80 found
Sort by:
  1. Branden Fitelson & Richard Feldman (2012). Evidence of Evidence is Not (Necessarily) Evidence. Analysis 72 (1):85-88.
    In this note, I consider various precisifications of the slogan ‘evidence of evidence is evidence’. I provide counter-examples to each of these precisifications (assuming an epistemic probabilistic relevance notion of ‘evidential support’).
    No categories
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Earl Conee & Richard Feldman (2011). Replies. In Trent Dougherty (ed.), Evidentialism and its Discontents. Oxford University Press.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Richard Feldman & Ted A. Warfield (eds.) (2010). Disputing About Taste. Oxford University Press.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Richard Feldman (2009). Evidentialism, Higher-Order Evidence, and Disagreement. Episteme 6 (3):294-312.
    Evidentialism is the thesis that a person is justified in believing a proposition iff the person's evidence on balance supports that proposition. In discussing epistemological issues associated with disagreements among epistemic peers, some philosophers have endorsed principles that seem to run contrary to evidentialism, specifying how one should revise one's beliefs in light of disagreement. In this paper, I examine the connection between evidentialism and these principles. I argue that the puzzles about disagreement provide no reason to abandon evidentialism and (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Richard Feldman, Roderick Chisholm. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Richard Feldman (2009). Thinking, Reasoning, and Education. In Harvey Siegel (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Education. Oxford University Press. 67.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Richard Feldman (2009). Thinking, Reasoning, Teaching, and Learning. Thinking, Reasoning, and Education. In Harvey Siegel (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Education. Oxford University Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Richard Feldman & Ted Warfield (eds.) (2009). Disagreement. Oup.
    Disagreement is common: even informed, intelligent, and generally reasonable people often come to different conclusions when confronted with what seems to be the same evidence. Can the competing conclusions be reasonable? If not, what can we reasonably think about the situation? This volume examines the epistemology of disagreement. Philosophical questions about disagreement arise in various areas, notably politics, ethics, aesthetics, and the philosophy of religion: but this will be the first book focusing on the general epistemic issues arising from informed (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Earl Conee & Richard Feldman (2008). Evidence. In Quentin Smith (ed.), Epistemology: New Essays. Oxford University Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Richard Feldman (2008). Earl Confiee. In Ernest Sosa (ed.), Epistemology: An Anthology. Blackwell Pub.. 310.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Richard Feldman (2008). Modest Deontologism in Epistemology. Synthese 161 (3):339 - 355.
    Deontologism in epistemology holds that epistemic justification may be understood in terms of “deontological” sentences about what one ought to believe or is permitted to believe, or what one deserves praise for believing, or in some similar way. If deonotologism is true, and people have justified beliefs, then the deontological sentences can be true. However, some say, these deontological sentences can be true only if people have a kind of freedom or control over their beliefs that they do not in (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Richard Feldman (2007). Knowledge and Lotteries. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (1):211–226.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Richard Feldman (2007). Knowledge and Lotteries by John Hawthorne. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (1):211-226.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Richard Feldman (2007). Reasonable Religious Disagreements. In Louise Antony (ed.), Philosophers Without Gods: Meditations on Atheism and the Secular. Oup. 194-214.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Richard Feldman (2006). BonJour and Sosa on Internalism, Externalism, and Basic Beliefs. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 131 (3):713 - 728.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Richard Feldman (2006). Clifford's Principle and James's Options. Social Epistemology 20 (1):19 – 33.
    In this paper I discuss William J. Clifford's principle, "It is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence" and an objection to it based on William James's contention that "Our passional nature not only lawfully may, but must, decide an option between propositions, whenever it is a genuine option that cannot by its nature be decided on intellectual grounds." I argue that on one central way of understanding the key terms, there are no genuine options (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Richard Feldman (2006). Epistemological Puzzles About Disagreement. In Stephen Hetherington (ed.), Epistemology Futures. Oxford University Press. 216-236.
    My conclusion will be that, more often than we might have thought, suspension of judgment is the epistemically proper attitude. It follows that in such cases we lack reasonable belief and so, at least on standard conceptions, knowledge. This is a kind of contingent real-world skepticism that has not received the attention it deserves. I hope that this paper will help to bring this issue to life.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Richard Feldman (2005). Deep Disagreement, Rational Richard Resolutions, and Critical Thinking. Informal Logic 25 (1).
    Direct download (15 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Richard Feldman (2005). Justification is Internal. In Steup Matthias & Sosa Ernest (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. Blackwell. 270--84.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Richard Feldman (2005). Review of William P. Alston, Beyond "Justification": Dimensions of Epistemic Evaluation. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (8).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Richard Feldman (2005). Respecting the Evidence. Philosophical Perspectives 19 (1):95–119.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Richard Feldman (2005). Useful Advice and Good Arguments. Informal Logic 25 (3).
    Direct download (15 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Richard Feldman & Earl Conee (2005). Some Virtues of Evidentialism. Veritas 50 (4).
    O evidencialismo é, primordialmente, uma tese sobre a justificação epistêmica e, secundariamente, uma tese sobre o conhecimento. Sustenta que a justificação epistêmica é superveniente da evidência. As versões do evidencialismo diferem quanto ao que conta como evidência, quanto ao que seja possuir algo como evidência e quanto ao que um dado corpo de evidência apóia. A tese secundária é a de que o apoio evidencial é necessário ao conhecimento. O evidencialismo ajuda a formular as questões epistemológicas de uma forma que (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Kris McDaniel, Jason R. Raibley, Richard Feldman & Michael J. Zimmerman (eds.) (2005). The Good, the Right, Life And Death: Essays in Honor of Fred Feldman. Ashgate.
  25. Earl Conee & Richard Feldman (2004). Evidentialism. Oxford University Press.
    Evidentialism holds that the justified attitudes are determined entirely by the person's evidence. This is the traditional view ofjustification.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Richard Feldman (2004). And Knowledge. 1 Armstrong Wrote. In Richard Schantz (ed.), The Externalist Challenge. De Gruyter. 2--143.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Richard Feldman (2004). Comments on DeRose's “Single Scoreboard Semantics”. Philosophical Studies 119 (1-2):23-33.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Richard Feldman (2004). 12 Freedom and Contextualism. In M. O.’Rourke J. K. Campbell (ed.), Freedom and Determinism. Mit. 255.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Richard Feldman (2004). Foundational Beliefs and Empirical Possibilities. Philosophical Issues 14 (1):132–148.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Richard Feldman (2004). Foundational Justification. In Greco John (ed.), Ernest Sosa and His Critics. 2004--42.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Richard Feldman (2004). In Search of Internalism and Externalism. In Richard Schantz (ed.), The Externalist Challenge. De Gruyter. 143--156.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Richard Feldman (2003). Plantinga on Exclusivism. Faith and Philosophy 20 (1):85-90.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Richard Feldman (2003). Chisholm's Internalism and Its Consequences. Metaphilosophy 34 (5):603-620.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Richard H. Feldman & Andrei A. Buckareff (2003). Reasons Explanations and Pure Agency. Philosophical Studies 112 (2):135-145.
    We focus on the recent non-causal theory of reasons explanationsof free action proffered by a proponent of the agency theory, Timothy O'Connor. We argue that the conditions O'Connor offersare neither necessary nor sufficient for a person to act for a reason. Finally, we note that the role O'Connor assigns toreasons in the etiology of actions results in further conceptual difficulties for agent-causalism.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Richard Feldman (2002). Review of Stephen Hetherington, Good Knowledge, Bad Knowledge: On Two Dogmas of Epistemology. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2002 (8).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Richard Feldman & Earl Conee (2002). Typing Problems. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (1):98-105.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Earl Conee & Richard Feldman (2001). Internalism Defended. In Hilary Kornblith (ed.), Epistemology: Internalism and Externalism. Blackwell. 1 - 18.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Richard Feldman (2001). Alvin Goldman Knowledge in a Social World. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (1):163-168.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Richard Feldman (2001). Skeptical Problems, Contextualist Solutions. Philosophical Studies 103 (1):61 - 85.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Richard Feldman (2001). Voluntary Belief and Epistemic Evaluation. In Matthias Steup (ed.), Knowledge, Truth, and Duty: Essays on Epistemic Justification, Responsibility, and Virtue. Oxford University Press. 77--92.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Richard Feldman & Earl Conee (2001). Internalism Defended. American Philosophical Quarterly 38 (1):1 - 18.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Richard Feldman (2000). Kvanvig on Externalism and Epistemology Worth Doing. Southern Journal of Philosophy 38 (S1):43-50.
  43. Richard Feldman (2000). The Ethics of Belief. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (3):667-695.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Richard Feldman (1999). Contextualism and Skepticism. Philosophical Perspectives 13 (s13):91-114.
    In the good old days, a large part of the debate about skepticism focused on the quality of the reasons we have for believing propositions of various types. Skeptics about knowledge in a given domain argued that our reasons for believing propositions in that domain were not good enough to give us knowledge; opponents of skepticism argued that they were. The different conclusions drawn by skeptics and non-skeptics could come either from differences in their views about the standards or conditions (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Richard Feldman (1999). Epistemology, Argumentation, and Citizenship. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 3:89-105.
    In this paper I will examine two issues concerning the nature of arguments, one having to do with the goal of argumentation and the criteria for a good or successful argument and the other having to do with the role of the informal fallacies in effective argument analysis.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Richard Feldman (1997). Review Essay. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (1):205-221.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Richard Feldman (1997). Review: Review Essay. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (1):205 - 221.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Richard Feldman (1996). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] Mind 105 (417):170-176.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Richard Feldman (1995). Authoritarian Epistemology. Philosophical Topics 23 (1):147-169.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 80