28 found
Sort by:
  1. Rainer Hegselmann & Oliver Will (2013). From Small Groups to Large Societies: How to Construct a Simulator? [REVIEW] Biological Theory 8 (2):185-194.
    There seems to be an overarching historical process in which life in small groups has evolved into life in large societies. This paper describes the design of a simulator for the study of that process. The simulator is named after David Hume (1711–1776), who presented a rich, informal, and still modern theory about the problems, useful inventions, and driving mechanisms in the evolution from small groups to large societies. HUME1.0 is a simulator that is meant to cover the interplay of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Ulrich Krause & Rainer Hegselmann (2009). Deliberative Exchange, Truth, and Cognitive Division of Labour: A Low-Resolution Modeling Approach. Episteme 6 (2):130-144.
    This paper develops a formal framework to model a process in which the formation of individual opinions is embedded in a deliberative exchange with others. The paper opts for a low-resolution modeling approach and abstracts away from most of the details of the social-epistemic process. Taking a bird's eye view allows us to analyze the chances for the truth to be found and broadly accepted under conditions of cognitive division of labour combined with a social exchange process. Cognitive division of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Rainer Hegselmann & Andreas Flache (2000). Rational and Adaptive Playing. Analyse & Kritik 22 (1):75-97.
    In this paper we compare two micro foundations for modelling human behaviour and decision making. We focus on perfect strategic rationality on the one hand and a simple reinforcement mechanism on the other hand. Iterated prisoner's dilemmas serve as the play ground for the comparison. The main lesson of our analysis is that in the space of all possible 2x2 PDs different micro foundations do matter. This suggests that researchers can not safely rely on the assumption that implementing simple models (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Andreas Flache & Rainer Hegselmann (1998). Rational Vs. Adaptive Egoism in Support Networks: How Different Micro Foundations Shape Different Macro Hypotheses. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 5:261-275.
    In the following we study the evolution of support networks among egoists who differ widely in their degree of neediness, are free to choose their partners, and do so in opportunistic ways. No central authority is involved. The question we address is to what degree and under what aspect it shapes the structure of emerging solidarity networks whether we model egoistic actors as rational actors in a game theoretical sense or as adaptive actors, i.e. learning beings following a simple learning (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Rainer Hegselmann (1998). Cliques, and Solidarity. In Christoph Fehige & Ulla Wessels (eds.), Preferences. De Gruyter 19--298.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Rainer Hegselmann (1997). Was könnte dazu motivieren, moralisch zu sein? Überlegungen zum Verhältnis von Moralität und Klugheit. In Hartmut Kliemt & Rainer Hegselmann (eds.), Moral Und Interesse: Zur Interdisziplinären Erneuerung der Moralwissenschaften. Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag 23-46.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Rainer Hegselmann & Hartmut Kliemt (eds.) (1997). Moral Und Interesse: Zur Interdisziplinären Erneuerung der Moralwissenschaften. Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Hartmut Kliemt & Rainer Hegselmann (1997). Einleitung: Plädoyer für eine interdisziplinäre Moralwissenschaft. In Hartmut Kliemt & Rainer Hegselmann (eds.), Moral Und Interesse: Zur Interdisziplinären Erneuerung der Moralwissenschaften. Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag 7-22.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Rainer Hegselmann, Ulrich Mueller & Klaus G. Troitzsch (1996). Modelling and Simulation in the Social Sciences From the Philosophy of Science Point of View.
  10. Rainer Hegselmann (1994). Humboldt’s Argument Against the Welfare State: A Reconstruction in Terms of Game Theory. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 2:229-243.
    In 1792 Wilhelm von Humboldt wrote his treatise Ideen zu einem Versuch, die Gränzen der Wirksamkeit des Staates zu bestimmen . The treatise supports a notion of the state one would nowadays call libertarian. Seen against the backdrop of his time, characterized by far-reaching governmental regulations, Humboldt’s work must be considered a radical manifesto of deregulation.1 Analyzing various fields of potential governmental activity, Humboldt pleaded in favor of a minimum of governmental intervention.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Rainer Hegselmann (1993). Order and Chaos in Nature and Society. Chaos and Music. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 1:296-298.
    Chaos, order and the transitions between them — these are issues which are being intensively debated in many different sciences at present. These debates are by no means restricted to the natural sciences. Numerous popularizations confirm the existence of a broad following which is intensely interested in the phenomenon. This provided the background against which the Institute Vienna Circle organized a symposion, as international as it was interdisciplinary, entitled “Order and Chaos in Nature and Society”, held on 18 – 21 (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Joachim Schulte, Brian Mcguinness & Rainer Hegselmann (1992). Einheitswissenschaft.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Rainer Hegselmann & Geo Siegwart (1991). Zur Geschichte der 'Erkenntnis'. Erkenntnis 35 (1-3):461 - 471.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Rainer Hegselmann (1990). Schwierigkeiten der moralischen Aufklärung. Analyse & Kritik 12 (2):162-173.
    The article argues that a central part of moral integrity under the condition of moral enlightenment consists in virtues concerning thinking and discussing about moral problems.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Rainer Hegselmann (1990). Zur spieltheoretischen Rekonstruktion desasterträchtiger Situationen. Ethik Und Sozialwissenschaften 1 (1):65.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Rainer Hegselmann (1989). Introduction. Erkenntnis 30 (1/2):1.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Rainer Hegselmann (1989). Review. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 31 (1):143-159.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Rainer Hegselmann (1989). Review: Rational Egoism, Mutual Advantage and Morality -- A Review-Discussion of D. Gauthier: "Morals by Agreement". [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 31 (1):143 - 159.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Rainer Hegselmann (1988). Formale Dialektik. Ein Beitrag zu einer Theorie des rationalen Argumentierens. Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 42 (1):159-162.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Rainer Hegselmann (1988). Wozu könnte Moral gut sein? oder Kant, das Gefangenendilemma und die Klugheit. Grazer Philosophische Studien 31:1-28.
    Die Erfahrung eines Konflikts zwischen Forderungen der Moral und kluger Verfolgung des Eigeninteresses ist elementar. In Gefangenen-Dilemma-Situationen hat es für die Beteiligten katastrophale Konsequenzen, wenn alle klug ihr Eigeninteresse verfolgen. Hingegen kann in solchen Situationen jeder unter dem Gesichtspunkt seines Eigeninteresses besser gestellt werden, wenn sich jeder von Forderungen der Moral leiten läßt. Eine Funktion der Moral kann daher sein, die Individuen gerade vor den Fallen der Klugheit zu schützen.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Rainer Hegselmann (1987). Review. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 26 (2):143-159.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Moritz Schlick, Henk L. Mulder, Anne J. Kox & Rainer Hegselmann (1987). The Problems of Philosophy in Their Interconnection Winter Semester Lecture, 1933-34. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Rainer Hegselmann, Werner Raub & Thomas Voss (1986). Zur Entstehung der Moral Aus Natürlichen Neigungen. Eine Spieltheoretische Spekulation. Analyse & Kritik 8 (2):150-177.
    Do individuals accept a moral point of view - if they are completely oriented towards their natural preferences and interests? The present article outlines the context of discussion concerning this question within moral philosophy and the social science. In addition it suggests a game-theoretical model with the help of which the question can be answered positively.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Rainer Hegselmann & Werner Raub (1982). Zur Logikabhängigkeit Wissenschafts-Theoretischer Paradoxien. Erkenntnis 17 (3):349 - 359.
    Investigations in meta-theoretical topics such as the definability of disposition terms or the explication of qualitative and quantitative concepts of confirmation, as well as discussions of various systems of modal logic, e.g., deontic logic, often deal with a number of well known paradoxes. In general, classical logic is used in deriving the paradox of the ravens, Goodman's paradox, the paradoxes of derived obligation, etc. The questions whether these paradoxes depend essentially on the use of classical logic and whether they can (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Rainer Hegselmann (1979). Grenzen der Wissenschaftlichen Weltauffassung des Wiener Kreises. Eine Replik Auf A. Beckermanns "Logischer Positivismus Und Radikale Gesellschaftsreform. Analyse & Kritik 1 (1):47-50.
    Beckermann states correctly that one wing of the Vienna Circle advocated a program of rationality including theoretical as well as practical questions. However, contrary to Beckermann, it can be pointed out that there is no consistent relationship between the theoretical and practical parts of this program. These inconsistencies could be e1iminated if one takes the historical background from which Logical Empiricism originated into consideration.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Rainer Hegselmann (1979). Klassische und konstruktive theorie des Elementarsatzes. Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 33 (1):89 - 107.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Rainer Hegselmann (1979). Normativität Und Rationalität Zum Problem Prakt. Vernunft in D. Analyt. Philsophie.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Carl Friedrich Gethmann & Rainer Hegselmann (1977). Das Problem der Begründung Zwischen Dezisionismus Und Fundamentalismus. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 8 (2):342-368.
    Ausgehend von einer Analyse des "Begründungsstreits", der in den letzten Jahren im Anschluß an H. Alberts Kritik des methodischen Prinzips der Begründung v.a. in der deutschen Philosophie geführt worden ist, werden zunächst die Positionen von K. O. Apel und J. Habermas einer immanenten methodischen Kritik unterzogen. Beide Programme erweisen sich als undurchführbar. Ausgehend von einer Präzisierung des Begriffes "Begründung" wird durch systematische Einführung begründungstheoretischer Termini ein begriffsiches Instrumentarium vorgeschlagen, das eine Rekonstruktion von Begründungssituationen erlauben soll. Mit seiner Hilfe werden die (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation