16 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Rebecca Bennett [14]Rebecca J. Bennett [2]
See also:
Profile: Rebecca Bennett (University of Manchester)
  1. Rebecca Bennett (2014). There Can Be No Moral Obligation to Eradicate All Disability. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 23 (1):30-40.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Paul Benjamin Lowry, Clay Posey, Tom L. Roberts & Rebecca J. Bennett (2014). Is Your Banker Leaking Your Personal Information? The Roles of Ethics and Individual-Level Cultural Characteristics in Predicting Organizational Computer Abuse. Journal of Business Ethics 121 (3):385-401.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Amel Alghrani, Rebecca Bennett & Suzanne Ost (eds.) (2013). Bioethics, Medicine, and the Criminal Law. Cambridge University Press.
    Machine generated contents note: 1. Introduction - when criminal law encounters bioethics: a case of tensions and incompatibilities or an apt forum for resolving ethical conflict? Amel Alghrani, Rebecca Bennett and Suzanne Ost; Part I. Death, Dying, and the Criminal Law: 2. Euthanasia and assisted suicide should, when properly performed by a doctor in an appropriate case, be decriminalised John Griffiths; 3. Five flawed arguments for decriminalising euthanasia John Keown; 4. Euthanasia excused: between prohibition and permission Richard Huxtable; Part II. (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Rebecca Bennett (2013). Birth Control. In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Wiley-Blackwell.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Rebecca Bennett (2013). When Intuition is Not Enough. Why the Principle of Procreative Beneficence Must Work Much Harder to Justify Its Eugenic Vision. Bioethics 28 (8).
    The Principle of Procreative Beneficence (PPB) claims that we have a moral obligation, where choice is possible, to choose to create the best child we can. The existence of this moral obligation has been proposed by John Harris and Julian Savulescu and has proved controversial on many levels, not least that it is eugenics, asking us to produce the best children we can, not for the sake of that child's welfare, but in order to make a better society. These are (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Amel Alghrani, Rebecca Bennett & Suzanne Ost (eds.) (2012). Bioethics, Medicine, and the Criminal Law: The Criminal Law and Bioethical Conflict: Walking the Tightrope. Cambridge University Press.
    Machine generated contents note: 1. Introduction - when criminal law encounters bioethics: a case of tensions and incompatibilities or an apt forum for resolving ethical conflict? Amel Alghrani, Rebecca Bennett and Suzanne Ost; Part I. Death, Dying, and the Criminal Law: 2. Euthanasia and assisted suicide should, when properly performed by a doctor in an appropriate case, be decriminalised John Griffiths; 3. Five flawed arguments for decriminalising euthanasia John Keown; 4. Euthanasia excused: between prohibition and permission Richard Huxtable; Part II. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Bella L. Galperin, Rebecca J. Bennett & Karl Aquino (2011). Status Differentiation and the Protean Self: A Social-Cognitive Model of Unethical Behavior in Organizations. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 98 (3):407 - 424.
    Based on social-cognitive theory, this article proposes a model that seeks to explain why high status organizational members engage in unethical behavior. We argue that status differentiation in organizations creates social isolation which initiates activation of high status group identity and a deactivation of moral identity. We further argue that high status group identity results in insensitivity to the needs of out-group members which, in turn, results in lessened motivation to selfregulate ethical decision making. As a result of this identity (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Rebecca Bennett (2009). The Fallacy of the Principle of Procreative Beneficence. Bioethics 23 (5):265-273.
    The claim that we have a moral obligation, where a choice can be made, to bring to birth the 'best' child possible, has been highly controversial for a number of decades. More recently Savulescu has labelled this claim the Principle of Procreative Beneficence. It has been argued that this Principle is problematic in both its reasoning and its implications, most notably in that it places lower moral value on the disabled. Relentless criticism of this proposed moral obligation, however, has been (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Rebecca Bennett (2008). Is Reproduction Women's Business? How Should We Regulate Regarding Stored Embryos, Posthumous Pregnancy, Ectogenesis and Male Pregnancy? Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 2 (3).
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Rebecca Bennett (2007). Should We Criminalize HIV Transmission? In Charles A. Erin & Suzanne Ost (eds.), The Criminal Justice System and Health Care. Oup Oxford.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Rebecca Bennett & John Harris (2007). Reproductive Choice. In Rosamond Rhodes, Leslie Francis & Anita Silvers (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Medical Ethics. Blackwell Pub..
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. George Agich, Priscilla Anderson, Alice Asby, Dominic Beer, Rebecca Bennett, Alec Bodkin, Stephen Braude, Dan Brock, Gideon Calder & Emma Cave (2002). Many Thanks to Bioethics Reviewers. In Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred Dycus Miller & Jeffrey Paul (eds.), Bioethics. Cambridge University Press. 2002.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Rebecca Bennett (2001). Antenatal Genetic Testing and the Right to Remain in Ignorance. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 (5):461-471.
    As knowledge increases about the human genome,prenatal genetic testing will become cheaper,safer and more comprehensive. It is likelythat there will be a great deal of support formaking prenatal testing for a wide range ofgenetic disorders a routine part of antenatalcare. Such routine testing is necessarilycoercive in nature and does not involve thesame standard of consent as is required inother health care settings. This paper askswhether this level of coercion is ethicallyjustifiable in this case, or whether pregnantwomen have a right to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Rebecca Bennett (2001). Should We Routinely Test Pregnant Women for HIV? In Rebecca Bennett & Charles A. Erin (eds.), Hiv and Aids, Testing, Screening, and Confidentiality. Clarendon Press.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Rebecca Bennett & Charles A. Erin (eds.) (2001). HIV and AIDS, Testing, Screening, and Confidentiality. Clarendon Press.
    The series: General Editors: John Harris, University of Manchester; Soren Holm, University of Manchester. Consulting Editor: Ranaan Gillon, Director, Imperial College Health Service, London. North American Consulting Editor: Bonnie Steinbock, Professor of Philosophy, SUNY, Albany. -/- The late twentieth century has witnessed dramatic technological developments in biomedical science and the delivery of health care, and these developments have brought with them important social changes. All too often ethical analysis has lagged behind these changes. The purpose of this series is to (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Rebecca Bennett & Charles A. Erin (2001). Introduction. In Rebecca Bennett & Charles A. Erin (eds.), Hiv and Aids, Testing, Screening, and Confidentiality. Clarendon Press.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation