25 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Richard E. Ashcroft [24]Richard Edmund Ashcroft [1]
  1. Richard E. Ashcroft (2013). Doing Good by Stealth: Comments on 'Salvaging the Concept of Nudge'. Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (8):494-494.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Richard E. Ashcroft & Mary Dixon-Woods (2011). The Social Forms and Functions of Bioethics in the United Kingdom. In Catherine Myser (ed.), Bioethics Around the Globe. Oxford University Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Richard E. Ashcroft (2008). Inclusion: The Politics of Difference in Medical Research (Review). International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 1 (2):174-178.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Richard E. Ashcroft (2008). Steven Epstein,Inclusion: The Politics of Difference in Medical Research(University of Chicago Press, 2007). International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 1 (2):174-178.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Richard Edmund Ashcroft (2008). Regulating Biomedical Enhancements in the Military. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (2):47 – 49.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Mary Dixon-Woods & Richard E. Ashcroft (2008). Regulation and the Social Licence for Medical Research. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11 (4):381-391.
    Regulation and governance of medical research is frequently criticised by researchers. In this paper, we draw on Everett Hughes’ concepts of professional licence and professional mandate, and on contemporary sociological theory on risk regulation, to explain the emergence of research governance and the kinds of criticism it receives. We offer explanations for researcher criticism of the rules and practices of research governance, suggesting that these are perceived as interference in their mandate. We argue that, in spite of their complaints, researchers (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Richard E. Ashcroft (ed.) (2007). Principles of Health Care Ethics. John Wiley & Sons.
    Edited by four leading members of the new generation of medical and healthcare ethicists working in the UK, respected worldwide for their work in medical ethics, Principles of Health Care Ethics, Second Edition_is a standard resource for students, professionals, and academics wishing to understand current and future issues in healthcare ethics. With a distinguished international panel of contributors working at the leading edge of academia, this volume presents a comprehensive guide to the field, with state of the art introductions to (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Richard E. Ashcroft (2006). Fair Rationing is Essentially Local: An Argument for Postcode Prescribing. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 14 (3):135-144.
    In this paper I argue that resource allocation in publicly funded medical systems cannot be done using a purely substantive theory of justice, but must also involve procedural justice. I argue further that procedural justice requires institutions and that these must be “local” in a specific sense which I define. The argument rests on the informational constraints on any non-market method for allocating scarce resources among competing claims of need. However, I resist the identification of this normative account of local (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Richard E. Ashcroft & Adam M. Hedgecoe (2006). Genetic Databases and Pharmacogenetics: Introduction. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 37 (3):499-502.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Richard E. Ashcroft (2005). Access to Essential Medicines: A Hobbesian Social Contract Approach. Developing World Bioethics 5 (2):121–141.
  11. Richard E. Ashcroft (ed.) (2005). Case Analysis in Clinical Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
    Case Analysis in Clinical Ethics is an eclectic review from a team of leading ethicists covering the main methods for analysing ethical problems in modern medicine. Anneke Lucassen, a clinician, begins by presenting an ethically challenging genetics case drawn from her clinical experience. It is then analysed from different theoretical points of view. Each ethicist takes a particular approach, illustrating it in action and giving the reader a basic grounding in its central elements. Each chapter can be read on its (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Richard E. Ashcroft & Karen P. Gui (2005). Ethics and World Pictures in Kamm on Enhancement. American Journal of Bioethics 5 (3):19 – 20.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Ainsley J. Newson & Richard E. Ashcroft (2005). Whither Authenticity? American Journal of Bioethics 5 (3):53 – 55.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Richard E. Ashcroft (2004). Bioethics and Conflicts of Interest. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 35 (1):155-165.
  15. Richard E. Ashcroft (2004). From Public Interest to Political Justice. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (01):20-27.
  16. Peter E. M. Butler, Alex Clarke & Richard E. Ashcroft (2004). Face Transplantation: When and for Whom? American Journal of Bioethics 4 (3):16 – 17.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Richard E. Ashcroft (2003). Constructing Empirical Bioethics: Foucauldian Reflections on the Empirical Turn in Bioethics Research. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 11 (1):3-13.
    The empirical turn in bioethics has been widely discussed by philosophical medical ethicists and social scientists. The focus of this discussion has been almost exclusively on methodological issues in research, on the admissibility of empirical evidence in rational argument, and on the possible superiority of empirical methods for permitting democratic lay involvement in decision-making. In this paper I consider how the collection of qualitative and quantitative social research evidence plays its part in the construction of social order, and how this (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Richard E. Ashcroft (2003). Kant, Mill, Durkheim? Trust and Autonomy in Bioethics and Politics: Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics: The Gifford Lectures, University of Edinburgh, 2001Onora O'Neill; Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002, Pp. Xiii+ 213, Price£ 40.00 Hardback, ISBN 0-521-81540-1,£ 14.95 Paperback, ISBN 0-521-89453-0. A Question of Trust: The BBC Reith Lectures 2002Onora O'Neill; Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002, Pp. Viii+ 100, Price£ 25.00 Hardback, ISBN 0-521-82304-8,£ 9.95 Paperback, ISBN 0-521-52996-4. [REVIEW] Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 34 (2):359-366.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Richard E. Ashcroft (2003). Kant, Mill, Durkheim? Trust and Autonomy in Bioethics and Politics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 34 (2):359-366.
  20. Udo Schüklenk & Richard E. Ashcroft (2002). Affordable Access to Essential Medication in Developing Countries: Conflicts Between Ethical and Economic Imperatives. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (2):179 – 195.
    Recent economic and political advances in developing countries on the African continent and South East Asia are threatened by the rising death and morbidity rates of HIV/AIDS. In the first part of this paper we explain the reasons for the absence of affordable access to essential AIDS medication. In the second part we take a closer look at some of the pivotal frameworks relevant for this situation and undertake an ethical analysis of these frameworks. In the third part we discuss (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Udo Sch�Klenk & Richard E. Ashcroft (2002). Affordable Access to Essential Medication in Developing Countries: Conflicts Between Ethical and Economic Imperatives1. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (2):179-195.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Richard E. Ashcroft (2001). Money, Consent, and Exploitation in Research. American Journal of Bioethics 1 (2):62-63.
  23. Richard E. Ashcroft (2000). Solidarity, Society and the Welfare State in the United Kingdom. Health Care Analysis 8 (4):377-394.
    Political argument and institutions in the UnitedKingdom have frequently been represented as the products of ablend of nationalistic conservatism, liberal individualism andsocialism, in which consensus has been prized over ideology. This situation changed, as the standard story has it, with therise of Thatcherism in the late 1970s, and again with the arrivalof Tony Blair's ``New Labour'' pragmatism in the late 1990s. Solidarity as an element of political discourse makes itsappearance in the UK late in the day. It has been most (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Richard E. Ashcroft (2000). Teaching for Patient-Centred Ethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3 (3):285-293.
    In this paper three models of teaching and learning medical ethics are discussed critically, the traditional and revised vocational models, and the patient-centred model. The autonomy-oriented patient-centred ethics of Beauchamp and Childress is rejected in favour of a hermeneutic practical ethics. A performative conception of ethics teaching is recommended as the most appropriate model for use in the theory and practice of ethics pedagogy.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Jane L. Hutton & Richard E. Ashcroft (2000). Some Popular Versions of Uninformed Consent. Health Care Analysis 8 (1):41-53.
    A patient's informed consent is required by the Nuremberg code, and its successors, before she can be entered into a clinical trial. However, concern has been expressed by both patients and professionals about the beneficial or detrimental effect on the patient of asking for her consent. We examine advantages and drawbacks of popular variations on consent, which might reduce the stress on patients at the point of illness. Both informed and uninformed responses to particular trials, and trials in general, are (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation