4 found
Sort by:
  1. Ralph-Axel Müller (2006). Blackboards in the Brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (1):81-81.
    Although van der Velde's de Kamps's (vdV&dK) attempt to put syntactic processing into a broader context of combinatorial cognition is promising, their coverage of neuroscientific evidence is disappointing. Neither their case against binding by temporal coherence nor their arguments against recurrent neural networks are compelling. As an alternative, vdV&dK propose a blackboard model that is based on the assumption of special processors (e.g., lexical versus grammatical), but evidence from the cognitive neuroscience of language, which is, overall, less than supportive of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Ralph-Axel Müller (2002). Weak Evidence for a Strong Case Against Modularity in Developmental Disorders. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):764-765.
    Thomas & Karmiloff-Smith (T&K-S) provide evidence from computational modeling against modular assumptions of “Residual Normality” (RN) in developmental disorders. Even though I agree with their criticism, I find their choice of empirical evidence disappointing. Cognitive neuroscience cannot as yet provide a complete understanding of most developmental disorders, but what is known is more than enough to debunk the idea of RN.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Ralph-Axel Müller (1996). Innateness, Autonomy, Universality? Neurobiological Approaches to Language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (4):611.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Ralph-Axel Müller (1996). The Epigenesis of Regional Specificity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (4):650.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation