Search results for 'Redundancy' (try it on Scholar)

507 found
Sort by:
  1. Rens Bod (2007). Getting Rid of Derivational Redundancy or How to Solve Kuhn's Problem. Minds and Machines 17 (1):47-66.score: 24.0
    This paper deals with the problem of derivational redundancy in scientific explanation, i.e. the problem that there can be extremely many different explanatory derivations for a natural phenomenon while students and experts mostly come up with one and the same derivation for a phenomenon (modulo the order of applying laws). Given this agreement among humans, we need to have a story of how to select from the space of possible derivations of a phenomenon the derivation that humans come up (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Sonia Maria Ramos de Vasconcelos & Miguel Roig (forthcoming). Prior Publication and Redundancy in Contemporary Science: Are Authors and Editors at the Crossroads? Science and Engineering Ethics:1-12.score: 24.0
    We discuss prior publication and redundancy in contemporary science in the context of changing perceptions of originality in the communication of research results. These perceptions have been changing in the publication realm, particularly in the last 15 years. Presenting a brief overview of the literature, we address some of the conflicts that are likely to arise between authors and editors. We illustrate our approach with conference presentations that are later published as journal articles and focus on a recent retraction (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Jussi Suikkanen (2005). Contractualist Replies to the Redundancy Objections. Theoria 71 (1):38-58.score: 22.0
    This paper is a defence of T.M. Scanlon's contractualism - the view that an action is wrong if it is forbidden by the principles which no one could reasonably reject. Such theories have been argued to be redundant in two ways. They are claimed to assume antecedent moral facts to explain which principles could not be reasonably rejected, and the reasons they provide to follow the non-rejectable principles are said to be unnecessary given that we already have sufficient reasons not (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Harold W. Noonan (1990). Object-Dependent Thoughts and Psychological Redundancy. Analysis 50 (January):1-9.score: 21.0
  5. G. R. Lockhead (1966). Effects of Dimensional Redundancy on Visual Discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (1):95.score: 21.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Muriel C. Thompson & Dominic W. Massaro (1973). Visual Information and Redundancy in Reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology 98 (1):49.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Brian A. Knowles, Kenneth R. Hammond, Thomas R. Stewart & David A. Summers (1971). Positive and Negative Redundancy in Multiple Cue Probability Tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology 90 (1):157.score: 21.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Robert M. Levy (1973). Redundancy and Dimensional Load in Stimulus Identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology 98 (1):138.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Nancy S. Anderson & J. Alfred Leonard (1958). The Recognition, Naming, and Reconstruction of Visual Figures as a Function of Contour Redundancy. Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 (3):262.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Lyle E. Bourne Jr & Robert C. Haygood (1959). The Role of Stimulus Redundancy in Concept Identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (3):232.score: 21.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Francis J. Di Vesta & Gary M. Ingersoll (1969). Effect of Semantic Redundancy on Children's Identification of Verbal Concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (2):360.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Robert C. Haygood & Lyle E. Bourne (1964). Forms of Relevant Stimulus Redundancy in Concept Identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (4):392.score: 21.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Brian A. Knowles, Kenneth R. Hammond, Thomas R. Stewart & David A. Summers (1972). Detection of Redundancy in Multiple Cue Probability Tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology 93 (2):425.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Martin E. Seligman (1966). CS Redundancy and Secondary Punishment. Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (4):546.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Herman H. Spitz (1972). Effects of Redundancy Level and Presentation Method on the Paired-Associate Learning of Educable Retardates, Third Graders, and Eighth Graders. Journal of Experimental Psychology 95 (1):164.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Craig Callender, Discussion: The Redundancy Argument Against Bohm's Theory.score: 18.0
    Advocates of the Everett interpretation of quantum mechanics have long claimed that other interpretations needlessly invoke "new physics" to solve the measurement problem. Call the argument fashioned that gives voice to this claim the Redundancy Argument, or ’Redundancy’ for short. Originating right in Everett’s doctoral thesis, Redundancy has recently enjoyed much attention, having been advanced and developed by a number of commentators, as well as criticized by a few others.[1] Although versions of this argument can target collapse (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. David McNaughton & Piers Rawling (2003). Can Scanlon Avoid Redundancy by Passing the Buck? Analysis 63 (4):328–331.score: 18.0
    Scanlon suggests a buck-passing account of goodness. To say that something is good is not to give a reason to, say, favour it; rather it is to say that there are such reasons. When it comes to wrongness, however, Scanlon rejects a buck-passing account: to say that j ing is wrong is, on his view, to give a sufficient moral reason not to j. Philip Stratton-Lake 2003 argues that Scanlon can evade a redundancy objection against his (Scanlon’s) view of (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. David Sztybel (2001). Animal Rights: Autonomy and Redundancy. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (3):259-273.score: 18.0
    Even if animal liberation were to be adopted, would rights for animals be redundant – or even deleterious? Such an objection, most prominently voiced by L. W. Sumner and Paul W. Taylor, is misguided, risks an anthropocentric and anthropomorphic conception of autonomy and freedom, overly agent-centered rights conceptions, and an overlooking of the likely harmful consequences of positing rights for humans but not for nonhuman animals. The objection in question also stems from an overly pessimistic construal of autonomy-infringements thought to (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Philip Stratton-Lake (2003). Scanlon, Permissions, and Redundancy: Response to McNaughton and Rawling. Analysis 63 (4):332–337.score: 18.0
    According to one formulation of Scanlon’s contractualist principle, certain acts are wrong if they are permitted by principles that are reasonably rejectable because they permit such acts. According to the redundancy objection, if a principle is reasonably rejectable because it permits actions which have feature F, such actions are wrong simply in virtue of having F and not because their having F makes principles permitting them reasonably rejectable. Consequently Scanlon’s contractualist principle adds nothing to the reasons we have not (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Derek Partridge (1981). Information Theory and Redundancy. Philosophy of Science 48 (2):308-316.score: 18.0
    This paper argues that Information Theoretic Redundancy (ITR) is fundamentally a composite concept that has been continually misinterpreted since the very inception of Information Theory. We view ITR as compounded of true redundancy and partial redundancy. This demarcation of true redundancy illustrates a limiting case phenomenon: the underlying metric (number of alternatives) differs only by degree but the properties of this concept differ in kind from those of partial redundancy. Several other studies are instanced which (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Philippe Schlenker, A Simplified Modal Presentation of the ‘Non-Redundancy’ System.score: 18.0
    We give a simplified version of the system introduced in ‘Non-Redundancy’, presented here as a Modal Logic whose primitive elements are finite sequences. It includes a treatment of Condition C, Condition B, Condition A, and the Locality of Variable Binding, but disregards quantification and Weak and Strong Crossover effects, which are treated in the longer paper.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Michael Ridge, Scanlon, Permissions, and Redundancy: Response to McNaughton and Rawling.score: 18.0
    According to one formulation of <span class='Hi'>Scanlon</span>’s contractualist principle, certain acts are wrong if they are permitted by principles that are reasonably rejectable because they permit such acts. According to the redundancy objection, if a principle is reasonably rejectable because it permits actions which have feature F, such actions are wrong simply in virtue of having F and not because their having F makes principles permitting them reasonably rejectable. Consequently <span class='Hi'>Scanlon</span>’s contractualist principle adds nothing to the reasons we (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Hannes Eisler (1998). Distal Similarity, Shape Referents, Subjective World, and Redundancy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):470-470.score: 18.0
    The concept of distal similarity that plays a crucial role in Edelman's theory of representation is called into question in this commentary on theoretical as well as empirical grounds. A possible confusion between shape and (knowledge of) its referent, the problem of the subjective world, redundancy, and large individual differences in subjective space encountered in contrived universes are discussed.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. A. Steiner & I. Walker (1990). The Pattern of Population Growth as a Function of Redundancy and Repair. Acta Biotheoretica 38 (2).score: 18.0
    A basic model of hierarchical structure, expressed by simple, linear differential equations, shows that the pattern of population growth is essentially determined by conditions of redundancy in the sub-structure of individuals. There does not exist any possible combination between growth rate and accident rate that could balance population numbers and/or the level of redundancy within the population; all possible combinations either lead to extinction or to positive population growth with a decline of the fraction of individuals with redundant (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Brian Riordan & Michael N. Jones (2011). Redundancy in Perceptual and Linguistic Experience: Comparing Feature-Based and Distributional Models of Semantic Representation. Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (2):303-345.score: 16.0
    Abstract Since their inception, distributional models of semantics have been criticized as inadequate cognitive theories of human semantic learning and representation. A principal challenge is that the representations derived by distributional models are purely symbolic and are not grounded in perception and action; this challenge has led many to favor feature-based models of semantic representation. We argue that the amount of perceptual and other semantic information that can be learned from purely distributional statistics has been underappreciated. We compare the representations (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Richard Ashcroft (2008). Fair Process and the Redundancy of Bioethics: A Polemic. Public Health Ethics 1 (1):3-9.score: 16.0
    Queen Mary, University of London, School of Law, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK. Tel: +442078825126, Fax: +442089818733, Email: r.ashcroft{at}qmul.ac.uk ' + u + '@' + d + ' '//--> Abstract Recent doctrine in both national and international organisations concerned with public health planning and resource allocation has it that direct ethical justification of substantive decisions is so difficult as to be impossible. Instead, we should agree on criteria of procedural justice and reach decisions whose justification lies in how (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Tamra Frei (2009). The Redundancy Objection, and Why Scanlon is Not a Contractualist. Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (1):47-65.score: 15.0
  28. Philip Stratton–Lake (2003). Scanlon's Contractualism and the Redundancy Objection. Analysis 63 (277):70–76.score: 15.0
    Ebbhinghaus, H., J. Flum, and W. Thomas. 1984. Mathematical Logic. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. Forster, T. Typescript. The significance of Yablo’s paradox without self-reference. Available from http://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk. Gold, M. 1965. Limiting recursion. Journal of Symbolic Logic 30: 28–47. Karp, C. 1964. Languages with Expressions of Infinite Length. Amsterdam.
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Philip Stratton-Lake (2003). Scanlon’s Contractualism and the Redundancy Objection. Analysis 63 (1):70-76.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Michael Ridge (2003). Contractualism and the New and Improved Redundancy Objection. Analysis 63 (4):337–342.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Richard Norman (2001). Practical Reasons and the Redundancy of Motives. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (1):3-22.score: 15.0
    Jonathan Dancy, in his 1994 Aristotelian Society Presidential Address, set out to show ''why there is really no such thing as the theory of motivation''. In this paper I want to agree that there is no such thing, and to offer reasons of a different kind for that conclusion. I shall suggest that the so-called theory of motivation misconstrues the question which it purports to answer, and that when we properly analyse the question and distinguish it clearly from other questions (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Lenny Moss (2006). Redundancy, Plasticity, and Detachment: The Implications of Comparative Genomics for Evolutionary Thinking. Philosophy of Science 73 (5):930-946.score: 15.0
    Radically new or unexpected findings in a science demand an openness to new concepts and styles of explanation. The time is more than ripe for asking ourselves what we have learned from the research program of comparative genomics. Where not long ago the human genome was expected to reveal a close association of complexity with the quantitative expansion of the roster of unique genes, more recent findings, especially in relation to comparisons between human and chimp, have raised the bracing possibility (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. William Ulrich (1977). Redundancy and Frege's Chosen Object Theory. Philosophical Studies 32 (3):313 - 319.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Gerhard Schurz & Paul D. Thorn (2014). TTB Vs. Franklin's Rule in Environments of Different Redundancy. Frontiers in Psychology.score: 15.0
    This is an appendix to the paper "Cognitive Success: Instrumental Justifications of Normative Systems of Reasoning".
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Antti Heikinheimo (2013). Redundancy of the Zombie Argument in The Conscious Mind. Journal of Consciousness Studies 20 (5-6):5-6.score: 15.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Irving M. Copi (1950). The Inconsistency or Redundancy of Principia Mathematica. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 11 (2):190-199.score: 15.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Paul Ehrlich & Brian Walker (1998). Rivets and Redundancy. BioScience 48 (5):387-387.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Berent Enc (1985). Redundancy, Degeneracy and Deviance in Action. Philosophical Studies 48 (3):353 - 374.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Peter Gardenfors (1976). Relevance and Redundancy in Deductive Explanations. Philosophy of Science 43 (3):420-431.score: 15.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Christopher R. Wolfe (2007). Adaptive Redundancy, Denominator Neglect, and the Base-Rate Fallacy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (3):286-287.score: 15.0
    Homo sapiens have evolved a dual-process cognitive architecture that is adaptive but prone to systematic errors. Fuzzy-trace theory predicts that nested or overlapping class-inclusion relations create processing interference, resulting in denominator neglect: behaving as if one ignores marginal denominators in a 2 × 2 table. Ignoring marginal denominators leads to fallacies in base-rate problems and conjunctive and disjunctive probability estimates.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Andreas Wagner (2005). Distributed Robustness Versus Redundancy as Causes of Mutational Robustness. Bioessays 27 (2):176-188.score: 15.0
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Ramesh Balasubramaniam (2004). Redundancy in the Nervous System: Where Internal Models Collapse. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):396-397.score: 15.0
    Grush has proposed a fairly comprehensive version of the idea of internal models within the framework of the emulation theory of representation. However, the formulation suffers from assumptions that render such models biologically infeasible. Here I present some problems from physiological principles of human movement production to illustrate why. Some alternative views to emulation are presented.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Jean-Claude Choul (1984). Redundancy as a Semiotic Principle. Semiotics:239-249.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Theodore C. Denise (1986). Redundancy and Inus Conditionality. Analysis 46 (3):126 - 130.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Rom Harre (2000). Verbal Games: The Redundancy of" Self" in Psychiatric Talk. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 7 (2):137-138.score: 15.0
  46. Kerry E. Jordan, Sumarga H. Suanda & Elizabeth M. Brannon (2008). Intersensory Redundancy Accelerates Preverbal Numerical Competence. Cognition 108 (1):210-221.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. J. C. Cheroweth McKinsey (1935). On a Redundancy in "Principia Mathematica". Mind 44 (174):270-271.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Daniel Palmer (2012). Redundancy in Photography. Philosophy of Photography 3 (1):36-44.score: 15.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Shin Sakuragi (2006). Frege's Redundancy Thesis. Kagaku Tetsugaku 39 (1):29-45.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 507