Search results for 'Religion and science' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Philip Clayton (2014). The Fruits of Pluralism: A Vision for the Next Seven Years in Religion/Science. Zygon 49 (2):430-442.score: 162.0
    This article offers a vision for work at the intersection of science and religion over the coming seven years. Because predictions are inherently risky and are more often than not false, the text first offers an assessment of the current state of the science-religion discussion and a quick survey of the last 50 years of work in this field. The implications of the six features of this vision for the future of the field are then presented (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Gregg Caruso (2014). Science and Religion: 5 Questions. Automatic Press/VIP.score: 156.0
    Are science and religion compatible when it comes to understanding cosmology (the origin of the universe), biology (the origin of life and of the human species), ethics, and the human mind (minds, brains, souls, and free will)? Do science and religion occupy non-overlapping magisteria? Is Intelligent Design a scientific theory? How do the various faith traditions view the relationship between science and religion? What, if any, are the limits of scientific explanation? What are the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Massimo Pigliucci (2013). When Science Studies Religion: Six Philosophy Lessons for Science Classes. Science and Education 22 (1):49-67.score: 150.0
    It is an unfortunate fact of academic life that there is a sharp divide between science and philosophy, with scientists often being openly dismissive of philosophy, and philosophers being equally contemptuous of the naivete ́ of scientists when it comes to the philosophical underpinnings of their own discipline. In this paper I explore the possibility of reducing the distance between the two sides by introducing science students to some interesting philosophical aspects of research in evolutionary biology, using biological (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Paul Howard Ellson (2006). The Beautiful Union of Science, Philosophy, and Religion. Aasb Media.score: 150.0
    Humankind : a limited company? -- From volume to point: 1. Philosophy, 2. Religion -- Science : specialised but not special -- Cosmic hierarchies -- Consciousness -- Cognition -- In theory -- Back to Genesis -- The beautiful union.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Helen De Cruz (2013). Cognitive Science of Religion and the Study of Theological Concepts. Topoi:1-11.score: 144.0
    The cultural transmission of theological concepts remains an underexplored topic in the cognitive science of religion (CSR). In this paper, I examine whether approaches from CSR, especially the study of content biases in the transmission of beliefs, can help explain the cultural success of some theological concepts. This approach reveals that there is more continuity between theological beliefs and ordinary religious beliefs than CSR authors have hitherto recognized: the cultural transmission of theological concepts is influenced by content biases (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Robert T. Pennock (2011). Can't Philosophers Tell the Difference Between Science and Religion? Demarcation Revisited. Synthese 178 (2):177-206.score: 144.0
    In the 2005 Kitzmiller v Dover Area School Board case, a federal district court ruled that Intelligent Design creationism was not science, but a disguised religious view and that teaching it in public schools is unconstitutional. But creationists contend that it is illegitimate to distinguish science and religion, citing philosophers Quinn and especially Laudan, who had criticized a similar ruling in the 1981 McLean v. Arkansas creation-science case on the grounds that no necessary and sufficient demarcation (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Peter B. Todd (ed.) (2012). The Individuation of God:Integrating Science and Religion. Chiron Publications.score: 144.0
    Todd argues for the integration of science and religion to form a new paradigm for the third millennium. He counters both the arguments made by fundamentalist Christians against science and the rejection of religion by the New Atheists, in particular Richard Dawkins and his followers. Drawing on the work of scientists, psychologists, philosophers, and theologians, Todd challenges the materialistic reductionism of our age and offers an alternative grounded in the visionary work taking place in a wide (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Willem B. Drees (2004). Where to Look for Guidance? On the Nature of "Religion and Science". Zygon 39 (2):367-378.score: 144.0
    . For moral guidance we human beings may be tempted to turn toward the past (scripture, tradition), toward present science, or toward future consequences. Each of these approaches has strengths and limitations. To address those limitations, we need to consider how these various perspectives can be brought together—and “religion and science” is an area in which this may happen. That makes the question of where to look for guidance potentially a central one for religion and science, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Michael Naas (2009). Miracle and Machine: The Two Sources of Religion and Science in Derrida's "Faith and Knowledge". Research in Phenomenology 39 (2):184-203.score: 144.0
    This essay attempts to lay out the three principal theses of Jacques Derrida’s 1994-1995 “Faith and Knowledge,‘ Derrida’s most sustained but also most challenging work on the nature of religion and the relationship between religion and science. After demonstrating through these three theses that religion and science not only share a common source-or have a common genesis-but are in what Derrida calls an autoimmune relationship to one another, the essay puts these theses to the test (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. James H. Fetzer (2011). Evolution and Atheism: Has Griffin Reconciled Science and Religion? Synthese 178 (2):381 - 396.score: 144.0
    The distinguished theologian, David Ray Griffin, has advanced a set of thirteen theses intended to characterize (what he calls) "Neo-Darwinism" and which he contrasts with "Intelligent Design". Griffin maintains that Neo-Darwinism is "atheistic" in forgoing a creator but suggests that, by adopting a more modest scientific naturalism and embracing a more naturalistic theology, it is possible to find "a third way" that reconciles religion and science. The considerations adduced here suggest that Griffin has promised more than he can (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. William Desmond, John Steffen & Koen Decoster (eds.) (2001). Beyond Conflict and Reduction: Between Philosophy, Science, and Religion. Leuven University Press.score: 144.0
    INTRODUCTION Much attention has been devoted to the different tensions and conflicts between science and religion in the modern age. ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Matthew Walhout (2010). Looking to Charles Taylor and Joseph Rouse for Best Practices in Science and Religion. Zygon 45 (3):558-574.score: 144.0
    People discussing science and religion usually frame their conversations in terms of essentialist assumptions about science, assumptions requiring the existence (but not the specification) of criteria according to which science can be distinguished from other forms of inquiry. However, criteria functioning at a level of generality appropriate to such discussions may not exist at all. Essentialist assumptions may be avoided if science is understood within a broader context of human practices. In a philosophy of practices, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. John Hedley Brooke & Ian Maclean (eds.) (2005). Heterodoxy in Early Modern Science and Religion. Oxford University Press.score: 144.0
    The separation of science and religion in modern secular culture can easily obscure the fact that in sixteenth- and seventeenth-century Europe ideas about nature were intimately related to ideas about God. Readers of this book will find fresh and exciting accounts of a phenomenon common to both science and religion: deviation from orthodox belief. How is heterodoxy to be measured? How might the scientific heterodoxy of particular thinkers impinge on their religious views? Would heterodoxy in (...) create a predisposition towards heterodoxy in science? Might there be a homology between heterodox views in both domains? Such major protagonists as Galileo and Newton are re-examined together with less familiar figures in order to bring out the extraordinary richness of scientific and religious thought in the pre-modern world. (shrink)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Willem B. Drees (2013). Islam and Bioethics in the Context of “Religion and Science”. Zygon 48 (3):732-744.score: 144.0
    This paper places “Islam and bioethics” within the framework of “religion and science” discourse. It thus may be seen as a complement to the paper by Henk ten Have () with which this thematic section in Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science opens, which places “Islam and bioethics” in the context of contemporary bioethics. It turns out that in Zygon there have been more submitted articles on Islam and bioethics than on any other Islam-related topic. This (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Taede A. Smedes (2014). Emil Brunner Revisited: On the Cognitive Science of Religion, the Imago Dei, and Revelation. Zygon 49 (1):190-207.score: 144.0
    This article aims at a constructive and argumentative engagement between the cognitive science of religion (CSR) and philosophical and theological reflection on the imago Dei. The Swiss theologian Emil Brunner argued that the theological notion that humans were created in the image of God entails that there is a “point of contact” for revelation to occur. This article argues that Brunner's notion resonates quite strongly with the findings of the CSR. The first part will give a short overview (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Salman Hameed (2012). Walking the Tightrope of the Science and Religion Boundary. Zygon 47 (2):337-342.score: 144.0
    AbstractIslam's Quantum Question by Nidhal Guessoum offers a sophisticated approach to reconciling the results of modern science with Islamic tradition. The book provides a valuable critique of existing literature on Islam and science and advocates the promotion of good science and science education in the Muslim world. A central tension in the book revolves around Guessoum's efforts to promote a version of theistic science, while at the same establishing a clear boundary for science and (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. K. D. Gangrade (2005). Concept of Truth in Science and Religion. Concept Pub. Co..score: 144.0
    Drawing Heavily On The Writings Of Professor D.S. Kothari And Mahatma Gandhi, This Book Analyses The Concept Of Truth In Science And Religion.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Mark Vernon (2007). Science, Religion, and the Meaning of Life. Palgrave Macmillan.score: 144.0
    Have evolution, science and the trappings of the modern world killed off God irrevocably? And what do we lose if we choose not to believe in him? From Newton and Descartes to Darwin and the discovery of the genome, religion has been pushed back further and further while science has gained ground. But what fills the void that religion leaves behind? This book is an attempt to look at these questions and to suggest a third way (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Barbara A. Strassberg (2005). Magic, Religion, Science, Technology, and Ethics in the Postmodern World. Zygon 40 (2):307-322.score: 138.0
  20. Emeritus Professor J. R. Postgate (1996). Science, Morality and Religion: An Essay. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (1):9-16.score: 138.0
  21. William Sweet (2003). Religion, Science, and Non-Science. Dharmaram Publications.score: 138.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Henry Nelson Wieman (1975). Seeking a Faith for a New Age ; Essays on the Interdependence of Religion, Science, and Philosophy. Scarecrow Press.score: 138.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Philip Clayton & P. C. W. Davies (eds.) (2006). The Re-Emergence of Emergence: The Emergentist Hypothesis From Science to Religion. Oxford University Press.score: 126.0
    This volume introduces readers to emergence theory, outlines the major arguments in its defence, and summarizes the most powerful objections against it. It provides the clearest explication yet of this exciting new theory of science, which challenges the reductionist approach by proposing the continuous emergence of novel phenomena.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Koshy Tharakan (2008). Science Amidst Religion: The Politics of Knowledge. Current Science 94 (6):714.score: 126.0
  25. Bernardo Cantens (2006). Peirce on Science and Religion. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 59 (2):93 - 115.score: 126.0
  26. Willem B. Drees (ed.) (2003). Is Nature Ever Evil?: Religion, Science, and Value. Routledge.score: 126.0
    Can one call nature 'evil'? Or is life a matter of eating and being eaten, where value judgments should not be applied? Is nature beautiful? Or is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Scientists often pretend that their disciplines only describe and analyze natural processes in factual terms, without making evaluative statements regarding reality. However, scientists may also be driven by the beauty of that which they study. Or they may be appalled by suffering they encounter, and look for (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Michael Naas (2012). Miracle and Machine: Jacques Derrida and the Two Sources of Religion, Science, and the Media. Fordham University Press.score: 126.0
    Miracle and Machine is a sort of "reader's guide" to Jacques Derrida's 1994 essay "faith and knowledge," his most important work on the nature of religion in general and on the unprecedented forms it is taking today through science and the ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. John Hick (2007). The New Frontier of Religion and Science: Religious Experience, Neuroscience, and the Transcendent. Palgrave Macmillan.score: 126.0
    This is the first major response to the new challenge of neuroscience to religion. There have been limited responses from a purely Christian point of view, but this takes account of eastern as well as western forms of religious experience. It challenges the prevailing naturalistic assumption of our culture, including the idea that the mind is either identical with or a temporary by-product of brain activity. It also discusses religion as institutions and religion as inner experience of (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Taede A. Smedes (2008). Beyond Barbour or Back to Basics? The Future of Science-and-Religion and the Quest for Unity. Zygon 43 (1):235-258.score: 120.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Emile Boutroux (1909/1970). Science & Religion in Contemporary Philosophy. Port Washington, N.Y.,Kennikat Press.score: 120.0
  31. Douglas R. McGaughey (2006). Kant on Religion and Science: Independence or Integration? Zygon 41 (3):727-746.score: 120.0
  32. Ernest William Barnes (1933). Scientific Theory and Religion: The World Described by Science and its Spiritual Interpretation. Cambridge [Eng.],The University Press.score: 120.0
  33. Anne Marie Dalton (2007). The Contribution of Ziauddin Sardar's Work to the Religion-Science Conversation. World Futures 63 (8):599 – 610.score: 120.0
    The article claims that Ziauddin Sardar's contribution to the religion-science conversation is primarily a performance situated in a social location that gives him access to a highly significant perspective. Sardar places Western science within the context of the Western culture from which it emerged and which it continues to serve. The contemporary hegemonous science of today is one form of science. Its acceptance as a universal and objective form enables its users and promoters to exercise (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Holmes Rolston Iii (2006). The Science and Religion Dialogue. In Fraser Watts & Kevin Dutton (eds.), Why the Science and Religion Dialogue Matters: Voices from the International Society for Science and Religion. Templeton Foundation Press.score: 120.0
    are the two most important things in the world. A student promptly objected: "No, Professor, you are wrong. that's sex and money." I convinced him otherwise by the time the semester was over. But I am still trying to convince most of the world- Science is the firss Iact of modern life, and religion is the perennial carrier of meaning. Seen in depth and in terms of their long-range personal and cultural impacts, science and religion are (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. William E. Carroll (1998). Cornell College: Program in Science and Religion. Zygon 33 (2):271-274.score: 120.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Holmes Rolston (1987/2006). Science & Religion: A Critical Survey. Templeton Foundation Press.score: 120.0
    This acclaimed book is back in print with a new introduction by its award-winning author.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Rustum Roy (2002). Religion/Technology, Not Theology/Science, as the Defining Dichotomy. Zygon 37 (3):667-676.score: 120.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Paul Russell Anderson (1933). Science in Defense of Liberal Religion. London, G. P. Putnam's Sons.score: 120.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. David L. Bender (1981/1985). Science and Religion: Opposing Viewpoints. Greenhaven Press.score: 120.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. V. G. Bhide (1982). "I" in Science, Religion, and Everyday Life: Rishabhadas Ranka Memorial Lectures 1979. Board of Extra-Mural Studies, University of Poona.score: 120.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Walter George Bond (1931). Three Things That Matter: Religion, Philosophy, Science. Watts & Co..score: 120.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. W. Russell Brain Brain (1959). Science, Philosophy, and Religion. Cambridge [Eng.]University Press.score: 120.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Edwin A. Burtt (1929). Religion in an Age of Science. Frederick A. Stokes.score: 120.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Raymond B. Cattell (1987). Beyondism: Religion From Science. Praeger.score: 120.0
  45. Hyung S. Choi, David F. Siemens & Shirley E. Williams (eds.) (2001). Naturalism: Its Impact on Science, Religion and Literature. Canyon Institute for Advanced Studies.score: 120.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Richard De Smet, Jean de Marneffe & Job Kozhamthadam (eds.) (1997). Interrelations and Interpretation: Philosophical Reflections on Science, Religion, and Hermeneutics in Honour of Richard De Smet, S.J. And Jean De Marneffe, S.J. [REVIEW] Intercultural Publications.score: 120.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Bailon de Sá (1991). Science and Religion. Bailon De Sá.score: 120.0
  48. Albert[from old catalog] Eagle (1935). The Philosophy of Religion Versus the Philosophy of Science. [Lowestoft, Eng.]Print. For Private Circulation.score: 120.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. George F. R. Ellis (2004). The Science & Religion Dialogue. International Society for Science and Religion.score: 120.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Michael Fuller (ed.) (2012). Inspiration in Science and Religion. Cambridge Scholars.score: 120.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000