Search results for 'Revisionism' (try it on Scholar)

336 found
Sort by:
  1. Manuel Vargas (2005). The Revisionist's Guide to Responsibility. Philosophical Studies 125 (3):399-429.score: 24.0
    Revisionism in the theory of moral responsibility is the idea that some aspect of responsibility practices, attitudes, or concept is in need of revision. While the increased frequency of revisionist language in the literature on free will and moral responsibility is striking, what discussion there has been of revisionism about responsibility and free will tends to be critical. In this paper, I argue that at least one species of revisionism, moderate revisionism, is considerably more sophisticated and (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Manuel Vargas (2009). Revisionism About Free Will: A Statement & Defense. Philosophical Studies 144 (1):45 - 62.score: 24.0
    This article summarizes and extends the moderate revisionist position I put forth in Four Views on Free Will and responds to objections to it from Robert Kane, John Martin Fischer, Derk Pereboom, and Michael McKenna. Among the principle topics of the article are (1) motivations for revisionism, what it is, and how it is different from compatibilism and hard incompatibilism, (2) an objection to libertarianism based on the moral costs of its current epistemic status, (3) an objection to the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Manuel Vargas (2011). Revisionist Accounts of Free Will: Origins, Varieties, and Challenges. In Robert Kane (ed.), Oxford Handbook on Free Will, 2nd Edition. Oxford UP.score: 24.0
    The present chapter is concerned with revisionism about free will. It begins by offering a new characterization of revisionist accounts and the way such accounts fit (or do not) in the familiar framework of compatibilism and incompatibilism. It then traces some of the recent history of the development of revisionist accounts, and concludes by remarking on some challenges for them.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Chris Weigel (2012). Experimental Evidence for Free Will Revisionism. Philosophical Explorations 16 (1):31 - 43.score: 24.0
    Philosophers who theorize about whether free will is compatible with causal determinism often rely on ordinary intuitions to bolster their theory. A revisionist theory of free will takes a different approach, saying that the best philosophical theory of what we ought to think about free will conflicts with what we ordinarily do think about free will. I contend that revisionism has not been taken as seriously as should be because philosophers have not realized the extent to which ordinary intuitions (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Manuel Vargas (2009). Revisionism About Free Will: A Statement and Defense. Philosophical Studies 144 (1):45-62.score: 24.0
    This article summarizes and extends the moderate revisionist position I put forth in Four Views on Free Will and responds to objections to it from Robert Kane, John Martin Fischer, Derk Pereboom, and Michael McKenna. Among the principle topics of the article are (1) motivations for revisionism, what it is, and how it is different from compatibilism and hard incompatibilism, (2) an objection to libertarianism based on the moral costs of its current epistemic status, (3) an objection to the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. J. C. Pinto de Oliveira (2007). Carnap, Kuhn, and Revisionism: On the Publication of Structure in Encyclopedia. [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science 38 (1):147-157.score: 24.0
    In recent years, a revisionist process focused on logical positivism can be observed, particularly regarding Carnap’s work. In this paper, I argue against the interpretation that Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions having been published in the International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, co-edited by Carnap, is evidence of the revisionist idea that Carnap “would have found Structure philosophically congenial”. I claim that Kuhn’s book, from Carnap’s point of view, is not in philosophy of science but rather in history of science (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Lene Bomann-Larsen (2009). Revisionism and Desert. Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (1):1-16.score: 24.0
    Revisionists claim that the retributive intuitions informing our responsibility-attributing practices are unwarranted under determinism, not only because they are false, but because if we are all victims of causal luck , it is unfair to treat one another as if we are deserving of moral and legal sanctions. One (moderate) revisionist strategy recommends a deflationary concept of moral responsibility, and that we justify punishment in consequentialist rather than retributive terms. Another (strong) revisionist strategy recommends that we eliminate all concepts of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Tibor Bárány (2013). “This is Not Art” — Should We Go Revisionist About Works of Art? Proceedings of the European Society for Aesthetics 5:86-99.score: 24.0
    To propose a revisionist ontology of art one has to hold that our everyday intuitions about the identity and persistence conditions of various kinds of artworks can be massively mistaken. In my presentation I defend this view: our everyday intuitions about the nature of art can be (and sometimes are) mistaken. First I reconstruct an influential argument of Amie L. Thomasson (2004; 2005; 2006; 2007a; 2007b) against the fallibility of our intuitive judgments about the identity and persistence conditions of various (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Manuel Vargas (2004). Responsibility and the Aims of Theory: Strawson and Revisionism. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85 (2):218-241.score: 21.0
    In recent years, reflection on the relationship between individual moral responsibility and determinism has undergone a remarkable renaissance. Incompatibilists, those who believe moral responsibility is incompatible with determinism, have offered powerful new arguments in support of their views. Compatibilists, those who think moral responsibility is compatible with determinism, have responded with ingenious counterexamples and alternative accounts of responsibility. Despite the admirable elevation of complexity and subtlety within both camps, the trajectory of the literature is somewhat discouraging. Every dialectical stalemate between (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Manuel Vargas (2010). The Revisionist Turn: A Brief History of Recent Work on Free Will. In Jesus Aguilar, Andrei Buckareff & Keith Frankish (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Action. Palgrave.score: 21.0
    I’ve been told that in the good old days of the 1970s, when Quine’s desert landscapes were regarded as ideal real estate and David Lewis and John Rawls had not yet left a legion of influential students rewriting the terrain of metaphysics and ethics respectively, compatibilism was still compatibilism about free will. And, of course, incompatibilism was still incompatibilism about free will. That is, compatibilism was the view that free will was compatible with determinism. Incompatibilism was the view that free (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Attila Tanyi (2009). Desire-Based Reasons, Naturalism, and Tolerable Revisionism: Lessons From Moore and Parfit. Cuadernos de Anuario Filosófico 212:49-57.score: 21.0
    My aim in this paper is to critically assess the idea that reasons for action are provided by desires (the Desire-based Reasons Model or the Model). I start from the claim that the most often employed meta-ethical background for the Model is ethical naturalism; I then consider attempts to argue against the Model through its naturalism. I make use of two objections that are both intended to refute naturalism per se. One is the indirect version of G. E. Moore’s Open (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Ronnie Littlejohn (2014). The Environmental Ethics of Fan Ruiping's Revisionist Confucianism. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 13 (3):403-406.score: 21.0
    Fan Ruiping is engaged in a wide-ranging project to reconstruct Confucianism for the contemporary period. It includes his sustained attack on John Rawls’ theory of distributive justice, various Chinese policies and practices on the delivery of health and elder care, and global business ethics. This paper describes his revised Confucian understanding of environmental morality under the metaphor of nature as garden and man as gardener. I argue the current state of this effort is in need of a more robust appropriation (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Alan Salter & Charles T. Wolfe (2009). “Empiricism Contra Experiment: Harvey, Locke and the Revisionist View of Experimental Philosophy”. Bulletin d'histoire et d'épistémologie des sciences de la vie 16 (2):113-140.score: 18.0
    In this paper we suggest a revisionist perspective on two significant figures in early modern life science and philosophy: William Harvey and John Locke. Harvey, the discoverer of the circulation of the blood, is often named as one of the rare representatives of the ‘life sciences’ who was a major figure in the Scientific Revolution. While this status itself is problematic, we would like to call attention to a different kind of problem: Harvey dislikes abstraction and controlled experiments (aside from (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. J. R. G. Williams (2008). Supervaluationism and Logical Revisionism. Journal of Philosophy 105 (4):192-212.score: 18.0
    In the literature on supervaluationism, a central source of concern has been the acceptability, or otherwise, of its alleged logical revisionism. I attack the presupposition of this debate: arguing that when properly construed, there is no sense in which supervaluational consequence is revisionary. I provide new considerations supporting the claim that the supervaluational consequence should be characterized in a ‘global’ way. But pace Williamson (1994) and Keefe (2000), I argue that supervaluationism does not give rise to counterexamples to familiar (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. D. G. Brown (2010). Mill's Moral Theory: Ongoing Revisionism. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 9 (1):5-45.score: 18.0
    Revisionist interpretation of Mill needs to be extended to deal with a residue of puzzles about his moral theory and its connection with his theory of liberty. The upshot shows his reinterpretation of his Benthamite tradition as a form of ‘philosophical utilitarianism’; his definition of the art of morality as collective self-defence; his ignoring of maximization in favour of ad hoc dealing in utilities; the central role of his account of the justice of punishment; the marginal role of the internal (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. H. W. Noonan (2012). Personal Pronoun Revisionism - Asking the Right Question. Analysis 72 (2):316-318.score: 18.0
    Personal pronoun revisionism (so-called by Olson, E. 2007. What are We? A Study in Personal Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press) is a response to the problem of the thinking animal on behalf of the neo-Lockean theorist. Many worry about this response. The worry rests on asking the wrong question, namely: how can two thinkers that are so alike differ in this way in their cognitive capacities? This is the wrong question because they don't. The right question is: how can (...)
    Direct download (14 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Ted Honderich, Manuel R. Vargas: The Revisionist's Guide to Responsibility.score: 18.0
    Revisionism in the theory of moral responsibility is, roughly, the idea that some aspect of our responsibility practices, attitudes, or concept is in need of revision. In this paper, I argue that (1) in spite of being an increasingly prevalent thread in discussions of moral responsibility, revisionism is poorly understood, (2) the limited critical discussion there has been of it does not reflect the complexities and nuances of revisionist theories, and (3) at least one species of revisionismmoderate (...)- has some advantages over conventional compatibilist and incompatibilist theories. If I am right, one result is that the outcome of prominent debates about the compatibility (or not) of determinism and our commonsense thinking about moral responsibility may be less crucial than they seem. (shrink)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. J. Blandford (2011). An Examination of the Revisionist Challenge to the Catholic Tradition on Providing Artificial Nutrition and Hydration to Patients in a Persistent Vegetative State. Christian Bioethics 17 (2):153-164.score: 18.0
    The Catholic moral tradition has consistently offered the distinction between ordinary and extraordinary means as a framework for making end-of-life decisions. Recent papal allocutions, however, have raised the question of whether providing artificial nutrition to patients in a persistent vegetative state is to be considered ordinary and thus morally obligatory in all cases. I argue that this “revisionist” position is contrary to Catholic teaching and that enforcing such a position would endanger the ability of Catholic health care institutions to minister (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Yemima Ben-Menahem (1995). Pragmatism and Revisionism: James's Conception of Truth. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 3 (2):270 – 289.score: 18.0
    Abstract The paper argues that James's conception of truth is non?revisionist, that is, it sanctions common use of the notion of truth, but criticizes foundation?alist philosophical accounts of that notion. This interpretation conflicts with traditional interpretations of James such as Russell's and Moore's, and contemporary interpretations such as Dummett's, all of which are revisionist. To the extent that objections raised against James's pragmatism depend on such revisionist reading, this paper constitutes a defence of James. The paper argues, further, that non? (...) distinguishes James from logical positivism and contemporary verificationism, and that James seeks to defend rather than renounce metaphysics. On this issue the paper disagrees with Rorty, who ascribes to James an extreme anti?metaphysical stance. (shrink)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Thomas Teo & Laura C. Ball (2009). Twin Research, Revisionism and Metahistory. History of the Human Sciences 22 (5):1-23.score: 18.0
    We understand metahistory as an approach that studies how histories within a particular discipline have been written and focus on insider scientists’ reconstructions of twin research. Using the concept of ethical-political affordances we suggest that such histories are based on a management of resources that prove to be beneficial for representing one’s own research traditions in a positive light. Instead of discussing information on the context and intellectual life of pioneers of the twin method, which include high-caliber eugenicists and Nazi (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. N. -N. Lee (2014). Sublimated or Castrated Psychoanalysis? Adorno's Critique of the Revisionist Psychoanalysis: An Introduction to 'The Revisionist Psychoanalysis'. Philosophy and Social Criticism 40 (3):309-338.score: 18.0
    In ‘The Revisionist Psychoanalysis’, Adorno criticizes the neo-Freudian psychoanalysis for losing the critical edge of Freud’s theory with regard to social critique. Neo-Freudians whom Adorno calls ‘revisionists’ criticize Freud for his ‘mechanical’ views of the human psyche and for his over-emphasis on sexual libido. They reverse Freud’s dictum – ‘where id was, there ego shall be’ – by stressing the importance of development of the ego, and thus that of its adaptive functions. For revisionists, the aim of psychoanalytic practice is (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Philip Gerrans (2012). Dream Experience and a Revisionist Account of Delusions of Misidentification. Consciousness and Cognition 21 (1):217-227.score: 18.0
    Standard accounts of delusion explain them as responses to experience. Cognitive models of feature binding in the face recognition systems explain how experiences of mismatch between feelings of "familiarity" and faces can arise. Similar mismatches arise in phenomena such as déjà and jamais vu in which places and scenes are mismatched to feelings of familiarity. These cognitive models also explain similarities between the phenomenology of these delusions and some dream states which involve mismatch between faces, feelings of familiarity and identities. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Evi Gkotzaridis (2008). Revisionism in the Twentieth Century: A Bankrupt Concept or Permanent Practice? The European Legacy 13 (6):725-741.score: 18.0
    Written in the wake of a critical incident which the author considers worrying and yet characteristic of the times we live in, this article contends that the conflation heretofore evident between critical historical thinking (revisionism) and negationism is ultimately harmful to the historical discipline since it can serve the interests of the deniers and indirectly grant an argument to radical postmodernists who demote history to a loosely constructed form of personal fiction. On the other hand, it also eschews the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Fabrice Pataut, Logical Revisionism: Logical Rules Vs. Structural Rules.score: 18.0
    As far as logic is concerned, the conclusion of Michael Dummett's manifestability argument is that intuitionistic logic, as first developed by Heyting, satisfies the semantic requirements of antirealism. The argument may be roughly sketched as follows: since we cannot manifest a grasp of possibly justification-transcendent truth conditions, we must countenance conditions which are such that, at least in principle and by the very nature of the case, we are able to recognize that they are satisfied whenever they are. Intuitionistic logic (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Elizabeth Rapaport (2013). Classical Liberalism and Rawlsian Revisionism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7 (sup1):95-119.score: 18.0
    (1977). Classical Liberalism and Rawlsian Revisionism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy: Vol. 7, Supplementary Volume 3: New Essays on Contract Theory, pp. 95-119.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Charles T. Wolfe (2010). Rethinking Empiricism and Materialism: The Revisionist View. Annales Philosophici 1 (1):101-113.score: 15.0
    There is an enduring story about empiricism, which runs as follows: from Locke onwards to Carnap, empiricism is the doctrine in which raw sense-data are received through the passive mechanism of perception; experience is the effect produced by external reality on the mind or ‘receptors’. Empiricism on this view is the ‘handmaiden’ of experimental natural science, seeking to redefine philosophy and its methods in conformity with the results of modern science. Secondly, there is a story about materialism, popularized initially by (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Harold W. Noonan (2010). The Thinking Animal Problem and Personal Pronoun Revisionism. Analysis 70 (1):93-98.score: 15.0
    (No abstract is available for this citation).
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Markku Peltonen (1999). A Revisionist History of the Scientific Revolution. Social Epistemology 13 (3 & 4):323 – 330.score: 15.0
  29. C. J. G. Wright (2001). On Being in a Quandary. Relativism Vagueness Logical Revisionism. Mind 110 (437):45--97.score: 15.0
    This paper addresses three problems: the problem of formulating a coherent relativism, the Sorites paradox and a seldom noticed difficulty in the best intuitionistic case for the revision of classical logic. A response to the latter is proposed which, generalised, contributes towards the solution of the other two. The key to this response is a generalised conception of indeterminacy as a specific kind of intellectual bafflement - Quandary. Intuitionistic revisions of classical logic are merited wherever a subject matter is conceived (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Sheila Fitzpatrick (2007). Revisionism in Soviet History. History and Theory 46 (4):77–91.score: 15.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Terence Ball (1995). Reappraising Political Theory: Revisionist Studies in the History of Political Thought. Oxford University Press.score: 15.0
    In this lively and entertaining book, Terence Ball maintains that 'classic' works in political theory continue to speak to us only if they are periodically re-read and reinterpreted from alternative perspectives. That, the author contends, is how these works became classics, and why they are regarded as such. Ball suggests a way of reading that is both 'pluralist' and 'problem-driven'--pluralist in that there is no one right way to read a text, and problem-driven in that the reinterpretation is motivated by (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Samuel Black (1992). Revisionist Liberalism and the Decline of Culture. Ethics 102 (2):244-267.score: 15.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Nicholas K. Jones (2011). Williams on Supervaluationism and Logical Revisionism. Journal of Philosophy 108 (11):633-641.score: 15.0
    Central to discussion of supervaluationist accounts of vagueness is the extent to which they require revisions of classical logic and if so, whether those revisions are objectionable. In an important recent Journal of Philosophy article, J.R.G. Williams presents a powerful challenge to the orthodox view that supervaluationism is objectionably revisionary. Williams argues both that supervaluationism is non-revisionary and that even if it were, those revisions would be unobjectionable. This note shows that his arguments for both claims fail.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Kai Nielsen (1978). On the Very Possibility of a Classless Society: Rawls, Macpherson, and Revisionist Liberalism. Political Theory 6 (2):191-208.score: 15.0
  35. Todd A. Salzman (2001). The Basic Goods Theory and Revisionism: A Methodological Comparison on the Use of Reason and Experience as Sources of Moral Knowledge. Heythrop Journal 42 (4):423–450.score: 15.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Andrew D. Williams (1995). The Revisionist Difference Principle. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 25 (2):257 - 281.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Istvan S. N. Berkeley, A Revisionist History of Connectionism.score: 15.0
    According to the standard (recent) history of connectionism (see for example the accounts offered by Hecht-Nielsen (1990: pp. 14-19) and Dreyfus and Dreyfus (1988), or Papert's (1988: pp. 3-4) somewhat whimsical description), in the early days of Classical Computational Theory of Mind (CCTM) based AI research, there was also another allegedly distinct approach, one based upon network models. The work on network models seems to fall broadly within the scope of the term 'connectionist' (see Aizawa 1992), although the term had (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Jung-Yeup Kim (2011). A Revisionist Understanding of Zhang Zai's Development of Qi in the Context of His Critique of the Buddhist. Asian Philosophy 20 (2):111-126.score: 15.0
    In a comprehensive survey of contemporary scholarship on Zhang Zai's (1020-1077) development of the notion qi ( 'vital energy') in the context of his critique of the Buddhist, I observe that there is a prevalent imposition of a Western concept, namely, 'substance monism', on his understanding of qi . It is assumed that he posits that 'the myriad things ( wanwu )' and 'the vast emptiness ( taixu )' are simultaneously differentiated and unified in that they are but different manifestations (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. David Boucher (1985). Texts in Context: Revisionist Methods for Studying the History of Ideas. Distributor for the U.S. And Canada, Kluwer Academic Publishers.score: 15.0
    Introduction History, Historicism and Hermeneutics In the Phaedrus Socrates argues that the written word is far inferior to the spoken word as a means of ...
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Richard Ashcraft (1996). Book Review:Reappraising Political Theory: Revisionist Studies in the History of Political Thought. Terence Ball. [REVIEW] Ethics 106 (4):868-.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Don Habibi (1998). J. S. Mill's Revisionist Utilitarianism. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 6 (1):89 – 114.score: 15.0
    The article shows that Mill's ethical theory is intimately connected with his theory of human improvement. This can be discerned by analyzing how his utilitarianism differs from Bentham's version. Mill regards the received doctrine as inadequate and he defends it against its critics by making major changes. The article argues that Mill's introduction of qualitative distinctions among pleasures and his emphasis on the higher pleasures were designed to accommodate utilitarianism to his belief in self-cultivation and progress. It concludes that Mill's (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Scott Soames (1995). Revisionism About Reference: A Reply to Smith. Synthese 104 (2):191-216.score: 15.0
    A reply to Quentin Smith's argument (abstracted in this section; 9607133) that important ideas of the "new theory of reference" do not emanate from the work of Saul Kripke, as is commonly assumed, but from an article by Ruth Barcan Marcus (1961). In an analysis of the historical records, Smith's claims are found to be false. It is argued that Marcus's papers do not concern natural language & do not contain defenses of proper names. Kripke's role, unlike that of Marcus, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Stephen Dunn (2009). The Poem, its Buried Subject, and the Revisionist Reader: Behind "the Guardian Angel". Midwest Studies in Philosophy 33 (1):5-10.score: 15.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. John-Michael Kuczynski (2013). Some Non-Revisionist Solutions to Some Semantic Antinomies. Philosophical Inquiry 37 (3-4):51-61.score: 15.0
    It is shown that Russell's Paradox can be solved without advocating the Theory of Types, and also that the Liar's Paradox can be solved in much the same way. Neither solution requires that any of our commonsense-based beliefs be revised, let alone jettisoned. It is also shown that the Theory of Types is false.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Giorgos Antoniou (2007). The Lost Atlantis of Objectivity: The Revisionist Struggles Between the Academic and Public Spheres. History and Theory 46 (4):92–112.score: 15.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Peter S. H. Tang (1986). Communist Ideological Development in Yugoslavia: Anti-Doctrinaire Pragmatic Revisionism and its Impact on Peking. Studies in East European Thought 32 (3):207-224.score: 15.0
  47. Crispin Wright (1981). Review: Dummett and Revisionism. [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 31 (122):47 - 67.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Scott Soames (1995). Revisionism About Reference: A Reply to Smith: Eastern Division Meetings of the APA Boston, December 1994. Synthese 104 (2):191 - 216.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Herman C. Waetjen (2008). A Mélange of Revisionist Kantian Studies. Theoria 55 (115):120-128.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Benjamin D. Crowe (2008). Revisionism and Religion in Fichte's Jena Wissenschaftslehre. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2):371 – 392.score: 15.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 336