Search results for 'Rob van Someren Greve' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Samenvatting van (forthcoming). De Stem van de St (r) aat. Res Publica.score: 120.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Rob van Someren Greve (2013). Objective Consequentialism and Avoidable Imperfections. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (3):481-492.score: 50.3
    There are two distinct views on how to formulate an objective consequentialist account of the deontic status of actions, actualism and possibilism. On an actualist account, what matters to the deontic status of actions is only the value of the outcome an action would have, if performed. By contrast, a possibilist account also takes into account the value of the outcomes that an action could have. These two views come apart in their deontic verdicts when an agent is imperfect in (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Rob van Someren Greve (2011). Wishful Thinking in Moral Theorizing: Comment on Enoch. Utilitas 23 (04):447-450.score: 50.3
    David Enoch recently defended the idea that there are valid inferences of the form ‘it would be good if p, therefore, p’. I argue that Enoch's proposal allows us to infer the absurd conclusion that ours is the best of all possible worlds.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Rob van Someren Greve (2014). The Value of Practical Usefulness. Philosophical Studies 168 (1):167-177.score: 50.3
    Some moral theories, such as objective forms of consequentialism, seem to fail to be practically useful: they are of little to no help in trying to decide what to do. Even if we do not think this constitutes a fatal flaw in such theories, we may nonetheless agree that being practically useful does make a moral theory a better theory, or so some have suggested. In this paper, I assess whether the uncontroversial respect in which a moral theory can be (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Rob van Someren Greve (2012). Can Reasons Be Self-Undermining? Philosophia 40 (2):411-414.score: 50.3
    The characterization of objective, normative reasons to φ as facts (or truths) that count in favor of φ-ing is widely accepted. But are there any further conditions that considerations which count in favor of φ-ing must meet, in order to count as a reason to φ? In this brief paper, I consider and reject one such condition, recently proposed by Caspar Hare.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Rob van Someren Greve (forthcoming). 'Ought', 'Can', and Fairness. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice:1-10.score: 50.3
    According to the principle that ‘ought’ implies ‘can’, it is never the case that you ought to do something you cannot do. While many accept this principle in some form, it also has its share of critics, and thus it seems desirable if an argument can be offered in its support. The aim of this paper is to examine a particular way in which the principle has been defended, namely, by appeal to considerations of fairness. In a nutshell, the idea (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Eveline Seghers (forthcoming). De relevantie van evolutietheorie voor esthetica: een reactie op Rob Van Gerwen. Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Wijsbegeerte.score: 40.5
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Mark Starr (2003). Rob van Gerwen, Ed., Richard Wollheim on the Art of Painting: Art as Representation and Expression Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 23 (3):222-224.score: 40.5
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. David Hills (2002). Review of Van Gerwen, Rob (Ed.), Richard Wollheim on the Art of Painting: Art As Representation and Expression. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2002 (8).score: 36.0
  10. Robert W. Binkley (1998). Johan van Benthem, Frans H. Van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst and Frank Veltman (Eds.), Logic and Argumentation. Argumentation 12 (4):508-512.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Kirsten M. Christensen (2003). Rob Faesen, Begeerte in het werk van Hadewijch. (Antwerpse Studies over Nederlandse Literatuurgeschiedenis, 4.) Leuven: Peeters, 2000. Paper. Pp. xvi, 396. [REVIEW] Speculum 78 (4):1286.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. David M. Godden (2005). Frans H. Van Eemeren and Rob Grootendorst, A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 25 (1):72-75.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Claude Gratton (2004). Eemeren, Frans H. Van, Grootendorst, Rob and Snoeck Henkemans, A. Francisca (2002). Argumentation 18 (4):489-494.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. F. J. Kauffeld (1996). Frans H. Van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, Sally Jackson, and Scott Jacobs, Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse. Argumentation 10:129-137.score: 36.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Manfred Kienpointner (1998). Frans H. Van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans Et Alia, Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Background and Contemporary Developments. [REVIEW] Argumentation 12 (1):127-133.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Maciej Koszowski (2007). Frans H. Van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The Pragma-Dialectical Approach, Cambridge 2004. Roczniki Filozoficzne:303-309.score: 36.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. J. M. Makau (1995). Frans H. Van Eemeren and Rob Grootendorst. Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Rhetoric 28:426-430.score: 36.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. R. C. Pinto (1996). Frans H. Van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair, and Charles A.(Eds.), Willard Argumentation Illuminated. Argumentation 10:414-419.score: 36.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Douglas N. Walton (1998). Brassart) Frans H. Van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans Et Al., Fundamentals of Argumen-Tation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Background and Contemporary Developments (Manfred Kien. [REVIEW] Argumentation 12:513-516.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Anne C. Van Helden, Rob H. Van Gent & A. Meskens (1997). Booklets: Christiaan Huygens, 1629-1695; Een vernuftig geleerde: de technische vonsten van C. Huygens; and The Huygens Collection. [REVIEW] Annals of Science 54 (3):312.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Rob van Gerwen (2013). Wachten op beeld.: De tragische retorica van Iconische foto's. Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Wijsbegeerte 105 (1):40-54.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Peter Hawke (2011). Van Inwagen's Modal Skepticism. Philosophical Studies 153 (3):351-364.score: 18.0
    In this paper, the author defends Peter van Inwagen’s modal skepticism. Van Inwagen accepts that we have much basic, everyday modal knowledge, but denies that we have the capacity to justify philosophically interesting modal claims that are far removed from this basic knowledge. The author also defends the argument by means of which van Inwagen supports his modal skepticism, offering a rebuttal to an objection along the lines of that proposed by Geirrson. Van Inwagen argues that Stephen Yablo’s recent and (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Marc Alspector-Kelly (2004). Seeing the Unobservable: Van Fraassen and the Limits of Experience. [REVIEW] Synthese 140 (3):331-353.score: 18.0
    I. Introduction “We can and do see the truth about many things: ourselves, others, trees and animals, clouds and rivers—in the immediacy of experience.”1 Absent from Bas van Fraassen’s list of those things we see are paramecia and mitochondria. We do not see such things, van Fraassen has long maintained, because they are unobservable, that is, they are undetectable by means of the unaided senses.2 But notice that these two notions—what we can see in the “immediacy” of experience and what (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Meghan E. Griffith (2005). Does Free Will Remain a Mystery? A Response to Van Inwagen. Philosophical Studies 124 (3):261-269.score: 18.0
    In this paper, I argue against Peter van Inwagen’s claim (in “Free Will Remains a Mystery”), that agent-causal views of free will could do nothing to solve the problem of free will (specifically, the problem of chanciness). After explaining van Inwagen’s argument, I argue that he does not consider all possible manifestations of the agent-causal position. More importantly, I claim that, in any case, van Inwagen appears to have mischaracterized the problem in some crucial ways. Once we are clear on (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Peter van Inwagen (2004). Van Inwagen on Free Will. In Joseph K. Campbell (ed.), Freedom and Determinism. Cambridge MA: Bradford Book/MIT Press.score: 18.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Federica Russo (2006). Salmon and Van Fraassen on the Existence of Unobservable Entities: A Matter of Interpretation of Probability. [REVIEW] Foundations of Science 11 (3):221-247.score: 18.0
    A careful analysis of Salmon’s Theoretical Realism and van Fraassen’s Constructive Empiricism shows that both share a common origin: the requirement of literal construal of theories inherited by the Standard View. However, despite this common starting point, Salmon and van Fraassen strongly disagree on the existence of unobservable entities. I argue that their different ontological commitment towards the existence of unobservables traces back to their different views on the interpretation of probability via different conceptions of induction. In fact, inferences to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Michael Huemer (2000). Van Inwagen's Consequence Argument. Philosophical Review 109 (4):525-544.score: 18.0
    Peter van Inwagen’s argument for incompatibilism uses a sentential operator, “N”, which can be read as “No one has any choice about the fact that . . . .” I show that, given van Inwagen’s understanding of the notion of having a choice, the argument is invalid. However, a different interpretation of “N” can be given, such that the argument is clearly valid, the premises remain highly plausible, and the conclusion implies that free will is incompatible with determinism.
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Janez Bregant (2004). Van Gulick's Solution of the Exclusion Problem Revisited. Acta Analytica 19 (33):83-94.score: 18.0
    The anti-reductionist who wants to preserve the causal efficacy of mental phenomena faces several problems in regard to mental causation, i.e. mental events which cause other events, arising from her desire to accept the ontological primacy of the physical and at the same time save the special character of the mental. Psychology tries to persuade us of the former, appealing thereby to the results of experiments carried out in neurology; the latter is, however, deeply rooted in our everyday actions and (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Silvio Seno Chibeni (2008). Explanations in Microphysics: A Response to van Fraassen's Argument. Principia 12 (1):49-72.score: 18.0
    http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2008v12n1p49 The aim of this article is to offer a rejoinder to an argument against scientific realism put forward by van Fraassen, based on theoretical considerations regarding microphysics. At a certain stage of his general attack to scientific realism, van Fraassen argues, in contrast to what realists typically hold, that empirical regularities should sometimes be regarded as “brute facts”, which do not ask for explanation in terms of deeper, unobservable mechanisms. The argument from microphysics formulated by van Fraassen is based (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Mitchell O. Stokes (2007). Van Inwagen and the Quine-Putnam Indispensability Argument. Erkenntnis 67 (3):439 - 453.score: 18.0
    In this paper I do two things: (1) I support the claim that there is still some confusion about just what the Quine-Putnam indispensability argument is and the way it employs Quinean meta-ontology and (2) I try to dispel some of this confusion by presenting the argument in a way which reveals its important meta-ontological features, and include these features explicitly as premises. As a means to these ends, I compare Peter van Inwagen’s argument for the existence of properties with (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Helen Longino (2009). Perilous Thoughts: Comment on Van Fraassen. Philosophical Studies 143 (1):25 - 32.score: 18.0
    Bas van Fraassen’s empiricist reading of Perrin’s achievement invites the question: whose doubts about atoms did Perrin put to rest? This comment recontextualizes the argument and applies the notion of empirical grounding to some contemporary work in behavioral biology.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. John Martin Fischer (1986). Van Inwagen on Free Will. Philosophical Quarterly 36 (April):252-260.score: 18.0
    I discuss van inwagen's "first formal argument" for the incompatibility of causal determinism and freedom to do otherwise. I distinguish different interpretations of the important notion, "s can render p false." I argue that on none of these interpretations is the argument clearly sound. I point to gaps in the argument, Although I do not claim that it is unsound.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. John Bacon (1990). Van Cleve Versus Closure. Philosophical Studies 58 (3):239-242.score: 18.0
    In "Supervenience, Necessary Coextension, and Reducibility" (Philosophical Studies 49, 1986, 163-176), among other results, I showed that weak or ordinary supervenience is equivalent to Jaegwon Kim's strong supervenience, given certain assumptions: S4 modality, the usual modal conception of properties as class-concepts, and diagonal closure or resplicing of the set of base properties. This last means that any mapping of possible worlds into extensions of base properties counts itself as a base property. James Van Cleve attacks the modal conception of property (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Philippe De Rouilhan (2012). In Defense of Logical Universalism: Taking Issue with Jean van Heijenoort. [REVIEW] Logica Universalis 6 (3-4):553-586.score: 18.0
    Van Heijenoort’s main contribution to history and philosophy of modern logic was his distinction between two basic views of logic, first, the absolutist, or universalist, view of the founding fathers, Frege, Peano, and Russell, which dominated the first, classical period of history of modern logic, and, second, the relativist, or model-theoretic, view, inherited from Boole, Schröder, and Löwenheim, which has dominated the second, contemporary period of that history. In my paper, I present the man Jean van Heijenoort (Sect. 1); then (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Jennifer L. Soerensen (2013). The Local Problem of God's Hiddenness: A Critique of van Inwagen's Criterion of Philosophical Success. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (3):297-314.score: 18.0
    In regards to the problem of evil, van Inwagen thinks there are two arguments from evil which require different defenses. These are the global argument from evil—that there exists evil in general, and the local argument from evil—that there exists some particular atrocious evil X. However, van Inwagen fails to consider whether the problem of God’s hiddenness also has a “local” version: whether there is in fact a “local” argument from God’s hiddenness which would be undefeated by his general defense (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Harold W. Noonan (forthcoming). Tollensing van Inwagen. Philosophia:1-7.score: 18.0
    Van Inwagen (1990) has an ingenious argument for the non-existence of human artefacts (and other non-living complex things). But the argument cannot be accepted, since human artefacts are everywhere. However, it cannot be ignored. The proper response to it is to treat it as a refutation of its least plausible premise, i.e., to ‘tollens’ it. I first set out van Inwagen’s argument. I then identify its least plausible premise and explain the consequence of denying it, that is, the acceptance of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Irving H. Anellis (2012). Editor's Introduction to Jean van Heijenoort, Historical Development of Modern Logic. Logica Universalis 6 (3-4):301-326.score: 18.0
    Van Heijenoort’s account of the historical development of modern logic was composed in 1974 and first published in 1992 with an introduction by his former student. What follows is a new edition with a revised and expanded introduction and additional notes.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Kenshi Miyabe (2010). An Extension of van Lambalgen's Theorem to Infinitely Many Relative 1-Random Reals. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51 (3):337-349.score: 18.0
    Van Lambalgen's Theorem plays an important role in algorithmic randomness, especially when studying relative randomness. In this paper we extend van Lambalgen's Theorem by considering the join of infinitely many reals which are random relative to each other. In addition, we study computability of the reals in the range of Omega operators. It is known that $\Omega^{\phi'}$ is high. We extend this result to that $\Omega^{\phi^{(n)}}$ is $\textrm{high}_n$ . We also prove that there exists A such that, for each n (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Anita Burdman Feferman (2012). Jean van Heijenoort: Kaleidoscope. [REVIEW] Logica Universalis 6 (3-4):277-291.score: 18.0
    Leitmotifs in the life of Jean van Heijenoort.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Solomon Feferman (2012). On Rereading van Heijenoort's Selected Essays. Logica Universalis 6 (3-4):535-552.score: 18.0
    This is a critical reexamination of several pieces in van Heijenoort’s Selected Essays that are directly or indirectly concerned with the philosophy of logic or the relation of logic to natural language. Among the topics discussed are absolutism and relativism in logic, mass terms, the idea of a rational dictionary, and sense and identity of sense in Frege.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Felice Masi (2012). Il verso della dissoluzione e quello della caduta. Notizie sull'orientamento architettonico tra Th. Lipps e H. van der Laan. [REVIEW] Aisthesis. Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 5 (2).score: 18.0
    The paper aims at drawing the main lines of a reflection about architectonic space, starting from the comparison between two hypothesis, as much as ever different: Theodor Lipps’ spatial aesthetics and Hans van der Laan’s elemental theory. The emphasis given by both authors to the intersection between directions and way, but also to the mutual subordination between thing and space, allows to rewrite the obituary of architecture as a spatial art, according to which the Modern Style has turned the spatiality (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. John W. Dawson Jr (2012). Jean van Heijenoort and the Gödel Editorial Project. Logica Universalis 6 (3-4):293-299.score: 18.0
    A colleague’s personal recollections of Jean van Heijenoort’s contributions to the editing of volumes I–III of Gödel’s Collected Works and of his interactions with the other editors.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Irving H. Anellis (2012). Jean van Heijenoort's Conception of Modern Logic, in Historical Perspective. Logica Universalis 6 (3-4):339-409.score: 18.0
    I use van Heijenoort’s published writings and manuscript materials to provide a comprehensive overview of his conception of modern logic as a first-order functional calculus and of the historical developments which led to this conception of mathematical logic, its defining characteristics, and in particular to provide an integral account, from his most important publications as well as his unpublished notes and scattered shorter historico-philosophical articles, of how and why the mathematical logic, whose he traced to Frege and the culmination of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Pablo Lorenzano (2008). Bas Van Fraassen y la Ley de Hardy-Weinberg: una discusión y desarrolo de su diagnóstico. Principia 12 (2):121-154.score: 18.0
    http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2008v12n2p121 O objetivo deste trabalho é discutir e desenvolver o diagnóstico que efetua van Fraassen (1987, p. 110) da lei de Hardy-Weinberg, de acordo coo qual esta: 1) não pode ser considerada uma lei a ser utilizada como un axioma da teoria genética de populações, pois é uma lei de equilíbrio que só vale sob certas condições especiais, 2) só determina uma subclasse de modelos, 3) sua generalização resulta vácua e 4) variantes complexas da lei podem ser deduzidas para pressupostos (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. María G. Navarro (2011). Etapas/ Fases de la Argumentación. In Luis Vega and Paula Olmos Gómez (ed.), Compendio de Lógica, Argumentación y Retórica. Editorial Trotta. 243--244.score: 18.0
    El estudio y análisis de las argumentaciones cotidianas entendidas como interacciones discursivas e intencionales encaminadas a dar cuenta de algo con el fin de lograr que aquello que se sostiene sea aceptado, sería inconcebible sin la aparición de la teoría de los actos de habla de Austin (1962), la propuesta de Searle (1969), el trabajo de Grice sobre la teoría de la conversación (1975) y el importante estudio sistemático de Hamblin sobre el argumento falaz (1970). Como una reelaboración de dichas (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. María G. Navarro (2009). Critical Notice of 'Controversy and Confrontation. Relating Controversy Analysis with Argumentation Theory' by Frans H. Van Eemeren and Bart Garssen. [REVIEW] Informal Logic 31 (1):69-74.score: 18.0
    Since the first volume appeared in 2005, the collection Controversies has brought together pieces of work related to the field of argumentation, giving particular attention to those that are concerned with theoretical and practical problems connected with discursive controversy and confrontation. Authors such as P. Barrotta, M. Dascal, S. Frogel, H. Chang and D. Walton had already either edited or written previous editions to the present volume (volume six) of the collection. F. H. van Eemeren and B. Garssen (the former (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Johanna N. Y. Franklin & Frank Stephan (2010). Van Lambalgen's Theorem and High Degrees. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 52 (2):173-185.score: 18.0
    We show that van Lambalgen's Theorem fails with respect to recursive randomness and Schnorr randomness for some real in every high degree and provide a full characterization of the Turing degrees for which van Lambalgen's Theorem can fail with respect to Kurtz randomness. However, we also show that there is a recursively random real that is not Martin-Löf random for which van Lambalgen's Theorem holds with respect to recursive randomness.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Henrik Friberg‐Fernros (2014). A Critique Of Rob Lovering'S Criticism Of The Substance View. Bioethics 28 (4).score: 18.0
    In his article, The Substance View: a critique, Rob Lovering argues that the substance view – according to which the human embryo is a person entitled to human rights – leads to such implausible implications that this view should be abandoned. In this article I respond to his criticism by arguing that either his arguments fail because the proponents of the substance view are not obligated to hold positions which may be considered absurd, or because the positions which they are (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. William Little (2013). Shooting for Dead Time in Gus Van Sant's Elephant. Film-Philosophy 17 (1):115-133.score: 18.0
    In Elephant , director Gus Van Sant dramatises a massacre at a suburban American high school in order to examine narrative cinema's ethical capacity to respond to that which resists being framed as a meaningful event. In the film, this stubborn stuff is experience shot through with contingency. Van Sant depicts acts of violence that are indiscriminate and, at best, ambiguously motivated, as well as school-day activities that appear coincidental and insignificant. This essay argues that the director aims to screen (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Cynthia Meersohn (2005). Introducción a Teun Van Dijk: Análisis de Discurso. Cinta de Moebio 24.score: 18.0
    Teun van Dijk, despite he initiated his academic path on linguistics, and more specifically, in the area of grammars; he has developed over his academic whereabouts the idea that we cannot elucidate the mysteries of discourse by its purely structural analysis. More so, in time he has explored the fi..
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000