Search results for 'R. M. Yost Jr' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1. R. M. & Elizabeth Williams (1829). Letters From Elizabeth Williams to Anne Mowbray; or, Justice to Ourselves and Others, the Consequence of True Piety [Signed M- R-].
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  9
    G. B. R. (1914). The Authorship of the Platonic Epistles. By R. Hackforth, M.A. 8vo. 1 Vol. Pp. 203. Manchester: University Press, 1913. The Classical Review 28 (07):231-232.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  6
    Y. T. R. (1899). Cambridge Compositions Cambridge Compositions, Greek and Latin. Edited by R. D. Archer-Hind, M.A., and R. D. Hicks, M.A., Fellows of Trinity College, Cambridge. Cambridge: At the University Press. 1899. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 13 (04):227-230.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  8
    C. S. R. (1895). Blake's Edition of Xenophon's Hellenica I. II., and Other Selections The Hellenica of Xenophon, Books I. And II., Together with Selections From Lysias C. Eratosthenes and From Aristotle's Constitution of Athens, Edited with Notes by R. W. Blake, A.M. Boston. 1894. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 9 (04):231-.
  5.  2
    G. G. R. (1931). Psychopathology. By J. S. Nicole, M.R.C.P. & S. (London: Bailliere Tindall & Cox. 1930. Pp. Xii + 203. Price 10s. 6d.). Philosophy 6 (22):271-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  1
    Nicholas Rescher (1955). Review: R. M. Yost, Leibniz and Philosophical Analysis. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 20 (2):171-171.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  3
    Lindsey Esbensen (2014). Health Care Ethics: Theological Foundations, Contemporary Issues, and Controversial Cases, Revised Edition by Michael R. Panicola, David M. Belde, John Paul Slosar, and Mark F. Repenshek, And: On Moral Medicine: Theological Perspectives in Medical Ethics, Third Edition Ed. By M. Therese Lysaught and Joseph J. Kotva Jr. With Stephen E. Lammers and Allen Verhey. [REVIEW] Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics 34 (2):211-214.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  7
    A. Bitel (1997). Review. Apuleius Madaurensis: Metamorphoses Book IX: Text, Introduction and Commentary. BL Hijmans [Jr], R Th. Van der Paardt, V Schmidt, B Wesseling, M Zimmerman. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 47 (1):57-59.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  13
    D. S. Colman (1948). School Books Alston Hurd Chase and Henry Phillips Jr.: A New Introduction to Greek. Pp. 128. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press (London: Oxford University Press), 1946. Paper, 10s. F. Kinchin Smith and T. W. Melluish: Teach Yourself Greek. Pp. 331. London: Hodder and Stoughton (for the English Universities Press), 1947. Cloth, 4s. 6d. K. C. Masterman: A Latin Word-List. Pp. 3. Melbourne: Macmillan, 1945. Paper, 2s. 6d. K. D. Robinson and R. L. Chambers: The Latin Way. Pp. Xxviii+380 (Many Drawings by Hilary M. Crosse). London: Christophers, 1947. Cloth, 6s. 6d. O. N. Jones: Faciliora Reddenda. Pp. 96. London and Glasgow: Blackie, 1947. Cloth, 2s. I. Williamson: The Friday Afternoon Latin Book. Pp. 79 (Illustrated by Drawings). London and Glasgow: Blackie, 1947. Cloth, 2s. 3d. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 62 (3-4):158-159.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  14
    Erica K. Rangel (2008). Innovation and the Pharmaceutical Industry: Critical Reflections on the Vitures of Profit , H.T. Engelhardt, Jr. And J.R. Garrett (Eds.) (Salem: M & M Scrivener Press, 2008). [REVIEW] HEC Forum 20 (4):375-378.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  2
    Maria Letizia Zanier (2001). P.M. Sniderman, P. Peri, R.J.P. De Figueiredo, Jr. E T. Piazza, "The Outsider". Polis 15 (1):158-160.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. N. Chater, E. Colunga, C. J. Croucher, C. H. Echols, H. Gleitman, L. Gleitman, U. Hahn, S. Hulme, S. S. Jones & G. Keren (2003). Akahane-Yamada, R., B47 Bertamini, M., 33 Booth, AE, 215 Brockmole, JR, B59 Chambers, KE, B69. Cognition 87:235.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Donald Phillip Verene (1994). Mary Anne O'Neil, William E. Cain, Christopher Wise, C. S. Schreiner, Willis Salomon, James A. Grimshaw, Jr., Donald K. Hedrick, Wendell V. Harris, Paul Duro, Julia Epstein, Gerald Prince, Douglas Robinson, Lynne S. Vieth, Richard Eldridge, Robert Stoothoff, John Anzalone, Kevin Walzer, Eric J. Ziolkowski, Jacqueline LeBlanc, Anna Carew-Miller, Alfred R. Mele, David Herman, James M. Lang, Andrew J. McKenna, Michael Calabrese, Robert Tobin, Sandor Goodhart, Moira Gatens, Paul Douglass, John F. Desmond, James L. Battersby, Marie J. Aquilino, Celia E. Weller, Joel Black, Sandra Sherman, Herman Rapaport, Jonathan Levin, Ali Abdullatif Ahmida, David Lewis Schaefer. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Literature 18 (1):131.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Roderick M. Chisholm & Keith Lehrer (eds.) (1975). Analysis and Metaphysics: Essays in Honor of R. M. Chisholm. D. Reidel Pub. Co..
    Taylor, R. A tribute.--Epistemology: Cornman, J. W. Chisholm on sensing and perceiving. Ross, J. F. Testimonial evidence. Lehrer, K. Reason and consistency. Keim, R. Epistemic values and epistemic viewpoints. Hanen, M. Confirmation, explanation, and acceptance. Canfield, J. V. "I know that I am in pain" is senseless. Steel, T. J. Knowledge and the self-presenting.--Metaphysics: Cartwright, R. Scattered objects. Duggan, T. J. Hume on causation. Arnaud, R. B. Brentanist relations. Johnson, M. L., Jr. Events as recurrables.--Ethics: Stevenson, J. T. On doxastic (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15.  2
    M. M. La mbe’R. (1999). Lo Gicand La W: Fo Rmalversus Ju R Id Ic Al Lo G Ic Ro Bert E. Ro des, Jr. And Ho Ward Po Sposel, Premises and Conclusions: Symbolic Logic for Legal Analysis. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1997. X 1 387 Pp. No Price Stated. ISBN 0-13-262635-7. Reviewed by La Mbe'r MM Ro Yakkers, Department of Philosophy and Method. [REVIEW] History and Philosophy of Logic 20 (47):53.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  67
    R. Song (1989). Book Review : Nuclear Deterrence, Morality and Realism, by John Finnis, Joseph M. Boyle, Jr, and Germain Grisez. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1987. Xvi + 429pp. 30.00 & 12.50. [REVIEW] Studies in Christian Ethics 2 (1):124-133.
  17.  5
    R. N. Swanson (2007). Love of Self and Love of God in Thirteenth-Century Ethics. By Thomas M. Osborne, Jr. Heythrop Journal 48 (2):299–301.
  18. John R. Williams (2015). The Economy of Desire: Christianity and Capitalism in a Postmodern World . By Daniel M. Bell Jr. Pp. 224, Grand Rapids, MI, Baker Academic, 2012, $19.99. The Wound and the Blessing: Economics, Relationships and Happiness. By Luigino Bruni . Pp. Xxiv, 123, Hyde Park, NY, New City Press, 2012, £12.50. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 56 (3):484-486.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Charles R. Pigden (1990). Ought-Implies-Can: Erasmus Luther and R.M. Hare. Sophia 29 (1):2-30.
    l. There is an antinomy in Hare's thought between Ought-Implies-Can and No-Indicatives-from-Imperatives. It cannot be resolved by drawing a distinction between implication and entailment. 2. Luther resolved this antinomy in the l6th century, but to understand his solution, we need to understand his problem. He thought the necessity of Divine foreknowledge removed contingency from human acts, thus making it impossible for sinners to do otherwise than sin. 3. Erasmus objected (on behalf of Free Will) that this violates Ought-Implies-Can which he (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  20.  20
    R. M. Yost Jr (1964). Price on Appearing and Appearances. Journal of Philosophy 61 (11):328-334.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  11
    R. M. Yost Jr (1959). Professor Malcolm on Dreaming and Scepticism--II. Philosophical Quarterly 9 (36):231-243.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  22
    R. M. Yost Jr (1959). Professor Malcolm on Dreaming and Scepticism--I. Philosophical Quarterly 9 (35):142-151.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  10
    R. M. Yost Jr (1959). Professor Malcolm on Dreaming and Scepticism--I. Philosophical Quarterly 9 (April):142-151.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  9
    R. M. Yost Jr & Donald Kalish (1955). Miss MacDonald on Sleeping and Waking. Philosophical Quarterly 5 (19):109 - 124.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  6
    R. M. Yost Jr & Donald Kalish (1955). Miss MacDonald on Sleeping and Waking. Philosophical Quarterly 5 (19):109 - 124.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. R. M. Yost Jr (1962). Professor Price on Perspectival Illusion. Philosophical Review 71 (2):202-217.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  48
    A. H. Louie (2006). (M,R)-Systems and Their Realizations. Axiomathes 16 (1-2):35-64.
    Robert Rosen’s (M,R)-systems are a class of relational models that define organisms. The realization of relational models plays a central role in his study of life, itself. Biology becomes identified with the class of material realizations of a certain kind of relational organization, exhibited in (M,R)-systems. In this paper I describe several realizations of (M,R)-systems, and in particular alternate realizations of the replication component.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  28.  16
    J. Prideaux (2011). Kinetic Models of (M-R)-Systems. Axiomathes 21 (3):373-392.
    Kinetic models using enzyme kinetics are developed for the three ways that Louie proved that Rosen’s minimal (M-R)-System can be closed to efficient cause; i.e., how the “replication” component can itself be entailed from within the system. The kinetic models are developed using the techniques of network thermodynamics. As a demonstration, each model is simulated using a SPICE circuit simulator using arbitrarily chosen rate constants. The models are built from SPICE sub-circuits representing the key terms in the chemical rate equations. (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  9
    R. Mackay (1977). Book Reviews : The Structures of the Life-World. By Alfred Schutz and Thomas Luckmann. Translated by Richard M. Zaner and H. Tristram Engelhardt. Jr. London: Heinemann Educational Books, 1974. Pp. XXIX + 335. 4 Cloth, 2 Paper. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 7 (4):405-409.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  1
    John Boswell Cobb Jr (1988). Ultimate Reality: A Christian View Replies by M. Abe and R. Ray, with Discussions, Pp 65-109; Photos. Buddhist-Christian Studies 8:51-64.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  1
    M. D. Hooker (1972). J. H. Negenman. New Atlas of the Bible. Ed. H. H. Rowley, Trans. H. Hoskins and R. Beckley. £5·25.Robert A. Spivey and D. Moody Smith Jr,. Anatomy of the New Testament. £4·20. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 8 (2):191.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  1
    P. R. Mckenzie (1984). Walter L. Brenneman Jr, Stanley O. Yarian in Association with Alan M. Olson. The Seeing Eye: Hermeneutical Phenomenology in the Study of Religion. Pp. 177. £, 8.10. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 20 (3):497.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. W. I. Gasarch, A. C. Y. Lee, M. Groszek, T. Hummel, V. S. Harizanov, H. Ishihara, B. Khoussainov, A. Nerode, I. Kalantari & L. Welch (1998). Downey, R., Fiiredi, Z., Jockusch Jr., CG and Ruhel, LA. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 93:263.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Jacob M. Held (2009). Frederic R. Kelllog, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., Legal Theory and Judicial Restraint Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 28 (1):33-35.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. J. M. Held (2008). Frederic R. Kellogg, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., Legal Theory, and Judicial Restraint. Philosophy in Review 28 (1):33.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Grace M. Jantzen (1982). Nathan R. Scott Jr. Mirrors of Man in Existentialism. Pp. 248. $7·95. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 18 (2):273.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Daniel C. Dennett (1976). Are Dreams Experiences? Philosophical Review 73 (April):151-71.
  38.  44
    Richard Gale (1998). R. M. Adams's Theodicy of Grace. Philo 1 (1):36-44.
    R. M. Adams’s essay, “Must God Create the Best?” can be interpreted as offering a theodicy for God’s creating morally less perfect beings than he could have created. By creating these morally less perfect beings, God is bestowing grace upon them, which is an unmerited or undeserved benefit. He does so, however, in advance of the free moral misdeeds that render them undeserving. This requires that God have middle knowledge, pace Adams’s version of the Free Will Theodicy, of what would (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  39. R. M. Hare (1993). Objective Prescriptions*: R. M. Hare. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 35:1-17.
    I offer no apology for presenting a simple paper about what is essentially a simple subject: the objectivity of moral judgments. Most of the complications are introduced by those who do not grasp the distinctions I shall be making. I am afraid that they include the majority of moral philosophers at the present time. These complications can be unravelled; but not in a short paper. I have tried to do it in my other writings.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  29
    Anthony Skelton (2001). Review of R. M. Hare, Sorting Out Ethics. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (4):583 – 585.
    This is a short review of R.M. Hare's Sorting Out Ethics. It critically evaluates Hare's universal prescriptivism.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  5
    R. M. Rattenbury (1933). Die apokrypken Apostelgeschichten und die romanhafte Literatur der Antike. Von Rosa Söder. (Würzburger Studien zur Altertumswissenschaft, Heft 3.) Pp. xii+216. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1932. Paper, R.M. 12. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 47 (01):39-.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  6
    Petr Dvořák (2006). Univerzální preskriptivismus R. M. Hara. Studia Neoaristotelica 3 (1):56-61.
    Praescriptivismus universalis R. M. HariiDisseratinis huius finis est, R. M Harii doctrinam ethicam, quae in libris, quibus tituli The language of Morals (1952) et Freedom and Reason (1963) exponitur, et systematice proponere et critice interpretari. Haec doctrina, quamquam ob multa apte dicta magna attentione digna est, difficultatibus tamen gravibus expers esse non videtur. Praecipua harum difficultatum in hoc consistit, quod, unde principiorum seu praeceptorum moralium vis obligandi proveniat, auctor non prodit.Universal Prescriptivism of R. M. HareThe article is a critical systematic (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  3
    Lenart Škof (2010). In Dialogue for Democracy. R. M. Unger's Pragmatist Vision of Democratic Experimentalism and Explorations of Democracy in Luce Irigaray. [REVIEW] Synthesis Philosophica 24 (2):233-242.
    The paper focuses on R. M. Unger’s pragmatist vision of democratic experimentalism and its possible application to the area of contemporary intercultural philosophy. The paper connects the field of American pragmatism’s political and social thought with the contemporary pressing issues of intercultural philosophy. In the second part, Unger’s philosophy is put into a dialogue with the philosophy of Luce Irigaray, thus opening a new platform for the ethico-political vision of democracy in the era of globalization. The analysis of the democratic (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  3
    Lenart Škof (2010). Im Dialog für die Demokratie. R. M. Ungers pragmatistische Vision des demokratischen Experimentalismus und der Demokratieforschung bei Luce Irigaray. [REVIEW] Synthesis Philosophica 24 (2):233-242.
    Diese Arbeit fokussiert sich auf R. M. Ungers pragmatistische Vision des demokratischen Experimentalismus sowie dessen etwaige Anwendung auf die zeitgenössische interkulturelle Philosophie. Hierbei wird das Sachgebiet des politischen und sozialen Gedankens aus dem amerikanischen Pragmatismus mit den kontemporären Kernfragen der interkulturellen Philosophie in Verbindung gebracht. Im zweiten Teil wird Ungers Philosophie mit jener Luce Irigarays in Dialog gesetzt, wodurch eine neue Plattform zur ethisch-politischen Demokratievision in der Globalisierungsära eröffnet wird. Somit stellt sich die Analyse des demokratischen Experimentalismus selbsttätig her – (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  3
    Lenart Škof (2010). En dialogue pour la démocratie. La vision pragmatique de l'expérimentalisme démocratique de R. M. Unger et l'étude de la démocratie chez Luce Irigaray. [REVIEW] Synthesis Philosophica 24 (2):233-242.
    L’article se focalise sur la vision pragmatique de l’expérimentalisme démocratique de R. M. Unger et sur sa mise en application possible dans le domaine de la philosophie interculturelle contemporaine. Le champ de la pensée politique et sociale dans le pragmatisme américain est mis en relation avec des questions importantes de la philosophie interculturelle contemporaine. Dans la deuxième partie, la philosophie de Unger est mise en dialogue avec la philosophie de Luce Irigaray, ouvrant ainsi une nouvelle plate-forme pour une vision éthico-politique (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  2
    Lenart Škof (2010). U dijalogu za demokraciju. R. M. Ungerova pragmatistička vizija demokratskog eksperimentalizma i istraživanja demokracije kod Luce Irigaray. [REVIEW] Synthesis Philosophica 24 (2):233-242.
    Članak se fokusira na R. M. Ungerovu pragmatističku viziju demokratskog eksperimentalizma i moguće primjene na suvremenu interkulturalnu filozofiju. Povezuje se polje političke i socijalne misli američkog pragmatizma sa suvremenim gorućim pitanjima interkulturalne filozofije. U drugom je dijelu Ungerova filozofija stavljena u dijalog s filozofijom Luce Irigaray otvarajući tako novu platformu za etičko-političku viziju demokracije u eri globalizacije. Analiza demokratskog eksperimentalizma se, na taj način, sama uspostavlja kao alternativni projekt političke etike te kao Ungerov i Irigarayin projekt demokratskog eksperimentalizma u dobu (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  3
    Sui Yuefei & Zhang Zaiyue (1999). The Cupping Theorem in R/M. Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (2):643-650.
    It will be proved that the Shoenfield cupping conjecture holds in R/M, the quotient of the recursively enumerable degrees modulo the cappable r.e. degrees. Namely, for any [a], [b] ∈ R/M such that [0] $\prec$ [b] $\prec$ [a] there exists [c] ∈ R/M such that [c] $\prec$ [a] and [a] = [b] ∨ [c].
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Petr Dvořák (2006). Univerzální Preskriptivismus R. M. Hara: A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism. Studia Neoaristotelica 3 (1):56-61.
    The article is a critical systematic presentation of R. M. Hare's ethical concepts and doctrine as outlined in his books The Language of Morals and Freedom and Reason . The theory merits attention for many reasons, yet it appears to suffer from some weaknesses; the chief among them being the lack of explanation for the source of binding force of moral principles.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. R. M. Hare, Bryan Magee & British Broadcasting Corporation (1977). Moral Philosophy. Bryan Magee Talked to R.M. Hare. British Broadcasting Corporation.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. R. M. Hare (1984). Philosophy and Practice: Some Issues About War and Peace: R. M. Hare. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 18:1-15.
    I am going in this lecture on ‘Philosophy and Practice’ first to say something about philosophy and then something about practice, in order to show you how they bear on one another. But I must start by paying a tribute to the President of the Society for Applied Philosophy, Professor Sir A. J. Ayer, who has kindly agreed to take the chair at this lecture. I can honestly say that he is more responsible than anybody else for putting me on (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000