Search results for 'René Van Hezewijk' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Terence Cuneo & René Van (2004). Woudenberg. In Terence Cuneo Rene van Woudenberg (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Thomas Reid. Cambridge University Press.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Samenvatting van (forthcoming). De Stem van de St (r) aat. Res Publica.score: 180.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Ryan Nichols (2005). Review of Terence Cuneo and René van Woudenberg: The Cambridge Companion to Thomas Reid. [REVIEW] Journal of Scottish Philosophy 3 (1):83-93.score: 140.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. H. D. Westlake (1962). Siceliot Chronology René van Compernolle: Étude de chronologie et d'historiographie siciliotes. Recherches sur le système chronologique des sources de Thucydide concernant la fondation des colonies siciliotes. Pp. xx+603; 2 maps. Brussels: Institut Historique Beige de Rome, Palais des Académies, 1960. Paper, 320 B. fr. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 12 (03):266-268.score: 140.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Benson Mates (1951). Review: Rene van den Driessche, Sur le "De Syllogismo Hypothetico" de Boece. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 16 (2):150-150.score: 140.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. D. D. Todd (2007). The Cambridge Companion to Thomas Reid Terence Cuneo and René Van Woudenberg, Editors New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004, Xxii + 369 Pp., $70.00, $26.00 Paper. [REVIEW] Dialogue 46 (1):197-199.score: 140.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. M. Schaar (2003). Recensie van: René van Woudenberg, Filosofie van taal en tekst. Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 95:153.score: 140.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Dabney Townsend (2004). Terence Cuneo and René van Woudenberg, The Cambridge Companion to Thomas Reid Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 24 (5):316-319.score: 140.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Marko Barendregt & René Van Hezewijk (2005). Adaptive and Genomic Explanations of Human Behaviour: Might Evolutionary Psychology Contribute to Behavioural Genomics? [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 20 (1):57-78.score: 87.0
    . Evolutionary psychology and behavioural genomics are both approaches to explain human behaviour from a genetic point of view. Nonetheless, thus far the development of these disciplines is anything but interdependent. This paper examines the question whether evolutionary psychology can contribute to behavioural genomics. Firstly, a possible inconsistency between the two approaches is reviewed, viz. that evolutionary psychology focuses on the universal human nature and disregards the genetic variation studied by behavioural genomics. Secondly, we will discuss the structure of biological (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. René van Hezewijk & Edward H. F. de Haan (1994). The Symbolic Brain or the Invisible Hand? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (1):85.score: 87.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. René van Woudenberg (1997). Kennis op basis Van ervaring en kennis op basis Van getuigenis. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 59 (3):407 - 433.score: 58.0
    The thesis developed and defended in this paper is that is it false that all knowledge is founded on experience. Much of our knowledge (or alleged knowledge), it is argued, is based on testimony. Still, many philosophers have either not dealt with testimony at all, or treated it very unkindly. One of the reasons for this is that those philosophers (such as Descartes and Locke) work with a concept of knowledge according to which knowledge is certain, indubitable, and/or self-evident. And (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Rik Peels (2008). De waarde van kennis. Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 100 (2):148-150.score: 58.0
    Na een decennia lange discussie over de afzonderlijk noodzakelijke en tezamen voldoende condities voor kennis is gedurende de afgelopen jaren onder epistemologen een debat ontstaan over de waarde van kennis. Een goede theorie van wat kennis inhoudt, zo is bij velen de gedachte, zal moeten kunnen uitleggen waarom wij waarde(n) hechten aan kennis. Iets nauwkeuriger geformuleerd: een goede kennistheorie zal duidelijk moeten kunnen maken waarom wij meer epistemische waarde hechten aan kennis dan aan waar geloof. Dit probleem wordt wel het (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. René Van Woudenberg (1997). Godsbewijzen en de crisis van het klassieke funderingsdenken. Bijdragen 58 (1):2-28.score: 54.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. René van Woudenberg (2004). Filosofie en de verduistering van het verstand. Philosophia Reformata 69 (2):140-150.score: 54.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. René van Woudenberg (forthcoming). Repliek aan Van Woudenberg, Buekens en Marres. Krisis.score: 54.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. René van Woudenberg (2007). Wat mogen we van een theorie over waarheid verwachten? Philosophia Reformata 72 (1):53-68.score: 54.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Guido J. M. Verstraeten & Willem W. Verstraeten (eds.) (2010). Mijn Thuisplek: Landethiek over geborgenheid en dreiging van ruimte-tijd en diversiteit. Damon.score: 54.0
    Iedereen zoekt geborgenheid in een eigenhuis, een plek onder de zon. Het vinden van een thuisplek is nochtans niet zo idyllisch als René Froger bezingt. Vooral in een multiculturele samenleving is de drang naar een thuisplek hevig. Op die plek exclusieve rechten uitoefenen wars van elke vorm van diversiteit, is een nieuw adagio. Wat voor de ene gemeenschap geborgenheid betekent, vormt voor een andere een regelrechte bedreiging. Hiertegen formuleren de auteurs een alternatieve landethiek in het spoor van Aldo Leopold. (...)
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Rupert Read (1996). Caroline Van Eck, James McAllister and Renee Van De Vall, Eds., The Question of Style in Philosophy and the Arts Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 16 (3):215-217.score: 46.7
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Judith Wambacq (2010). Renée van de Vall. At the Edges of Vision. A Phenomenological Aesthetics of Contemporary Spectatorship. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 72 (1):183-185.score: 46.7
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Marcel Poorthuis (2009). Renee Van Riessen, Man as a Place of God. Levinas' Hermeneutics of Kenosis. Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 101 (1).score: 46.7
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Jean-René Duchesneau (2013). Geert Van Oyen, Lire l'évangile de Marc comme un roman. Traduit du néerlandais par Michel Perquy. Bruxelles, Éditions Lessius (coll. « Le livre et le rouleau », 38), 2011, 175 p.Geert Van Oyen, Lire l'évangile de Marc comme un roman. Traduit du néerlandais par Michel Perquy. Bruxelles, Éditions Lessius (coll. « Le livre et le rouleau », 38), 2011, 175 p. [REVIEW] Laval Théologique et Philosophique 69 (3):654-656.score: 42.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Jo Ann McNamara (2006). Mathilde van Dijk and Renée Nip, Eds., Saints, Scholars, and Politicians: Gender as a Tool in Medieval Studies. Festschrift in Honour of Anneke Mulder-Bakker on the Occasion of Her Sixty-Fifth Birthday. (Medieval Church Studies, 15.) Turnhout: Brepols, 2005. Pp. Viii, 261; Black-and-White Figures and 1 Table. €60. [REVIEW] Speculum 81 (4):1268-1270.score: 40.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Stephen Voss (ed.) (1993). Essays on the Philosophy and Science of René Descartes. Oxford University Press.score: 36.0
    A major contribution to Descartes studies, this book provides a panorama of cutting-edge scholarship ranging widely over Descartes's own primary concerns: metaphysics, physics, and its applications. It is at once a tool for scholars and--steering clear of technical Cartesian science--an accessible resource that will delight nonspecialists. The contributors include Edwin Curley, Willis Doney, Alan Gabbey, Daniel Garber, Marjorie Grene, Gary Hatfield, Marleen Rozemond, John Schuster, Dennis Sepper, Stephen Voss, Stephen Wagner, Margaret Welson, Jean Marie Beyssade, Michelle Beyssade, Michel Henry, Evert (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. René Vincente Arcilla (1993). The Association for Philosophy of Education Symposium: Must Private Selves Be Ironists? A Response to Van Hook. Metaphilosophy 24 (1-2):179-182.score: 36.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. René Boumans (1952). De getalsterkte van Katholieken en Protestanten te Antwerpen in 1585. Revue Belge de Philologie Et D'Histoire 30 (3):741-798.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Margaret van de Pitte (1985). This Is Not a Pipe, with Illustrations and Letters by René Magritte Michel Foucault Translated and Edited by James Harkness Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1983. Pp. X, 66, with 30 Plates. $14.95. [REVIEW] Dialogue 24 (04):742-.score: 36.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. René Boomkens (2000). Empirische filosofie als ontologie van de moderne ervaring. Een pleidooi voor een andersoortige filosofie. Krisis 1 (1):41-48.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. René Boomkens & Wim Dubbink (1999). Het nut en de charme van omwegen. Popmuziek en authenticiteit. Krisis 76:9-21.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. René Lavendhomme, Thierry Lucas & Sequent Calculi (2000). François Lepage, Elias Thijsse, Heinrich Wansing/In-Troduction 1 J. Michael Dunn/Partiality and its Dual 5 Jan van Eijck/Making Things Happen 41 William M. Farmer, Joshua D. Guttman/A Set Theory. [REVIEW] Studia Logica 66:447-448.score: 36.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Mikael van Reis (1988). Begarets strategier: nagra nedslag i René Girards tankande. Res Publica 10:62-72.score: 36.0
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. René van Woudenberg (1999). Thomas Reid on Memory. Journal of the History of Philosophy 37 (1):117-133.score: 28.0
  32. René van Woudenberg (2009). Ignorance and Force: Two Excusing Conditions for False Beliefs. American Philosophical Quarterly 46 (4):373 - 386.score: 28.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. René Van Woudenberg (1998). Panmetaphoricism Examined. Philosophy and Rhetoric 31 (4):231 - 247.score: 28.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. René Van Woudenberg (2006). Perspectives on the Philosophy of W.P. Alston - Edited by Heather D. Battaly and Michael P. Lynch. Philosophical Books 47 (4):360-362.score: 28.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Raymond Wetzels, Rene Wolters, Chris Van Weel & Michel Wensing (2009). Harm Caused by Adverse Events in Primary Care: A Clinical Observational Study. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (2):323-327.score: 28.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. René Van Woudenberg (1994). Review: Alston on Direct Perception and Interpretation. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 36 (2):117 - 124.score: 28.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. René van den Brink & Peter Borm (2002). Digraph Competitions and Cooperation Games. Theory and Decision 53:327-342.score: 28.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. René Görtzen & Frederik van Gelder (1979). Jürgen Habermas: The Complete Oeuvre. A Bibliography of Primary Literature, Translations and Reviews. [REVIEW] Human Studies 2 (1):285-300.score: 28.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. René Jorna & Barend van Heusden (1996). Semiotics of the User Interface. Semiotica 109 (3-4):237-250.score: 28.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. René van Woudenberg (2009). Responsible Belief and Our Social Institutions. Philosophy 84 (327):47 - 73.score: 28.0
    The idea that we can properly be held responsible for what we believe underlies large stretches of our social and institutional life; without that idea in place, social and institutional life would be unthinkable, and more importantly, it would stumble and fall. At the same time, philosophers have argued that this idea is strange, puzzling, beyond belief, false, meaningless or at any rate defective. The first section develops the alleged problem. The burden of this paper, however, is not to discuss (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. René van Woudenberg (2007). Rede en religie in kentheoretisch perspectief. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 69 (4):653 - 680.score: 28.0
    This paper deals with the manifold relations that exist between 'reason' and Christian belief. The plurality of relations is due to the fact that 'reason' can refer to a certain cognitive faculty, a norm, as well as to 'the scientific enterprise'. The author makes three claims in this paper. 1) Even though Christian belief is not, for the most part, a product of the faculty of reason, it does not conflict with the products of reason. 2) Christian belief does not (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Peter Hawke (2011). Van Inwagen's Modal Skepticism. Philosophical Studies 153 (3):351-364.score: 24.0
    In this paper, the author defends Peter van Inwagen’s modal skepticism. Van Inwagen accepts that we have much basic, everyday modal knowledge, but denies that we have the capacity to justify philosophically interesting modal claims that are far removed from this basic knowledge. The author also defends the argument by means of which van Inwagen supports his modal skepticism, offering a rebuttal to an objection along the lines of that proposed by Geirrson. Van Inwagen argues that Stephen Yablo’s recent and (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Marc Alspector-Kelly (2004). Seeing the Unobservable: Van Fraassen and the Limits of Experience. [REVIEW] Synthese 140 (3):331-353.score: 24.0
    I. Introduction “We can and do see the truth about many things: ourselves, others, trees and animals, clouds and rivers—in the immediacy of experience.”1 Absent from Bas van Fraassen’s list of those things we see are paramecia and mitochondria. We do not see such things, van Fraassen has long maintained, because they are unobservable, that is, they are undetectable by means of the unaided senses.2 But notice that these two notions—what we can see in the “immediacy” of experience and what (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Federica Russo (2006). Salmon and Van Fraassen on the Existence of Unobservable Entities: A Matter of Interpretation of Probability. [REVIEW] Foundations of Science 11 (3):221-247.score: 24.0
    A careful analysis of Salmon’s Theoretical Realism and van Fraassen’s Constructive Empiricism shows that both share a common origin: the requirement of literal construal of theories inherited by the Standard View. However, despite this common starting point, Salmon and van Fraassen strongly disagree on the existence of unobservable entities. I argue that their different ontological commitment towards the existence of unobservables traces back to their different views on the interpretation of probability via different conceptions of induction. In fact, inferences to (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Meghan E. Griffith (2005). Does Free Will Remain a Mystery? A Response to Van Inwagen. Philosophical Studies 124 (3):261-269.score: 24.0
    In this paper, I argue against Peter van Inwagen’s claim (in “Free Will Remains a Mystery”), that agent-causal views of free will could do nothing to solve the problem of free will (specifically, the problem of chanciness). After explaining van Inwagen’s argument, I argue that he does not consider all possible manifestations of the agent-causal position. More importantly, I claim that, in any case, van Inwagen appears to have mischaracterized the problem in some crucial ways. Once we are clear on (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Peter van Inwagen (2004). Van Inwagen on Free Will. In Joseph K. Campbell (ed.), Freedom and Determinism. Cambridge MA: Bradford Book/MIT Press.score: 24.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Michael Huemer (2000). Van Inwagen's Consequence Argument. Philosophical Review 109 (4):525-544.score: 24.0
    Peter van Inwagen’s argument for incompatibilism uses a sentential operator, “N”, which can be read as “No one has any choice about the fact that . . . .” I show that, given van Inwagen’s understanding of the notion of having a choice, the argument is invalid. However, a different interpretation of “N” can be given, such that the argument is clearly valid, the premises remain highly plausible, and the conclusion implies that free will is incompatible with determinism.
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Silvio Seno Chibeni (2008). Explanations in Microphysics: A Response to van Fraassen's Argument. Principia 12 (1):49-72.score: 24.0
    http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2008v12n1p49 The aim of this article is to offer a rejoinder to an argument against scientific realism put forward by van Fraassen, based on theoretical considerations regarding microphysics. At a certain stage of his general attack to scientific realism, van Fraassen argues, in contrast to what realists typically hold, that empirical regularities should sometimes be regarded as “brute facts”, which do not ask for explanation in terms of deeper, unobservable mechanisms. The argument from microphysics formulated by van Fraassen is based (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Janez Bregant (2004). Van Gulick's Solution of the Exclusion Problem Revisited. Acta Analytica 19 (33):83-94.score: 24.0
    The anti-reductionist who wants to preserve the causal efficacy of mental phenomena faces several problems in regard to mental causation, i.e. mental events which cause other events, arising from her desire to accept the ontological primacy of the physical and at the same time save the special character of the mental. Psychology tries to persuade us of the former, appealing thereby to the results of experiments carried out in neurology; the latter is, however, deeply rooted in our everyday actions and (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000