Search results for 'Relevance' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Nancy Cartwright (2009). Evidence-Based Policy: What's to Be Done About Relevance? [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 143 (1):127 - 136.score: 24.0
    How can philosophy of science be of more practical use? One thing we can do is provide practicable advice about how to determine when one empirical claim is relevant to the truth of another; i.e., about evidential relevance. This matters especially for evidence-based policy, where advice is thin—and misleading—about how to tell what counts as evidence for policy effectiveness. This paper argues that good efficacy results (as in randomized controlled trials), which are all the rage now, are only a (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. J. Barrett (1995). Causal Relevance and Nonreductive Physicalism. Erkenntnis 42 (3):339-62.score: 24.0
    It has been argued that nonreductive physicalism leads to epiphenominalism about mental properties: the view that mental events cannot cause behavioral effects by virtue of their mental properties. Recently, attempts have been made to develop accounts of causal relevance for irreducible properties to show that mental properties need not be epiphenomenal. In this paper, I primarily discuss the account of Frank Jackson and Philip Pettit. I show how it can be developed to meet several obvious objections and to capture (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Mark Young (2011). Relevance and Relationalism. Metaphysica 12 (1):19-30.score: 24.0
    This paper will provide support for relationalism; the claim that the identity of objects is constituted by the totality of their relations to other things in the world. I will consider how Kit Fine’s criticisms of essentialism within modal logic not only highlight the inability of modal logic to account for essential properties but also arouse suspicion surrounding the possibility of nonrelational properties. I will claim that Fine’s criticisms, together with concerns surrounding Hempel’s paradox, show that it is not possible (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Deirdre Wilson & Dan Sperber (2002). Truthfulness and Relevance. Mind 111 (443):632583-.score: 24.0
    This paper questions the widespread view that verbal communication is governed by a maxim, norm or convention of truthfulness which applies at the level of what is literally meant, or what is said. Pragmatic frameworks based on this view must explain the frequent occurrence and acceptability of loose and figurative uses of language. We argue against existing explanations of these phenomena and provide an alternative account, based on the assumption that verbal communication is governed not by expectations of truthfulness but (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Stuart Glennan (2009). Productivity, Relevance and Natural Selection. Biology and Philosophy 24 (3):325-339.score: 24.0
    Recent papers by a number of philosophers have been concerned with the question of whether natural selection is a causal process, and if it is, whether the causes of selection are properties of individuals or properties of populations. I shall argue that much confusion in this debate arises because of a failure to distinguish between causal productivity and causal relevance. Causal productivity is a relation that holds between events connected via continuous causal processes, while causal relevance is a (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Yingjin Xu & Pei Wang (2012). The Frame Problem, the Relevance Problem, and a Package Solution to Both. Synthese 187 (S1):43-72.score: 24.0
    As many philosophers agree, the frame problem is concerned with how an agent may efficiently filter out irrelevant information in the process of problem-solving. Hence, how to solve this problem hinges on how to properly handle semantic relevance in cognitive modeling, which is an area of cognitive science that deals with simulating human's cognitive processes in a computerized model. By "semantic relevance", we mean certain inferential relations among acquired beliefs which may facilitate information retrieval and practical reasoning under (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Ronald R. Cox (1978). Schutz's Theory of Relevance: A Phenomenological Critique. Nijhoff.score: 24.0
    CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Relevance was one of the most important concerns in the philosophy of Alfred Schutz. In a sequence of articles dealing with a number ...
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Vladimir L. Vasyukov (2011). Paraconsistency in Categories: Case of Relevance Logic. Studia Logica 98 (3):429-443.score: 24.0
    Categorical-theoretic semantics for the relevance logic is proposed which is based on the construction of the topos of functors from a relevant algebra (considered as a preorder category endowed with the special endofunctors) in the category of sets Set. The completeness of the relevant system R of entailment is proved in respect to the semantic considered.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Anthony Dardis (1993). Sunburn: Independence Conditions on Causal Relevance. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (3):577-598.score: 24.0
    Causally committed properties are properties which require that their instances have a cause (or an effect) of a certain kind. Sunburn, for instance, must be caused by the sun. Causal relevance is a contingent dependency relation between properties of events. The connection between a causally committed property and the property to which it is committed is not contingent. Hence a pair consisting of a causally committed property and the property to which it is committed should not be in the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Jan Dejnožka (2010). The Concept of Relevance and the Logic Diagram Tradition. Logica Universalis 4 (1):67-135.score: 24.0
    What is logical relevance? Anderson and Belnap say that the “modern classical tradition [,] stemming from Frege and Whitehead-Russell, gave no consideration whatsoever to the classical notion of relevance.” But just what is this classical notion? I argue that the relevance tradition is implicitly most deeply concerned with the containment of truth-grounds, less deeply with the containment of classes, and least of all with variable sharing in the Anderson–Belnap manner. Thus modern classical logicians such as Peirce, Frege, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. A. J. B. Fugard, Niki Pfeifer & B. Mayerhofer (2011). Probabilistic Theories of Reasoning Need Pragmatics Too: Modulating Relevance in Uncertain Conditionals. Journal of Pragmatics 43:2034–2042.score: 24.0
    According to probabilistic theories of reasoning in psychology, people's degree of belief in an indicative conditional `if A, then B' is given by the conditional probability, P(B|A). The role of language pragmatics is relatively unexplored in the new probabilistic paradigm. We investigated how consequent relevance a ects participants' degrees of belief in conditionals about a randomly chosen card. The set of events referred to by the consequent was either a strict superset or a strict subset of the set of (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Norbert Paul (1998). Incurable Suffering From the “Hiatus Theoreticus”? Some Epistemological Problems in Modern Medicine and the Clinical Relevance of Philosophy of Medicine. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (3):229-251.score: 24.0
    Up to now neither the question, whether all theoretical medical knowledge can at least be described as scientific, nor the one how exactly access to the existing scientific and theoretical medical knowledge during clinical problem-solving is made, has been sufficiently answered. Scientific theories play an important role in controlling clinical practice and improving the quality of clinical care in modern medicine on the one hand, and making it vindicable on the other. Therefore, the vagueness of unexplicit interrelations between medicine''s stock (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Eunsuk Yang (2013). R and Relevance Principle Revisited. Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (5):767-782.score: 24.0
    This paper first shows that some versions of the logic R of Relevance do not satisfy the relevance principle introduced by Anderson and Belnap, the principle of which is generally accepted as the principle for relevance. After considering several possible (but defective) improvements of the relevance principle, this paper presents a new relevance principle for (three versions of) R, and explains why this principle is better than the original and others.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Sven Ove Hansson (2007). Praxis Relevance in Science. Foundations of Science 12 (2):139-154.score: 24.0
    Science is praxis relevant to the extent that it guides goal-directed action by telling us how to act in order to achieve the goals. Investigations aiming at high praxis relevance are performed in various disciplines under names such as clinical trials, evaluation research, intervention research and social experiments. In this contribution, the notion of (direct) praxis relevance is delineated, and it is distinguished from related properties of science such as those of being applied and being practically useful in (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Barry Smith (1991). Relevance, Relatedness and Restricted Set Theory. In Georg Schurz (ed.), Advances in Scientific Philosophy. 45--56.score: 24.0
    Relevance logic has become ontologically fertile. No longer is the idea of relevance restricted in its application to purely logical relations among propositions, for as Dunn has shown in his (1987), it is possible to extend the idea in such a way that we can distinguish also between relevant and irrelevant predications, as for example between “Reagan is tall” and “Reagan is such that Socrates is wise”. Dunn shows that we can exploit certain special properties of identity within (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Eunsuk Yang (2014). Algebraic Kripke-Style Semantics for Relevance Logics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 43 (4):803-826.score: 24.0
    This paper deals with one kind of Kripke-style semantics, which we shall call algebraic Kripke-style semantics, for relevance logics. We first recall the logic R of relevant implication and some closely related systems, their corresponding algebraic structures, and algebraic completeness results. We provide simpler algebraic completeness proofs. We then introduce various types of algebraic Kripke-style semantics for these systems and connect them with algebraic semantics.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Jaakko Kuorikoski & Petri Ylikoski (2010). Explanatory Relevance Across Disciplinary Boundaries: The Case of Neuroeconomics. Journal of Economic Methodology 17 (2):219–228.score: 24.0
