Morality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (1):22.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  44.  13
    R. G. Frey (1978). Contributory Causation and the Objectivity of the Social Sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 8 (2):175-179.
  45.  2
    R. G. Frey (1986). All That Dwell Therein. International Studies in Philosophy 18 (3):78-79.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  12
    R. G. Frey (1978). What a Good Man Can Bring Himself to Do. Journal of Value Inquiry 12 (2):134-141.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  9
    R. G. Frey (2001). R. M. Hare, Sorting Out Ethics:Sorting Out Ethics. Ethics 112 (1):158-159.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Gerald Dworkin, R. G. Frey & Sissela Bok (2000). Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide-For and Against. Mind 109 (436):893-896.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  49.  9
    R. G. Frey (1981). Against Empiricism: On Education, Epistemology and Value. Philosophical Books 22 (4):254-256.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  3
    R. G. Frey (1981). George Berkeley in America. [REVIEW] Philosophical Books 22 (2):94.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 102