72 found
Order:
  1. Risto Hilpinen (ed.) (1981). New Studies in Deontic Logic. Wiley-Blackwell.
  2.  73
    Risto Hilpinen, Artifact. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  3.  2
    Risto Hilpinen, Artifact. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  4.  43
    Risto Hilpinen (1993). Authors and Artifacts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 93:155 - 178.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   18 citations  
  5. Risto Hilpinen (ed.) (1981). Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings. Sold and Distributed in the U.S.A. And Canada by Kluwer Boston.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   16 citations  
  6. Risto Hilpinen (1992). On Artifacts and Works of Art. Theoria 58 (1):58-82.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  7. Risto Hilpinen (1988). Knowledge and Conditionals. Philosophical Perspectives 2:157-182.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  8.  15
    Risto Hilpinen (2013). Conception, Sense, and Reference in Peircean Semiotics. Synthese 192 (4):1-28.
    In his Logical Investigations Edmund Husserl criticizes John Stuart Mill’s account of meaning as connotation, especially Mill’s failure to separate the distinction between connotative and non-connotative names from the distinction between the meaningful and the meaningless. According to Husserl, both connotative and non-connotative names have meaning or “signification”, that is, what Gottlob Frege calls the sense (“Sinn”) of an expression. The distinction between connotative and non-connotative names is a distinction between two kinds of meaning (or sense), attributive and non-attributive meaning (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  9. Risto Hilpinen (1968). Rules of Acceptance and Inductive Logic. Amsterdam, North-Holland Pub. Co..
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  10.  11
    Risto Hilpinen (1982). On C. S. Peirce's Theory of the Proposition: Peirce as a Precursor of Game-Theoretical Semantics. The Monist 65 (2):182 - 188.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  11.  32
    Risto Hilpinen (1970). Knowing That One Knows and the Classical Definition of Knowledge. Synthese 21 (2):109 - 132.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  12.  25
    Risto Hilpinen (1995). Belief Systems as Artifacts. The Monist 78 (2):136-155.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  13.  30
    Risto Hilpinen (1982). Schlick on the Foundations of Knowledge. Grazer Philosophische Studien 16:63-78.
    This paper outlines the main features of the conception of empirical knowledge presented by Moritz Schlick in his paper 'Über das Fundament der Erkenntnis', and contains a detaüed analysis of Schlick's concept of "Konstatierung". It is argued that in spite of its basically foundationalist appearance, Schlick's theory resembles in important respects contemporary coherence theories of knowledge.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  13
    Risto Hilpinen (1990). Peirce, Goodman and the Aesthetic Sign. Grazer Philosophische Studien 37:177-184.
    Expressions of the form "s represents an F", "s represents t as G", and "s represents an F as G" are analysed by means of C. S. Peirce's and Nelson Goodman's semiotic theories, and these theories are compared with each other. It is argued that Peirce's concept of interpretant provides a plausible account of what Goodman calls the exemplification features of aesthetic signs (works of art).
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  15.  8
    Risto Hilpinen (1975). The Structure of Scientific Inference. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 72 (15):485-491.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  17
    Risto Hilpinen (1973). Carnap's New System of Inductive Logic. Synthese 25 (3-4):307 - 333.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  17.  9
    Risto Hilpinen (1991). Inquiry, Argumentation and Knowledge. In André Fuhrmann & Michael Morreau (eds.), The Logic of Theory Change. Springer 1--18.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  18. Risto Hilpinen (2002). Some Remarks On Self-Deception: Mele, Moore And Lakatos. Florida Philosophical Review 2 (1):82-97.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  19.  48
    Risto Hilpinen (2007). On Practical Abduction. Theoria 73 (3):207-220.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  19
    Risto Hilpinen (1982). On C. S. Peirce's Theory of the Proposition. The Monist 65 (2):182-188.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  21.  12
    Risto Hilpinen (1992). On Peirce's Philosophical Logic: Propositions and Their Objects. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 28 (3):467 - 488.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  22. Risto Hilpinen (1986). The Semantics of Questions and the Theory of Inquiry. Logique Et Analyse 29 (116):523-539.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  23.  15
    Risto Hilpinen (1986). International Union of History and Philosophy of Science Division of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science Bulletin No. 10. Synthese 67 (2):381-382.
  24.  39
    Risto Hilpinen (1983). Skepticism and Justification. Synthese 55 (2):165 - 173.
    This paper discusses the skeptical argument presented by Keith Lehrer in his paper Why Not Scepticism?. It is argued that Lehrer's argument depends on unacceptable premises, and therefore fails to establish the skeptical conclusion. On the other hand, it is also shown that even if the skeptic's opponent (called a dogmatist) knows something, he may be unable to prove this in a way which could convince the skeptic; hence the difficulty of refuting skepticism. The paper also criticises Dretske's attempt to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  20
    Risto Hilpinen (2013). Types and Tokens: On the Identity and Meaning of Names and Other Words. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 48 (3):259-284.
    Charles S. Peirce introduces the distinction between a token and a type into semiotics and philosophy by using as an example two ways of individuating words:(P1) A common mode of estimating the amount of matter in a MS. or printed book is to count the number of words. There will ordinarily be about twenty the's on a page, and of course they count as twenty words. In another sense of the word "word," however, there is but one word "the" in (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  8
    Risto Hilpinen (1973). On the Conditions of Causality. Philosophical Studies 24 (6):386 - 391.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  27. Amedeo G. Conte, Risto Hilpinen, G. H. von Wright & Universität Bielefeld (1977). Deontische Logik Und Semantik.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  28. Risto Hilpinen (2004). On a Pragmatic Theory of Meaning and Knowledge. Cognitio 5 (2):150.
    : According to C. S. Peirce, there are two ways of explaining what a sign means, namely, a definition and a precept. A precept tells the interpreters of a sign what the sign means by prescribing what they have to do in order to find or become acquainted with an object of the sign. A precept for a concept specifies how an interpreter can determine whether the concept is applicable to a given situation or object.Peirce accepted the scholastic definition of (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  29.  16
    Risto Hilpinen (1974). A Note on Necessary-and-Sufficient Causes. Philosophical Studies 26 (5-6):447 - 448.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  30. Risto Hilpinen (2008). Conditionals and Possible Worlds : On C.S. Peirce's Conception of Conditionals and Modalities. In Leila Haaparanta (ed.), The Development of Modern Logic. Oxford University Press
  31.  39
    Risto Hilpinen (2007). On the Objects and Interpretants of Signs: Comments on T. L. Short's. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4).
    : This paper is a commentary on some topics discussed by Thomas Short in his recent book Peirce's Theory of Signs: Peirce's distinction between iconic and indexical signs, the objects of propositions, and different ways of interpreting the distinction between the immediate and dynamic objects of signs. Peirce's distinction between immediate and dynamic objects is in certain respects analogous to Alexius Meinong's distinction between the "auxiliary objects" and the "ultimate objects" ("target objects") of mental representations. It is suggested that the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  23
    Risto Hilpinen & Jaakko Hintikka (1971). Rules of Acceptance, Indices of Lawlikeness, and Singular Inductive Inference: Reply to a Critical Discussion. Philosophy of Science 38 (2):303-307.
  33.  9
    Risto Hilpinen (1987). International Union of History and Philosophy of Science Division of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science Bulletin No. 11. Studia Logica 46 (1):111-112.
  34.  7
    Risto Hilpinen (1988). Preface. Grazer Philosophische Studien 32:1-1.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  18
    Risto Hilpinen (2007). On the Objects and Interpretants of Signs: Comments on T. L. Short's Peirce's Theory of Signs. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4):610 - 618.
    This paper is a commentary on some topics discussed by Thomas Short in his recent book Peirce's Theory of Signs: Peirce's distinction between iconic and indexical signs, the objects of propositions, and different ways of interpreting the distinction between the immediate and dynamic objects of signs. Peirce's distinction between immediate and dynamic objects is in certain respects analogous to Alexius Meinong's distinction between the "auxiliary objects" and the "ultimate objects" ("target objects") of mental representations. It is suggested that the models (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  6
    Risto Hilpinen (2012). 2012 Presidential Address: Types and Tokens: On the Identity and Meaning of Names and Other Words. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 48 (3):259-284.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  13
    Risto Hilpinen (1971). Relational Hypotheses and Inductive Inference. Synthese 23 (2-3):266 - 286.
  38. Risto Hilpinen (1981). New Studies in Deontic Logic Norms, Actions, and the Foundations of Ethics.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  39.  17
    Risto Hilpinen (2005). Review: Notes on The Cambridge Companion to Peirce. [REVIEW] Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 41 (4):740-761.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  23
    Risto Hilpinen (1990). International Union of History and Philosophy of Science; Division of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science Bulletin No. 14. Synthese 85 (1):179-183.
  41.  2
    Robert Demolombe & Risto Hilpinen (2000). Preface. Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 5 (2):63-64.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  12
    Risto Hilpinen (1977). Remarks on Personal and Impersonal Knowledge. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7 (1):1-9.
    THIS PAPER DISCUSSES A CONCEPT OF IMPERSONAL KNOWLEDGE ('Kp') SATISFYING THE PRINCIPLE ('K subscript a'p implies Kp), BUT NOT ITS CONVERSE. IT IS ARGUED THAT SEVERAL GETTIER-TYPE COUNTEREXAMPLES TO THE CLASSICAL ANALYSIS KNOWLEDGE (ESPECIALLY THOSE DEPENDING UPON THE 'SOCIAL' ASPECT OF KNOWLEDGE) CAN BE ACCOUNTED FOR IN TERMS OF THE ABOVE PRINCIPLE.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  3
    Risto Hilpinen (2004). Peirce's logic. In Dov M. Gabbay, John Woods & Akihiro Kanamori (eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic. Elsevier 3--611.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  15
    Risto Hilpinen (1991). International Union of History and Philosophy of Science Division of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science Bulletin No. 15. Synthese 88 (1):113-115.
  45.  10
    Risto Hilpinen, Leonard Carrier, Howard Pospesel & Noah Lemos (2006). Ramon M. Lemos, 1927-2006. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 79 (5):129 - 130.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  9
    Risto Hilpinen (1985). Preface. Law and Philosophy 4 (2):143-144.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  10
    Howard Smokler, R. Harré & Risto Hilpinen (1971). Reviews. [REVIEW] Synthese 23 (2-3):327-346.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  2
    Risto Hilpinen (2011). Remarks on the Iconicity and Interpretation of Existential Graphs. Semiotica 2011 (186):169-187.
    In the 1890s, Peirce reformulated quantification theory by expressing it in a language of diagrams, called existential graphs. Peirce thought that the iconicity of his graphs made them suitable for analyzing logical reasoning. Iconic signs can be said to show their meaning, and this paper studies the ways in which graphs do this. Peirce's pragmatic analysis of propositions resembles game-theoretical semantics, and existential graphs show what they mean by displaying the structure of the semantic game for the proposition represented by (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  2
    Risto Hilpinen (forthcoming). Occasions for Argumentation. Communication and Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly Journal.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  2
    Risto Hilpinen (1973). Review: E. J. Lemmon, If I Know, Do I Know That I Know? [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 38 (4):662-662.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 72