Search results for 'R. M. Rizkalla' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1. R. M. & Elizabeth Williams (1829). Letters From Elizabeth Williams to Anne Mowbray; or, Justice to Ourselves and Others, the Consequence of True Piety [Signed M- R-].
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  9
    G. B. R. (1914). The Authorship of the Platonic Epistles. By R. Hackforth, M.A. 8vo. 1 Vol. Pp. 203. Manchester: University Press, 1913. The Classical Review 28 (07):231-232.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  6
    Y. T. R. (1899). Cambridge Compositions Cambridge Compositions, Greek and Latin. Edited by R. D. Archer-Hind, M.A., and R. D. Hicks, M.A., Fellows of Trinity College, Cambridge. Cambridge: At the University Press. 1899. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 13 (04):227-230.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  9
    C. S. R. (1895). Blake's Edition of Xenophon's Hellenica I. II., and Other Selections The Hellenica of Xenophon, Books I. And II., Together with Selections From Lysias C. Eratosthenes and From Aristotle's Constitution of Athens, Edited with Notes by R. W. Blake, A.M. Boston. 1894. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 9 (04):231-.
  5.  2
    G. G. R. (1931). Psychopathology. By J. S. Nicole, M.R.C.P. & S. (London: Bailliere Tindall & Cox. 1930. Pp. Xii + 203. Price 10s. 6d.). Philosophy 6 (22):271-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Charles R. Pigden (1990). Ought-Implies-Can: Erasmus Luther and R.M. Hare. Sophia 29 (1):2-30.
    l. There is an antinomy in Hare's thought between Ought-Implies-Can and No-Indicatives-from-Imperatives. It cannot be resolved by drawing a distinction between implication and entailment. 2. Luther resolved this antinomy in the l6th century, but to understand his solution, we need to understand his problem. He thought the necessity of Divine foreknowledge removed contingency from human acts, thus making it impossible for sinners to do otherwise than sin. 3. Erasmus objected (on behalf of Free Will) that this violates Ought-Implies-Can which he (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  7.  49
    A. H. Louie (2006). (M,R)-Systems and Their Realizations. Axiomathes 16 (1-2):35-64.
    Robert Rosen’s (M,R)-systems are a class of relational models that define organisms. The realization of relational models plays a central role in his study of life, itself. Biology becomes identified with the class of material realizations of a certain kind of relational organization, exhibited in (M,R)-systems. In this paper I describe several realizations of (M,R)-systems, and in particular alternate realizations of the replication component.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  8.  17
    J. Prideaux (2011). Kinetic Models of (M-R)-Systems. Axiomathes 21 (3):373-392.
    Kinetic models using enzyme kinetics are developed for the three ways that Louie proved that Rosen’s minimal (M-R)-System can be closed to efficient cause; i.e., how the “replication” component can itself be entailed from within the system. The kinetic models are developed using the techniques of network thermodynamics. As a demonstration, each model is simulated using a SPICE circuit simulator using arbitrarily chosen rate constants. The models are built from SPICE sub-circuits representing the key terms in the chemical rate equations. (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Roderick M. Chisholm & Keith Lehrer (eds.) (1975). Analysis and Metaphysics: Essays in Honor of R. M. Chisholm. D. Reidel Pub. Co..
    Taylor, R. A tribute.--Epistemology: Cornman, J. W. Chisholm on sensing and perceiving. Ross, J. F. Testimonial evidence. Lehrer, K. Reason and consistency. Keim, R. Epistemic values and epistemic viewpoints. Hanen, M. Confirmation, explanation, and acceptance. Canfield, J. V. "I know that I am in pain" is senseless. Steel, T. J. Knowledge and the self-presenting.--Metaphysics: Cartwright, R. Scattered objects. Duggan, T. J. Hume on causation. Arnaud, R. B. Brentanist relations. Johnson, M. L., Jr. Events as recurrables.--Ethics: Stevenson, J. T. On doxastic (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10.  1
    Anselmo Carvalho de Oliveira (2016). R.M. Hare's Solution to the Problems of Descriptivism and Moral Emotivism. Ideas Y Valores 65 (160):5-28.
    Na primeira parte, argumento que o descritivismo proposto por Moritz Schlick não compreende adequadamente a função dos juízos morais. Na segunda parte, argumento que o emotivismo não apresenta uma explicação adequada para o papel da razão na ética. Na terceira parte, argumento que o prescritivismo universal proposto por R. M. Hare avança na solução dos problemas do emotivismo, porque amplia o papel da razão na ética, e na solução dos problemas do descritivismo, porque compreende a função dos juízos morais na (...)
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  45
    Richard Gale (1998). R. M. Adams's Theodicy of Grace. Philo 1 (1):36-44.
    R. M. Adams’s essay, “Must God Create the Best?” can be interpreted as offering a theodicy for God’s creating morally less perfect beings than he could have created. By creating these morally less perfect beings, God is bestowing grace upon them, which is an unmerited or undeserved benefit. He does so, however, in advance of the free moral misdeeds that render them undeserving. This requires that God have middle knowledge, pace Adams’s version of the Free Will Theodicy, of what would (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  12. R. M. Hare (1993). Objective Prescriptions*: R. M. Hare. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 35:1-17.
    I offer no apology for presenting a simple paper about what is essentially a simple subject: the objectivity of moral judgments. Most of the complications are introduced by those who do not grasp the distinctions I shall be making. I am afraid that they include the majority of moral philosophers at the present time. These complications can be unravelled; but not in a short paper. I have tried to do it in my other writings.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  29
    Anthony Skelton (2001). Review of R. M. Hare, Sorting Out Ethics. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (4):583 – 585.
    This is a short review of R.M. Hare's Sorting Out Ethics. It critically evaluates Hare's universal prescriptivism.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  8
    Petr Dvořák (2006). Univerzální preskriptivismus R. M. Hara. Studia Neoaristotelica 3 (1):56-61.
    Praescriptivismus universalis R. M. HariiDisseratinis huius finis est, R. M Harii doctrinam ethicam, quae in libris, quibus tituli The language of Morals (1952) et Freedom and Reason (1963) exponitur, et systematice proponere et critice interpretari. Haec doctrina, quamquam ob multa apte dicta magna attentione digna est, difficultatibus tamen gravibus expers esse non videtur. Praecipua harum difficultatum in hoc consistit, quod, unde principiorum seu praeceptorum moralium vis obligandi proveniat, auctor non prodit.Universal Prescriptivism of R. M. HareThe article is a critical systematic (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  5
    R. M. Rattenbury (1933). Die apokrypken Apostelgeschichten und die romanhafte Literatur der Antike. Von Rosa Söder. (Würzburger Studien zur Altertumswissenschaft, Heft 3.) Pp. xii+216. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1932. Paper, R.M. 12. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 47 (01):39-.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  3
    Lenart Škof (2010). In Dialogue for Democracy. R. M. Unger's Pragmatist Vision of Democratic Experimentalism and Explorations of Democracy in Luce Irigaray. [REVIEW] Synthesis Philosophica 24 (2):233-242.
    The paper focuses on R. M. Unger’s pragmatist vision of democratic experimentalism and its possible application to the area of contemporary intercultural philosophy. The paper connects the field of American pragmatism’s political and social thought with the contemporary pressing issues of intercultural philosophy. In the second part, Unger’s philosophy is put into a dialogue with the philosophy of Luce Irigaray, thus opening a new platform for the ethico-political vision of democracy in the era of globalization. The analysis of the democratic (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  3
    Lenart Škof (2010). Im Dialog für die Demokratie. R. M. Ungers pragmatistische Vision des demokratischen Experimentalismus und der Demokratieforschung bei Luce Irigaray. [REVIEW] Synthesis Philosophica 24 (2):233-242.
    Diese Arbeit fokussiert sich auf R. M. Ungers pragmatistische Vision des demokratischen Experimentalismus sowie dessen etwaige Anwendung auf die zeitgenössische interkulturelle Philosophie. Hierbei wird das Sachgebiet des politischen und sozialen Gedankens aus dem amerikanischen Pragmatismus mit den kontemporären Kernfragen der interkulturellen Philosophie in Verbindung gebracht. Im zweiten Teil wird Ungers Philosophie mit jener Luce Irigarays in Dialog gesetzt, wodurch eine neue Plattform zur ethisch-politischen Demokratievision in der Globalisierungsära eröffnet wird. Somit stellt sich die Analyse des demokratischen Experimentalismus selbsttätig her – (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  3
    Lenart Škof (2010). En dialogue pour la démocratie. La vision pragmatique de l'expérimentalisme démocratique de R. M. Unger et l'étude de la démocratie chez Luce Irigaray. [REVIEW] Synthesis Philosophica 24 (2):233-242.
    L’article se focalise sur la vision pragmatique de l’expérimentalisme démocratique de R. M. Unger et sur sa mise en application possible dans le domaine de la philosophie interculturelle contemporaine. Le champ de la pensée politique et sociale dans le pragmatisme américain est mis en relation avec des questions importantes de la philosophie interculturelle contemporaine. Dans la deuxième partie, la philosophie de Unger est mise en dialogue avec la philosophie de Luce Irigaray, ouvrant ainsi une nouvelle plate-forme pour une vision éthico-politique (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  3
    Sui Yuefei & Zhang Zaiyue (1999). The Cupping Theorem in R/M. Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (2):643-650.
    It will be proved that the Shoenfield cupping conjecture holds in R/M, the quotient of the recursively enumerable degrees modulo the cappable r.e. degrees. Namely, for any [a], [b] ∈ R/M such that [0] $\prec$ [b] $\prec$ [a] there exists [c] ∈ R/M such that [c] $\prec$ [a] and [a] = [b] ∨ [c].
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  2
    Lenart Škof (2010). U dijalogu za demokraciju. R. M. Ungerova pragmatistička vizija demokratskog eksperimentalizma i istraživanja demokracije kod Luce Irigaray. [REVIEW] Synthesis Philosophica 24 (2):233-242.
    Članak se fokusira na R. M. Ungerovu pragmatističku viziju demokratskog eksperimentalizma i moguće primjene na suvremenu interkulturalnu filozofiju. Povezuje se polje političke i socijalne misli američkog pragmatizma sa suvremenim gorućim pitanjima interkulturalne filozofije. U drugom je dijelu Ungerova filozofija stavljena u dijalog s filozofijom Luce Irigaray otvarajući tako novu platformu za etičko-političku viziju demokracije u eri globalizacije. Analiza demokratskog eksperimentalizma se, na taj način, sama uspostavlja kao alternativni projekt političke etike te kao Ungerov i Irigarayin projekt demokratskog eksperimentalizma u dobu (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Petr Dvořák (2006). Univerzální Preskriptivismus R. M. Hara: A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism. Studia Neoaristotelica 3 (1):56-61.
    The article is a critical systematic presentation of R. M. Hare's ethical concepts and doctrine as outlined in his books The Language of Morals and Freedom and Reason . The theory merits attention for many reasons, yet it appears to suffer from some weaknesses; the chief among them being the lack of explanation for the source of binding force of moral principles.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. R. M. Hare, Bryan Magee & British Broadcasting Corporation (1977). Moral Philosophy. Bryan Magee Talked to R.M. Hare. British Broadcasting Corporation.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. R. M. Hare (1984). Philosophy and Practice: Some Issues About War and Peace: R. M. Hare. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 18:1-15.
    I am going in this lecture on ‘Philosophy and Practice’ first to say something about philosophy and then something about practice, in order to show you how they bear on one another. But I must start by paying a tribute to the President of the Society for Applied Philosophy, Professor Sir A. J. Ayer, who has kindly agreed to take the chair at this lecture. I can honestly say that he is more responsible than anybody else for putting me on (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. R. M. Sainsbury & Michael Tye (2011). I—R. M. Sainsbury and Michael Tye: An Originalist Theory of Concepts. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 85 (1):101-124.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. R. M. Sainsbury (1999). I–R.M. Sainsbury. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 73 (1):243-269.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Cemal Yıldırım & Kumru Arapgirlioğlu (eds.) (2008). Bir Us Ve Bilim Savaşçısı: Cemal Yıldırım'a Armağan. İmge Kitabevi.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  7
    M. R. Wright (1992). R. M. Dancy: Two Studies in the Early Academy. (Suny Series in Ancient Greek Philosophy.) Pp. Xii + 219. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press, 1991. Paper, $14.95. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 42 (02):457-458.
  28.  78
    A. J. Dale (1985). Hare on Supervenience: Remarks on R.M. Hare's Supervenience. Mind 94 (October):599-600.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  9
    J. M. Edmonds (1910). Two Editions of the Characters of Theophrastvs Theophrasti Characteres Recensuit Hermannus Diels. Oxford Classical Texts. 1909. 3s. 6d. Net. Pp. Xxviii + (Unnumbered). Θεοφρστου Xαρακτρες. The Characters of Theophrastus. An English Translation From a Revised Text. With Introduction and Notes by R. C. Jebb, M.A. A New Edition. Edited by J. E. Sandys, Litt.D. Macmillan. 1909. 7s. 6d. Net. C. 23×14½. Pp. Xvi+229. [REVIEW] Classical Quarterly 4 (02):128-.
    Theophrasti Characteres recensuit Hermannus Diels. Oxford Classical Texts. 1909. 3s. 6d. net. Pp. xxviii + .Θεοφρστου Xαρακτxs22EFρες. The Characters of Theophrastus. An English Translation from a Revised Text. With Introduction and Notes by R. C. Jebb, M.A. A new edition. Edited by J. E. Sandys, Litt.D. Macmillan. 1909. 7s. 6d. net. c. 23×14½. Pp. xvi+229.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  63
    David Schweickart, Economic Democracy: A W o R T H y S o C I a L I S M That Would Really Work.
    w a y s h a v e b e e n . W e a l l r e m e m b e r M a r x ' s p o l e m i c a g a i n s t P r o u d h o n , t h e Manifesto's critique of "historical action [yielding] to personal inventive action, historically created conditions of emancipation to fantastic ones, and the gradual spontaneous class (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  12
    R. M. Cook (1969). M. R. Popham and L. H. Sackett: Excavations at Lefkandi, Euboea: 1964–66. Pp. 35; 82 Figs. London:Thames and Hudson, 1968. Paper, 12s. 6d. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 19 (02):246-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  12
    R. M. Cook (1958). R. Lullies and M. Hirmer: Greek Sculpture. Pp. 88; 264 Plates (8 in Colour), 11 Figs. London: Thames and Hudson, 1957. Cloth, 63s. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 8 (3-4):299-300.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  10
    R. M. Cook (1992). R. W. V. Catling, I. S. Lemos: Lefkandi II: The Protogeometric Building at Toumba (Edited by M. R. Popham, P. G. Calligas, L. H. Sackett). Part 1: The Pottery. Pp. Xv + 174; 81 Plates, London: The British School of Archaeology at Athens/Thames & Hudson, 1990. £40. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 42 (01):227-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  6
    R. M. L. W. (1913). The Argonautica in English Apollonius Rhodius. The Argonautica, with an English Translation. By R. C. Seaton, M.A., Formerly Fellow of Jesus College, Cambridge. 1 Vol. 8vo. Pp. Xiv + 432. London: William Heinemann; New York: The Macmillan Co., 1912. 5s. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 27 (03):98-99.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. R. B. Braithwaite (1954). HARE, R. M. - The Language of Morals. [REVIEW] Mind 63:249.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  36.  29
    Roy M. Sorensen (1991). Paradoxes, by R. M. Sainsbury. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (2):455-459.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  4
    R. H. Martin (1977). Tacitus' Opera Minora Cornelii Taciti Opera Minora Recognouerunt Breuique Adnotatione Critica Instruxerunt M. Winterbottom Et R. M. Ogilvie. Pp. X + 114. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975. Cloth, £2·25. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 27 (02):193-194.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  15
    F. R. D. Goodyear (1966). Livy I–V R. M. Ogilvie: A Commentary on Livy, Books 1–5. Pp. Xiv+776; 2 Maps. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1965. Cloth, £5 Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 16 (01):60-63.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  6
    A. R. Burn (1968). A New Agricola Cornelii Taciti De Vita Agricolae: Edited by R. M. Ogilvie and the Late Sir Ian Richmond. Pp. Xvi+344; 8 Plates, Numerous Maps & Plans in Text. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967. Cloth, 25s. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 18 (03):314-316.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  6
    K. R. Potter (1932). P. Ovidius Naso. Vol. III, fasc. 2. Fastorum libri VI. Post R. Ehwaldium iteratis curis edidit F. W. Lenz. Pp. xxxii + 266. Leipzig: Teubner, 1932. Cloth, R.M. 6.40 (unbound, 5.60). [REVIEW] The Classical Review 46 (06):275-.
  41.  9
    M. L. Clarke (1965). Phases of Classical Influence R. M. Ogilvie: Latin and Greek. A History of the Influence of the Classics on English Life From 1600 to 1918. Pp. Xiv + 189. London: Routledge, 1964. Cloth, 30s. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 15 (01):106-108.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  2
    R. Mckenzie (1928). Philonis Byzantii Index. (Index verborum a Philone Byzantio in Mechanicae Syntaxis libris quarto quintoque adhibitorum.) Composuit Maximilianus Arnim. Pp. viii + 90. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner. R.-M. 5.60; bound, R.-M. 6.60. 1927. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 42 (01):41-.
  43.  9
    R. G. Frey (2001). R. M. Hare, Sorting Out Ethics:Sorting Out Ethics. Ethics 112 (1):158-159.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  8
    J. M. Reynolds (1956). Rome Beyond the Imperial Frontiers R. M. Wheeler: Rome Beyond the Imperial Frontiers. Pp. Xii+192; 38 Plates, 19 Figs, Map. London: Bell, 1954. Cloth, 25s. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 6 (02):153-155.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  8
    A. M. Snodgrass (1975). Greek Painted Pottery R. M. Cook: Greek Painted Pottery. Second Edition. Pp. Xxiv+390; 56 Plates, 44 Figs. London: Methuen, 1972. Cloth, £10. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 25 (01):127-128.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  2
    R. Macmillan (1986). Book Reviews : Feature Films As History. Edited by K. R. M. SHORT. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1981. Pp. 192. $16.50. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 16 (4):511-513.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  6
    H. R. Hall (1907). The Discoveries in Crete The Discoveries in Crete and Their Bearing on the History of Ancient Civilization. By Prof. R. M. Burrows. London : Murray. Pp. 244. 5s. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 21 (08):237-239.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  4
    P. R. Bell (1981). Russell By R. M. Sainsbury Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979, Xiv + 348 Pp., £13.95. [REVIEW] Philosophy 56 (216):271-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. M. F. Ashley-Montagu (1938). Human AffairsR. B. Cattell J. Cohen R. M. W. Travers. Isis 28 (2):508-510.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. J. R. Bellerby (1931). A Contributive Society. By R. M. MacIver. [REVIEW] Ethics 42:338.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000