10 found
Sort by:
  1. Ralph R. Acampora (2014). Corporal Compassion: Animal Ethics and Philosophy of Body. University of Pittsburgh Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Drucilla Cornell, Julian H. Franklin, Heather M. Kendrick, Eduardo Mendieta, Andrew Linzey, Paola Cavalieri, Rod Preece, Ted Benton, Michael J. Thompson, Michael Allen Fox, Lori Gruen, Ralph R. Acampora, Bernard Rollin & Peter Sloterdijk (2012). Strangers to Nature: Animal Lives and Human Ethics. Lexington Books.
    Strangers to Nature brings together many of the leading scholars who are working to redefine and expand the discourse on animal ethics. This volume will engage both scholars and lay-people by revealing the breadth of theorizing about the human/non-human animal relationship that is currently taking place.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Ralph R. Acampora (2008). Animal Constructs and Natural Reality: The Import of Environmental Ontology for Inter-Species Ethics. Humana. Mente 7:1-17.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Ralph R. Acampora (2006). Anthropocentrism and Its Discontents: The Moral Status of Animals in the History of Western Philosophy (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (3):480-481.
    Ralph R. Acampora - Anthropocentrism and Its Discontents: The Moral Status of Animals in the History of Western Philosophy - Journal of the History of Philosophy 44:3 Journal of the History of Philosophy 44.3 480-481 Gary Steiner. Anthropocentrism and Its Discontents: The Moral Status of Animals in the History of Western Philosophy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2005. Pp. ix + 332. Cloth, $37.50. In this text Steiner surveys the history of doctrines, attitudes, and beliefs about the ethical standing of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Christa Davis Acampora & Ralph R. Acampora (eds.) (2004). A Nietzschean Bestiary Becoming Animal Beyond Docile and Brutal. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    Nietzsche's use of metaphor has been widely noted but rarely focused to explore specific images in great detail. A Nietzschean Bestiary gathers essays devoted to the most notorious and celebrated beasts in Nietzsche's work. The essays illustrate Nietzsche's ample use of animal imagery, and link it to the dual philosophical purposes of recovering and revivifying human animality, which plays a significant role in his call for de-deifying nature.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Ralph R. Acampora (2002). Electric Animal: Toward a Rhetoric of Wildlife. Environmental Ethics 24 (2):219-220.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Ralph R. Acampora (2001). Representation Cubed: Reviewing Reflections on Animal Imagery. Society and Animals 9 (3):299-307.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Ralph R. Acampora, Jay L. Garfield, Rachael Kohn, Winifred Wing Han Lamb, Peter Wong Yih Jiun, Andrew Kelley & V. L. Krishnamoorthy (1997). Reviews & Discussions. Sophia 36 (2):136-159.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Ralph R. Acampora (1996). The Body Beneath Bioethics: Somatic Bases of Inter-Species Morality. Dissertation, Emory University
    This dissertation is an attempt to show that, and how, an inter-species morality of compassion may be grounded reasonably in a phenomenology of body. It provides a literature survey of relevant works and authors, largely drawn from the modern European traditions of philosophic existentialism, phenomenology, and hermeneutics . The ontology and axiology presupposed by a somatically based bioethic are outlined in advance of the latter's presentation . Relevance of the embodied bioethic to actual affairs is demonstrated through exercises in practical (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Ralph R. Acampora (1994). Using and Abusing Nietzsche for Environmental Ethics. Environmental Ethics 16 (2):187-194.
    Max Hallman has put forward an interpretation of Nietzsche’s philosophy according to which Nietzsche is a prototypical deep ecologist. In reply, I dispute Hallman’s main interpretive claim as well as its ethical and exegetical corollaries. I hold that Nietzsche is not a “biospheric egalitarian,” but rather an aristocratically individualistic “high humanist.” A consistently naturalistic transcendentalist, Nietzsche does submit a critique of modernity’s Christian-inflected anthropocentrism (pace Hallman), and yet—in his later work—he endorses exploitation in the quest for nobility (contra Hallman). I (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation