5 found
Sort by:
See also:
  1. Jacek Malinowski & Rafał Palczewski (2011). Logic in Cognitive Science. Logic and Logical Philosophy 20 (1-2):3-5.
    According to a brief and very general definition Cognitive Science is an interdisciplinary scientific study of how information is represented and transformed in a human nervous system. “Information”, “representation” and “transformation” are keywords here. Many disciplines bring considerable contribution to Cognitive Science. Logic is one of them. Logic investigates these rules which allow us to recognize valid reasonings and distinguish them from those that fail to fulfill the condition of valid- ity. Thus logic investigates some representation (or representations) of reasoning. (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Rafał Palczewski (2009). Kontrastywizm epistemiczny. Filozofia Nauki 4.
    According to contrastivism in epistemology - advocated chiefly by Jonathan Schaffer - the knowledge relation is not binary (s knows that p) but ternary (s knows that p rather than q). Thus knowledge ascriptions are contrast-sensitive. The aim of this paper is to portray, investigate and assess the details of this view. In the first three sections I focus mainly on arguments for contrastivism. Section fourth is devoted to the contrastivist solution to the skeptical puzzle. In the last three sections (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Rafał Palczewski (2007). Distributed Knowability and Fitch's Paradox. Studia Logica 86 (3):455--478.
    Recently predominant forms of anti-realism claim that all truths are knowable. We argue that in a logical explanation of the notion of knowability more attention should be paid to its epistemic part. Especially very useful in such explanation are notions of group knowledge. In this paper we examine mainly the notion of distributed knowability and show its effectiveness in the case of Fitch’s paradox. Proposed approach raised some philosophical questions to which we try to find responses. We also show how (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Rafał Palczewski (2004). „Śledzący” kontekstualizm semantyczny, jego źródła i konsekwencje. Filozofia Nauki 1.
    Contextualism is an epistemological claim that truth-conditions of knowledge ascribing sentences depend on context in which they are uttered. The discussion concerned with its background and assumptions is predominant in recent epistemology. However, contextualism is known better as the suggested solution for skepticism about the external world. In this paper I present one of the most important contextualist theory which have been proposed in 90's by Keith DeRose. In what follows I outline this proposal's main sources, i.e. i) a relevant (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Rafał Palczewski (2002). Iteracje epistemiczne - zarys problematyki. Przegląd Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 41 (1):83-99.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation