Search results for 'Raymond van Ee' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Samenvatting van (forthcoming). De Stem van de St (r) aat. Res Publica.score: 120.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Raymond van Ee Ewa A. Miendlarzewska, Gijs van Elswijk, Carlo V. Cannistraci (2013). Working Memory Load Attenuates Emotional Enhancement in Recognition Memory. Frontiers in Psychology 4.score: 90.0
    Emotionally arousing stimuli are perceived and remembered better than neutral stimuli. Under threat, this negativity bias is further increased. We investigated whether working memory load can attenuate incidental memory for emotional images. Two groups of participants performed the N-back task with two working memory load levels. In one group, we induced anxiety using a threat-of-shock paradigm to increase attentional processing of negative information. During task performance we incidentally and briefly flashed emotional distracter images which prolonged response times in both load (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Gijs J. Brouwer, Raymond van Ee & Jens Schwarzbach (2005). Activation in Visual Cortex Correlates with the Awareness of Stereoscopic Depth. Journal of Neuroscience 25 (45):10403-10413.score: 87.0
  4. Jeremy duQuesnay Adams (1987). Raymond Van Dam, Leadership and Community in Late Antique Gaul. (The Transformation of the Classical Heritage, 8.) Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press, 1985. Pp. Xii, 350. $35. [REVIEW] Speculum 62 (4):999-1002.score: 84.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Guy Halsall (1995). Raymond Van Dam, Saints and Their Miracles in Late Antique Gaul. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993. Pp. Xi, 349; Map. $49.50 (Cloth); $16.95 (Paper). [REVIEW] Speculum 70 (1):217-218.score: 84.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Joseph Martos (2014). Evidence and Religious Belief. Edited by Kelly James Clark and Raymond J. Van Arragon . Pp. 214, Oxford University Press, 2011, £35.00. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 55 (1):140-141.score: 72.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Phyllis B. Roberts (1985). Odo of Canterbury, The Latin Sermons, Ed. Charles de Clercq (†), with the Assistance of Raymond Macken. (Verhandelingen, Klasse der Letteren, 45/105.) Brussels: Koninklijke Academie Voor Wetenschappen, Letteren En Schone Kunsten van België, 1983. Paper. Pp. 341. BF 1,400. [REVIEW] Speculum 60 (4):1010-1011.score: 72.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Vincent W. J. Van Gerven Oei & Jonas Staal (2011). The Missing Link / Monument for the Distribution of Wealth (Johannesburg, 2010). Continent 1 (4).score: 30.0
    continent. 1.4 (2011): 242—252. Introduction The following two works were produced by visual artist Jonas Staal and writer Vincent W.J. van Gerven Oei during a visit as artists in residence at The Bag Factory, Johannesburg, South Africa during the summer of 2010. Both works were produced in situ and comprised in both cases a public intervention conceived by Staal and a textual work conceived by Van Gerven Oei. It was their aim, in both cases, to produce complementary works that could (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. William Lane Craig (2005). Is “Craig's Contentious Suggestion” Really so Implausible? Faith and Philosophy 22 (3):358-362.score: 28.0
    Raymond Van Arragon considers my my suggestion that most of those who never have the opportunity to accept Christ during their earthly lives suffer from transworld damnation, and he offers four different interpretations of that notion. He argues that at least three of these interpretations are such that on them the suggestion becomes implausible. I maintain that once my suggestion is properly understood, then, despite Van Arragon’s misgivings, it ought not to be thought implausible even on the first two, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Raymond Van Dam & Mirko D. Grmek (1995). Saints and Their Miracles in Late Antique Gaul. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 17 (1):173.score: 28.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. R. van Ee & C. J. Erkelens (1996). Binocularly Perceived Direction and Outline Shape. In Enrique Villanueva (ed.), Perception. Ridgeview. 70-71.score: 28.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Kelly James Clark & Michael Rea (eds.) (2012). Reason, Metaphysics, and Mind: New Essays on the Philosophy of Alvin Plantinga. OUP USA.score: 24.0
    In May 2010, philosophers, family and friends gathered at the University of Notre Dame to celebrate the career and retirement of Alvin Plantinga, widely recognized as one of the world's leading figures in metaphysics, epistemology, and the philosophy of religion. Plantinga has earned particular respect within the community of Christian philosophers for the pivotal role that he played in the recent renewal and development of philosophy of religion and philosophical theology. Each of the essays in this volume engages with some (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Raymond W. Gibbs & Guy van Orden (2012). Pragmatic Choice in Conversation. Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (1):7-20.score: 24.0
    How do people decide what to say in context? Many theories of pragmatics assume that people have specialized knowledge that drives them to utter certain words in different situations. But these theories are mostly unable to explain both the regularity and variability in people’s speech behaviors. Our purpose in this article is to advance a view of pragmatics based on complexity theory, which specifically explains the pragmatic choices speakers make in conversations. The concept of self-organized criticality sheds light on how (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Sander Gaal, Esther Van Laarhoven, René Wolters, Raymond Wetzels, Wim Verstappen & Michel Wensing (2010). Patient Safety in Primary Care has Many Aspects: An Interview Study in Primary Care Doctors and Nurses. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (3):639-643.score: 24.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Raymond van Dam (2009). Essays Liebeschuetz (J.) Drinkwater, (B.) Salway (Edd.) Wolf Liebeschuetz Reflected. Essays Presented by Colleagues, Friends, & Pupils. (BICS Supplement 91.) Pp. Xvi + 268, Ills, Maps. London: Institute of Classical Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London, 2007. Paper, £28. ISBN: 978-1-905670-04-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 59 (01):226-.score: 24.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Raymond van Dam (2003). SAINTS' CULTS IN GAUL B. Beaujard: Le Culte des Saints En Gaule. Les Premiers Temps. D'Hilaire de Poitiers à la Fin du VIe Siècle . Pp. Iv + 613, Ills. Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf, 2000. Paper, Frs. 290. ISBN: 2-204-05618-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 53 (01):185-.score: 24.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Century By Raymond Aron (2004). Approaching the Great Perfection: Simultaneous and Gradual Approaches to Dzog-Chen Practice in Jigme Lingpa's Longchen Nyingtig. By Sam van Schaik. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2004. Pp. Xvi+ 386. Paper $29.95. Chinese Characteristics. By Arthur H. Smith, Introduction by Lydia Liu. Norwalk: EastBridge, 2002. Pp. 342. Paper $14.95. [REVIEW] Philosophy East and West 54 (4):586-587.score: 24.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Raymond H. Reis (1966). "Evolution and Philosophy," by Andrew G. Van Melsen. The Modern Schoolman 44 (1):84-86.score: 24.0
  19. Raymond C. Van Leeuwen (forthcoming). Book Review: The Book of Job: A Contest of Moral Imaginations. [REVIEW] Interpretation 58 (2):185-186.score: 24.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Raymond van Uytven (1975). Politiek En Economie: De Crisis der Late XVe Eeuw in de Nederlanden. Revue Belge de Philologie Et D'Histoire 53 (4):1097-1149.score: 24.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Raymond van Uytven (1966). Standenprivilegies en -beden in Brabant onder Jan I (1290-1293). Revue Belge de Philologie Et D'Histoire 44 (2):413-456.score: 24.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Harold Bekkering, Ellen R. A. De Bruijn, Raymond H. Cuijpers, Roger Newman‐Norlund, Hein T. Van Schie & Ruud Meulenbroek (2009). Joint Action: Neurocognitive Mechanisms Supporting Human Interaction. Topics in Cognitive Science 1 (2):340-352.score: 24.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Raymond M. Smullyan (1959). Review: Willard Van Orman Quine, Methods of Logic. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 24 (3):219-220.score: 24.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Raymond van Uytven & W. Blockmans (1969). Constitutions and Their Application in the Netherlands During the Middle Ages. Revue Belge de Philologie Et D'Histoire 47 (2):399-424.score: 24.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Raymond van Uytven (1958). De Sociale Krisis der XVIe Eeuw Te Leuven. Revue Belge de Philologie Et D'Histoire 36 (2):356-387.score: 24.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Paul van Velthoven (2005). Het Verantwoorde Engagement: Filosofie En Politiek Bij Raymond Aron. Aspekt.score: 24.0
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Raymond Van Dam (2004). Kathleen Mitchell and Ian Wood, Eds., The World of Gregory of Tours. (Cultures, Beliefs and Traditions: Medieval and Early Modern Peoples, 8.) Leiden, Boston, and Cologne: Brill, 2002. Pp. Xx, 445; 8 Black-and-White Plates and 1 Table. $128. [REVIEW] Speculum 79 (3):804-805.score: 24.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Fernand Van Steenberghen (1993). Raymond Lulle, Le livre du gentil et des trois sages. Traduction du catalan, introduction et notes par Armand Llinarès. Revue Philosophique de Louvain 91 (90):324-325.score: 24.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Raymond van Uytven (1991). Stadsgeschiedenis in Frankrijk en Nederland. Vier voorbeelden. Revue Belge de Philologie Et D'Histoire 69 (2):322-331.score: 24.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Raymond Van Dam (2008). The East (1): Greece and Asia Minor. In Susan Ashbrook Harvey & David G. Hunter (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Early Christian Studies. Oup Oxford.score: 24.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Raymond Van Over (1974). The Psychology of Freedom. Fawcett Publications.score: 24.0
    The individual and society: Meerloo, J. A. M. Freedom--our mental backbone. Allport, G. Freedom. Marcuse, H. The new forms of control. Kerr, W. A. Psychology of the free competition of ideas. Eysenck, H. J. The technology of consent. Dewey, J. Toward a new individualism. Emerson, R. W. Self-reliance. Fromm, E. Freedom and democracy.--Religion and the inner man: St. Augustine. The freedom and the will. Mercier, L. J. A. Freedom of the will and psychology. Dostoyevsky, F. The grand inquisitor. Berdyaev, N. (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Raymond Wetzels, Rene Wolters, Chris Van Weel & Michel Wensing (2009). Harm Caused by Adverse Events in Primary Care: A Clinical Observational Study. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (2):323-327.score: 24.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Peter Hawke (2011). Van Inwagen's Modal Skepticism. Philosophical Studies 153 (3):351-364.score: 18.0
    In this paper, the author defends Peter van Inwagen’s modal skepticism. Van Inwagen accepts that we have much basic, everyday modal knowledge, but denies that we have the capacity to justify philosophically interesting modal claims that are far removed from this basic knowledge. The author also defends the argument by means of which van Inwagen supports his modal skepticism, offering a rebuttal to an objection along the lines of that proposed by Geirrson. Van Inwagen argues that Stephen Yablo’s recent and (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Marc Alspector-Kelly (2004). Seeing the Unobservable: Van Fraassen and the Limits of Experience. [REVIEW] Synthese 140 (3):331-353.score: 18.0
    I. Introduction “We can and do see the truth about many things: ourselves, others, trees and animals, clouds and rivers—in the immediacy of experience.”1 Absent from Bas van Fraassen’s list of those things we see are paramecia and mitochondria. We do not see such things, van Fraassen has long maintained, because they are unobservable, that is, they are undetectable by means of the unaided senses.2 But notice that these two notions—what we can see in the “immediacy” of experience and what (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Peter van Inwagen (2004). Van Inwagen on Free Will. In Joseph K. Campbell (ed.), Freedom and Determinism. Cambridge MA: Bradford Book/MIT Press.score: 18.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Meghan E. Griffith (2005). Does Free Will Remain a Mystery? A Response to Van Inwagen. Philosophical Studies 124 (3):261-269.score: 18.0
    In this paper, I argue against Peter van Inwagen’s claim (in “Free Will Remains a Mystery”), that agent-causal views of free will could do nothing to solve the problem of free will (specifically, the problem of chanciness). After explaining van Inwagen’s argument, I argue that he does not consider all possible manifestations of the agent-causal position. More importantly, I claim that, in any case, van Inwagen appears to have mischaracterized the problem in some crucial ways. Once we are clear on (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Federica Russo (2006). Salmon and Van Fraassen on the Existence of Unobservable Entities: A Matter of Interpretation of Probability. [REVIEW] Foundations of Science 11 (3):221-247.score: 18.0
    A careful analysis of Salmon’s Theoretical Realism and van Fraassen’s Constructive Empiricism shows that both share a common origin: the requirement of literal construal of theories inherited by the Standard View. However, despite this common starting point, Salmon and van Fraassen strongly disagree on the existence of unobservable entities. I argue that their different ontological commitment towards the existence of unobservables traces back to their different views on the interpretation of probability via different conceptions of induction. In fact, inferences to (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Michael Huemer (2000). Van Inwagen's Consequence Argument. Philosophical Review 109 (4):525-544.score: 18.0
    Peter van Inwagen’s argument for incompatibilism uses a sentential operator, “N”, which can be read as “No one has any choice about the fact that . . . .” I show that, given van Inwagen’s understanding of the notion of having a choice, the argument is invalid. However, a different interpretation of “N” can be given, such that the argument is clearly valid, the premises remain highly plausible, and the conclusion implies that free will is incompatible with determinism.
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Enzo Rossi (2010). Reality and Imagination in Political Theory and Practice: On Raymond Geuss’s Realism. [REVIEW] European Journal of Political Theory 9 (4):504-512.score: 18.0
    Can political theory be action-guiding without relying on pre-political normative commitments? I answer that question affirmatively by unpacking two related tenets of Raymond Geuss’ political realism: the view that political philosophy should not be a branch of ethics, and the ensuing empirically-informed conception of legitimacy. I argue that the former idea can be made sense of by reference to Hobbes’ account of authorization, and that realist legitimacy can be normatively salient in so far as it stands in the correct (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Janez Bregant (2004). Van Gulick's Solution of the Exclusion Problem Revisited. Acta Analytica 19 (33):83-94.score: 18.0
    The anti-reductionist who wants to preserve the causal efficacy of mental phenomena faces several problems in regard to mental causation, i.e. mental events which cause other events, arising from her desire to accept the ontological primacy of the physical and at the same time save the special character of the mental. Psychology tries to persuade us of the former, appealing thereby to the results of experiments carried out in neurology; the latter is, however, deeply rooted in our everyday actions and (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Silvio Seno Chibeni (2008). Explanations in Microphysics: A Response to van Fraassen's Argument. Principia 12 (1):49-72.score: 18.0
    http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2008v12n1p49 The aim of this article is to offer a rejoinder to an argument against scientific realism put forward by van Fraassen, based on theoretical considerations regarding microphysics. At a certain stage of his general attack to scientific realism, van Fraassen argues, in contrast to what realists typically hold, that empirical regularities should sometimes be regarded as “brute facts”, which do not ask for explanation in terms of deeper, unobservable mechanisms. The argument from microphysics formulated by van Fraassen is based (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. John Martin Fischer (1986). Van Inwagen on Free Will. Philosophical Quarterly 36 (April):252-260.score: 18.0
    I discuss van inwagen's "first formal argument" for the incompatibility of causal determinism and freedom to do otherwise. I distinguish different interpretations of the important notion, "s can render p false." I argue that on none of these interpretations is the argument clearly sound. I point to gaps in the argument, Although I do not claim that it is unsound.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Mitchell O. Stokes (2007). Van Inwagen and the Quine-Putnam Indispensability Argument. Erkenntnis 67 (3):439 - 453.score: 18.0
    In this paper I do two things: (1) I support the claim that there is still some confusion about just what the Quine-Putnam indispensability argument is and the way it employs Quinean meta-ontology and (2) I try to dispel some of this confusion by presenting the argument in a way which reveals its important meta-ontological features, and include these features explicitly as premises. As a means to these ends, I compare Peter van Inwagen’s argument for the existence of properties with (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Helen Longino (2009). Perilous Thoughts: Comment on Van Fraassen. Philosophical Studies 143 (1):25 - 32.score: 18.0
    Bas van Fraassen’s empiricist reading of Perrin’s achievement invites the question: whose doubts about atoms did Perrin put to rest? This comment recontextualizes the argument and applies the notion of empirical grounding to some contemporary work in behavioral biology.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Philippe De Rouilhan (2012). In Defense of Logical Universalism: Taking Issue with Jean van Heijenoort. [REVIEW] Logica Universalis 6 (3-4):553-586.score: 18.0
    Van Heijenoort’s main contribution to history and philosophy of modern logic was his distinction between two basic views of logic, first, the absolutist, or universalist, view of the founding fathers, Frege, Peano, and Russell, which dominated the first, classical period of history of modern logic, and, second, the relativist, or model-theoretic, view, inherited from Boole, Schröder, and Löwenheim, which has dominated the second, contemporary period of that history. In my paper, I present the man Jean van Heijenoort (Sect. 1); then (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. John Bacon (1990). Van Cleve Versus Closure. Philosophical Studies 58 (3):239-242.score: 18.0
    In "Supervenience, Necessary Coextension, and Reducibility" (Philosophical Studies 49, 1986, 163-176), among other results, I showed that weak or ordinary supervenience is equivalent to Jaegwon Kim's strong supervenience, given certain assumptions: S4 modality, the usual modal conception of properties as class-concepts, and diagonal closure or resplicing of the set of base properties. This last means that any mapping of possible worlds into extensions of base properties counts itself as a base property. James Van Cleve attacks the modal conception of property (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Anita Burdman Feferman (2012). Jean van Heijenoort: Kaleidoscope. [REVIEW] Logica Universalis 6 (3-4):277-291.score: 18.0
    Leitmotifs in the life of Jean van Heijenoort.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Harold W. Noonan (forthcoming). Tollensing van Inwagen. Philosophia:1-7.score: 18.0
    Van Inwagen (1990) has an ingenious argument for the non-existence of human artefacts (and other non-living complex things). But the argument cannot be accepted, since human artefacts are everywhere. However, it cannot be ignored. The proper response to it is to treat it as a refutation of its least plausible premise, i.e., to ‘tollens’ it. I first set out van Inwagen’s argument. I then identify its least plausible premise and explain the consequence of denying it, that is, the acceptance of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000