5 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Raj Singh [3]Raj Vir Singh [1]Rajendra Singh [1]
  1. Roni Katzir & Raj Singh (2013). Constraints on the Lexicalization of Logical Operators. Linguistics and Philosophy 36 (1):1-29.
    We revisit a typological puzzle due to Horn (Doctoral Dissertation, UCLA, 1972) regarding the lexicalization of logical operators: in instantiations of the traditional square of opposition across categories and languages, the O corner, corresponding to ‘nand’ (= not and), ‘nevery’ (= not every), etc., is never lexicalized. We discuss Horn’s proposal, which involves the interaction of two economy conditions, one that relies on scalar implicatures and one that relies on markedness. We observe that in order to express markedness and to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Niranjan Saggurti, Ravi K. Verma, Shiva S. Halli, Suvakanta N. Swain, Rajendra Singh, Hanimi Reddy Modugu, Saumya Ramarao, Bidhubhusan Mahapatra & Anrudh K. Jain (2011). Motivations for Entry Into Sex Work and Hiv Risk Among Mobile Female Sex Workers in India. Journal of Biosocial Science 43 (5):535-554.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Raj Singh (2011). Maximize Presupposition! And Local Contexts. Natural Language Semantics 19 (2):149-168.
    Maximize Presupposition! is an economy condition that adjudicates between contextually equivalent competing structures. Building on data discovered by O. Percus, I will argue that the constraint is checked in the local contexts of embedded constituents. I will argue that this architecture leads to a general solution to the problem of antipresupposition projection, and also allows I. Heim’s ‘Novelty/Familiarity Condition’ to be eliminated as a constraint on operations of context change.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Raj Singh (2008). On the Interpretation of Disjunction: Asymmetric, Incremental, and Eager for Inconsistency. [REVIEW] Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (2):245-260.
    Hurford’s Constraint (Hurford, Foundations of Language, 11, 409–411, 1974) states that a disjunction is infelicitous if its disjuncts stand in an entailment relation: #John was born in Paris or in France. Gazdar (Pragmatics, Academic Press, NY, 1979) observed that scalar implicatures can obviate the constraint. For instance, sentences of the form (A or B) or (Both Aand B) are felicitous due to the exclusivity implicature of the first disjunct: A or B implicates ‘not (A and B)’. Chierchia, Fox, and Spector (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Raj Vir Singh (1992). 41. Measuring Seepage Losses From Fish Ponds. In B. C. Chattopadhyay (ed.), Science and Technology for Rural Development. S. Chand & Co..
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation