Search results for 'Rainer Lange' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Dirk Hartmann & Rainer Lange (2000). Epistemology Culturalized. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 31 (1):75-107.score: 240.0
    The anti-metaphysical intentions of naturalism can be respected without abandoning the project of a normative epistemology. The central assumptions of naturalism imply that (1.) the distinction between action and behaviour is spurious, and (2.) epistemology cannot continue to be a normative project. Difficulties with the second implication have been adressed by Normative Naturalism, but without violating the naturalistic consensus, it can only appreciate means-end-rationality. However, this does not suffice to justify its own implicit normative pretensions. According to our diagnosis, naturalism (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Yvonne Rainer, Christophe Wavelet, Véronique Fabbri & Catherine Delaruelle (2004). Danse publique et communauté : Trio A et autres pièces ou films d'Yvonne Rainer. Rue Descartes 2 (2):80-93.score: 180.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Marc Lange (2005). Reply to Ellis and to Handfield on Essentialism, Laws, and Counterfactuals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (4):581 – 588.score: 60.0
    In Lange 2004a, I argued that 'scientific essentialism' [Ellis 2001 cannot account for the characteristic relation between laws and counterfactuals without undergoing considerable ad hoc tinkering. In recent papers, Brian Ellis 2005 and Toby Handfield 2005 have defended essentialism against my charge. Here I argue that Ellis's and Handfield's replies fail. Even in ordinary counterfactual reasoning, the 'closest possible world' where the electron's electric charge is 5% greater may have less overlap with the actual world in its fundamental natural (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Jim Woodward, Barry Loewer, John Carroll & Marc Lange (2011). Counterfactuals All the Way Down? Metascience 20 (1):27-52.score: 60.0
    Counterfactuals all the way down? Content Type Journal Article DOI 10.1007/s11016-010-9437-9 Authors Jim Woodward, History and Philosophy of Science, 1017 Cathedral of Learning, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA Barry Loewer, Department of Philosophy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA John W. Carroll, Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8103, USA Marc Lange, Department of Philosophy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB#3125—Caldwell Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3125, USA Journal Metascience (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. A. -M. Palmer (1984). Rainer Henke: Studien zum Romanushymnus des Prudentius. (Europäische Hochschulschriften, 15. Klassische Sprachen und Literaturen, 27.) Pp. 185. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1983. Paper, Sw.frs.45. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 34 (02):327-328.score: 50.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Marc Lange (2004). A Note on Scientific Essentialism, Laws of Nature, and Counterfactual Conditionals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (2):227 – 241.score: 30.0
    Scientific essentialism aims to account for the natural laws' special capacity to support counterfactuals. I argue that scientific essentialism can do so only by resorting to devices that are just as ad hoc as those that essentialists accuse Humean regularity theories of employing. I conclude by offering an account of the laws' distinctive relation to counterfactuals that portrays laws as contingent but nevertheless distinct from accidents by virtue of possessing a genuine variety of necessity.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. M. Lange (2011). Meta-Laws of Nature and the Best System Account. Analysis 71 (2):216-222.score: 30.0
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Marc Lange (2008). Could the Laws of Nature Change? Philosophy of Science 75 (1):69-92.score: 30.0
    After reviewing several failed arguments that laws cannot change, I use the laws' special relation to counterfactuals to show how temporary laws would have to differ from eternal but time-dependent laws. Then I argue that temporary laws are impossible and that neither Lewis's nor Armstrong's analyses of law nicely accounts for the laws' immutability. *Received September 2006; revised September 2007. ‡Many thanks to John Roberts and John Carroll for valuable comments on earlier drafts, as well as to several anonymous referees (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Marc Lange (2007). Laws and Meta-Laws of Nature: Conservation Laws and Symmetries. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38 (3):457-481.score: 30.0
  10. Marc Lange (1999). Why Are the Laws of Nature so Important to Science? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (3):625-652.score: 30.0
    Why should science be so interested in discovering whether p is a law over and above whether p is true? The answer may involve the laws' relation to counterfactuals: p is a law iff p would still have obtained under any counterfactual supposition that is consistent with the laws. But unless we already understand why science is especially concerned with the laws, we cannot explain why science is especially interested in what would have happened under those counterfactual suppositions consistent with (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Marc Lange (2005). Laws and Their Stability. Synthese 144 (3):415Ð432.score: 30.0
    Many philosophers have believed that the laws of nature differ from the accidental truths in their invariance under counterfactual perturbations. Roughly speaking, the laws would still have held had q been the case, for any q that is consistent with the laws. (Trivially, no accident would still have held under every such counterfactual supposition.) The main problem with this slogan (even if it is true) is that it uses the laws themselves to delimit qs range. I present a means of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Marc Lange (1996). Laws of Nature, Cosmic Coincidences and Scientific Realism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (4):614 – 638.score: 30.0
  13. Marc Lange (2006). Farewell to Laws of Nature? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (2):361-369.score: 30.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Marc Lange (2012). Abstraction and Depth in Scientific Explanation. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (2):483-491.score: 30.0
  15. Marc Lange (2006). How to Account for the Relation Between Chancy Facts and Deterministic Laws. Mind 115 (460):917--946.score: 30.0
    Suppose that unobtanium-346 is a rare radioactive isotope. Consider: (1) Every Un346 atom, at its creation, decays within 7 microseconds (µs). (50%) Every Un346 atom, at its creation, has a 50% chance of decaying within 7µs. (1) and (50%) can be true together, but (1) and (50%) cannot together be laws of nature. Indeed, (50%)'s mere (non-vacuous) truth logically precludes (1)'s lawhood. A satisfactory analysis of chance and lawhood should nicely account for this relation. I shall argue first that David (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Marc Lange (2007). Laws and Meta-Laws of Nature. The Harvard Review of Philosophy 15 (1):457-481.score: 30.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Marc Lange (1996). Inductive Confirmation, Counterfactual Conditionals, and Laws of Nature. Philosophical Studies 85 (1):1-36.score: 30.0
  18. Marc Lange (2002). Who's Afraid of Ceteris-Paribus Laws? Or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Them. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 57 (3):281Ð301.score: 30.0
    Ceteris-paribus clauses are nothing to worry about; aceteris-paribus qualifier is not poisonously indeterminate in meaning. Ceteris-paribus laws teach us that a law need not be associated straightforwardly with a regularity in the manner demanded by regularity analyses of law and analyses of laws as relations among universals. This lesson enables us to understand the sense in which the laws of nature would have been no different under various counterfactual suppositions — a feature even of those laws that involve no ceteris-paribus (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Marc Lange (1995). Are There Natural Laws Concerning Particular Biological Species? Journal of Philosophy 92 (8):430-451.score: 30.0
  20. Marc Lange (1994). Scientific Realism and Components. The Monist 77 (1):111-127.score: 30.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Marc Lange (1993). Natural Laws and the Problem of Provisos. Erkenntnis 38 (2):233Ð248.score: 30.0
    Hempel and Giere contend that the existence of provisos poses grave difficulties for any regularity account of physical law. However, Hempel and Giere rely upon a mistaken conception of the way in which statements acquire their content. By correcting this mistake, I remove the problem Hempel and Giere identify but reveal a different problem that provisos pose for a regularity account — indeed, for any account of physical law according to which the state of affairs described by a law-statement presupposes (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Marc Lange (1999). Laws, Counterfactuals, Stability, and Degrees of Lawhood. Philosophy of Science 66 (2):243-267.score: 30.0
    I identify the special sort of stability (invariance, resilience, etc.) that distinguishes laws from accidental truths. Although an accident can have a certain invariance under counterfactual suppositions, there is no continuum between laws and accidents here; a law's invariance is different in kind, not in degree, from an accident's. (In particular, a law's range of invariance is not "broader"--at least in the most straightforward sense.) The stability distinctive of the laws is used to explicate what it would mean for there (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Marc Lange (2005). A Counterfactual Analysis of the Concepts of Logical Truth and Necessity. Philosophical Studies 125 (3):277 - 303.score: 30.0
    This paper analyzes the logical truths as (very roughly) those truths that would still have been true under a certain range of counterfactual perturbations.What’s nice is that the relevant range is characterized without relying (overtly, at least) upon the notion of logical truth. This approach suggests a conception of necessity that explains what the different varieties of necessity (logical, physical, etc.) have in common, in virtue of which they are all varieties of necessity. However, this approach places the counterfactual conditionals (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Marc Lange (2009). Dimensional Explanations. Noûs 43 (4):742-775.score: 30.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Marc Lange (2006). Do Chances Receive Equal Treatment Under the Laws? Or: Must Chances Be Probabilities? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (2):383-403.score: 30.0
    I offer an argument regarding chances that appears to yield a dilemma: either the chances at time t must be determined by the natural laws and the history through t of instantiations of categorical properties, or the function ch(•) assigning chances need not satisfy the axioms of probability. The dilemma's first horn might seem like a remnant of determinism. On the other hand, this horn might be inspired by our best scientific theories. In addition, it is entailed by the familiar (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Marc Lange (1993). Lawlikeness. Noûs 27 (1):1-21.score: 30.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Marc Lange (2009). Must the Fundamental Laws of Physics Be Complete? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 78 (2):312-345.score: 30.0
    The beauty of electricity, or of any other force, is not that the power is mysterious and unexpected, touching every sense at unawares in turn, but that it is under law... Michael Faraday, Wheatstone's Electric Telegraph's Relation to Science (being an argument in favour of the full recognition of Science as a branch of Education), 1854.
    No categories
    Direct download (14 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Marc Lange (2002). Baseball, Pessimistic Inductions and the Turnover Fallacy. Analysis 62 (4):281–285.score: 30.0
    Among the niftiest arguments for scientific anti-realism is the ‘pessimistic induction’ (also sometimes called ‘the disastrous historical meta-induction’). Although various versions of this argument differ in their details (see, for example, Poincare 1952: 160, Putnam 1978: 25, and Laudan 1981), the argument generally begins by recalling the many scientific theories that posit unobservable entities and that at one time or another were widely accepted. The anti-realist then argues that when these old theories were accepted, the evidence for them was quite (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Marc Lange (2000). Natural Laws in Scientific Practice. Oxford University Press.score: 30.0
    It is often presumed that the laws of nature have special significance for scientific reasoning. But the laws' distinctive roles have proven notoriously difficult to identify--leading some philosophers to question if they hold such roles at all. This study offers original accounts of the roles that natural laws play in connection with counterfactual conditionals, inductive projections, and scientific explanations, and of what the laws must be in order for them to be capable of playing these roles. Particular attention is given (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. M. Lange (2010). What Are Mathematical Coincidences (and Why Does It Matter)? Mind 119 (474):307-340.score: 30.0
    Although all mathematical truths are necessary, mathematicians take certain combinations of mathematical truths to be ‘coincidental’, ‘accidental’, or ‘fortuitous’. The notion of a ‘mathematical coincidence’ has so far failed to receive sufficient attention from philosophers. I argue that a mathematical coincidence is not merely an unforeseen or surprising mathematical result, and that being a misleading combination of mathematical facts is neither necessary nor sufficient for qualifying as a mathematical coincidence. I argue that although the components of a mathematical coincidence may (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Marc Lange & Alexander Rosenberg (2011). Can There Be A Priori Causal Models of Natural Selection? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (4):591 - 599.score: 30.0
    Sober 2011 argues that, contrary to Hume, some causal statements can be known a priori to be true?notably, some ?would promote? statements figuring in causal models of natural selection. We find Sober's argument unconvincing. We regard the Humean thesis as denying that causal explanations contain any a priori knowable statements specifying certain features of events to be causally relevant. We argue that not every ?would promote? statement is genuinely causal, and we suggest that Sober has not shown that his examples (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Marc Lange (1999). Calibration and the Epistemological Role of Bayesian Conditionalization. Journal of Philosophy 96 (6):294-324.score: 30.0
  33. Marc Lange (1993). When Would Natural Laws Have Been Broken? Analysis 53 (4):262-269.score: 30.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Marc Lange (2009). Why Proofs by Mathematical Induction Are Generally Not Explanatory. Analysis 69 (2):203-211.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Marc Lange (2000). Salience, Supervenience, and Layer Cakes in Sellars's Scientific Realism, McDowell's Moral Realism, and the Philosophy of Mind. Philosophical Studies 101 (2-3):213-251.score: 30.0
  36. Marc Lange (1996). Life, "Artificial Life," and Scientific Explanation. Philosophy of Science 63 (2):225-244.score: 30.0
    Recently, biologists and computer scientists who advocate the "strong thesis of artificial life" have argued that the distinction between life and nonlife is important and that certain computer software entities could be alive in the same sense as biological entities. These arguments have been challenged by Sober (1991). I address some of the questions about the rational reconstruction of biology that are suggested by these arguments: What is the relation between life and the "signs of life"? What work (if any) (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Carsten Hjort Lange (2011). The Battle of Actium: A Reconsideration. Classical Quarterly 61 (02):608-623.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. John F. Lange (1966). R. M. Hare's Reformulation of the Open Question. Mind 75 (298):244-247.score: 30.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Marc Lange (2001). The Most Famous Equation. Journal of Philosophy 98 (5):219-238.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Marc Lange (2004). Review Essay on Dynamics of Reason by Michael Friedman. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (3):702–712.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Marc Lange (2000). Is Jeffrey Conditionalization Defective by Virtue of Being Non-Commutative? Remarks on the Sameness of Sensory Experiences. Synthese 123 (3):393 - 403.score: 30.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. M. Lange (2009). Review: Tim Maudlin: The Metaphysics Within Physics. [REVIEW] Mind 118 (469):197-200.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Marc Lange (ed.) (2007). Philosophy of Science: An Anthology. Blackwell Pub..score: 30.0
    Philosophy of Science: An Anthology assembles some of the finest papers in the philosophy of science since 1945, showcasing enduring classics alongside important and innovative recent work. Introductions by the editor highlight connections between selections, and contextualize the articles Nine sections address topics at the heart of philosophy of science, including realism and the character of scientific theories, scientific explanations and laws of nature, singular casusation, and the metaphysical implications of modern physics Provides an authoritative and accessible overview of the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Marc Lange (2008). Why Contingent Facts Cannot Necessities Make. Analysis 68 (298):120–128.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Marc Lange (2004). Bayesianism and Unification: A Reply to Wayne Myrvold. Philosophy of Science 71 (2):205-215.score: 30.0
    Myrvold (2003) has proposed an attractive Bayesian account of why theories that unify phenomena tend to derive greater epistemic support from those phenomena than do theories that fail to unify them. It is argued, however, that "unification" in Myrvold's sense is both too easy and too difficult for theories to achieve. Myrvold's account fails to capture what it is that makes unification sometimes count in a theory's favor.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Marc Lange (2002). An Introduction to the Philosophy of Physics. Blackwell.score: 30.0
    This book combines physics, history, and philosophy in a radical new approach to introducing the philosophy of physics.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Marc Lange (2004). The Autonomy of Functional Biology: A Reply to Rosenberg. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 19 (1):93-109.score: 30.0
    Rosenberg has recently argued that explanations supplied by (what he calls) functional biology are mere promissory notes for macromolecular adaptive explanations. Rosenberg's arguments currently constitute one of the most substantial challenges to the autonomy, irreducibility, and indispensability of the explanations supplied by functional biology. My responses to Rosenberg's arguments will generate a novel account of the autonomy of functional biology. This account will turn on the relations between counterfactuals, scientific explanations, and natural laws. Crucially, in their treatment of the laws' (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Marc Lange (2004). Would "Direct Realism" Resolve the Classical Problem of Induction? Noûs 38 (2):197–232.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Marc Lange (2002). Okasha on Inductive Scepticism. Philosophical Quarterly 52 (207):226-232.score: 30.0
    In a recent paper replying to the inductive sceptic, Samir Okasha says that the Humean argument for inductive scepticism depends on mistakenly construing inductive reasoning as based on a principle of the uniformity of nature. I dispute Okasha's argument that we are entitled to the background beliefs on which (he says) inductive reasoning depends. Furthermore, I argue that the sorts of theoretically impoverished contexts to which a uniformity-of-nature principle has traditionally been restricted are exactly the contexts relevant to the inductive (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Marc Lange (2001). The Apparent Superiority of Prediction to Accommodation as a Side Effect: A Reply to Maher. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (3):575-588.score: 30.0
    has offered a lovely example to motivate the intuition that a successful prediction has a kind of confirmatory significance that an accommodation lacks. This paper scrutinizes Maher's example. It argues that once the example is tweaked, the intuitive difference there between prediction and accommodation disappears. This suggests that the apparent superiority of prediction to accommodation is actually a side effect of an important difference between the hypotheses that tend to arise in each case.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000