13 found
Order:
See also:
Profile: Ramon Das (Victoria University of Wellington)
  1.  77
    Ramon Das (2016). Evolutionary Debunking of Morality: Epistemological or Metaphysical? Philosophical Studies 173 (2):417-435.
    It is widely supposed that evolutionary debunking arguments against morality constitute a type of epistemological objection to our moral beliefs. In particular, the debunking force of such arguments is not supposed to depend on the metaphysical claim that moral facts do not exist. In this paper I argue that this standard epistemological construal of EDAs is highly misleading, if not mistaken. Specifically, I argue that the most widely discussed EDAs all make key and controversial metaphysical claims about the nature of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  8
    Ramon Das (forthcoming). Bad News for Moral Error Theorists: There Is No Master Argument Against Companions in Guilt Strategies. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-12.
    ABSTRACTA ‘companions in guilt’ strategy against moral error theory aims to show that the latter proves too much: if sound, it supports an implausible error-theoretic conclusion in other areas such as epistemic or practical reasoning. Christopher Cowie [2016] has recently produced what he claims is a ‘master argument’ against all such strategies. The essence of his argument is that CG arguments cannot work because they are afflicted by internal incoherence or inconsistency. I argue, first, that Cowie's master argument does not (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  11
    Ramon Das (forthcoming). Why Companions in Guilt Arguments Still Work: Reply to Cowie. Philosophical Quarterly:pqv078.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  31
    Ramon Das (2014). Has Industrialization Benefited No One? Climate Change and the Non-Identity Problem. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (4):747-759.
    Within the climate justice debate, the ‘beneficiary pays’ principle holds that those who benefit from greenhouse emissions associated with industrialization ought to pay for the costs of mitigating and adapting to their adverse effects. This principle constitutes a claim of inter-generational justice, and it is widely believed that the non-identity problem raises serious difficulties for any such claim. After briefly sketching the rationale behind ‘beneficiary pays,’ this paper offers a new way of understanding the claim that persons in developed societies (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Ramon Das (2003). 美德伦理学和正确的行动. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (3):324-339.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  6.  52
    Ramon Das (2002). Suffering and Moral Responsibility. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80 (2):240 – 241.
    Book Information Suffering and Moral Responsibility. Suffering and Moral Responsibility Meyerfeld Jamie New York Oxford University Press ix + 237 Hardback £35 By Meyerfeld Jamie. Oxford University Press. New York. Pp. ix + 237. Hardback:£35.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  8
    Dan Weijers, David Eng & Ramon Das (2010). Sharing the Responsibility of Dealing with Climate Change: Interpreting the Principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibilities. In Jonathan Boston, Andrew Bradstock & David L. Eng (eds.), Public Policy: Why Ethics Matters. Anue Press 141--58.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  22
    Ramon Das (2000). Prerogatives Without Restrictions? Philosophical Studies 99 (3):347-371.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  14
    Ramon Das (2007). Ethics and International Affairs. Philosophical Books 48 (4):329-344.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  3
    Ramon Das (2006). Political Theory of Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Case for the World State Luis Cabrera,Political Theory of Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Case for the World State. Politics and Ethics Review 2 (1):97-100.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  5
    Ramon Das (2012). Globalizing Justice: The Ethics of Poverty and Power–By Richard W. Miller; Politics as Usual: What Lies Behind the Pro‐Poor Rhetoric–By Thomas Pogge; The Life You Can Save: Acting Now to End World Poverty–By Peter Singer. Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (1):79-83.
  12.  3
    Ramon Das (2003). Prudence, Identity, and Value. In Heather Dyke (ed.), Time and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection. Kluwer Academic Publishers 27--39.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Ramon Das (2003). World Poverty and Human Rights. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (3).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography