Search results for 'Relationalism' (try it on Scholar)

140 found
Order:
  1.  78
    Pendaran Roberts & Kelly Ann Schmidtke (forthcoming). Relationalism About Perceptible Properties and the Principle of Charity. Synthese:1-25.
    Color relationalism holds that the colors are constituted by relations to subjects. The introspective rejoinder against this view claims that it is opposed to our phenomenally-informed, pre-theoretic intuitions. The rejoinder seems to be correct about how colors appear when looking at how participants respond to an item about the metaphysical nature of color but not when looking at an item about the ascription of colors. The present article expands the properties investigated to sound and taste and inspects the mentioned (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Oliver Pooley (2013). Substantivalist and Relationalist Approaches to Spacetime. In Robert Batterman (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Physics. Oxford University Press
    Substantivalists believe that spacetime and its parts are fundamental constituents of reality. Relationalists deny this, claiming that spacetime enjoys only a derivative existence. I begin by describing how the Galilean symmetries of Newtonian physics tell against both Newton's brand of substantivalism and the most obvious relationalist alternative. I then review the obvious substantivalist response to the problem, which is to ditch substantival space for substantival spacetime. The resulting position has many affinities with what are arguably the most natural interpretations of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  3.  10
    Derek H. Brown (2015). Colour Layering and Colour Relationalism. Minds and Machines 25 (2):177-191.
    Colour Relationalism asserts that colours are non-intrinsic or inherently relational properties of objects, properties that depend not only on a target object but in addition on some relation that object bears to other objects. The most powerful argument for Relationalism infers the inherently relational character of colour from cases in which one’s experience of a colour contextually depends on one’s experience of other colours. Experienced colour layering—say looking at grass through a tinted window and experiencing opaque green through (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  4. Bence Nanay (2014). The Representationalism Versus Relationalism Debate: Explanatory Contextualism About Perception. European Journal of Philosophy 23 (1):321-336.
    There are two very different ways of thinking about perception. According to representationalism, perceptual states are representations: they represent the world as being a certain way. They have content, which may or may not be different from the content of beliefs. They represent objects as having properties, sometimes veridically, sometimes not. According to relationalism, perception is a relation between the agent and the perceived object. Perceived objects are literally constituents of our perceptual states and not of the contents thereof. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5.  4
    Simon Coghlan (forthcoming). Moral Individualism and Relationalism: A Narrative-Style Philosophical Challenge. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice:1-17.
    Morally unequal treatment of different nonhuman species, like pigs and dogs, can seem troublingly inconsistent. A position Todd May calls moral individualism and relationalism appears to justify the moral discomfit attending such species-differentiated treatment. Yet some of its basic assumptions are challenged by a philosophical style Roger Scruton called narrative philosophy. Expanding upon Christopher Cordner’s discussion of narrative philosophy, this paper develops a narrative-style philosophical critique of Todd May’s moral individualism and relationalism, especially its reductionist understanding of moral (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  65
    Pendaran Roberts (2014). Color Relationalism, Ordinary Illusion, and Color Incompatibility. Philosophia 42 (4):1085-1097.
    Relationalism is a view popularized by Cohen according to which the colors are relational properties. Cohen’s view has the unintuitive consequence that the following propositions are false: (i) no object can be more than one determinate or determinable color all over at the same time; (ii) ordinary illusion cases occur whenever the color perceptually represented conflicts, according to (i) above, with the object’s real color; and (iii) the colors we perceive obey (i). I investigate Cohen’s attempt to address these (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  58
    Mark Young (2011). Relevance and Relationalism. Metaphysica 12 (1):19-30.
    This paper will provide support for relationalism; the claim that the identity of objects is constituted by the totality of their relations to other things in the world. I will consider how Kit Fine’s criticisms of essentialism within modal logic not only highlight the inability of modal logic to account for essential properties but also arouse suspicion surrounding the possibility of nonrelational properties. I will claim that Fine’s criticisms, together with concerns surrounding Hempel’s paradox, show that it is not (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8.  3
    Jonathan Cohen (forthcoming). Chromatic Layering and Color Relationalism. Minds and Machines:1-15.
    Brown highlights cases of “chromatic layering”—scenarios in which one perceives an opaque object through a transparent volume/film/filter with a chromatic or achromatic content of its own—as a way of reining in the argument from perceptual variation sometimes used to motivate a relationalist account of color properties. Brown urges that the argument in question does not generalize smoothly to all types of perceptual variation—in particular, that it fits poorly in layering cases in which there is either experiential fusion or scission. While (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  93
    Joseph Kaipayil (2009). Relationalism: A Theory of Being. Bangalore: JIP Publications.
    In this work, the author tries to give an ontological foundation and framework for relationalism, by interpreting the meaning of being in terms of particular (individual) in its relationality. This work provides many an insight into how we can look at not only metaphysics but epistemology and ethics as well from a relationalist point of view.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  61
    Keith Allen (2012). Colour Relationalism, Contextualism, and Self-Locating Contents. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 36:331-350.
    In addressing the metaphysical question of what colours are, a consideration that is commonly appealed to is how colours are represented—typically in perceptual experiences, but also in beliefs and linguistic utterances. Although representations need not accurately reflect the nature of what they represent—indeed, they need not represent anything that actually exists at all—the way colours are represented is often taken to provide at least a defeasible guide to the metaphysics: all else being equal, it seems we should prefer a theory (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Jonathan Cohen (2004). Color Properties and Color Ascriptions: A Relationalist Manifesto. Philosophical Review 113 (4):451-506.
    Are colors relational or non-relational properties of their bearers? Is red a property that is instantiated by all and only the objects with a certain intrinsic (/non-relational) nature? Or does an object with a particular intrinsic (/non-relational) nature count as red only in virtue of standing in certain relations - for example, only when it looks a certain way to a certain perceiver, or only in certain circumstances of observation? In this paper I shall argue for the view that color (...)
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   35 citations  
  12. Pendaran Roberts, James Andow & Kelly Schmidtke (2014). Colour Relationalism and the Real Deliverances of Introspection. Erkenntnis 79 (5):1173-1189.
    Colour relationalism holds that the colours are constituted by relations to subjects. Anti-relationalists have claimed that this view stands in stark contrast to our phenomenally-informed, pre-theoretic intuitions. Is this claim right? Cohen and Nichols’ recent empirical study suggests not, as about half of their participants seemed to be relationalists about colour. Despite Cohen and Nichols’ study, we think that the anti-relationalist’s claim is correct. We explain why there are good reasons to suspect that Cohen and Nichols’ experimental design skewed (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  13. William Fish (2008). Relationalism and the Problems of Consciousness. Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 28 (3):167-80.
    Recent attempts to show that functional processing entails the presence of phenomenal consciousness have failed to deliver the kind of answers to the “problems of consciousness” that anti-materialists insist the functionalist must provide. I will illustrate this by focusing on the claims that there is a special “Hard Problem” of consciousness and an “explanatory gap” between functional and phenomenal facts. I then argue that if we supplement the functionalist stories with a relationalist conception of phenomenal properties, we can begin to (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14. Jonathan Cohen (2007). A Relationalist's Guide to Error About Color Perception. Noûs 41 (2):335–353.
    Color relationalism is the view that colors are constituted in terms of relations to perceiving subjects. Among its explanatory virtues, relation- alism provides a satisfying treatment of cases of perceptual variation. But it can seem that relationalists lack resources for saying that a representa- tion of x’s color is erroneous. Surely, though, a theory of color that makes errors of color perception impossible cannot be correct. In this paper I’ll argue that, initial appearances notwithstanding, relationalism contains the resources (...)
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  15. Oliver Pooley & Harvey R. Brown (2002). Relationalism Rehabilitated? I: Classical Mechanics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (2):183--204.
    The implications for the substantivalist–relationalist controversy of Barbour and Bertotti's successful implementation of a Machian approach to dynamics are investigated. It is argued that in the context of Newtonian mechanics, the Machian framework provides a genuinely relational interpretation of dynamics and that it is more explanatory than the conventional, substantival interpretation. In a companion paper (Pooley [2002a]), the viability of the Machian framework as an interpretation of relativistic physics is explored. 1 Introduction 2 Newton versus Leibniz 3 Absolute space versus (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  16.  89
    Jonathan Cohen (2010). Color Relationalism and Color Phenomenology. In Bence Nanay (ed.), Perceiving the World. Oxford University Press 13.
    Color relationalism is the view that colors are constituted in terms of relations between subjects and objects. The most historically important form of color relationalism is the classic dispositionalist view according to which, for example red is the disposition to look red to standard observers in standard conditions (mutatis mutandis for other colors).1 However, it has become increasingly apparent in recent years that a commitment to the relationality of colors bears interest that goes beyond dispositionalism (Cohen, 2004; Matthen, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  17.  3
    James Liu (2015). Globalizing Indigenous Psychology: An East Asian Form of Hierarchical Relationalism with Worldwide Implications. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 45 (1):82-94.
    Globalization has changed almost every facet of life for people around the world, and today the flow of influence is no longer uni-directional. It is argued (...)that East Asian societies are anchored in an indigenous form of hierarchical relationalism where social structure is produced by relational obligations of an ethical and normative nature that have slowed its traditional culturemelting into airas prophesied by Marx. The successfully modernization of East Asia has involved hybridization, compartmentalization, and sequencing of traditional psychological features of Confucianist societies such as delay of gratification and respect for education, paternalistic leadership, filial piety, and beliefs in harmony or benevolence. Features of hierarchical relationalism are adaptable to creating niches for East Asian societies that thrive under globalization as characterized by the paradoxical coupling of economic inequality in fact with discourses of equality in principle. Moral, ethical demands for enlightened leadership constrain East Asian elites to at least attempt to protect subordinates and protect societal well-being. A fundamental contribution of East Asia to global society may be in the articulation of how to ameliorate economic inequality using Confucian principles of hierarchical relationalism. (shrink)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  18.  19
    Osmo Kivinen & Tero Piiroinen (2006). Toward Pragmatist Methodological Relationalism: From Philosophizing Sociology to Sociologizing Philosophy. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (3):303-329.
    University of Turku, Finland In this article, relationalist approaches to social sciences are analyzed in terms of a conceptual distinction between "philosophizing sociology" and "sociologizing philosophy." These mark two different attitudes toward philosophical metaphysics and ontological commitments. The authors’ own pragmatist methodological relationalism of Deweyan origin is compared with ontologically committed realist approaches, as well as with Bourdieuan methodological relationalism. It is argued that pragmatist philosophy of social sciences is an appropriate tool for assisting social scientists in their (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  19.  12
    Dan Cavedon‐Taylor (2015). Kind Properties and the Metaphysics of Perception: Towards Impure Relationalism. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 96 (4):487-509.
    A central debate in contemporary philosophy of perception is between those who hold that perception is a detection relation of sensory awareness and those who hold that it is representational state akin to belief. Another key debate is between those who claim that we can perceive natural or artifactual kind properties, e.g. ‘being a tomato’, ‘being a doorknob’, etc. and those who hold we cannot. The current consensus is that these debates are entirely unrelated. I argue that this consensus is (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  99
    Jonathan Cohen & Shaun Nichols (2010). Colours, Colour Relationalism and the Deliverances of Introspection. Analysis 70 (2):218 - 228.
    An important motivation for relational theories of color is that they resolve apparent conflicts about color: x can, without contradiction, be red relative to S1 and not red relative to S2. Alas, many philosophers claim that the view is incompatible with naive, phenomenally grounded introspection. However, when we presented normal adults with apparent conflicts about color (among other properties), we found that many were open to the relationalist's claim that apparently competing variants can simultaneously be correct. This suggests that, philosophers' (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  21.  22
    Kwang-Kuo Hwang (2000). Chinese Relationalism: Theoretical Construction and Methodological Considerations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 30 (2):155–178.
    The goal of this article is attempting to establish a research tradition of Chinese relationalism on the methodological grounds of constructive realism. Two of Ho’s key concepts, person-in-relations and persons-in-relation, are carefully examined and reinterpreted. Three of my theoretical models, namely, my Face and Favor model , Confucian ethics for ordinary people , and a conflict resolution model , are conceived of as microworlds for illustrating an account of person-in relations in Chinese culture. The manifestation of Confucian ethics for (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  22. Gordon Belot (1999). Rehabilitating Relationalism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13 (1):35 – 52.
    I argue that the conviction, widespread among philosophers, that substantivalism enjoys a clear superiority over relationalism in both Newtonian and relativistic physics is ill-founded. There are viable relationalist approaches to understanding these theories, and the substantival-relational debate should be of interest to philosophers and physicists alike, because of its connection with questions about the correct space of states for various physical theories.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  23.  10
    Shamik Dasgupta (2015). Substantivalism Vs Relationalism About Space in Classical Physics. Philosophy Compass 10 (9):601-624.
    Substantivalism is the view that space exists in addition to any material bodies situated within it. Relationalism is the opposing view that there is no such thing as space; there are just material bodies, spatially related to one another. This paper assesses this issue in the context of classical physics. It starts by describing the bucket argument for substantivalism. It then turns to anti-substantivalist arguments, including Leibniz's classic arguments and their contemporary reincarnation under the guise of ‘symmetry’. It argues (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  56
    Jonathan Cohen (2012). Redness, Reality, and Relationalism. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 12 (3):351-378.
    In this paper I reply to two sets of criticisms—a first from Joshua Gert, and a second from Keith Allen—of the relationalist view of color developed and defended in my book, The Red and the Real: An Essay on Color Ontology.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Jonathan Cohen (2010). It's Not Easy Being Green : Hardin and Color Relationalism. In Jonathan Cohen & Mohan Matthen (eds.), Color Ontology and Color Science. MIT Press
    But Hardin hasn’t contented himself with reframing traditional philosoph- ical issues about color in a way that is sensitive to relevant empirical con- straints. In addition, he has been a staunch defender of color eliminativism — the view that there are no colors, qua properties of tables, chairs, and other mind-external objects, and a vociferous critic of several varieties of re- alism about color that have been defended by others (e.g., [Hardin, 2003], [Hardin, 2005]). These other views include the so-called (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  12
    Barry Maund (2012). Colour Relationalism and Colour Irrealism/Eliminativism/Fictionalism. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 36 (3):379-398.
    Jonathan Cohen has produced a powerful argument for Colour Relationalism: the metaphysical thesis that colours are relational properties of a certain sort—relational with respect to perceivers and circumstances. Cohen makes two important assumptions: one is that Colour Relationalism and Colour Irrealism are rivals; the second is that “error theories” are theories of last resort. In this paper, I challenge both assumptions. In particular, I argue that there is good reason to think that Colour Relationalism needs to be (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  39
    Daniel A. Kaufman (2007). Family Resemblances, Relationalism, and the Meaning of 'Art'. British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (3):280-297.
    Peter Kivy has maintained that the Wittgensteinian account of ‘art’ ‘is not a going concern’ and that ‘the traditional task of defining the work of art is back in fashion, with a vengeance’. This is true, in large part, because of the turn towards relational definitions of ‘art’ taken by philosophers in the 1960s; a move that is widely believed to have countered the Wittgensteinian charge that ‘art’ is an open concept and which gave rise to a ‘New Wave’ in (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  14
    Raya A. Jones (2013). Relationalism Through Social Robotics. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 43 (4):405-424.
    Social robotics is a rapidly developing industry-oriented area of research, intent on making robots in social roles commonplace in the near future. This has led to rising interest in the dynamics as well as ethics of human-robot relationships, described here as a nascent relational turn. A contrast is drawn with the 1990s’ paradigm shift associated with relational-self themes in social psychology. Constructions of the human-robot relationship reproduce the “I-You-Me” dominant model of theorising about the self with biases that (as in (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  13
    John Barry Maund (2012). Colour Relationalism and Colour Irrealism/Eliminativism/Fictionalism. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 12 (3):379-398.
    Jonathan Cohen has produced a powerful argument for Colour Relationalism: the metaphysical thesis that colours are relational properties of a certain sort—relational with respect to perceivers and circumstances. Cohen makes two important assumptions: one is that Colour Relationalism and Colour Irrealism (which include Colour Eliminativism, Fictionalism and other “error theories”) are rivals; the second is that “error theories” are theories of last resort. In this paper, I challenge both assumptions. In particular, I argue that there is good reason (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  23
    Philip Catton & Graham Solomon (1988). Uniqueness of Embeddings and Space-Time Relationalism. Philosophy of Science 55 (2):280-291.
    From recent writings of Brent Mundy and Michael Friedman we reconstruct two different representation-theoretic or embedding accounts of space-time relationalism, involving two different conditions on embeddings: respectively, uniqueness up to symmetry and uniqueness up to indistinguishability. We discuss the properties of these two accounts, and, with respect specifically to Friedman's projects, assess their merits and demerits.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  1
    Emily Erikson (2013). Formalist and Relationalist Theory in Social Network Analysis. Sociological Theory 31 (3):219-242.
    Social network research is widely considered atheoretical. In contrast, in this article I argue that network analysis often mixes two distinct theoretical frameworks, creating a logically inconsistent foundation. Relationalism rejects essentialism and a priori categories and insists upon the intersubjectivity of experience and meaning as well as the importance of the content of interactions and their historical setting. Formalism is based on a structuralist interpretation of the theoretical works of Georg Simmel. Simmel laid out a neo-Kantian program of identifying (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Mazviita Chirimuuta (2015). Colour Layering and Colour Relationalism. Minds and Machines 25 (2):177-191.
    Colour Relationalism asserts that colours are non-intrinsic or inherently relational properties of objects, properties that depend not only on a target object but in addition on some relation that object bears to other objects. The most powerful argument for Relationalism infers the inherently relational character of colour from cases in which one’s experience of a colour contextually depends on one’s experience of other colours. Experienced colour layering—say looking at grass through a tinted window and experiencing opaque green through (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  60
    Alex Byrne & David R. Hilbert (forthcoming). Color Relationalism and Relativism. Topics in Cognitive Science.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  5
    James P. Binkoski (forthcoming). On the Viability of Galilean Relationalism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science:axw002.
    I explore the viability of a Galilean relational theory of space-time—a theory that includes a three-place collinearity relation among its stock of basic relations. Two formal results are established. First, I prove the existence of a class of dynamically possible models of Newtonian mechanics in which collinearity is uninstantiated. Second, I prove that the dynamical properties of Newtonian systems fail to supervene on their Galilean relations. On the basis of these two results, I argue that Galilean relational space-time is too (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  6
    J. Cohen & S. Nichols (2010). Colours, Colour Relationalism and the Deliverances of Introspection. Analysis 70 (2):218-228.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  67
    Howard Robinson (2012). Relationalism Versus Representationalism: How Deep is the Divide? [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 62 (248):614-619.
  37.  17
    Adam D. Moore (2004). Values, Objectivity, and Relationalism. Journal of Value Inquiry 38 (1):75-90.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  38.  7
    Sherry B. Ortner (1995). The Case of the Disappearing Shamans, or No Individualism, No Relationalism. Ethos: Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology 23 (3):355-390.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  39.  5
    Shamik Dasgupta (2015). Teaching and Learning Guide For: Substantivalism Vs Relationalism About Space in Classical Physics. Philosophy Compass 10 (10):736-737.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  22
    Richard Peters (2012). “Naturalism, Knowledge, and Nature—Alvin Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism in Relationalist Cosmological Perspective”. Process Studies 40 (1):206-207.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  3
    Steven Cassedy (1988). Mathematics, Relationalism, and the Rise of Modern Literary Aesthetics. Journal of the History of Ideas 49 (1):109.
  42.  13
    Todd May (2014). Moral Individualism, Moral Relationalism, and Obligations to Non-Human Animals. Journal of Applied Philosophy 31 (2):155-168.
    Moral individualists like Jeff McMahan and Peter Singer argue that our moral obligations to animals, both human and non-human, are grounded in the morally salient capacities of those animals. By contrast, what might be called moral relationalists argue that our obligations to non-human animals are grounded in our relationship to them. Moral relationalists are of various kinds, from relationalists regarding assistance to animals, such as Clare Palmer and Elizabeth Anderson, to relationalists grounded in a Wittgensteinian view of human practice, such (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  16
    Yong Li (2013). Hwang, Kwang-Kuo 黃光國, Confucian Relationalism 儒家關係主義. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 12 (1):121-124.
  44.  2
    Richard Arneson (2014). Against Relationalism in Global Justice Theory. Ethics and International Affairs 28 (4):477-487.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  26
    David Weberman (2001). Heidegger's Relationalism. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 9 (1):109 – 122.
  46. Sherry B. Ortner (1995). The Case of the Disappearing Shamans, or No Individualism, No Relationalism. Ethos 23 (3):355-390.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  47.  7
    Barbara Lariviere (1987). Leibnizian Relationalism and the Problem of Inertia. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 17 (2):437 - 447.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Michael Futch (2012). Leibnizian Relationalism and Temporal Essentialism. Studia Leibnitiana 44 (1):60-80.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  57
    Fabian Dorsch (forthcoming). Perceptual Acquaintance and the Seeeming Relationality of Hallucinations. Journal of Consciousness Studies.
    In recent years, it has become popular again to endorse relationalism about perception.1 According to this view, perceptions are essentially relational experiences and thus di er in nature from non-relational hallucinations. In this article, I assume that relationalism is true. The issue that I am generally interested in is rather which version of relationalism we should endorse, given that perceptions are relational. The standard answer to this question is Acquaintance Relationalism, the view that perceptions are relational (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  41
    Jonathan Cohen (2009/2011). The Red and the Real: An Essay on Color Ontology. Oxford.
    The space of options -- The argument from perceptual variation -- Variation revisited : objections and responses -- Relationism defended : linguistic and mental representation of color -- Relationism defended : ontology -- Relationism defended : phenomenology -- A role functionalist theory of color -- Role functionalism and its relationalist rivals.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   30 citations  
1 — 50 / 140