28 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Richard Otte [27]Richard E. Otte [1]
  1. Richard Otte (2014). Passionate Reason. Faith and Philosophy 31 (2):160-180.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Richard Otte (2012). And the Problem of Evil. In Jake Chandler Victoria S. Harrison (ed.), Probability in the Philosophy of Religion. Oxford. 127.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Richard Otte (2009). Transworld Depravity and Unobtainable Worlds. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 78 (1):165-177.
    No categories
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Richard Otte (2006). Counterfactuals and Epistemic Probability. Synthese 152 (1):81 - 93.
    Philosophers have often attempted to use counterfactual conditionals to analyze probability. This article focuses on counterfactual analyzes of epistemic probability by Alvin Plantinga and Peter van Inwagen. I argue that a certain type of counterfactual situation creates problems for these analyses. I then argue that Plantinga's intuition about the role of warrant in epistemic probability is mistaken. Both van Inwagen's and Plantinga's intuitions about epistemic probability are flawed.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Richard Otte (2005). A Defense of Hume on Miracles. Hume Studies 31 (1):165-168.
  6. Richard Otte (2005). Robert J. Fogelin. A Defense of Hume on Miracles. Hume Studies 31 (1):165-168.
  7. Richard Otte (2004). Review of Fogelin, A Defense of Hume on Miracles. [REVIEW] Hume Studies 30 (1):165-68.
    With A Defense of Hume on Miracles Robert Fogelin enters the recent discussion on Hume’s treatment of miracles. In this short book Fogelin begins by presenting his interpretation of Hume’s argument concerning miracles. The second chapter is a lengthy treatment of recent work by David Johnson and John Earman, and the third short chapter is a discussion of the relation of Hume’s view on miracles to his broader philosophy. There are also two appendices and the text of “Of Miracles.”.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Richard Otte (2003). Review of Richard Swinburne, The Resurrection of God Incarnate. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2003 (9).
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Richard Otte (2002). Rowe's Probabilistic Argument From Evil. Faith and Philosophy 19 (2):147-171.
    In this article I investigate Rowe's recent probabilistic argument from evil. By using muddy Venn diagrams to present his argument, we see that although his argument is fallacious, it can be modified in a way that strengthens it considerably. I then discuss the recent exchange between Rowe and Plantinga over this argument. Although Rowe's argument is not an argument from degenerate evidence as Plantinga claimed, it is problematic because it is an argument from partitioned evidence. I conclude by discussing the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Richard Otte (2000). Evidential Arguments From Evil. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 48 (1):1-10.
    Recent discussion of the problem of evil has centered around what is known as the probabilistic or evidential argument from evil. According to this argument the evil in our world is evidence against the existence of God, even though evil is logically consistent with God’s existing. Based on this it is claimed it is irrational to believe one of the traditional theistic religions, unless there is overwhelming positive evidence to counter this negative evidence. One of the most important and widely (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Richard Otte (1996). Mackie's Treatment of Miracles. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 39 (3):151 - 158.
    A recent discussion of Hume’s argument concerning the rationality of accepting a belief that a miracle has occurred is given by J. L. Mackie in The Miracle of Theism. Mackie believes that Hume’s argument is essentially correct, although he attempts to clarify and strengthen it. Any version of Hume’s argument depends upon one’s conception of miracles and laws of nature; I will argue that Mackie commits a simple logical error and that given his conception of laws of nature (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Richard Otte (1994). A Solution to a Problem for Bayesian Confirmation Theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (2):764-769.
    Charles Chihara has presented a problem he claims Bayesian confirmation theory cannot handle. Chihara gives examples in which he claims the change in belief cannot be construced as conditionalizing on new evidence. These are situations in which the agent suddenly thinks of new possibilities. I propose a solution that incorporates the important ideas of Bayesian theory. In particular, I present a principle which shows that the change of belief in Chihara's example is due to simple conditionalization.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Richard Otte (1993). Philosophy of Physics. Teaching Philosophy 16 (3):259-260.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Richard Otte (1993). Schlesinger and Miracles. Faith and Philosophy 10 (1):93-98.
    George Schlesinger has recently presented a reply to Hume’s argument concerning miracles. Schlesinger argues that probability theory and some simple assumptions about miracles show that testimony for a miracle increases the probability of God existing; furthermore this testimony can raise the probability of God existing enough that it is rational to believe that God exists. I argue that one of the assumptions that Schlesinger makes is false, and that the justification Schlesinger gives for it does not succeed. Thus I claim (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Richard Otte (1990). Scientific Realism, Perceptual Beliefs, and Justification. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:393 - 404.
    This paper investigates the justification of certain beliefs central to scientific realism. Some have claimed that the underdetermination of a theory by empirical evidence implies that belief in the truth of the theory and in the existence of the corresponding unobservable entities is unjustified. It is argued that the justification of certain realist beliefs is similar to the justification of our perceptual beliefs. Neither are justified by argument from more basic beliefs, and their underdetermination by the evidence does not affect (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Richard Otte (1987). A Defense of Middle Knowledge. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 21 (3):161 - 169.
    tionals, which means that he knows what actions would be necessary for him to perform in order to bring about a certain outcome. Because he is omnipotent, he can do whatever action is necessary to bring about a certain outcome that he desires. His benevolence implies that he will want to actualize the best possible world, or at least a world containing no evil. Given this scenario it is argued..
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Richard Otte (1987). A Theistic Conception of Probability. Faith and Philosophy 4 (4):427-447.
    Although the doctrines of theism are rich enough to support a distinctively theistic conception of probability, historically there has been little discussion of probability from a theistic perspective. In this article I investigate how a theist might view epistemic probability. A unique conception of probability naturally follows from ideas central to theism, and it is argued that this conception of probability avoids many problems associated with other interpretations of probability.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Richard Otte (1987). Critical Discussion: McCall and Counterfactuals. Noûs 21 (3):421-425.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Richard Otte (1987). Indeterminism, Counterfactuals, and Causation. Philosophy of Science 54 (1):45-62.
    In this paper I wish to argue that counterfactual analyses of causation are inadequate. I believe the counterfactuals that are involved in counterfactual analyses of causation are often false, and thus the theories do not provide an adequate account of causation. This is demonstrated by the presentation of a counterexample to the counterfactual analyses of causation. I then present a unified theory of causation that is based upon probability and counterfactuals. This theory accounts for both deterministic and indeterministic causation, and (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Richard Otte (1987). Subjective Probability, Objective Probability, and Coherence. Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):373-380.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Richard Otte (1986). Reichenbach, Causation, and Explanation. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:59 - 65.
    This paper investigates the differences between two conceptions of causation which are claimed to amount for causation in indeterministic situations. Recent analyses of indeterministic causation have been based upon mark transmission, and upon probability relations. Both types of analyses were proposed by Reichenbach, who claimed that they were extensionally equivalent. I demonstrate that they are not equivalent, and discuss some implications of this for models of scientific explanation.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Richard Otte (1985). John Earman, Ed., Testing Scientific Theories Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 5 (4):161-163.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Richard Otte (1985). Probabilistic Causality and Simpson's Paradox. Philosophy of Science 52 (1):110-125.
    This paper discusses Simpson's paradox and the problem of positive relevance in probabilistic causality. It is argued that Cartwright's solution to Simpson's paradox fails because it ignores one crucial form of the paradox. After clarifying different forms of the paradox, it is shown that any adequate solution to the paradox must allow a cause to be both a negative cause and a positive cause of..
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Richard Otte (1983). Critical Review: Brian Skyrms, Causal Necessity. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 44 (3):425 - 433.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Richard Otte (1983). Review: Critical Review: Brian Skyrms, "Causal Necessity". [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 44 (3):425 - 433.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Davis Baird & Richard E. Otte (1982). How to Commit the Gambler's Fallacy and Get Away with It. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:169 - 180.
    In a recent article Ian Hacking argues that there can be cases where no probabilities may correctly be ascribed to individual members of a population, while probabilities are correctly ascribable to the population as a whole. In this paper a simple artificial coin-flipping model for such probabilities, not 'grounded from below' is constructed. The inferences licensed by this model and a consequence of the model for the theory of statistical tests is explored.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Richard Otte (1982). Modality as a Metalinguistic Predicate. Philosophical Studies 41 (2):153 - 159.
    Philosophers generally use the idea of necessity in two ways. One way of looking at necessity is to construe it as a sentential operator. Necessity would operate on sentences in much the same way that the sentential operator of..
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Richard Otte (1981). A Critique of Suppes' Theory of Probabilistic Causality. Synthese 48 (2):167 - 189.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation