16 found
Order:
  1.  8
    R. James Long (1975). Richard Fishacre and the Problem of the Soul. Modern Schoolman 52 (3):263-270.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  5
    R. James Long (1972). The Science of Theology According to Richard Fishacre: Edition of the Prologue to His Commentary on the Sentences. Mediaeval Studies 34 (1):71-98.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  9
    R. James Long (1985). Alfred of Sareshel's Commentary on the Pseudo-Aristotelian De Plantis: A Critical Edition. Mediaeval Studies 47 (1):125-167.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  8
    R. James Long (2008). Lying with Hagar: The Role of Natural Philosophy in the Theology of Richard Fishacre. Modern Schoolman 86 (1-2):47-64.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  5
    R. James Long (1997). Roger Bacon on the Nature and Place of Angels'. Vivarium 35 (2):266-282.
  6.  9
    R. James Long (1975). Richard Fishacre and the Problem of the Soul. Modern Schoolman 52 (3):263-270.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  18
    Richard DeWitt & R. James Long (2007). Richard Rufus's Reformulations of Anselm's Proslogion Argument. International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (3):329-347.
    In a Sentences Commentary written about 1250 the Franciscan Richard Rufus subjects Anselm’s argument for God’s existence in his Proslogion to the most trenchant criticism since Gaunilon wrote his response on behalf of the “fool.” Anselm’s argument is subtle but sophistical, claims Rufus, because he fails to distinguish between signification and supposition. Rufus therefore offers five reformulations of the Anselmian argument, which we restate in modern formal logic and four of which we claim are valid, the fifth turning on a (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  16
    R. James Long (1999). Saint Thomas Aquinas, Volume 1, the Person and His Work. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 73 (2):355-357.
  9.  5
    R. James Long (1998). Of Angels and Pinheads: The Contributions of the Early Oxford Masters to the Doctrine of Spiritual Matter. Franciscan Studies 56 (1):239-254.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  3
    R. James Long (2011). Richard Fishacre. In H. Lagerlund (ed.), Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer 1123--1126.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  4
    R. James Long (1978). Richard Fishacre's Quaestio on the Ascension of Christ: An Edition. Mediaeval Studies 40 (1):30-55.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  2
    R. James Long (2008). Lying with Hagar: The Role of Natural Philosophy in the Theology of Richard Fishacre. Modern Schoolman 86 (1-2):47-64.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. R. James Long (2005). 3. Aquinas and Franciscan Nature Mysticism. Logos 8 (2).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. R. James Long, James A. Weisheipl & Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies (1991). Philosophy and the God of Abraham Essays in Memory of James A. Weisheipl, Op.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. R. James Long (2015). Stephen Langton, Quaestiones Theologiae Ed. By Riccardo Quinto and Magdalena Bieniak. Journal of the History of Philosophy 53 (4):782-783.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. R. James Long & Maura O'caroll Snd (2003). The Life and Works of Richard Fishacre OP. Prolegomena to the Edition of his Commentary on the Sentences. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 65 (1):181-181.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography