9 found
Sort by:
  1. Richard W. Lind (1996). Micro-Phenomenology: Toward a Hypothetico-Inductive Science of Experience. International Philosophical Quarterly 36 (4):429-42.
  2. Richard W. Lind (1988). Aesthetic'Sympathy'and Expressive Qualities. In Michael H. Mitias (ed.), Aesthetic Quality and Aesthetic Experience. Königshausen & Neumann. 45--63.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Richard W. Lind (1986). Does the Unconscious Undermine Phenomenology? Inquiry 29 (September):325-344.
    According to Paul Ricoeur, the Freudian unconscious invalidates the ability of Husserlian phenomenology to explicate human psychology. The stumbling block is said to be the mechanism of repression, which can not only obviate conscious access to certain ideas and motives but also distort consciousness itself. The whole enterprise of phenomenology would seem to be at stake. But we must carefully distinguish being a conscious object from being a conscious process. By means of ?micro?phenomenology?, the reflective analysis of focal dynamics, I (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Richard W. Lind (1986). The Priority of Attention: Intentionality for Automata. The Monist 69 (October):609-619.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Richard W. Lind (1984). Microphenomenology and Numerical Relations. The Monist 67 (1):29-45.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Richard W. Lind (1983). Towards a Phenomenological Metaethics. Philosophy Research Archives 9:639-663.
    Hany metaethicists have all but abandoned the possibility that ordinary value language has any sort of universal logic. But careful phenomenological reflection indicates that we call something “good” only if we tacitly believe that it is disposed to be “pragmatically attractive” in some way. Conversely, “bad” things must be “pragmatically repellent”. Linguistic and phenomenological evidence supports these observations. Differences in the meanings of diverse value judgments seem to be due to variations in the practical context in which the attraction or (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Richard W. Lind (1980). Attention and the Aesthetic Object. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 39 (2):131-142.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Richard W. Lind (1979). A Phenomenological Definition of “Good”. Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 10 (1):107-115.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Richard W. Lind (1977). Must the Critic Be Correct? Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 35 (4):445-456.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation