20 found
Sort by:
  1. Richard Schantz, Critical Study.
    What is Truth? is a collection of original philosophical articles by many of the central figures in the field. Most of the contributions are focused on deflationism, for and against, although other approaches have a fair airing, and some novel accounts are presented. The intrinsic worth of many of the papers apart, the interest of the collection arises, I think, from its bringing into relief a number of problematic lacunae within the extant deflationisms, which, I predict, will be the main (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Richard Schantz (ed.) (forthcoming). Current Issues in Theoretical Philosophy, V.3, Prospects for Meaning. De Gruyter.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Richard Schantz (ed.) (forthcoming). Prospects for Meaning. de Gruyter.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Richard Schantz (2014). Was Tarski a Deflationist? Logic and Logical Philosophy 6:157.
  5. Richard Schantz (2011). Realism and Relativism. In Richard Schantz & Markus Seidel (eds.), The Problem of Relativism in the Sociology of (Scientific) Knowledge. ontos.
  6. Richard Schantz & Markus Seidel (2011). The Problem of Relativism in the Sociology of (Scientific) Knowledge. ontos.
    This volume comprises original articles by leading authors – from philosophy as well as sociology – in the debate around relativism in the sociology of (scientific) knowledge. Its aim has been to bring together several threads from the relevant disciplines and to cover the discussion from historical and systematic points of view. Among the contributors are Maria Baghramian, Barry Barnes, Martin Endreß, Hubert Knoblauch, Richard Schantz and Harvey Siegel.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Richard Schantz (2010). Anti-Realism. In Sven Bernecker & Duncan Pritchard (eds.), Routledge Companion to Epistemology. New York: Routledge.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Richard Schantz (2009). Goodman on Truth. In G. Ernst, J. Steinbrenner & O. Scholz (eds.), From Logic to Art: Themes From Nelson Goodman. Ontos. 7--171.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Richard Schantz (2008). Review Essay on Sami Pihlström's Solipsism: History, Critique, and Relevance. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (1):268-271.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Richard Schantz (2007). 14 Why Truth is Not an Epistemic Concept. In Geo Siegwart & Dirk Griemann (eds.), Truth and Speech Acts: Studies in the Philosophy of Language. Routledge. 5--307.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Richard Schantz (2005). Die Natur der Intentionalit. Metaphysica 6 (1):5-22.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Richard Schantz (ed.) (2004). The Externalist Challenge. De Gruyter.
    Thus the texts attempt to answer the fundamental questions - of whether there are meanings, and, if there are, of what they are and of the form a serious ...
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Richard Schantz (2001). Truth and Reference. Synthese 126 (1-2):261 - 281.
    The article defends a modern version of the correspondence theory of truth, one which explains the truth of a statement in terms of referential relations between its parts and aspects of the world. Davidson's views on truth are discussed in detail and, in particular, a critical eye is cast over his degradation of the concept of reference which, if successful, would preclude the possibility of developing a full-blooded correspondence theory.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Richard Schantz (2001). The Given Regained: Reflections on the Sensuous Content of Experience. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (1):167-180.
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Richard Schantz (2000). Selbstbewußtsein und Objektbewußtsein bei Kant. Grazer Philosophische Studien 60:151-169.
    In the Paralogisms of Pure Reason Kant casts a critical glance at that doctrine of the soul which was called "rational psychology" by the classical metaphysics of his time, and which can best be understood as a systematic reconstruction of Descartes' theory of mind. Kant agrees with the proponents of rational psychology that our representation of a subject of experience is necessarily the representation of a simple, unitary and persisting subject. But Kant's decisive objection to his opponents is that from (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Richard Schantz (2000). Wie plastisch ist die sinnliche Wahrnehmung? Philosophia Naturalis 37 (1):59-76.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Richard Schantz (1999). William P. Alston, A Realist Conception of Truth. Erkenntnis 51 (2/3):347-351.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Richard Schantz (1999). The Role of Sensory Experience in Epistemic Justification: A Problem for Coherentism. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 50 (2-3):177-191.
    The author argues that coherence views of justification, in spite of their crucial insight into the interpenetration of our beliefs, neglect a key constraint on justification: they are unable to accommodate the epistemic significance of experience. Epistemic justification is not just a function of our beliefs and their interrelations. Both, beliefs and experiences, are relevant to the justification of an empirical belief. Experience is not itself a form of belief or disposition to believe; it cannot be analyzed in doxastic terms. (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Richard Schantz (1998). Verifikationismus und Realismus in der Philosophie des Pragmatismus. Eine Studie zu Peirce und James. Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 52 (3):363 - 382.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation