37 found
Sort by:
  1. Robert M. Harnish (2011). François Recanati , Truth-Conditional Pragmatics . Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 31 (4):301-304.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Robert M. Harnish (2011). Uli Sauerland and Kasuko Yatsushiro, Eds. , Semantics and Pragmatics: From Experiment to Theory . Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 30 (6):425-427.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Robert Harnish (2009). Michael Morris, An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language. Philosophy in Review 29 (1):52.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Robert M. Harnish (2009). G. Preyer and G. Peter, Eds., Context-Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism. Philosophy in Review 29 (5):367.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Robert M. Harnish (2009). The Problem of Fragments: Two Interpretative Strategies. Pragmatics and Cognition 17 (2):251-282.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Merrill Garrett & Robert M. Harnish (2007). Experimental Pragmatics: Testing for Implicitures. Pragmatics and Cognition 15 (1):65-90.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Robert M. Harnish (2007). Frege on Direct Quotation. Essays in Philosophy 8 (1):8.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Robert M. Harnish & Christian Plunze (2006). Illocutionary Rules. Pragmatics and Cognition 14 (1):37-52.
    The idea that speaking a language is a rule- (or convention-)governed form of behavior goes back at least to Wittgenstein¿s language-game analogy, and can be found most prominently in the work of Searle and Alston. Both theorists have a conception of illocutionary rules as putting illocutionary conditions on utterance acts. We argue that this conception of illocutionary rules is inadequate ¿ it does not meet intuitively plausible conditions of adequacy for the description of illocutionary acts. Nor are illocutionary rules as (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Robert M. Harnish (2005). Commitments and Speech Acts. Philosophica 75.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Robert M. Harnish (2005). Folk Psychology and Literal Meaning. Pragmatics and Cognition 13 (2):383-400.
    Recanati (2004), Literal Meaning argues against what he calls ¿literalism¿ and for what he calls ¿contextualism¿. He considers a wide spectrum of positions and arguments from relevance theory to hidden variables theory. In the end, however, he seems to hold that semantic and pragmatic theorizing must answer to broadly introspective or folk psychological constraints ¿ they don¿t exist in ¿heaven¿. After surveying Recanati¿s wide-ranging and provocative discussion of these issues, we wonder why parity of reasoning does not condemn syntax and (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Robert M. Harnish (2005). Review of “Departing From Frege: Essays in the Philosophy of Language”. [REVIEW] Essays in Philosophy 6 (1):13.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Robert M. Harnish (2004). Arthur Sullivan, Ed., Logicism and the Philosophy of Language: Selections From Frege and Russell Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 24 (5):379-382.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Robert M. Harnish (2003). Frege and the Logic of Sense and Reference. Review of Metaphysics 56 (4):886-887.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Robert M. Harnish (2003). John Perry, Reference and Reflexivity Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 23 (2):135-138.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Robert M. Harnish (2003). Speech Acts. In L. Nadel (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. Nature Publishing Group.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Robert M. Harnish (2002). Harold W. Noonan, Frege: A Critical Introduction Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 22 (6):434-436.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Robert M. Harnish (2002). Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning William P. Alston Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000, Xiii + 327 Pp., $48.50. [REVIEW] Dialogue 41 (03):589-.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Robert M. Harnish (2002). Joseph Salerno, On Frege Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 22 (4):307-308.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Robert M. Harnish (2001). Grasping Modes of Presentation: Frege Vs Fodor and Schweizer. Acta Analytica 25:19-46.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Robert M. Harnish (ed.) (2001). Minds, Brains, Computers: An Historical Introduction to the Foundations of Cognitive Science. Wiley-Blackwell.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Robert M. Harnish (2001). Nick Fotion, John Searle Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 21 (5):332-334.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. R. M. Harnish (1996). Consciousness, Cognitivism and Computation: A Reply to Searle. Conceptus 29 (75):229-249.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Robert M. Harnish (1995). Modularity and Speech Acts. Pragmatics and Cognition 3 (1):1-29.
  24. Robert M. Harnish (1994). Mood, Meaning and Speech Acts. In Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives. Routledge. 407--459.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Robert M. Harnish (1994). What is the Sense of Phos and Hes? Grazer Philosophische Studien 47:185-196.
    Frege's puzzle for demonstratives is accounting for the cognitive significance of identity statements containing demonstratives, such as "That [demonstration-1] is identical to that [demonstration-2]". Since the demonstrative 'that' makes the same semantic contribution (has the same 'character') on both occurrences, the difference must be due to the cognitive significance or 'senses' of the associated demonstrations. But what is the sense of a demonstration? Kaplan's suggested solutions in terms of gestures and appearances are not compatible with his general theory, and do (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Robert M. Harnish (1993). Communicating with Proverbs. Communication and Cognition. Monographies 26 (3-4):265-290.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Kent Bach & Robert M. Harnish (1992). How Performatives Really Work: A Reply to Searle. [REVIEW] Linguistics and Philosophy 15 (1):93 - 110.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Rm Harnish (1992). Refuting Kripke: The Modal Arguments and the Epistemic Arguments. Conceptus 26 (68-69):79-95.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Kent Bach & Robert M. Harnish (1987). Relevant Questions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 (4):711.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Kent Bach & Robert M. Harnish (1983). Review. [REVIEW] Synthese 54 (3):469-493.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Robert M. Harnish (1983). Pragmatic Derivations. Synthese 54 (3):325 - 373.
    In this paper I have tried to give the SAS some descriptive content with respect to English. I have suggested that correlations of form, function and fit play a central role in accounting for understanding literal and direct communication, and I have tried to take some initial steps towards constructing a plausible theory of such communication incorporating these notions.As with any developing theory, the SAS has a long way to grow. Among the problem areas that need further work are the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Kent Bach & Robert M. Harnish (1982). Katz as Katz Can. Journal of Philosophy 79 (3):168-171.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Robert Cummins & Robert M. Harnish (1980). The Language Faculty and the Interpretation of Linguistics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (1):18.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. K. Bach & R. Harnish (1979). Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Mit Press.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Robert M. Harnish (1977). Searle on Katz's Semantic Theory. Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 8 (1):23-32.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Robert M. Harnish (1976). Two Consequences of Transparent Subject Position. Philosophical Studies 30 (1):11 - 18.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Robert J. Weber & Roger Harnish (1974). Visual Imagery for Words: The Hebb Test. Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (3):409-414.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation