Search results for 'Reviewed by Jeff Spinner‐Halev' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1. Heta Aleksandra Gylling (2006). Avigail Eisenberg and Jeff Spinner-Halev, Eds., Minorities Within Minorities: Equality, Rights and Diversity Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 26 (2):94-97.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Jeff Spinner-Halev (2003). William Galston, Liberal Pluralism: The Implications of Value Pluralism for Political Theory and Practice Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 23 (2):105-107.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. D. A. Reidy (2001). The Boundaries of Citizenship: Race, Ethnicity, and Nationality in the Liberal State by Jeff Spinner. Auslegung 25 (1):92-100.
  4. Jerome I. Gellman (1996). Jeff Jordan and Daniel Howards-Snyder, Eds., Faith, Freedom, and Rationality, Philosophy of Religion Today Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 16 (5):355-357.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Jonathan Salem-Wiseman (2001). Mark Wrathall and Jeff Malpas, Eds., Essays in Honor of Hubert L. Dreyfus, Vol. I-II (Heidegger, Authenticity, and Modernity: Heidegger, Coping, and Cognitive Science) Reviewed By. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 21 (4):305-309.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Kenneth A. Bryson (2000). Jeff Malpas and Robert C. Solomon, Eds., Death and Philosophy Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 20 (1):50-52.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. James Thomas (1998). Jeff Mitscherling, Roman Ingarden's Ontology and Aesthetics Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 18 (5):365-366.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  9
    Reviewed by Jeff Spinner‐Halev (2000). Noah M. J. Pickus, Immigration and Citizenship in the Twenty‐First Century. Ethics 110 (4).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Jeff Spinner-Haley (2003). Rob Reich, Bridging Liberalism and Multiculturalism in American Education Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 23 (1):59-61.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Jeff Shantz (2006). Alex Thomson, Deconstruction and Democracy: Derrida's Politics of Friendship Reviewed By. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 26 (3):228-230.
  11. Jeff Shantz (2010). Jeffrey A. Bell, Philosophy at the Edge of Chaos: Gilles Deleuze and the Philosophy of Difference Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 27 (5):315-317.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Jeff Mitscherling (2000). Gene Fendt and David Rozema, Platonic Errors: Plato, a Kind of Poet Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 20 (4):248-249.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Jeff Shantz (2006). Paul Virilio, Negative Horizon: An Essay in Dromoscopy Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 26 (2):143-145.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Jeff McLaughlin (1999). David Porter, Ed., Internet Culture Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 19 (1):51-52.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Jeff Noonan (1995). Steven Best and Douglas Kellner, Postmodern Theory: Critical Interrogations Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 15 (5):306-309.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Jeff Mitscherling (1984). Julius Moravscik and Philip Temko, Eds., Plato on Beauty, Wisdom, and the Arts Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 4 (5):206-209.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Jeff Noonan (2005). James F. Pontuso, Assault on Ideology: Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn's Political Thought Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 25 (4):290-292.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Jeff Shantz (2006). Stephen Eric Bronner, Reclaiming the Enlightenment: Toward a Politics of Radical Engagement Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 26 (4):238-240.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Jeff Foss (1985). Joseph Margolis, Culture and Cultural Entities Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 5 (3):120-123.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Jeff Foss (1981). Richard M. Martin, Primordiality, Science and Value Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 1 (6):268-270.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Jeff Mitscherling (1991). Luc Ferry and Alain Renaut, Heidegger and Modernity Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 11 (3):184-186.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Jeff Foss (1988). Hilary Putnam, Representation and Reality Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 8 (12):491-494.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Jeff Lawrence (2011). Douglas Burnham and Martin Jesinghausen , Nietzsche's The Birth of Tragedy: A Reader's Guide . Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 31 (5):314-316.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Jeff Malpas (1994). Arleen B. Dallery and Charles E. Scott with P. Holey Roberts, Eds., Ethics and Danger. Essays on Heidegger and Continental Thought Reviewed By. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 14 (2):85-87.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Jeff McLaughlin (1993). John Arras and Nancy Rhoden, Eds., Ethical Issues in Modern Medicine, Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 13 (3):68-69.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Jeff McLaughlin (1994). Joseph R. Des Jardins, Environmental Ethics: An Introduction to Environmental Philosophy Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 14 (1):13-14.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Jeff McLaughlin (1992). Michael Yeo, Chief Author, Concepts and Cases in Nursing Ethics Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 12 (2):150-152.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Jeff Mitscherling (1990). Charles K. Griswold, Jr., Ed., Platonic Writings, Platonic Readings Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 10 (1):22-24.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Jeff Mitscherling (1986). John J. Cleary, Ed., Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium In Ancient Philosophy, Volume I: 1985 Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 6 (9):428-430.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Jeff Mitscherling (1990). John McCumber, Poetic Interaction: Language, Freedom, Reason Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 10 (6):245-247.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Jeff Mitscherling (1989). Rüdiger Bubner, Essays in Hermeneutics and Critical Theory Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 9 (6):217-220.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Jeff Mitscherling (1992). Richard Wolin, Ed., The Heidegger Controversy: A Critical Reader Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 12 (5):373-375.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Jeff Mitscherling (1987). Stanley Rosen, Plato's Symposium, Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 7 (11):463-464.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Jeff Noonan (2005). Carol C. Gould, Globalizing Democracy and Human Rights Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 25 (3):183-186.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Anthony Haynes (2012). Writing for Peer Reviewed Journals: Strategies for Getting Published. By Pat Thomson and Barbara Kamler: Pp 190+ 10. Abingdon: Routledge. 2013.£ 90 (Hbk),£ 22.99 (Pbk). ISBN 9780415809306 (Hbk), 9780415809313 (Pbk). [REVIEW] British Journal of Educational Studies 60 (4):452-452.
    It's not easy getting published, but everyone has to do it. Writing for Peer Reviewed Journals presents an insider's perspective on the secret business of academic publishing, making explicit many of the dilemmas and struggles faced by all writers, but rarely discussed. Its unique approach is theorised and practical. It offers a set of moves for writing a journal article that is structured and doable but also attends to the identity issues that manifest on the page and in the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  30
    Margaret Van De Pitte (2005). Peter Atterton and Matthew Calarco, Eds., Animal Philosophy: Essential Readings in Continental Thought Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 25 (4):235-237.
    The editors cull the works of 11 noted French and German philosophers for their contributions to the debate about what animals are like and how we should relate to them. Each selection gives the gist of the philosopher's view followed by a noted scholar's comments. The result, as Peter Singer notes in his merciless Foreward, is that most of the Continentals have had almost nothing of interest to say on the topic.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  31
    Andreea Mihali (2013). Descartes' Meditations—A Critical Guide Detlefsen Karen, Editor Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013; Reviewed By. [REVIEW] Dialogue (4):1-3.
    The Cambridge Descartes’ Meditations—A Critical Guide, a recent addition to the numerous companion texts, guidebooks, introductions and commentaries already available, aims to provide novel approaches to important themes of Descartes’ Meditations by combining contextualism and analysis (of arguments). Organized in four parts (Skepticism, Substance and Cause, Sensations, and The Human Being), the volume contains contributions from (mainly) established scholars of Early Modern Philosophy.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  32
    Andreea Mihali (2011). Vlad Alexandrescu, Ed. , Branching Off: The Early Moderns in Quest for the Unity of Knowledge . Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 31 (3):164-167.
    This collection of essays addresses the topic of the unity of knowledge by analyzing early modern ways of organizing and systematizing knowledge and by bringing to light the complex interactions between the different traditions which contributed to the making of modernity.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  26
    Andreea Mihali (2012). Desmond M. Clarke and Catherine Wilson, Eds., The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy in Early Modern Europe. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 32 (5):365-369.
    This Oxford Handbook examines the radical transformation of worldview taking place in the period from the middle of the 16th century to the early 18th century. The intention of the volume is to cover both well-known and undeservedly less well-known philosophical texts by placing these works in their historical context which includes tight interconnections with other disciplines as well as historical and political events. By proceeding in this manner the editors hope to recover a meaning of “philosophy” that comes closer (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  5
    Asaf Friedman (2015). Israel Bar-Yehuda Idalovichi, Symbolic Forms as the Metaphysical Groundwork for the Organon of the Cultural Sciences. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 35 (3):146-148.
    This ambitious work reclassifies and restructures the history of ideas and the philosophy of culture through a wide-ranging and novel use of the idea of the organon. It does so by radically revising standard interpretations and theories of all branches of philosophy, and by providing an intellectual and philosophical foundation for the new organon of the cultural sciences. The seeded idea that saw its growth in the form of this book is the unshakable conviction that the only way by which (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  3
    Rick Repetti (2015). Christian Coseru, Perceiving Reality: Consciousness, Intentionality, and Cognition in Buddhist Philosophy. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 35 (4):191-193.
    This work focuses on a narrow Buddhist epistemological tradition that begins with the Abhidharma philosopher Vasubandhu’s analyses of perception and is developed by Dignāga, Dharmakīrti, Kamalaśīla, and Śāntarakṣita. Coseru explains how Buddhist epistemology evolved in dialogue with competing conceptions internal to Buddhism and against orthodox Indian philosophies, particularly Nyāya and Mīmāṃsā. Coseru’s main argument is that although widespread interpretations of Buddhist epistemology are foundationalist, a more useful way to understand it is as a form of phenomenology consistent with enactivism and (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  22
    John Dilworth (2000). Joseph Margolis, What, After All, Is a Work of Art? Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 20 (2):129-131.
    This book is the outcome of a series of lectures on art-related topics which Margolis gave in various places, including Finland, Russia, Japan and the USA, from 1995 through 1997. Mainly these lectures vividly distill views which Margolis has developed more fully elsewhere. Also, as his readers know, Margolis has an unusually allencompassing and closely integrated series of views on almost all of the main issues concerning both art and philosophy generally. Thus the task of a reviewer of this book (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  17
    Zac Cogley (2013). Michael McKenna, Conversation and Responsibility. Reviewed by Zac Cogley. Philosophy in Review 33 (6):480-482.
    In this review I present the main claims of McKenna's book Conversation and Responsibility. There McKenna develops a theory of moral responsibility inspired by an analogy with the relationship people bear to each other as part of a conversational exchange. The first half of the book develops the conversational account and considers objections to it. In the second half of the book, McKenna turns to an examination of the kind of normative claim being made when we say that being morally (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  7
    Carl Sachs (2014). Joseph K. Schear (Ed.) , Mind, Reason, and Being-in-the-World: The McDowell-Dreyfus Debate . Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 34 (3-4):167-170.
    Here I review the essays by McDowell, Dreyfus, and many others edited by Schear for "The McDowell/Dreyfus Debate". Topics include the relation between conceptuality and "non-conceptual content", the role of embodied coping in human life, the extent of continuity and discontinuity between humans and other animals, and the legacies of German Idealism and phenomenology.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  8
    Michael J. Raven (2010). David Chalmers, David Manley, and Ryan Wasserman, Eds. Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 30 (3):173-175.
    Chalmers, Manley, and Wasserman's "Metametaphysics" anthology is reviewed.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. John P. Burgess, Reviewed By.
    In this era when results of empirical scientific research are being appealed to all across philosophy, when we even find moral philosophers invoking the results of brain scans, many profess to practice "naturalized epistemology," or to be "epistemological naturalists." Such phrases derive from the title of a well-known essay by Quine,[1] but Paul Gregory's thesis in the work under review is that there is less connection than is usually assumed between Quine's variety of naturalized epistemology and what is today taken, (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  2
    Markku Roinila (2015). Jolley, Nicholas , Causality and Mind: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy . Reviewed By. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 35 (2):97-99.
    Causality and Mind presents seventeen of Nicholas Jolley's essays on early modern philosophy, which focus on two main themes. One theme is the continuing debate over the nature of causality in the period from Descartes to Hume. Jolley shows that, despite his revolutionary stance, Descartes did no serious re-thinking about causality; it was left to his unorthodox disciple Malebranche to argue that there is no place for natural causality in the new mechanistic picture of the physical world. Several essays explore (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  3
    Hasana Sharp (2011). Beth Lord , Spinoza's Ethics . Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 31 (4):290-291.
    The guidebook is meant to be read alongside the Ethics. It thus follows the order of Spinoza’s text and discusses sets of propositions as the development of various strands of argument. It instructs readers to pause and, for example, read Propositions 1-5 of Part 1 together, before moving on to a different component of his argument for the simplicity of substance. Lord dedicates more elaborate discussion to crucial but problematic propositions, like Proposition 11 of Part 1, Proposition 7 of Part (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  7
    Robert Guay, Reviewed By.
    Nietzsche called his sister “llama,” a nickname which, according to her, derived from a description in a children’s biology book. Such a book in the Nietzsche-Archiv declares that “the llama, as a means of defense, squirts its spittle and half-digested fodder at its opponent.”1 Thus we see Nietzsche, as he does frequently in his writings, drawing on the semantic resources made available by the investigation of animal nature and using them to illuminate human character. The editors of A Nietzschean Bestiary (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  8
    Peter Singer, The Moral of the Story Reviewed by James Ley The Age, March 5, 2005.
    Literature and philosophy have a sometimes prickly relationship. And let's be blunt: it is all philosophy's fault. Specifically, it is all Plato's fault. In The Republic, he laid out the rationalist's basic suspicions of literary practice. Literature, he argued, corrupts reason by appealing to the emotions. It trades in appearances and not reality, fiction rather than truth. Not only does it fail to encourage good behaviour, it glamorises bad behaviour, making immorality appealing to the young and impressionable. Until poets could (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000