    Many of the arguments for neuroeconomics rely on mistaken assumptions about criteria of explanatory relevance across disciplinary boundaries and fail to distinguish between evidential and explanatory relevance. Building on recent philosophical work on mechanistic research programmes and the contrastive counterfactual theory of explanation, we argue that explaining an explanatory presupposition or providing a lower-level explanation does not necessarily constitute explanatory improvement. Neuroscientific findings have explanatory relevance only when they inform a causal and explanatory account of the psychology (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen (2005). Compositionality, Relevance, and Peirce's Logic of Existential Graphs. Axiomathes 15 (4):513-540.score: 24.0
    Charles S. Peirce’s pragmatist theory of logic teaches us to take the context of utterances as an indispensable logical notion without which there is no meaning. This is not a spat against compositionality per se , since it is possible to posit extra arguments to the meaning function that composes complex meaning. However, that method would be inappropriate for a realistic notion of the meaning of assertions. To accomplish a realistic notion of meaning (as opposed e.g. to algebraic meaning), Sperber (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Patrick Allo (2014). Relevant Information and Relevant Questions: Comment on Floridi's “Understanding Epistemic Relevance”. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 24 (1):71-83.score: 24.0
    Floridi’s chapter on relevant information bridges the analysis of “being informed” with the analysis of knowledge as “relevant information that is accounted for” by analysing subjective or epistemic relevance in terms of the questions that an agent might ask in certain circumstances. In this paper, I scrutinise this analysis, identify a number of problems with it, and finally propose an improvement. By way of epilogue, I offer some more general remarks on the relation between (bounded) rationality, the need to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Frederik Van De Putte & Peter Verdée (2012). The Dynamics of Relevance: Adaptive Belief Revision. Synthese 187 (S1):1-42.score: 24.0
    This paper presents eight (previously unpublished) adaptive logics for belief revision, each of which define a belief revision operation in the sense of the AGM framework. All these revision operations are shown to satisfy the six basic AGM postulates for belief revision, and Parikh's axiom of Relevance. Using one of these logics as an example, we show how their proof theory gives a more dynamic flavor to belief revision than existing approaches. It is argued that this turns belief revision (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. J. B. Paris & P. Waterhouse (2009). Atom Exchangeability and Instantial Relevance. Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (3):313 - 332.score: 24.0
    We give an account of some relationships between the principles of Constant and Atom Exchangeability and various generalizations of the Principle of Instantial Relevance within the framework of Inductive Logic. In particular we demonstrate some surprising and somewhat counterintuitive dependencies of these relationships on ostensibly unimportant parameters, such as the number of predicates in the overlying language.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Sebastian McEvoy (1999). The Construction of Issues: Pleading Theory and Practice, Relevance in Pragmatics, and the Confrontation Stage in the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. [REVIEW] Argumentation 13 (1):43-52.score: 24.0
    Legal theory and practice, particularly on the exchange of pleadings, are referred to as a means of examining current thinking in pragmatics on relevance. The rules of pleadings suggest that the concept of relevance as used in pragmatics is emptied of any meaning and that theories of argumentation have not sufficiently taken into account the preliminary construction which issues to be argued about require.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Mark Vorobej (2012). Moral Hybrids, Moral Relevance and Moral Particularism. Informal Logic 32 (3):306-312.score: 24.0
    Some of Jonathan Dancy's strongest arguments in support of moral particularism depend crucially upon the distinction he draws between three different kinds of relevance relations -- favourers, intensifiers and enablers. In this paper I generalize certain features of Dancy's account of the different roles that premises can play in moral argumentation. Most significantly, I argue that both intensifiers and enablers play parallel roles within different kinds of (more primitive) supplementation relations. This matters since it is common for people to (...)
    Direct download (17 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Jean-Baptiste Van Der Henst, Dan Sperber & Guy Politzer (2002). When is a Conclusion Worth Deriving? A Relevance-Based Analysis of Indeterminate Relational Problems. Thinking and Reasoning 8 (1):1 – 20.score: 24.0
    When is a conclusion worth deriving? We claim that a conclusion is worth deriving to the extent that it is relevant in the sense of relevance theory (Sperber & Wilson, 1995). To support this hypothesis, we experiment with ''indeterminate relational problems'' where we ask participants what, if anything, follows from premises such as A is taller than B, A is taller than C . With such problems, the indeterminate response that nothing follows is common, and we explain why. We (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Derek Allen (1996). Attributed Favourable Relevance and Argument Evaluation. Informal Logic 18 (2).score: 24.0
    I criticize a case made by George Bowles for a certain theory pertaining to the evaluation of arguments on which the (degree of) attributed favourable relevance of an argument's premises to its conclusion is relevant to its evaluation, but nevertheless argue that such favourable relevance is indeed relevant to an argument's evaluation.
    Direct download (14 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Deirdre Wilson & Dan Sperber (2012). Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge University Press.score: 24.0
    When people speak, their words never fully encode what they mean, and the context is always compatible with a variety of interpretations. How can comprehension ever be achieved? Wilson and Sperber argue that comprehension is an inference process guided by precise expectations of relevance. What are the relations between the linguistically encoded meanings studied in semantics and the thoughts that humans are capable of entertaining and conveying? How should we analyse literal meaning, approximations, metaphors and ironies? Is the ability (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. John Woods (1992). Apocalyptic Relevance. Argumentation 6 (2):189-202.score: 24.0
    In their book, Relevance, Sperber and Wilson make an important contribution towards constructing a credible theory of this unforthcoming notion. All is not clear sailing, however. If it is accepted as a condition on the adequacy of any account of relevance that it not be derivable either that nothing is relevant to anything or that everything is relevant to everything, it can be shown that Sperber and Wilson come close to violating the condition.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Arnon Avron (2014). The Classical Constraint on Relevance. Logica Universalis 8 (1):1-15.score: 24.0
    We show that as long as the propositional constants t and f are not included in the language, any language-preserving extension of any important fragment of the relevance logics R and RMI can have only classical tautologies as theorems . This property is not preserved, though, if either t or f is added to the language, or if the contraction axiom is deleted.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Frans H. Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst (1992). Relevance Reviewed: The Case of Argumentum Ad Hominem. [REVIEW] Argumentation 6 (2):141-159.score: 24.0
    This article aims tt providing some conceptual tools for dealing adequately with relevance in argumentative discourse. For this purpose, argumentative relevance is defined as a functional interactional relation between certain elements in the discourse. In addition to the distinction between interpretive and evaluative relevance that can be traced in the literature, analytic relevance is introduced as an intermediary concept. In order to classify the various problems of relevance arising in interpreting, analyzing and evaluating argumentative discourse, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Lisa Galminas & John G. Mersch (2012). A Pretabular Classical Relevance Logic. Studia Logica 100 (6):1211-1221.score: 24.0
    In this paper we construct an extension, ℒ, of Anderson and Belnap's relevance logic R that is classical in the sense that it contains p&p → q as a theorem, and we prove that ℒ is pretabular in the sense that while it does not have a finite characteristic matrix, every proper normal extension of it does. We end the paper by commenting on the possibility of finding other classical relevance logics that are also pretabular.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Fabrizio Macagno (2008). Dialectical Relevance and Dialogical Context in Walton's Pragmatic Theory. Informal Logic 28 (2):102-128.score: 24.0
    The notions of types of dialogue and dialectical relevance are central themes in Walton’s work and the grounds for a dialectical approach to many fallacies. After outlining the dialogue models constituting the background of Walton’s account, this article presents the concepts of dialectical relevance and dialogue shifts in their application to biased argumentation, fallacious moves, and illicit argumentative strategies. Showing the different dialectical proposals Walton advanced in several studies on argumentation as a development of a dialogical system, it (...)
    Direct download (14 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. M. Agnes Rees (1989). Conversation, Relevance, and Argumentation. Argumentation 3 (4):385-393.score: 24.0
    This paper deals with the explanation the maxim of relevance provides for the way utterances in argumentative discourse follow each other in an orderly and coherent fashion. Several senses are distinguished in which utterances can be considered relevant. It is argued that an utterance can be considered relevant as an interactional act, as an illocutionary act, as a propositional act, and as an elocutionary act. These four kinds of relevance manifest the rational organization of discourse, which is aimed (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. [deleted]Tiziana Zalla & Marco Sperduti (2013). The Amygdala and the Relevance Detection Theory of Autism: An Evolutionary Perspective. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7:894.score: 24.0
    In the last few decades, there has been increasing interest in the role of the amygdala in psychiatric disorders and in particular its contribution to the socio-emotional impairments in autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). Given that the amygdala is a component structure of the “social brain”, several theoretical explanations compatible with amygdala dysfunction have been proposed to account for socio-emotional impairments in ASDs, including abnormal eye contact, gaze monitoring, face processing, mental state understanding and empathy. Nevertheless, many theoretical accounts, based on (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Derek Allen (1993). Relevance, Conduction and Canada's Rape-Shield Decision. Informal Logic 15 (2).score: 24.0
    I examine a Canadian Supreme Court decision concerning the constitutionality of Canada's 1982 rape-shield legislation, and suggest how material from the decision might profitably be used in an informal-logic class in connection with the topics of relevance and conductive argument. I also consider theoretical matters related to the decision: first I develop two analyses of what I call an argument from 'unchasteness' and connect them to George Bowles's theory of propositional relevance; then I present Trudy Govier with a (...)
    Direct download (14 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. James B. Freeman (1992). Relevance, Warrants, Backing, Inductive Support. Argumentation 6 (2):219-275.score: 24.0
    We perceive relevance by virtue of inference habits, which may be expressed as Pierce's leading principles or as Toulmin's warrants. Hence relevance in a descriptive sense is a ternary relation between two statements and a set of inference rules. For a normative sense, the warrants must be properly backed. Different types of warrant to empirical generalizations, we introduce L.J. Cohen's notion of inductive support. A to empirical generalizations, we introduce L.J. Cohen's notion of inductive support. A generalization H (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. David Hitchcock (1992). Relevance. Argumentation 6 (2):251-270.score: 24.0
    Relevance is a triadic relation between an item, an outcome or goal, and a situation. Causal relevance consists in an item's ability to help produce an outcome in a situation. Epistemic relevance, a distinct concept, consists in the ability of a piece of information (or a speech act communicating or requesting a piece of information) to help achieve an epistemic goal in a situation. It has this ability when it can be ineliminably combined with other at least (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Jacques Moeschler (1989). Pragmatic Connectives, Argumentative Coherence and Relevance. Argumentation 3 (3):321-339.score: 24.0
    This article is concerned with pragmatic connectives and their uses in discursive argumentation. Three approaches to pragmatic connectives will be presented: (1) argumentation theory, which implies a conception of pragmatics integrated within semantics, and a specific type of argumentative rules, called ‘topoi’; (2) discourse structure theory, which associates a function in the structuring of discourse sequences to pragmatic connectives; (3) relevance theory, which constitutes a cognitive pragmatic theory, in which no specific principle is associated to linguistic items. However, two (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. William Rehg (2009). Cogency in Motion: Critical Contextualism and Relevance. [REVIEW] Argumentation 23 (1):39-59.score: 24.0
    If arguments are to generate public knowledge, as in the sciences, then they must travel, finding acceptance across a range of local contexts. But not all good arguments travel, whereas some bad arguments do. Under what conditions may we regard the capacity of an argument to travel as a sign of its cogency or public merits? This question is especially interesting for a contextualist approach that wants to remain critically robust: if standards of cogency are bound to local contexts of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Scott Jacobs & Sally Jackson (1992). Relevance and Digressions in Argumentative Discussion: A Pragmatic Approach. Argumentation 6 (2):161-176.score: 24.0
    Digressions in argumentative discussion are a kind of failure of relevance. Examination of what actual cases look like reveals several properties of argumentative relevance: (1) The informational relevance of propositions to the truth value of a conclusion should be distinguished from the pragmatic relevance of argumentative acts to the task of resolving a disagreement. (2) Pragmatic irrelevance is a collaborative phenomenon. It does not just short-circuit reasoning; it encourages a failure to take up the demands of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Christopher W. Tindale (1992). Audiences, Relevance, and Cognitive Environments. Argumentation 6 (2):177-188.score: 24.0
    This paper discusses the fundamental sense in which the components of an argument should be relevant to the intended audience. In particular, the evidence advanced should be relevant to the facts and assumptions that are manifest in the cognitive environment of the audience. A version of Sperber and Wilson's concept of the cognitive environment is applied to argumentative concerns, and from this certain features of audience-relevance are explored: that the relevance of a premise can vary with the audience; (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Douglas Walton (1999). Dialectical Relevance in Persuasion Dialogue. Informal Logic 19 (2).score: 24.0
    How to model relevance in argumentation is an important problem for informal logic. Dialectical relcvance is determined by the use of an argument for some purpose in different types of dialogue, according to the ncw dialectic. A central type of dialogue is persuasion dialogue in which one participant uses rational argumentation to try to get the other participant to accept a designated proposition. In this paper, a method for judging relevance in persuasion dialogue is presented. The method is (...)
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. J. Anthony Blair (1992). Premissary Relevance. Argumentation 6 (2):203-217.score: 24.0
    Premissary relevance is a property of arguments understood as speech act complexes. It is explicable in terms of the idea of a premise's lending support to a conclusion. Premissary relevance is a function of premises belonging to a set which authoritatively warrants an inference to a conclusion. An authoritative inference warrant will have associated with it a conditional proposition which is true— that is to say, which can be justified. The study of the Aristotelian doctrine of topoi or (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Erik C. W. Krabbe (1992). So What? Profiles for Relevance Criticism in Persuation Dialogues. Argumentation 6 (2):271-283.score: 24.0
    This paper discusses several types of relevance criticism within dialogue. Relevance criticism is a way one could or should criticize one's partner's contribution in a conversation as being deficient in respect of conversational coherence. The first section tries to narrow down the scope of the subject to manageable proportions. Attention is given to the distinction between criticism of alleged fallacies within dialogue and such criticism as pertains to argumentative texts. Within dialogue one may distigguish tenability criticism, connection criticism, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Douglas N. Walton (1992). Which of the Fallacies Are Fallacies of Relevance? Argumentation 6 (2):237-250.score: 24.0
    This paper looks around among the major traditional fallacies — centering mainly around the so-called “gang of eighteen” — to discuss which of them should properly be classified as fallacies of relevance. The paper argues that four of these fallacies are fallacies primarily because they are failures of relevance in argumentation, while others are fallacies in a way that is more peripherally related to failures of relevance. Still others have an even more tangential relation to failures of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. John Woods (2007). Agendas, Relevance and Dialogic Ascent. Argumentation 21 (3):209-221.score: 24.0
    E. C. W. Krabbe characterizes a metadialogue as a dialogue about a dialogue, which in turn, is characterized as a ground level dialogue. Krabbe raises a number of interesting questions about this distinction, of which the most pressing is whether the difference between ground level and metadialogues can be drawn in a principled and suitably general way. In this note, I develop the idea that something counts as a metadialogue to the extent that it stands to its ground level counterpart (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Mark B. Couch (2011). Mechanisms and Constitutive Relevance. Synthese 183 (3):375-388.score: 22.0
    This paper will examine the nature of mechanisms and the distinction between the relevant and irrelevant parts involved in a mechanism’s operation. I first consider Craver’s account of this distinction in his book on the nature of mechanisms, and explain some problems. I then offer a novel account of the distinction that appeals to some resources from Mackie’s theory of causation. I end by explaining how this account enables us to better understand what mechanisms are and their various features.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Tudor Baetu (2012). Filling in the Mechanistic Details: Two-Variable Experiments as Tests for Constitutive Relevance. [REVIEW] European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (3):337-353.score: 22.0
    This paper provides an account of the experimental conditions required for establishing whether correlating or causally relevant factors are constitutive components of a mechanism connecting input (start) and output (finish) conditions. I argue that two-variable experiments, where both the initial conditions and a component postulated by the mechanism are simultaneously manipulated on an independent basis, are usually required in order to differentiate between correlating or causally relevant factors and constitutively relevant ones. Based on a typical research project molecular biology, a (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Gemma Robles & José M. Méndez (2014). Curry's Paradox, Generalized Modus Ponens Axiom and Depth Relevance. Studia Logica 102 (1):185-217.score: 22.0
    “Weak relevant model structures” (wr-ms) are defined on “weak relevant matrices” by generalizing Brady’s model structure ${\mathcal{M}_{\rm CL}}$ built upon Meyer’s Crystal matrix CL. It is shown how to falsify in any wr-ms the Generalized Modus Ponens axiom and similar schemes used to derive Curry’s Paradox. In the last section of the paper we discuss how to extend this method of falsification to more general schemes that could also be used in deriving Curry’s Paradox.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Andreas Birnik & Jon Billsberry (2008). Reorienting the Business School Agenda: The Case for Relevance, Rigor, and Righteousness. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 82 (4):985 - 999.score: 22.0
    This article contributes to the current debate regarding management education and research. It frames the current business school critique as a paradox regarding the arguments for ‘self-interest’ versus ‘altruism’ as human motives. Based on this, a typology of management with four representative types labeled: unguided, altruistic, egoistic, and righteous is developed. It is proposed that the path to the future of management education and research might be found by relegitimizing the ‘altruistic’ spirit of the classics of the great Axial Age (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. [deleted]Pieter Van Dessel & Julia Vogt (2012). When Does Hearing Laughter Draw Attention to Happy Faces? Task Relevance Determines the Influence of a Crossmodal Affective Context on Emotional Attention. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6.score: 22.0
    Prior evidence has shown that a person’s affective context influences attention to emotional stimuli. The present study investigated whether a crossmodal affective context that is induced by remembering an emotional sound modulates attention to visual emotional stimuli. One group of participants had to remember a positive, negative, or neutral sound during each trial of a dot probe paradigm. A second group of participants also had to encode the valence of the sound. The results revealed that attention was preferentially deployed to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000